This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🧵 THREAD - US Global Leadership Corporation, representing 400 NGOs
Nicolas Turza, the person who got exposed by @JamesOKeefeIII and OMG, was featured in the following YouTube video by an interesting super-NGO - the US Global Leadership Corporation.
In the video, he argues for the involvement of USAID and Department of State in military operations.
Nicolas Turza, the person who got exposed by @JamesOKeefeIII and OMG, was featured in the following YouTube video by an interesting super-NGO - the US Global Leadership Corporation.
In the video, he argues for the involvement of USAID and Department of State in military operations.
What first tipped me about ActBlue for me was a leaked memo published by @DailySignal .
In it, ActBlue states they need to "move away from the dominance of small-dollar donors whose preferences may not align with the broader electorate."
That made no sense to me. By definition, small-dollar donors are grassroots supporters or the "broader electorate."
To me, that wording strongly suggests they knew the true source of those small-dollar donations, and it wasn't ordinary voters.
In it, ActBlue states they need to "move away from the dominance of small-dollar donors whose preferences may not align with the broader electorate."
That made no sense to me. By definition, small-dollar donors are grassroots supporters or the "broader electorate."
To me, that wording strongly suggests they knew the true source of those small-dollar donations, and it wasn't ordinary voters.
Also, give @PeterBernegger a follow - he's been on this for years and has a wonderful website.
https://x.com/DataRepublican/status/1915419548922331257?s=19
What first tipped me about ActBlue for me was a leaked memo published by @DailySignal .
In it, ActBlue states they need to "move away from the dominance of small-dollar donors whose preferences may not align with the broader electorate."
That makes no sense. By definition, small-dollar donors are grassroots supporters aka the "broader electorate."
To me, that wording strongly suggests they knew the true source of those small-dollar donations, and it wasn't ordinary voters.
What first tipped me about ActBlue for me was a leaked memo published by @DailySignal .
In it, ActBlue states they need to "move away from the dominance of small-dollar donors whose preferences may not align with the broader electorate."
That makes no sense. By definition, small-dollar donors are grassroots supporters aka the "broader electorate."
To me, that wording strongly suggests they knew the true source of those small-dollar donations, and it wasn't ordinary voters.
X (formerly Twitter)
DataRepublican (small r) (@DataRepublican) on X
What first tipped me about ActBlue for me was a leaked memo published by @DailySignal .
In it, ActBlue states they need to "move away from the dominance of small-dollar donors whose preferences may not align with the broader electorate."
That makes no sense.…
In it, ActBlue states they need to "move away from the dominance of small-dollar donors whose preferences may not align with the broader electorate."
That makes no sense.…
I asked AI to categorize the board members by the company they sit in.
Consulting & Professional-Services (International Development)
⚪ Roslyn M. Brock – Abt Associates
⚪ Paul Weisenfeld – RTI International
⚪ Jamey Butcher – Chemonics International
⚪ Jessica Kruvant – Creative Associates International
⚪ Kathleen O’Dell – Deloitte Consulting LLP
Humanitarian, Immigration & International-Development Non-Profits
⚪ Carrie Hessler-Radelet – Global Communities
⚪ Sean Callahan – Catholic Relief Services
⚪ Tjada D’Oyen McKenna – Mercy Corps
⚪ Rt. Hon. David Miliband – International Rescue Committee
⚪ Michelle Nunn – CARE USA
⚪ Edgar Sandoval – World Vision US
⚪ Janti Soeripto – Save the Children US
Consumer Goods, Retail & Food/Agriculture
⚪ Brigitte Schmidt Gwyn – PepsiCo
⚪ Selina Jackson – Procter & Gamble
⚪ James A. McGreevy III – Coca-Cola Company
⚪ Sarah Thorn – Walmart
⚪ Maria Pica Karp – ADM
⚪ Matthew Wohlman – Land O’Lakes Inc.
