Five studies. Every single one reaches the same conclusion: the vaccinated are sicker.

Not one retrospective study anywhere in the world, by any government, any health agency, any institution, has ever shown us that vaccinated children are healthier. Not one. The entire premise of this program has never been validated by the simple comparison it was built on.

This is science in America today. This is the system that is telling you vaccines are safe and effective. A system where a scientist will look you in the eye, confirm the data is good, and then walk away.

@delbigtree

A new study is asking the question that should have been asked before a single dose was ever administered.

"Aluminum Adjuvants, Autoimmunity and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Comprehensive Mechanistic, Neuropathological and Legal Analysis."

Here's what it connects. Autopsy studies of autistic brains show that 63-64% had evidence of autoimmune encephalitis, the immune system producing lymphocytes that attack and destroy neurons, creating brain injury that manifests as autism.

On the other side of the equation: aluminum adjuvants are added to vaccines specifically to amplify the immune response. They were added without anyone fully understanding the mechanism. Inject aluminum, the immune response magnifies... and nobody asked what else was being inflamed in the process.

Here's what they missed. When inflammation occurs, the entire body is affected, including the brain. The neuroinflammation piece was simply neglected. They looked at the inflammatory cells that hastened and magnified the immune response and stopped there.

The studies intended to establish aluminum's safety did a fine job of demonstrating its efficacy.

They really, really screwed up on safe.

@delbigtree

School lunches were always the obvious answer.

When the early MAHA conversations turned to where real change could begin, where the most impact could happen fastest, everyone landed in the same place.

Feed the kids differently, and you change everything downstream.

The "Eat Real Food" campaign just launched, and the reframe it offers is pretty amazing.

Stop treating children like they require a separate category of food altogether. Normalize what real food looks like in institutional settings and at home, and let that example do the work.

The path forward runs through schools and through parents at the same time, with communities integrated in the process together, not one without the other.

It's all in, and it's important enough to be.

@delbigtree

Canada is on the verge of surpassing 100,000 assisted suicides. That number exceeds the country's entire World War II death toll. 🇨🇦

This is MAiD (Medical Assistance in Dying). Track 1 applies to those whose natural death is reasonably foreseeable. Track 2 is where it gets deeply troubling.

Canada's own government website describes Track 2 to apply where a natural death is NOT reasonably foreseeable, leaving hospital bioethicists to determine whether a person has given "serious consideration" to other means of relieving their suffering. There is no clear standard. There is no defined boundary. It is, by design, a massive gray area.

The United Nations has formally told Canada to stop Track 2 entirely. Mental health professionals, disability advocates, and medical groups are raising alarms about how poverty and lack of access to adequate care are shaping patients' decisions to choose death. Even doctors are saying something is inherently wrong here.

Track 2 has not even been formally approved yet. The expansion it would bring is almost unimaginable.

The medical system is supposed to protect the vulnerable. This is not that.

@DelBigtree

The conversation around autism and vaccines is shifting on a public level, and the stories driving that shift all follow the same pattern.

It starts the same for so many parents. They have well-baby visit at their pediatrician, then they get the MMR and varicella (or some other combination), and then the slow regression begins. Parents watch their children lose speech and motor skills and are left searching for answers that the medical establishment refuses to provide.

The ask here is simple. Know what is going into your child's body. The vitamin K shot given at birth is not real vitamin K. It carries the biggest black box warning available, and it contains aluminum. Parents deserve to know that before they consent, not after.

Nobody is asking for a debate. The facts exist for the safety of children and adults alike, and informed consent is not a radical idea. It is the bare minimum.

@delbigtree

The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program includes something called a vaccine injury table. Each vaccine covered by the program lists the injuries considered associated with it and the timeframe in which those injuries must arise. When an injury meets those criteria, the burden shifts to the government to show the vaccine didn't cause it, rather than requiring the injured person to prove that it did.

The structure was deliberately made this way. It puts the responsibility on the CDC, FDA, and HHS to do the science on these products. If they haven't shown a vaccine doesn't cause a particular harm, but have found it's associated, it belongs on the table.

Aaron Siri has been fielding what he describes as an endless stream of questions from legacy media challenging this point. His answer is simple: the federal statute says explicitly that injuries to be added to the table are those that are associated with the vaccine. That is the exact word in the law. If someone objects to that standard, the remedy is to go to Congress and change it.

