🚨 CVE-2018-18508
In Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.36.7 and before 3.41.1, a malformed signature can cause a crash due to a null dereference, resulting in a Denial of Service.
🎖@cveNotify
In Network Security Services (NSS) before 3.36.7 and before 3.41.1, a malformed signature can cause a crash due to a null dereference, resulting in a Denial of Service.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2019-17007
In Network Security Services before 3.44, a malformed Netscape Certificate Sequence can cause NSS to crash, resulting in a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
In Network Security Services before 3.44, a malformed Netscape Certificate Sequence can cause NSS to crash, resulting in a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
bugzilla.mozilla.org
1533216 - (CVE-2019-17007) CERT_DecodeCertPackage() crash with Netscape Certificate Sequences
RESOLVED (dkeeler) in NSS - Libraries. Last updated 2020-08-08.
🚨 CVE-2020-25238
A vulnerability has been identified in PCS neo (Administration Console) (V3.0), TIA Portal (V15, V15.1 and V16). Manipulating certain files in specific folders could allow a local attacker to execute code with SYSTEM privileges. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker with a valid account and limited access rights on the system.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability has been identified in PCS neo (Administration Console) (V3.0), TIA Portal (V15, V15.1 and V16). Manipulating certain files in specific folders could allow a local attacker to execute code with SYSTEM privileges. The security vulnerability could be exploited by an attacker with a valid account and limited access rights on the system.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-11947
iscsi_aio_ioctl_cb in block/iscsi.c in QEMU 4.1.0 has a heap-based buffer over-read that may disclose unrelated information from process memory to an attacker.
🎖@cveNotify
iscsi_aio_ioctl_cb in block/iscsi.c in QEMU 4.1.0 has a heap-based buffer over-read that may disclose unrelated information from process memory to an attacker.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-28851
In x/text in Go 1.15.4, an "index out of range" panic occurs in language.ParseAcceptLanguage while parsing the -u- extension. (x/text/language is supposed to be able to parse an HTTP Accept-Language header.)
🎖@cveNotify
In x/text in Go 1.15.4, an "index out of range" panic occurs in language.ParseAcceptLanguage while parsing the -u- extension. (x/text/language is supposed to be able to parse an HTTP Accept-Language header.)
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
x/text: panic in language.ParseAcceptLanguage while parsing -u- extension · Issue #42535 · golang/go
What version of Go are you using (go version)? $ go version go version go1.15.4 linux/amd64 Does this issue reproduce with the latest release? What operating system and processor architecture are y...
🚨 CVE-2020-28852
In x/text in Go 1.15.4, a "slice bounds out of range" panic occurs in language.ParseAcceptLanguage while processing a BCP 47 tag. (x/text/language is supposed to be able to parse an HTTP Accept-Language header.)
🎖@cveNotify
In x/text in Go 1.15.4, a "slice bounds out of range" panic occurs in language.ParseAcceptLanguage while processing a BCP 47 tag. (x/text/language is supposed to be able to parse an HTTP Accept-Language header.)
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
x/text: panic in language.ParseAcceptLanguage while processing bcp47 tag · Issue #42536 · golang/go
What version of Go are you using (go version)? $ go version go version go1.15.4 linux/amd64 Does this issue reproduce with the latest release? What operating system and processor architecture are y...
🚨 CVE-2020-35495
There's a flaw in binutils /bfd/pef.c. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted input file to be processed by the objdump program could cause a null pointer dereference. The greatest threat from this flaw is to application availability. This flaw affects binutils versions prior to 2.34.
🎖@cveNotify
There's a flaw in binutils /bfd/pef.c. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted input file to be processed by the objdump program could cause a null pointer dereference. The greatest threat from this flaw is to application availability. This flaw affects binutils versions prior to 2.34.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-35494
There's a flaw in binutils /opcodes/tic4x-dis.c. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted input file to be processed by binutils could cause usage of uninitialized memory. The highest threat is to application availability with a lower threat to data confidentiality. This flaw affects binutils versions prior to 2.34.
🎖@cveNotify
There's a flaw in binutils /opcodes/tic4x-dis.c. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted input file to be processed by binutils could cause usage of uninitialized memory. The highest threat is to application availability with a lower threat to data confidentiality. This flaw affects binutils versions prior to 2.34.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-35496
There's a flaw in bfd_pef_scan_start_address() of bfd/pef.c in binutils which could allow an attacker who is able to submit a crafted file to be processed by objdump to cause a NULL pointer dereference. The greatest threat of this flaw is to application availability. This flaw affects binutils versions prior to 2.34.
