🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢🟢

11/11/26 @ 9:12 am est.

JUST IN: 🇷🇺 Russia's Central Bank says exchanges can begin cryptocurrency trading from November 17th.

https://x.com/watcherguru/status/2120519943901028726?a=8t1vBNfd2x4GIQ7DPlM&s=46

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

11/11/26 @ 10:20 am est.

🇺🇸 Michael Jackson's legendary Thriller jacket is going up for auction again… and it could sell for MILLIONS.

Yes, THAT jacket. The one that helped turn a music video into pop culture history.

After more than a decade off the auction block, it's making a comeback!

Writer: Samuel x.com/Reuters/status…

https://x.com/marionawfal/status/2120537030404800818?a=Z5u__0r2myJii05DGME&s=46

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨

11/10/26 @ 4:34 pm est.

Whenever you see the number 107, make a mental note that 107 has a specific meaning in the military.😎🙏🇺🇸🦅

Article 107 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) criminalizes making a false official statement or committing false swearing by a person subject to the UCMJ. This provision exists to safeguard the integrity of the military justice system and ensure that service members across the armed forces remain truthful in all official matters. Article 107 helps enforce the core values of honor, accountability, and duty that underpin military functions.

Service members on active duty, in the reserves, or even in a line of duty status are all subject to Article 107. Violations can have immediate and long-term consequences, including the risk of dishonorable discharge, damage to a military record, or even criminal prosecution in a court-martial. These consequences can severely impact your future in the military and in civilian life, especially if you’re seeking post-service employment that requires a security clearance or professional licensing.

Under Article 107 of the UCMJ, a violation occurs when a military member makes a statement or creates a document that is both false and official in nature and does so with the intent to deceive. It’s important to understand that the UCMJ does not require that the falsehood be significant—any false statement, no matter how small, may qualify if it is made in an official context.

Intent plays a key role. The accused must have known the information was false and made the statement to mislead someone performing a government function. The burden of proof is on the prosecution to establish these elements beyond a reasonable doubt during a court-martial or other military judicial proceedings.

Even service members who do not fully understand the implications of their words can be investigated under Article 107. This makes it critical for military members to be careful when communicating in any official capacity, whether it’s writing a report, submitting a request, or speaking to law enforcement or superiors.

https://x.com/mqaveli/status/2120268846485401859?a=OE9TjsLbCQYXMq0g5Vg&s=46