Law, Government-Relations & Lobbying Firms
⚪ Norm Coleman – Hogan Lovells
⚪ Stephen K. Benjamin – The Benjamin Firm LLC
⚪ Peter J. Roskam – BakerHostetler
⚪ Myron Brilliant – Dentons Global Advisors / Brilliant Impact Group
⚪ Heather Nauert – BGR Group
Pharmaceutical & Life-Sciences Corporations
⚪ Jane M. Adams – Johnson & Johnson
⚪ Jenelle Krishnamoorthy, Ph.D. – Merck
⚪ Caroline Roan – Pfizer
Healthcare & Global-Health Foundations / NGOs
⚪ Amb. Karl Hofmann – Population Services International (PSI)
⚪ William Moore – Eleanor Crook Foundation
Industrial & Diversified Corporations
⚪ Andrew H. Tisch – Loews Corporation
⚪ Bill Lane – (ret.) Caterpillar / Chair Emeritus, USGLC
Media, Entertainment & Educational Non-Profits
⚪ Susan L. Fox – The Walt Disney Company
⚪ Sherrie Rollins Westin – Sesame Workshop
Think Tanks & Policy-Research Institutes
⚪ Dr. Evelyn Farkas – McCain Institute at Arizona State University
⚪ Norman J. Ornstein – American Enterprise Institute
⚪ George Ingram – Brookings Institution
Public-Policy & Advocacy Organizations
⚪ Jeffrey Colman – AIPAC
⚪ Peter Yeo – UN Foundation / Better World Campaign
Finance & Banking
⚪ Candida “Candi” Wolff – Citigroup
Technology
⚪ Amb. Karan K. Bhatia – Google
Consulting & Professional-Services (International Development)
⚪ Roslyn M. Brock – Abt Associates
⚪ Paul Weisenfeld – RTI International
⚪ Jamey Butcher – Chemonics International
⚪ Jessica Kruvant – Creative Associates International
⚪ Kathleen O’Dell – Deloitte Consulting LLP
Humanitarian, Immigration & International-Development Non-Profits
⚪ Carrie Hessler-Radelet – Global Communities
⚪ Sean Callahan – Catholic Relief Services
⚪ Tjada D’Oyen McKenna – Mercy Corps
⚪ Rt. Hon. David Miliband – International Rescue Committee
⚪ Michelle Nunn – CARE USA
⚪ Edgar Sandoval – World Vision US
⚪ Janti Soeripto – Save the Children US
Consumer Goods, Retail & Food/Agriculture
⚪ Brigitte Schmidt Gwyn – PepsiCo
⚪ Selina Jackson – Procter & Gamble
⚪ James A. McGreevy III – Coca-Cola Company
⚪ Sarah Thorn – Walmart
⚪ Maria Pica Karp – ADM
⚪ Matthew Wohlman – Land O’Lakes Inc.
Law, Government-Relations & Lobbying Firms
⚪ Norm Coleman – Hogan Lovells
⚪ Stephen K. Benjamin – The Benjamin Firm LLC
⚪ Peter J. Roskam – BakerHostetler
⚪ Myron Brilliant – Dentons Global Advisors / Brilliant Impact Group
⚪ Heather Nauert – BGR Group
Pharmaceutical & Life-Sciences Corporations
⚪ Jane M. Adams – Johnson & Johnson
⚪ Jenelle Krishnamoorthy, Ph.D. – Merck
⚪ Caroline Roan – Pfizer
Healthcare & Global-Health Foundations / NGOs
⚪ Amb. Karl Hofmann – Population Services International (PSI)
⚪ William Moore – Eleanor Crook Foundation
Industrial & Diversified Corporations
⚪ Andrew H. Tisch – Loews Corporation
⚪ Bill Lane – (ret.) Caterpillar / Chair Emeritus, USGLC
Media, Entertainment & Educational Non-Profits
⚪ Susan L. Fox – The Walt Disney Company
⚪ Sherrie Rollins Westin – Sesame Workshop
Think Tanks & Policy-Research Institutes
⚪ Dr. Evelyn Farkas – McCain Institute at Arizona State University
⚪ Norman J. Ornstein – American Enterprise Institute
⚪ George Ingram – Brookings Institution
Public-Policy & Advocacy Organizations
⚪ Jeffrey Colman – AIPAC
⚪ Peter Yeo – UN Foundation / Better World Campaign
Finance & Banking
⚪ Candida “Candi” Wolff – Citigroup
Technology
⚪ Amb. Karan K. Bhatia – Google
You see the pattern. USGLC is a bullying arm financed by OSF and Gates Foundation which uses all these heavy hitters to pressurize the government into increasing foreign assistance and increased "public-private partnerships" aka NGOs.
As mentioned in last night's thread, they took credit for getting a 95 billion foreign assistance spending windfall passed.
As mentioned in last night's thread, they took credit for getting a 95 billion foreign assistance spending windfall passed.
Yesterday, the US Global Leadership Corporation (USGLC) put out a press release condemning the dismantling of the Millenium Challenge Corporation.
One of their board members, Jamey Butcher, is the CEO of Chemonics International which holds some of the high dollar MCC awards.
See the pattern? George Soros and Bill Gates used USGLC to play off corporate greed to create a shadow government in their own image.
One of their board members, Jamey Butcher, is the CEO of Chemonics International which holds some of the high dollar MCC awards.
See the pattern? George Soros and Bill Gates used USGLC to play off corporate greed to create a shadow government in their own image.
Even Walmart, which has had traditionally Republican leadership, had more donations for Harris than Trump.
🔵 Kamala Harris (D): $366,388 (57.9%)
🔴 Donald Trump (R): $266,604 (42.1%)
🔵 Kamala Harris (D): $366,388 (57.9%)
🔴 Donald Trump (R): $266,604 (42.1%)
You see the pattern.
It's a self-reinforcing loop. A company receives federal funding, often through "soft power" channels like USAID.
