Daniel Larimer Msg Only
1.18K subscribers
22 photos
10.1K links
Messages sent by Daniel Larimer in different EOS related Telegram groups and on Twitter

This bot is not made by Dan nor Block.one

Contact: @DestBest_BTSFCX

See also:
@BrendanBlumerEOS - Messages sent by Brendan Blumer - CEO at Block.one
Download Telegram
Very insightful

Replying to:
> Don't miss read what I'm trying to say. I think Dan is a genious and I think EOS is the best blockchain on the planet. But investors and users can't relate to just technology. They need leaders. They need to buy in to the leader and know where it's headed. Bitcoin is an exception but people are still searching for the Figure Head. Until a project has reach mass adoption this leadership or figure head is need for people to invest their time and money into anything.

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
Channel name was changed to Β«Daniel Larimer Msg OnlyΒ»
From channel admin: Daniel Larimer is back on Telegram πŸ₯³πŸŽ‰

Messages he sends in public Telegram groups will be copied here
Daniel Larimer Msg Only pinned Β«From channel admin: Daniel Larimer is back on Telegram πŸ₯³πŸŽ‰ Messages he sends in public Telegram groups will be copied hereΒ»
Does anyone know what forum software is powering forums.greymass.com?

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
Can we avoid repeating everythign I say in every channel in here?

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
How would everyone feel about a discourse server for EOS?

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
The question is do we target people's nights or work days? Do we do this on the weekend?

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
Deep thought πŸ™‚

Replying to:
> Big picture thinking/frame looks at how all the information is forming/patterning/transforming & acknowledges that development is vertical.
In other words it follows the principle of transcend but include.
atoms/molecules/cells/organisms.
The ingredients at the lower level come together to create a threshold for transcendence.
The majority of perspectives in Telegram who look at Dan only look horizontally and function in either/or thinking, motivated by short term price objectives.
Is it this or is it that.
From a vertical perspective we are never limited to either/or; it transforms to both/and
EOS will play out in a way that will serve the reason you invested in it, but we can’t say it will be β€˜this’ nor can we choose the time-frame.


πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
B1 is actively funding code for main net

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
if the community has a plan and a design then B1 might fund it

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
I mean EOS-specific code, things like the new resource model

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
So if we want to impliment a new governance system, we document it, we get community buy in on the direction, then B1 might choose to fund it.

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
I am certain that B1 wants EOS to be as independent as possible from them for their own legal defense

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
So anything the community does to "take over" that gives B1 confidence that EOS will be successful with greater independence from B1 the better for B1

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
Other chains have a strong leader that decides things, EOS hasn't.

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
Vitalik and Eth Foundation set the roadmap and the community generally follows.

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
All in favor of Tequila for King of EOS say Ay

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
EOS NY was likely to leave EOS due to funding had B1 not integrated them.

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—
Who is We, White Man

πŸ”— Context πŸ”—