This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ฅ๐ฅ EXPOSED: Soros, the Deep State & the Shadow Network ๐ฅ๐ฅ
Today, I launched a powerful new tool that indexes the National Endowment for Democracy journal... and here's what it uncovers:
๐ Dozen-plus Open Society Foundation staff, funded by George Soros, are writing in a U.S. government-backed journal.
๐บ๐ธ That journal is part of our taxpayer-funded National Endowment for Democracy, a quasi-government operation tied to foreign "democracy" missions- and Congress sits on its board.
No conspiracy theories. This is hard data.
๐ This proves Soros and our intelligence apparatus are deeply intertwined.
Today, I launched a powerful new tool that indexes the National Endowment for Democracy journal... and here's what it uncovers:
๐ Dozen-plus Open Society Foundation staff, funded by George Soros, are writing in a U.S. government-backed journal.
๐บ๐ธ That journal is part of our taxpayer-funded National Endowment for Democracy, a quasi-government operation tied to foreign "democracy" missions- and Congress sits on its board.
No conspiracy theories. This is hard data.
๐ This proves Soros and our intelligence apparatus are deeply intertwined.
I've been coding for three days and missed almost all of today's Comey drama. Has any Democrat condemned him yet?
If I were President Trump or @DNIGabbard, I would immediately announce the arrest of James Comey. But I would go one step further.
The administration needs to recognize this is also how intelligence elites manufacture "legitimacy" for their schemes. Before they twist this into another "justified" operation under the guise of national security, the administration needs to pre-empt it.
Make it clear: any attempt by the intelligence community to spin this into a legal or moral necessity will be seen for what it is: deep state interference.
The administration needs to recognize this is also how intelligence elites manufacture "legitimacy" for their schemes. Before they twist this into another "justified" operation under the guise of national security, the administration needs to pre-empt it.
Make it clear: any attempt by the intelligence community to spin this into a legal or moral necessity will be seen for what it is: deep state interference.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1923211567690285294?s=19
So, Rasmussen Reports is complaining that @MarkHalperin is attacking them for no reason.
Well, it's not "no reason." Mark Halperin's father, Morton Halperin, was deeply involved in the intelligence community and was a senior adviser to Open Society Foundations (yes, George Soros). It's right there in Morton Halperin's Wikipedia biography.
Why? Well, polling is a big part of how the intelligence agencies shape public opinion - just go to the NDI or IRI pages and see all the polls they commission. Any "honest" polling which contradicts their messaging is a threat.
So, Rasmussen Reports is complaining that @MarkHalperin is attacking them for no reason.
Well, it's not "no reason." Mark Halperin's father, Morton Halperin, was deeply involved in the intelligence community and was a senior adviser to Open Society Foundations (yes, George Soros). It's right there in Morton Halperin's Wikipedia biography.
Why? Well, polling is a big part of how the intelligence agencies shape public opinion - just go to the NDI or IRI pages and see all the polls they commission. Any "honest" polling which contradicts their messaging is a threat.
Spotted this in my tool. From an article by Rachel Kleinfeld, the same person who advocated mass arrests to stamp out J6 ideology.
So, what exactly are Over Zero, Carter Center, and Common Ground USA attempting in the United States? And who is behind the Disagree Better advertisement campaign? cc: @EagleEdMartin
So, what exactly are Over Zero, Carter Center, and Common Ground USA attempting in the United States? And who is behind the Disagree Better advertisement campaign? cc: @EagleEdMartin
Spotted this in my tool. From an article by Rachel Kleinfeld, the same person who advocated mass arrests to stamp out J6 ideology.
So, what exactly are Over Zero, Carter Center, and Common Ground USA attempting in the United States? And who is behind the Disagree Better advertisement campaign? cc: @EagleEdMartin
So, what exactly are Over Zero, Carter Center, and Common Ground USA attempting in the United States? And who is behind the Disagree Better advertisement campaign? cc: @EagleEdMartin
๐บ๐ธ๐ฅ Naming the people and NGOs behind the Biden's "Soul of the Nation" speech ๐ฅ๐บ๐ธ
"๐๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐ฑ ๐ง๐ฟ๐๐บ๐ฝ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐ฏ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ถ๐๐บ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐ฏ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ."
This was a quote from an extraordinary speech given by a sitting United States President. It took place on September 1, 2022, over an year after the events of January 6, and less than three years ago.
In it, he also goes onto declare:
"๐๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ค๐ณ๐ข๐ค๐บ ๐ค๐ข๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ด๐ถ๐ณ๐ท๐ช๐ท๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ช๐ฆ๐ท๐ฆ๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ญ๐บ ๐ต๐ธ๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ค๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ: ๐ฆ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐บ ๐ธ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐บ ๐ธ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ. ๐๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ตโ๐ด ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฃ๐ญ๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ฏ๐ด ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ข๐บ."
In other words, he declared the nation cannot survive the threat of 74 million Americans sharing their opinion.
Make no mistake. The people who were behind this speech haven't gone anywhere. The moment they have a friendly White House again, this kind of divisive, authoritarian rhetoric will be back in full force.
