Уже долго ебусь с выбором селф хостед солюшена для облачного хранилища для параноиков.

Nexcloud шляпа (сложно, много пердолинга)
Syncthing шляпа (был заебись, но когда они переписали бд в версии 2 он превратился в багованый пиздец)

Мои требования:
- hosting agnostic / encrypted (чтоб можно было хостить на самой дешевой и мутной хуйне включая старый ноут под столом)
- минимум сложности (потому что eventually все sync solutions начинают багать и это боль)
- минимум вендорлока
- понятно опенсорс
- возможность легкой валидации что твои данные на месте
- чтобы ок работало где-то до 2 ТБ данных включая тяжелые файлы 4+ гигов

В итоге пришёл к солюшену, которое можно занести в классику ДДД:

1. Папка на компе
2. Шифруется в другую папку через Rclone + systemd
3. Шифрованая папка синкается через Syncthing на хостинг
4. С хостинга через Unison + systemd синкается назад на комп
5. Расшифровывается
6. Вайбкоженая статус трей утилита по кд проверяет хеш первой папки и итоговой

Короче все файлы на HDD занимают х4 места))0)

TIL что большая часть блоков питания от ноутбука и зарядок от телефонов (и аналогичных 220V AC в ~12V DC преобразователей) работает если на AC вилку подать 48V DC))0)

Re: Bug Blindness

I think there are two opposite causes here: either an overly-aligned or completely unaligned mental model.

For developers, bug-blindness tends to be because their mental model is so close to the system's model that both have the same blind spots, and the developer can't effectively think outside the system (the classic "QA walks into a bar, orders 0 beers, orders -1 beers, orders 0.999 beers" vs "customer walks into a bar, asks where the bathroom is, bar immediately bursts into flames").

On the other hand, a common way for regular people to interact with a system is they just... don't have a model. None at all. Like, they click a thing and see what it does, and if it doesn't do what they expect they shrug and click something else. The horror of seeing a non-software person using a software system is realising that they usually cannot tell the difference between expected and unexpected behaviour, because they don't really form expectations in the first place. The computer is more genie than machine.

You can see this in the article: "Google Docs added some kind of delay such that the typing you do into the title box right after you open the doc gets overwritten". That's a developer forming a model of the system. The lay alternative is to simply learn that sometimes when you type in a box, the text appears. Other times, it doesn't. If it doesn't, you try again.

You don't need to understand the system if you abandon the assumption that the system was designed to be understood. And, in practice, the widespread plagues of shitty engineering, anti-features, and lack of respect for the user often combine to make that model the more information-theoretically optimal one.

In that sense, the very thing that makes us miserable is our perverse need to treat Google Docs as an engineered product rather than a cross between a djinn and a symbiotic fungus.

sgentle, 6 hours ago

Re: California lawmakers unanimously pass Linux exemption from age-verification law

Excellent. From now on all kids will become linux natives. The decade of the linux desktop is coming!

cm2187, 5 hours ago

I really recommending reading this.

In summary, a company which does ID verification for in-person interactions (hotels, car rentals, ID verification for alcohol or marijuana, etc) has some how exposed over 153,000,000 drivers licenses for people in the United States and Canada.

It is a catastrophic data breach, probably one of the worse I've ever seen. If you're in the United States and have traveled, gotten a hotel, purchased marijuana or alcohol, there is a high probability you're in this.

Unlike other breaches, this includes a photo of the person (from the license), making verification you've identified the person significantly easier.

This poses a significant threat to celebrities (musicians, YouTubers, streamers, adult entertainers, actors, etc), politicians, lawyers, wealthy people (CEOs, investors, people of public interest), Law Enforcement Officers, etc

Krebs himself, and several other security researchers, have already confirmed they're in the data leak.

tl;dr gah damn dawg this company is going to be sued into oblivion

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/09/fbi-probes-service-selling-153m-drivers-licenses/

Dawg, they got Pete Hegseth in the data breach. It's available for sale for $100

Сьогодні снилося, що писав промти ручкою в зошиті

Re: GPS glitched across the US by as much as 33 feet

This is exactly the sort of thing that leads to people getting reincarcerated after their electronic monitoring devices mistakenly report them leaving their homes.

Some reporting I did on the topic a few years back: https://chicagoreader.com/news/many-on-house-arrest-in-cook-...

chaps, 7 hours ago

The way to superhuman AI is to just make humans dumber