@delbigtree

Dr. @RobertWMalone resigned as vice chair of ACIP, stepping down from a committee he had helped reshape, citing a desire to avoid drama. Before he left, he was finally asking the kind of questions about vaccine safety, efficacy, and testing that the committee had gone years without asking.

His read on the judge's ruling that threw out @RobertFKennedyJr.'s realignment of the vaccine schedule is direct. The ruling asserts that any vaccine decisions made at the executive branch must consult ACIP, and Malone calls that contrived. By congressional statute, ACIP is meant to serve as a fully independent outside voice, free from industry capture, professional organizations, and bureaucratic influence, providing advice to the CDC director, who is the only person who actually makes decisions. ACIP does not create vaccine policy. Its output is recommendations, nothing more.

The argument that the schedule realignment was invalid because ACIP didn't weigh in on it, Malone says, is spurious logic that is not consistent with the facts. His conclusion is that a group of lawyers constructed another form of lawfare specifically to undermine Kennedy, using ACIP as the vehicle and a contrived legal argument as the weapon.

@delbigtree

Senator @RonJohnson's documents reveal that while the Biden administration was softening public warnings about COVID vaccine safety signals, it had internal working groups dedicated to managing the fallout from those same signals. The working groups included myocarditis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, thrombocytopenia, stroke, and one simply called the death project.

Meanwhile, strokes are getting younger. Headlines about the alarming rise in stroke rates among young people have become routine.

The read on that is blunt: we are looking at a crime scene, and we have the documents to prove it.

A new study on military personnel adds to the picture. Among soldiers who received two COVID shots, nearly 49% showed a relative increase exceeding 1.5 times their individual baseline on a blood test used to detect heart failure and measure the extent of heart damage.

Half the military.

The government can revise the food pyramid and update nutritional guidelines to make soldiers more combat-ready. How does any of that matter if you are simultaneously injecting a heart-stressing product into them, with boosters required every year, under a liability shield that makes accountability in court nearly impossible?

Del and Jefferey discuss

@delbigtree

The United States positions itself as the leader in medicine, the best in the world at advancing science and saving lives. Ed Clay's experience running a cancer research clinic tells a different story.

Getting to a Phase 1 safety trial with the FDA in the United States takes 5 to 7 years and costs an average of $30 to $50 million. Clay's clinic can do the equivalent work in as little as 6 months for under $1 million.

Clay frames this as an ethical failure, not just a bureaucratic one. The clinical trial model, as it currently exists, asks terminal patients to wait 10 to 15 years for treatments that might help them, when many of those patients don't have 10 to 15 months.

Modern healthcare, in his view, treats patients as numbers rather than individuals, and the system is built around its own timeline rather than theirs.

The regulatory barriers that push this research to Mexico are not protecting patients. They are keeping treatments away from them.

@delbigtree

Nineteen pharmaceutical companies. Twenty-one bribery investigations. Over $1.1 billion in sanctions. Zero admissions of wrongdoing.

A new peer-reviewed study in the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics spent years combing through OECD bribery reports across five countries and two decades. The names on the list are not fringe operators. Novartis, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Teva, Novo Nordisk. Bribes were paid through shell companies, fake consulting contracts, sham clinical studies, charitable foundations, and spa weekends billed as medical education. The analysis found that in case after case, bribery was approved or knowingly tolerated by senior management.

A separate 25-year analysis of US pharmaceutical kickback fines found that companies paid penalties amounting to 2.2% of the revenue tied to the violations. The penalties are not a deterrent. They are overhead.

The article puts all of this in the broader context of an industry that also brought us the opioid crisis, suppressed safety data on antidepressants in children, and pushed through a COVID vaccine rollout that bypassed standard long-term safety requirements while governments indemnified the manufacturers.

https://thehighwire.com/editorial/nineteen-companies-twenty-one-investigations-zero-admissions-of-wrongdoing/

@delbigtree

Before gender reassignment treatments, 9.8% of adolescents in a new Finnish study needed specialist psychiatric care. After? 60.7%.

The study followed over 2,000 gender-referred adolescents and young adults and tracked psychiatric outcomes before and after hormonal and surgical interventions. Among those approved for masculinizing treatments, the rate went from 21.6% to 54.5%.