🎖@cveNotify
There's a flaw in bfd_pef_scan_start_address() of bfd/pef.c in binutils which could allow an attacker who is able to submit a crafted file to be processed by objdump to cause a NULL pointer dereference. The greatest threat of this flaw is to application availability. This flaw affects binutils versions prior to 2.34.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-35493
A flaw exists in binutils in bfd/pef.c. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted PEF file to be parsed by objdump could cause a heap buffer overflow -> out-of-bounds read that could lead to an impact to application availability. This flaw affects binutils versions prior to 2.34.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw exists in binutils in bfd/pef.c. An attacker who is able to submit a crafted PEF file to be parsed by objdump could cause a heap buffer overflow -> out-of-bounds read that could lead to an impact to application availability. This flaw affects binutils versions prior to 2.34.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-35507
There's a flaw in bfd_pef_parse_function_stubs of bfd/pef.c in binutils in versions prior to 2.34 which could allow an attacker who is able to submit a crafted file to be processed by objdump to cause a NULL pointer dereference. The greatest threat of this flaw is to application availability.
🎖@cveNotify
There's a flaw in bfd_pef_parse_function_stubs of bfd/pef.c in binutils in versions prior to 2.34 which could allow an attacker who is able to submit a crafted file to be processed by objdump to cause a NULL pointer dereference. The greatest threat of this flaw is to application availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-36158
mwifiex_cmd_802_11_ad_hoc_start in drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/join.c in the Linux kernel through 5.10.4 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long SSID value, aka CID-5c455c5ab332.
🎖@cveNotify
mwifiex_cmd_802_11_ad_hoc_start in drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/join.c in the Linux kernel through 5.10.4 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long SSID value, aka CID-5c455c5ab332.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-8265
Node.js versions before 10.23.1, 12.20.1, 14.15.4, 15.5.1 are vulnerable to a use-after-free bug in its TLS implementation. When writing to a TLS enabled socket, node::StreamBase::Write calls node::TLSWrap::DoWrite with a freshly allocated WriteWrap object as first argument. If the DoWrite method does not return an error, this object is passed back to the caller as part of a StreamWriteResult structure. This may be exploited to corrupt memory leading to a Denial of Service or potentially other exploits.
🎖@cveNotify
Node.js versions before 10.23.1, 12.20.1, 14.15.4, 15.5.1 are vulnerable to a use-after-free bug in its TLS implementation. When writing to a TLS enabled socket, node::StreamBase::Write calls node::TLSWrap::DoWrite with a freshly allocated WriteWrap object as first argument. If the DoWrite method does not return an error, this object is passed back to the caller as part of a StreamWriteResult structure. This may be exploited to corrupt memory leading to a Denial of Service or potentially other exploits.
🎖@cveNotify
HackerOne
Node.js disclosed on HackerOne: Node.js: use-after-free in TLSWrap
Node.js: use-after-free in TLSWrap
Node v14.11.0 (Current) is vulnerable to a use-after-free bug in its TLS implementation.
When writing to a TLS enabled socket, node::StreamBase::Write calls...
Node v14.11.0 (Current) is vulnerable to a use-after-free bug in its TLS implementation.
When writing to a TLS enabled socket, node::StreamBase::Write calls...
🚨 CVE-2020-8287
Node.js versions before 10.23.1, 12.20.1, 14.15.4, 15.5.1 allow two copies of a header field in an HTTP request (for example, two Transfer-Encoding header fields). In this case, Node.js identifies the first header field and ignores the second. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling.
🎖@cveNotify
Node.js versions before 10.23.1, 12.20.1, 14.15.4, 15.5.1 allow two copies of a header field in an HTTP request (for example, two Transfer-Encoding header fields). In this case, Node.js identifies the first header field and ignores the second. This can lead to HTTP Request Smuggling.
🎖@cveNotify
HackerOne
Node.js disclosed on HackerOne: Potential HTTP Request Smuggling in...
**Summary:**
Potential HTTP Request Smuggling exists in nodejs. Attacker can use two same header field make TE-TE HTTP Request Smuggling attack.
**Description:**
nodejs allow same header field...
Potential HTTP Request Smuggling exists in nodejs. Attacker can use two same header field make TE-TE HTTP Request Smuggling attack.
**Description:**
nodejs allow same header field...
