From Twitter :
For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
🔗 Context 🔗
For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
If you start with a maximally fit DNA sequence for a creature in a stable environment it cannot maintain its maximal fitness and will decay toward less fit and never recover from generation to generation. Over time it will become less and less fit.
🔗 Context 🔗
If you start with a maximally fit DNA sequence for a creature in a stable environment it cannot maintain its maximal fitness and will decay toward less fit and never recover from generation to generation. Over time it will become less and less fit.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
Species can differentiate only by losing information. An animal can start with 2 arms and 2 legs and "evolve" into two different animals, one with 2 arms and another with 2 legs through the loss of info. Going in reverse is not possible.
🔗 Context 🔗
Species can differentiate only by losing information. An animal can start with 2 arms and 2 legs and "evolve" into two different animals, one with 2 arms and another with 2 legs through the loss of info. Going in reverse is not possible.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@aidanlean I agree with you that Life is more than matter and cannot be explained by physical processes alone. This means there must be a spiritual realm creating the physical reality.
🔗 Context 🔗
@aidanlean I agree with you that Life is more than matter and cannot be explained by physical processes alone. This means there must be a spiritual realm creating the physical reality.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@siferdub Only if you accept by faith that evolution is the process that turned non-life into life. However, what most people observe is actually devolution in action like forcing information through a filter rather than evolution (adding new information).
🔗 Context 🔗
@siferdub Only if you accept by faith that evolution is the process that turned non-life into life. However, what most people observe is actually devolution in action like forcing information through a filter rather than evolution (adding new information).
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@RufusYoakam what about the matter before an organism exists? This non-life that randomly mutated into the most basic form of life that had to be sophisticated enough to replicate with an error rate less than the negative mutation rate.
🔗 Context 🔗
@RufusYoakam what about the matter before an organism exists? This non-life that randomly mutated into the most basic form of life that had to be sophisticated enough to replicate with an error rate less than the negative mutation rate.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@geopete84 Only from a devolution perspective. The fittest would have to filter faster than the error mutation rate. If you program a simulation that doesn't cheat by perfectly preserving the most fit from generation to generation then you will never get an increase in info complexity.
🔗 Context 🔗
@geopete84 Only from a devolution perspective. The fittest would have to filter faster than the error mutation rate. If you program a simulation that doesn't cheat by perfectly preserving the most fit from generation to generation then you will never get an increase in info complexity.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
Since the banking system is a closed system, the only effect of a "bank run" is to centralize deposits with the ultimate end result CBDC. The "bailout" is effectively monetization of long-term debt. The only "safe place" is to buy things you need because inflation will explode.
🔗 Context 🔗
Since the banking system is a closed system, the only effect of a "bank run" is to centralize deposits with the ultimate end result CBDC. The "bailout" is effectively monetization of long-term debt. The only "safe place" is to buy things you need because inflation will explode.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@_JamesMart Natural selection from among the random changes. Which means if you have 100 random mutations, 1 of which has a net benefit the other 99 a net loss, then you need a survival rate of the beneficial change to be 100x the non-beneficial changes just to break even.
🔗 Context 🔗
@_JamesMart Natural selection from among the random changes. Which means if you have 100 random mutations, 1 of which has a net benefit the other 99 a net loss, then you need a survival rate of the beneficial change to be 100x the non-beneficial changes just to break even.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@BtsWeeklyReport It is an interesting theory. That kind of war will have significant collateral damage regardless of who wins.
🔗 Context 🔗
@BtsWeeklyReport It is an interesting theory. That kind of war will have significant collateral damage regardless of who wins.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
We are approaching the Hebrew new year (~March 21) which is 1993 years from our best guess of the death of Jesus which means the next 7 years could be the tribulation before the start of the millennial reign. Is it just a coincidence that world war and banking crisis is afoot?
🔗 Context 🔗
We are approaching the Hebrew new year (~March 21) which is 1993 years from our best guess of the death of Jesus which means the next 7 years could be the tribulation before the start of the millennial reign. Is it just a coincidence that world war and banking crisis is afoot?
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
Whether these next 7 years are the fulfillment of biblical prophecy or not, they are sure to be a great tribulation for almost all of the planet. Prepare accordingly. Tyranny will increase, violence will increase, famine will increase until the system collapses from its own evil
🔗 Context 🔗
Whether these next 7 years are the fulfillment of biblical prophecy or not, they are sure to be a great tribulation for almost all of the planet. Prepare accordingly. Tyranny will increase, violence will increase, famine will increase until the system collapses from its own evil
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@franky12358 There are certainly countless interpretations out there and at the end of the day what will happen will happen. Doesn't change what we can clearly see going on around us with the banking system, world war, and pole shift.
🔗 Context 🔗
@franky12358 There are certainly countless interpretations out there and at the end of the day what will happen will happen. Doesn't change what we can clearly see going on around us with the banking system, world war, and pole shift.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@cryptofordocs @CaitlinLong_ Depends upon the interest rate of the loan. If they can borrow against this phantom value at 2% and then buy treasuries that pay 3% then it is free cashflow and clearly a bailout or gift.
🔗 Context 🔗
@cryptofordocs @CaitlinLong_ Depends upon the interest rate of the loan. If they can borrow against this phantom value at 2% and then buy treasuries that pay 3% then it is free cashflow and clearly a bailout or gift.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@BitcoinMagazine Clearly lies, every buyer of crypto transfers the money to a seller of crypto and the total amount in deposits remains constant.
🔗 Context 🔗
@BitcoinMagazine Clearly lies, every buyer of crypto transfers the money to a seller of crypto and the total amount in deposits remains constant.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@Lynxabi @BitcoinMagazine the fiat just changes account holder and no deposits are lost across the system as a whole. Only withdrawing to paper cash can cause a deposit drop.
🔗 Context 🔗
@Lynxabi @BitcoinMagazine the fiat just changes account holder and no deposits are lost across the system as a whole. Only withdrawing to paper cash can cause a deposit drop.
🔗 Context 🔗
From Twitter :
@Disruptepreneur Where exactly do you think crypto exchanges keep custody of dollar deposits they hold for you? All "fiat-backed" stable coins are strictly less secure than the banks/loans that back them and they pay less interest to boot!
🔗 Context 🔗
@Disruptepreneur Where exactly do you think crypto exchanges keep custody of dollar deposits they hold for you? All "fiat-backed" stable coins are strictly less secure than the banks/loans that back them and they pay less interest to boot!
🔗 Context 🔗