The study's authors noted that the significant rise in psychiatric comorbidities among those seeking gender reassignment since 2011 is not explained by improved diagnosis, and that the data suggests gender dysphoria may, in some cases, be secondary to underlying mental health challenges.

Gender-affirming treatments are routinely promoted as life-saving care that reduces suicidality. This study does not support the claim that these interventions deliver the mental health outcomes commonly promised.

The article also covers the current legal and policy
landscape as courts and states continue to fight over whether these treatments should be available to minors.

https://thehighwire.com/news/finnish-study-psychiatric-problems-skyrocket-after-gender-reassignment-treatments-10-to-61/

@DelBigtree

Nearly 32 million Americans got their first mRNA COVID-19 dose and never came back for the second one. The CDC has had four years to explain why. They still haven't.

ICAN first asked in February 2022, then again in May 2022. Both letters were met with silence. The data CDC had in hand during the height of the pandemic showed that more than 38 million Americans failed to complete the two-dose series. Put another way, more than one in ten people who began the mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series never finished it.

@AaronSiri's team wrote it plainly in the new letter:

"When tens of millions make the same decision, it suggests that something meaningful is likely driving this result. Whether this reflects adverse events, perceived adverse reactions, or other safety-related concerns is a question that warrants formal evaluation."

That formal evaluation never came. So on March 9, 2026, ICAN sent a third letter, this time addressed directly to Jay Bhattacharya at HHS, Retsef Levi at the Covid-19 Vaccine Review Committee, Sarah Oliver at the CDC, and Dr. Marty Makary at the FDA, cc'd to Secretary Kennedy, asking the current administration to finally answer what the last one refused to.

Full legal update and letter linked below 👇

https://icandecide.org/press-release/ican-presses-cdc-missed-second-dose-covid-19-vaccine/

@delbigtree

🚨BREAKING: ICAN sent a letter to Secretary Kennedy last week urging him to revise the ACIP charter. Within days, he did.

Here is what changed:

🔥The membership criteria have been expanded beyond the vaccinologists and epidemiologists who have long dominated the committee, opening seats to experts in toxicology, data science, pediatric neurodevelopment, and vaccine injury.

🔥The word "safety" now appears ten times in the charter. It appeared three times before. The word "risks" appears five times. It appeared zero times before. The new language requires ACIP to evaluate risk/benefit profiles, consider cumulative effects of vaccines and their components, and conduct re-analysis as new safety data becomes available.

🔥New liaison representatives have been added to the committee, including the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), Independent Medical Alliance (formerly FLCCC), MAPS, and Physicians for Informed Consent, bringing pro-safety, informed consent voices into a room that has never had them.

🚨None of this happens without the people who show up, stay informed, and keep supporting this work. This is what winning looks like.

Full legal update linked below 👇

https://icandecide.org/press-release/kennedy-revises-acip-charter-vaccine-safety/

@delbigtree

A few weeks ago an activist judge wiped out the changes @RobertFKennedyJr. had made to the vaccine program and abolished his Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. A lot of people saw that as a devastating loss. We saw a window.

ICAN submitted a letter to Secretary Kennedy, drafted by our attorney @AaronSiri , laying out exactly what he could still do. Expand the ACIP membership criteria. Bring in people who specialize in vaccine safety and injury, not just the people who make vaccines and promote them. Add liaison representatives so that injured people and the organizations fighting for them actually have a seat at the table, instead of leaving it entirely to the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Days after receiving that letter, Robert Kennedy Jr. made exactly those changes to the ACIP charter.

When I was a kid I was taught that when something looks dark, you look for the window. That's what we did.

That's what Kennedy did. I want to thank him.

These are the changes we have been fighting for. This is what it looks like when it starts to work.

@delbigtree

What is happening right now with Bayer and Monsanto at the Supreme Court is the same story we have been telling about vaccines for twenty years, and it is playing out again in real time.

They are losing billions in lawsuits because their pesticides are causing non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. So instead of making a safer product, they are asking the government for liability protection. And our own Department of Justice is helping them make that case.

This is exactly what happened with vaccines. The manufacturers were losing money over death and injury. The government didn't say go back and fix it. They said we will protect you. And now an entire generation of children is living with the consequences of that decision, with no legal recourse for their families.

I trust Bobby Kennedy and the work he is doing, but we are watching complications inside this administration and I think people need to pay attention to this one. I can't imagine anyone walking down the street wants to give pesticide companies a free ride when their product is causing cancer and poisoning our children.