🚨 CVE-2021-24122
When serving resources from a network location using the NTFS file system, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.39, 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.106 were susceptible to JSP source code disclosure in some configurations. The root cause was the unexpected behaviour of the JRE API File.getCanonicalPath() which in turn was caused by the inconsistent behaviour of the Windows API (FindFirstFileW) in some circumstances.
🎖@cveNotify
When serving resources from a network location using the NTFS file system, Apache Tomcat versions 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.0-M9, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.39, 8.5.0 to 8.5.59 and 7.0.0 to 7.0.106 were susceptible to JSP source code disclosure in some configurations. The root cause was the unexpected behaviour of the JRE API File.getCanonicalPath() which in turn was caused by the inconsistent behaviour of the Windows API (FindFirstFileW) in some circumstances.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2017-15288
The compilation daemon in Scala before 2.10.7, 2.11.x before 2.11.12, and 2.12.x before 2.12.4 uses weak permissions for private files in /tmp/scala-devel/${USER:shared}/scalac-compile-server-port, which allows local users to write to arbitrary class files and consequently gain privileges.
🎖@cveNotify
The compilation daemon in Scala before 2.10.7, 2.11.x before 2.11.12, and 2.12.x before 2.12.4 uses weak permissions for private files in /tmp/scala-devel/${USER:shared}/scalac-compile-server-port, which allows local users to write to arbitrary class files and consequently gain privileges.
🎖@cveNotify
www.scala-lang.org
Security update: 2.12.4, 2.11.12, 2.10.7 (CVE-2017-15288)
🚨 CVE-2020-27218
In Eclipse Jetty version 9.4.0.RC0 to 9.4.34.v20201102, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.0.beta2, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.0.beta2, if GZIP request body inflation is enabled and requests from different clients are multiplexed onto a single connection, and if an attacker can send a request with a body that is received entirely but not consumed by the application, then a subsequent request on the same connection will see that body prepended to its body. The attacker will not see any data but may inject data into the body of the subsequent request.
🎖@cveNotify
In Eclipse Jetty version 9.4.0.RC0 to 9.4.34.v20201102, 10.0.0.alpha0 to 10.0.0.beta2, and 11.0.0.alpha0 to 11.0.0.beta2, if GZIP request body inflation is enabled and requests from different clients are multiplexed onto a single connection, and if an attacker can send a request with a body that is received entirely but not consumed by the application, then a subsequent request on the same connection will see that body prepended to its body. The attacker will not see any data but may inject data into the body of the subsequent request.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2021-20638
LOGITEC LAN-W300N/PGRB allows an attacker with administrative privilege to execute arbitrary OS commands via unspecified vectors.
🎖@cveNotify
LOGITEC LAN-W300N/PGRB allows an attacker with administrative privilege to execute arbitrary OS commands via unspecified vectors.
🎖@cveNotify
jvn.jp
JVN#96783542: Multiple vulnerabilities in multiple LOGITEC products
Japan Vulnerability Notes
🚨 CVE-2021-20643
Improper access control vulnerability in ELECOM LD-PS/U1 allows remote attackers to change the administrative password of the affected device by processing a specially crafted request.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper access control vulnerability in ELECOM LD-PS/U1 allows remote attackers to change the administrative password of the affected device by processing a specially crafted request.
🎖@cveNotify
jvn.jp
JVN#47580234: Multiple vulnerabilities in multiple ELECOM products
Japan Vulnerability Notes
🚨 CVE-2021-20650
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ELECOM NCC-EWF100RMWH2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and execute an arbitrary request via unspecified vector. As a result, the device settings may be altered and/or telnet daemon may be started.
🎖@cveNotify
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ELECOM NCC-EWF100RMWH2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators and execute an arbitrary request via unspecified vector. As a result, the device settings may be altered and/or telnet daemon may be started.
🎖@cveNotify
jvn.jp
JVN#47580234: Multiple vulnerabilities in multiple ELECOM products
Japan Vulnerability Notes
🚨 CVE-2021-20636
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LOGITEC LAN-W300N/PR5B allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via a specially crafted URL. As a result, unintended operations to the device such as changes of the device settings may be conducted.
🎖@cveNotify
Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in LOGITEC LAN-W300N/PR5B allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via a specially crafted URL. As a result, unintended operations to the device such as changes of the device settings may be conducted.
🎖@cveNotify
jvn.jp
JVN#96783542: Multiple vulnerabilities in multiple LOGITEC products
Japan Vulnerability Notes