"๐๐ผ๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐ฑ ๐ง๐ฟ๐๐บ๐ฝ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐ฏ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ถ๐๐บ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐๐ฏ๐น๐ถ๐ฐ."
This was a quote from an extraordinary speech given by a sitting United States President. It took place on September 1, 2022, over an year after the events of January 6, and less than three years ago.
In it, he also goes onto declare:
"๐๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ค๐ณ๐ข๐ค๐บ ๐ค๐ข๐ฏ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ต ๐ด๐ถ๐ณ๐ท๐ช๐ท๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ ๐ด๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ช๐ฆ๐ท๐ฆ๐ด ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ญ๐บ ๐ต๐ธ๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ต๐ค๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ข๐ฏ ๐ฆ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ค๐ต๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ: ๐ฆ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐บ ๐ธ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐บ ๐ธ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ๐ฅ. ๐๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ข๐ตโ๐ด ๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฃ๐ญ๐ช๐ค๐ข๐ฏ๐ด ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฐ๐ฅ๐ข๐บ."
In other words, he declared the nation cannot survive the threat of 74 million Americans sharing their opinion.
Make no mistake. The people who were behind this speech haven't gone anywhere. The moment they have a friendly White House again, this kind of divisive, authoritarian rhetoric will be back in full force.
So, you think you have proven that a mega-corporation sat on a pandemic for political reasons, potentially costing millions of lives and billions of dollars. What are you doing about it?
Mass migration enters the picture because it is a method of regime change, an attempt to turn countries like Somalia, Venezuela, etc. into a liberal democracy with the idea that they will eventually export that ideology (along with money) back home. And if you accept them all, well, that's good, you've made them into a liberal democracy. ๐คท
Reflections:
Several months ago, I started a website to search federal awards.
The idea here was we'd find general waste, cut spending, execute on a vision of smaller government. And there's certainly a lot of bloat.
However, what started out as waste-cutting quickly morphed into understanding why so much money is leaving the federal government and going into NGOs. These NGOs have been responsible for trafficking 20 million illegal immigrants into our country during the Biden years, many of them receiving benefits.
And many of these NGOs also are the primary beneficiaries of foreign aid.
And then I dig deeper - there is an entire ideology, an entire philosophy connecting this web of foreign aid and mass migration.
This is the same ideology which led Congress to finance Ukraine, but not Hurricane Helene victims.
This is the same ideology which led us into the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
This is the same ideology that George Soros outlined in his essay, "Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO."
This is the same ideology which caused President Biden to declare 74 million supporters of President Trump the greatest threat to our Republic.
To defeat government waste, we have to defeat this ideology.
I never expected to set on this path. I don't know where it will head. But I will continue to do my part.
Several months ago, I started a website to search federal awards.
The idea here was we'd find general waste, cut spending, execute on a vision of smaller government. And there's certainly a lot of bloat.
However, what started out as waste-cutting quickly morphed into understanding why so much money is leaving the federal government and going into NGOs. These NGOs have been responsible for trafficking 20 million illegal immigrants into our country during the Biden years, many of them receiving benefits.
And many of these NGOs also are the primary beneficiaries of foreign aid.
And then I dig deeper - there is an entire ideology, an entire philosophy connecting this web of foreign aid and mass migration.
This is the same ideology which led Congress to finance Ukraine, but not Hurricane Helene victims.
This is the same ideology which led us into the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.
This is the same ideology that George Soros outlined in his essay, "Toward a New World Order: The Future of NATO."
This is the same ideology which caused President Biden to declare 74 million supporters of President Trump the greatest threat to our Republic.
To defeat government waste, we have to defeat this ideology.
I never expected to set on this path. I don't know where it will head. But I will continue to do my part.
This is an actual quote from the NED Journal of Democracy. They call the U.S. Electoral College "democracy-subverting." In other words, our own Constitution is considered a threat to democracy. Why are we financing this institution?
@EagleEdMartin - Please see ADVANCE Democracy Act of 2007. 22 U.S. Code Chapter 89 (ยงยง 8201โ8262). While it doesn't explicitly bind NED to the US Constitution, it implies that NED has a duty to uphold its principles.
Furthermore, NED has active Congress members on its board who are required to uphold the Constitution.
@EagleEdMartin - Please see ADVANCE Democracy Act of 2007. 22 U.S. Code Chapter 89 (ยงยง 8201โ8262). While it doesn't explicitly bind NED to the US Constitution, it implies that NED has a duty to uphold its principles.
Furthermore, NED has active Congress members on its board who are required to uphold the Constitution.
Hello Mr. Krassenstein,
You are being disingenuous, and I will explain why.
This goes beyond defending your use of "8467." You're promoting the idea that because the phrase can be interpreted innocuously, that interpretation must prevail. That is not how speech laws work.
The capacity of such language to be reasonably read as incitement is exactly why it's being flagged. Many people have received Secret Service visits for much less. The idea that "oh, just because some other interpretation exists means that it should be protected speech" is complete nonsense.
You are not a victim because Secret Service took notice. You are someone who knowingly pushed language into the gray zone, and continues to do so.
