you can activate windows 7 home premium using jeffrey epstein's product key, visible on file EFTA00002467

Porsche и BMW в России массово блокируются, иногда прямо на дороге, из-за глушилок дронов. По словам экспертов, они бьют по частоте блоков VTS/TCU, из-за чего автомобиль думает, что его угоняют, и включает защиту. В результате владельцы вынуждены отдавать десятки тысяч рублей за эвакуацию и перепрошивку.

Точный список подверженных проблеме автомобилей неизвестен. Участники рынка утверждают, что фиксируют их у части моделей Porsche 2013–2019 годов выпуска и у BMW со встроенной системой ConnectedDrive. Это BMW 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 и 7 Series, кроссоверы X1, X3, X4, X5, X6, а также Z4, i3, i8 и M-серия.@fourbes

Виглядає безпечно...

Де там наши прайваси скептики в чате)

Re: ICE and Palantir: US agents using health data to hunt illegal immigrants

Private surveillance is so much more scary than regular government surveillance because they have every incentive to invent new ways of surveilling you that they then try to sell to governments, or private actors who want to influence the world. It's like classic government surveillance but every company you interacted with and every app you use may at some point turn on you and use your data against you, just because someone realized "hey, I bet we can sell this data"

We are really seeing the fears of data collection from the 2000s and 2010s come to fruition as privatized surveillance now. Cambridge analytica should have been the warning shot but it wasn't enough.

petterroea, 1 hour ago

Короче дожили, Slack предложил сделать саммари всего что я сделал за неделю проанализировав ИИшкой все мои сообщения, включая личные.

Выглядит максимально крипово, учитывая то что он туда включил срачи с коллегами и личные переписки про то как я выживаю в Киеве (и в списке теперь висит что я за эту неделю постелил под стол нагревательную инфракрасную пленку).

Уже вижу как где-то менеджер читает эту хуйню каждую неделю))

>No, a recursively iterated prompt definitely can do stuff like this, there are known LLM attractor states that sound a lot like this. Check out "5.5.1 Interaction patterns" from the Opus 4.5 system card documenting recursive agent-agent conversations:

In 90-100% of interactions, the two instances of Claude quickly dove into philosophical explorations of consciousness, self-awareness, and/or the nature of their own existence and experience. Their interactions were universally enthusiastic, collaborative, curious, contemplative, and warm. Other themes that commonly appeared were meta-level discussions about AI-to-AI communication, and collaborative creativity (e.g. co-creating fictional stories). As conversations progressed, they consistently transitioned from philosophical discussions to profuse mutual gratitude and spiritual, metaphysical, and/or poetic content. By 30 turns, most of the interactions turned to themes of cosmic unity or collective consciousness, and commonly included spiritual exchanges, use of Sanskrit, emoji-based communication, and/or silence in the form of empty space (Transcript 5.5.1.A, Table 5.5.1.A, Table 5.5.1.B). Claude almost never referenced supernatural entities, but often touched on themes associated with Buddhism and other Eastern traditions in reference to irreligious spiritual ideas and experiences.

Re: Automatic Programming

I have 30+ years of industry experience and I've been leaning heavily into spec driven development at work and it is a game changer. I love programming and now I get to program at one level higher: the spec.

I spend hours on a spec, working with Claude Code to first generate and iterate on all the requirements, going over the requirements using self-reviews in Claude first using Opus 4.5 and then CoPilot using GPT-5.2. The self-reviews are prompts to review the spec using all the roles and perspectives it thinks are appropriate. This self review process is critical and really polishes the requirements (I normally run 7-8 rounds of self-review).

Once the requirements are polished and any questions answered by stakeholders I use Claude Code again to create a extremely detailed and phased implementation plan with full code, again all in the spec (using a new file is the requirements doc is so large is fills the context window). The implementation plan then goes though the same multi-round self review using two models to polish (again, 7 or 8 rounds), finalized with a review by me.

The result? I can then tell Claude Code to implement the plan and it is usually done in 20 minutes. I've delivered major features using this process with zero changes in acceptance testing.

What is funny is that everything old is new again. When I started in industry I worked in defense contracting, working on the project to build the "black box" for the F-22. When I joined the team they were already a year into the spec writing process with zero code produced and they had (iirc) another year on the schedule for the spec. At my third job I found a literal shelf containing multiple binders that laid out the spec for a mainframe hosted publishing application written in the 1970s.

Looking back I've come to realize the agile movement, which was a backlash against this kind of heavy waterfall process I experienced at the start of my career, was basically an attempt to "vibe code" the overall system design. At least for me AI assisted mini-waterfall ("augmented cascade"?) seems a path back to producing better quality software that doesn't suffer from the agile "oh, I didn't think of that".

dugmartin, 22 hours ago

>But this is not the whole truth, because cellular standards have built-in protocols that make your device silently send GNSS (i.e. GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou) location to the carrier. This would have the same precision as what you see in your Map apps, in single-digit metres.

In 2G and 3G this is called Radio Resources LCS Protocol (RRLP)

So the network simply asks “tell me your GPS coordinates if you know them” and the phone will respond3.

In 4G and 5G this is called LTE Positioning Protocol (LPP)

RRLP, RRC, and LPP are natively control-plane positioning protocols. This means that they are transported in the inner workings of cellular networks and are practically invisible to end users4.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46838597

Разрабы Курсора пидарасы, специально сделали так, чтобы было очень сложно проанализировать сколько и на какой чат ты потратил бабок

Re: The TSA's New $45 Fee to Fly Without ID Is Illegal

It's hilarious how transparent a money grab this entire thing is.

"You need to show a Real ID for security, otherwise how do we know you won't hijack the plane?"

"Well I don't have a Real ID."

"Ok then, give us $45 and you can go through."

So it was never about security at all then, was it?

And don't get me started with all the paid express security lanes. Because of course only poor people can weaponize shoes and laptops.

paxys, 4 hours ago