Once that money becomes part of its revenue stream, the company has a direct financial incentive to support the politicians controlling the purse strings.
That's the mechanism by Bill Gates and George Soros accomplished ideological capture over the business world.
It's brilliant systems hacking.
It's a self-reinforcing loop. A company receives federal funding, often through "soft power" channels like USAID.
Once that money becomes part of its revenue stream, the company has a direct financial incentive to support the politicians controlling the purse strings.
That's the mechanism by Bill Gates and George Soros accomplished ideological capture over the business world.
It's brilliant systems hacking.
🧵 Lobbying and Donations of USGLC Companies
(Inspired by @Frogman_Pilot )
Which party receives donations from both USGLC member companies and their employees?
Let's start with Land O'Lakes, which was a surprise recipient of 100 million in USAID money.
The company's donations are split and relatively small, but they do spend an increasing volume of money in lobbying. Amy Klobuchar is the top recipient of funds.
80% of their 2024 employee donations go to Democratic candidates.
🔵 Democratic candidates: $24,250 (80.3%)
🔴 Republican candidates: $1,385 (4.6%)
⚪️ Other — PACs & committees: $4,550 (15.1%)
(Inspired by @Frogman_Pilot )
Which party receives donations from both USGLC member companies and their employees?
Let's start with Land O'Lakes, which was a surprise recipient of 100 million in USAID money.
The company's donations are split and relatively small, but they do spend an increasing volume of money in lobbying. Amy Klobuchar is the top recipient of funds.
80% of their 2024 employee donations go to Democratic candidates.
🔵 Democratic candidates: $24,250 (80.3%)
🔴 Republican candidates: $1,385 (4.6%)
⚪️ Other — PACs & committees: $4,550 (15.1%)
Heads-up: if you're curious to see US Global Leadership Corporation in action, especially if you're local to Utah, it looks like they're doing a livestream on YouTube at 12 PM MT.
The subject:
"America and the World: How Utah Wins"
I believe it will feature @SenJohnCurtis , the literal Democrat who switched to Republican before running for Senate and won on the account of low turnout.
Link below 👇
The subject:
"America and the World: How Utah Wins"
I believe it will feature @SenJohnCurtis , the literal Democrat who switched to Republican before running for Senate and won on the account of low turnout.
Link below 👇
I'd put it together now, but I have to be gone most of the day. This was just too mind-boggling to not to tease.
I'll finish this thread for now. Here's the timeline:
🔹 2007: The Gates Foundation seeded the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (USGLC) with a major donation. Over time, Gates contributed $71M+, with millions more flowing in from the Open Society Foundation (Soros).
🔹 Official Mission: USGLC claimed to promote U.S. soft power globally.
Actual Practice: It worked to outsource government functions to private NGOs.
🔹 Lobbying Power: USGLC successfully pushed for billions in federal funding to be directed to businesses, nonprofits, and faith-based entities.
🔹 Dependency Created: These organizations became financially dependent on continuous government contracts.
🔹 Biden’s First Day: An Executive Order mandated a review and prioritization of federal awardees that aligned with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) goals.
🔹 Ideological Capture: Companies, now reliant on federal dollars, were forced to conform to DEI principles to survive.
🔹 The Endgame: Through the combined influence of Soros and Gates, the U.S. government was systematically hacked; federal funds outsourced to ideologically compliant businesses and NGOs, locking in permanent institutional capture.
🔹 2007: The Gates Foundation seeded the U.S. Global Leadership Coalition (USGLC) with a major donation. Over time, Gates contributed $71M+, with millions more flowing in from the Open Society Foundation (Soros).
🔹 Official Mission: USGLC claimed to promote U.S. soft power globally.
Actual Practice: It worked to outsource government functions to private NGOs.
🔹 Lobbying Power: USGLC successfully pushed for billions in federal funding to be directed to businesses, nonprofits, and faith-based entities.
🔹 Dependency Created: These organizations became financially dependent on continuous government contracts.
🔹 Biden’s First Day: An Executive Order mandated a review and prioritization of federal awardees that aligned with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) goals.
🔹 Ideological Capture: Companies, now reliant on federal dollars, were forced to conform to DEI principles to survive.
🔹 The Endgame: Through the combined influence of Soros and Gates, the U.S. government was systematically hacked; federal funds outsourced to ideologically compliant businesses and NGOs, locking in permanent institutional capture.
These companies receiving federal money were incentivized to follow woke agendas.
On his first day in office, Biden signed EO 13985, Executive Order On Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government.
In it, he directs each agency's head to prioritize funding for agendas that go towards advancing equity-related goals.
In other words, he ordered an audit of federal awardees.
On his first day in office, Biden signed EO 13985, Executive Order On Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government.
In it, he directs each agency's head to prioritize funding for agendas that go towards advancing equity-related goals.
In other words, he ordered an audit of federal awardees.