There have been two assassination attempts on this President. Your insistence on legitimizing language that tiptoes around explicit threats contributes to the normalization of stochastic violence. You know that. Which means you're not acting out of naivety. You're complicit. And you should be thrown in jail.
You are being disingenuous, and I will explain why.
This goes beyond defending your use of "8467." You're promoting the idea that because the phrase can be interpreted innocuously, that interpretation must prevail. That is not how speech laws work.
The capacity of such language to be reasonably read as incitement is exactly why it's being flagged. Many people have received Secret Service visits for much less. The idea that "oh, just because some other interpretation exists means that it should be protected speech" is complete nonsense.
You are not a victim because Secret Service took notice. You are someone who knowingly pushed language into the gray zone, and continues to do so.
There have been two assassination attempts on this President. Your insistence on legitimizing language that tiptoes around explicit threats contributes to the normalization of stochastic violence. You know that. Which means you're not acting out of naivety. You're complicit. And you should be thrown in jail.
Hello Mr. Krassenstein,
I have a simple, unambiguous proposal for you to to prove the MAGA side wrong.
Condemn all political violence, without qualifiers, on both sides. Including condemning the poll I posted below. Do that, and then we can start talking about giving the benefit of the doubt to ambiguous language.
But my guess you won't. Because you know exactly what your side is signaling, and you're not willing to break with it. You're normalizing the usage of veiled threats under the guise of free speech.
I have a simple, unambiguous proposal for you to to prove the MAGA side wrong.
Condemn all political violence, without qualifiers, on both sides. Including condemning the poll I posted below. Do that, and then we can start talking about giving the benefit of the doubt to ambiguous language.
But my guess you won't. Because you know exactly what your side is signaling, and you're not willing to break with it. You're normalizing the usage of veiled threats under the guise of free speech.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1923740354899300763?t=6IvxslbMx0haiyIGqB1Wyg&s=19
I want a journalist to go to D.C. and put a microphone in front of a Democratic politician. Ask them, on record: will you condemn Pfizer for deliberately delaying a vaccine rollout?
My guess is every last one of them will hide behind word salad because deep down, they are fine with Pfizer letting people die preventable deaths, as long as it helped keep Trump out of office.
If you don't like this post - show me one Democratic Senator or Representative willing to call out this heinous calculus for what it is. You can prove me wrong. But you know you can't.
I want a journalist to go to D.C. and put a microphone in front of a Democratic politician. Ask them, on record: will you condemn Pfizer for deliberately delaying a vaccine rollout?
My guess is every last one of them will hide behind word salad because deep down, they are fine with Pfizer letting people die preventable deaths, as long as it helped keep Trump out of office.
If you don't like this post - show me one Democratic Senator or Representative willing to call out this heinous calculus for what it is. You can prove me wrong. But you know you can't.
X (formerly Twitter)
DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) on X
I want a journalist to go to D.C. and put a microphone in front of a Democratic politician. Ask them, on record: will you condemn Pfizer for deliberately delaying a vaccine rollout?
My guess is every last one of them will hide behind word salad because deepโฆ
My guess is every last one of them will hide behind word salad because deepโฆ
Quite a list of attendees at Impact 25 Poland (where Obama and others are speaking). I'm going to try and figure out a pipeline to auto-generate biographies and NGO affiliations in bulk.
X (formerly Twitter)
DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) on X
I want a journalist to go to D.C. and put a microphone in front of a Democratic politician. Ask them, on record: will you condemn Pfizer for deliberately delaying a vaccine rollout?
My guess is every last one of them will hide behind word salad because deepโฆ
My guess is every last one of them will hide behind word salad because deepโฆ
Thank you for a wonderful Spaces and sorry for the technical issues. I'll work with @DiligentDenizen to debug the microphone/audio and get a proper setup going.
Hello Dr. Krauss,
Per Wikipedia, you served on President Obama's science policy committee. So, let's examine the science policies enacted during his administration.
Consider this statement from NASA Administrator Charles Bolden during a 2010 Al Jazeera interview:
"One was that he wanted me to re-inspire children to want to get into science and math; he wanted me to expand our international relationships; and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math, and engineering."
So, under President Obama, NASA's top priority shifted from space exploration to making Muslim-majority countries feel good about themselves.
Given this, I am extremely skeptical that you know an iota what constitutes effective science policy. Therefore, your opinion is irrelevant. Next time, save yourself the effort of writing on science policy altogether.
Per Wikipedia, you served on President Obama's science policy committee. So, let's examine the science policies enacted during his administration.
Consider this statement from NASA Administrator Charles Bolden during a 2010 Al Jazeera interview:
"One was that he wanted me to re-inspire children to want to get into science and math; he wanted me to expand our international relationships; and third, and perhaps foremost, he wanted me to find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage much more with dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science, math, and engineering."
So, under President Obama, NASA's top priority shifted from space exploration to making Muslim-majority countries feel good about themselves.
Given this, I am extremely skeptical that you know an iota what constitutes effective science policy. Therefore, your opinion is irrelevant. Next time, save yourself the effort of writing on science policy altogether.