@delbigtree

🩸Americans are refusing blood transfusions from vaccinated donors in large enough numbers that it is now causing clinical harm. People are experiencing deterioration and in some cases going into shock rather than accept standard blood supply inventory. At the same time, the Red Cross declared a severe blood shortage in January after supply dropped 35% in a single month.

Jeffrey Jaxen's reporting lays the institutional failure bare. A study from Dr. Peter McCullough raised the concern directly, noting that COVID injectable products are associated with an increased risk of stroke and that the persistence of product artifacts in the blood presents a possible threat to transfusion recipients from donors who suffered vaccine-induced thrombosis or thrombocytopenia.

The Biden administration hid the stroke risk data. Nobody added an optional checkbox to donation forms asking whether a donor had been vaccinated. The science that could have addressed this was never done, and now the consequences are showing up in emergency rooms.

@DelBigtree

A 62-year-old woman developed uncontrollable tonic-clonic seizures after three COVID vaccines. Her face drooped as if she had suffered a stroke. The first seizure lasted 14 hours. She was having six of them a week.

Dr. Tina Peers asked her to start augmented NAC on June 3rd. By June 7th, the seizures stopped completely and never returned.

The science behind it starts with the spike protein itself. It attaches to ACE2 receptors, triggers inflammation, and cannot be cleared by the body on its own. Standard NAC, a precursor to glutathione, showed some ability to weaken the spike protein's bonds under electron microscopy, but not enough.

Working with a quantum physicist, researchers developed an augmented version with significantly greater bioavailability that can enter the spike protein and break it into pieces small enough for the liver to process and the body to excrete through urine. They then developed a urine test to confirm that the clearing was actually happening.

Dr. Tina Peers joins the show to discuss what she has found and what it means for people still carrying the spike protein in their tissues.

@delbigtree

‼️A grandmother spent five months in jail for a crime she did not commit, in a state she had never visited, after AI facial recognition technology wrongly linked her to bank fraud. It was her first time on a plane when police flew her a thousand miles to Fargo to face charges.

This is happening right now, and it is part of a much larger shift in how law enforcement is using AI to make decisions that destroy people's lives.

More to come...

@delbigtree

Water doesn't get the same attention as oil or energy policy, but the pressure on the supply is just as real and the consequences of getting it wrong are harder to reverse.

Freshwater demand from AI infrastructure alone is already straining regional supplies. Fracking raises the same questions from a different angle. Whatever position someone holds on that energy source, the volume of water consumed and the contamination risk to surrounding aquifers and waterways are costs that fall on everyone else.

Energy decisions made in boardrooms have a way of showing up in everyone else's tap water.

@delbigtree

Jefferey Jaxen reports on mounting concern over microplastics accumulating in the human body, as HHS Director @RobertFKennedyJr. announces a major new research effort to investigate the health implications of widespread plastic exposure.

From drinking water to the air we breathe, scientists are detecting microscopic plastic particles in places few expected to find them, raising new questions about how modern environmental contamination may be interacting with human biology.

At the same time, a new controversy is emerging around blood transfusions and COVID vaccination status, as some patients begin requesting blood donations exclusively from unvaccinated donors. Blood banks insist the supply remains safe, but the requests reflect a growing public conversation about what remains in the bloodstream after both environmental and pharmaceutical exposures.

As these two stories unfold, Jefferey examines why the question of what’s circulating in the human body today is becoming increasingly concerning for researchers, regulators, and the public alike.

@delbigtree

The mainstream news coverage of measles outbreaks follows a familiar pattern. A handful of cases, a doctor warning about declining vaccination rates, and an immediate recommendation to get two doses of the MMR vaccine, which happens to be 97% effective. It reads like a pharmaceutical ad because, as Del points out, it functionally is one.

Understand the actual history of the measles vaccine program. The goal was never just personal protection. The goal set in the 1960s was eradication, the complete elimination of measles from the planet. That program has failed by its own stated measure, and virologists and immunologists warned at the time that pushing hard against such a contagious and historically mild virus carried its own risks. Sound familiar?

When seven cases of a rash in one state and eleven in another become a national news emergency, and the answer is always the same product from the same industry that funds 70% of those news stations' advertising, the question becomes who benefits from the framing?

@delbigtree