🚨 CVE-2024-43806
Rustix is a set of safe Rust bindings to POSIX-ish APIs. When using `rustix::fs::Dir` using the `linux_raw` backend, it's possible for the iterator to "get stuck" when an IO error is encountered. Combined with a memory over-allocation issue in `rustix::fs::Dir::read_more`, this can cause quick and unbounded memory explosion (gigabytes in a few seconds if used on a hot path) and eventually lead to an OOM crash of the application. The symptoms were initially discovered in https://github.com/imsnif/bandwhich/issues/284. That post has lots of details of our investigation. Full details can be read on the GHSA-c827-hfw6-qwvm repo advisory. If a program tries to access a directory with its file descriptor after the file has been unlinked (or any other action that leaves the `Dir` iterator in the stuck state), and the implementation does not break after seeing an error, it can cause a memory explosion. As an example, Linux's various virtual file systems (e.g. `/proc`, `/sys`) can contain directories that spontaneously pop in and out of existence. Attempting to iterate over them using `rustix::fs::Dir` directly or indirectly (e.g. with the `procfs` crate) can trigger this fault condition if the implementation decides to continue on errors. An attacker knowledgeable about the implementation details of a vulnerable target can therefore try to trigger this fault condition via any one or a combination of several available APIs. If successful, the application host will quickly run out of memory, after which the application will likely be terminated by an OOM killer, leading to denial of service. This issue has been addressed in release versions 0.35.15, 0.36.16, 0.37.25, and 0.38.19. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Rustix is a set of safe Rust bindings to POSIX-ish APIs. When using `rustix::fs::Dir` using the `linux_raw` backend, it's possible for the iterator to "get stuck" when an IO error is encountered. Combined with a memory over-allocation issue in `rustix::fs::Dir::read_more`, this can cause quick and unbounded memory explosion (gigabytes in a few seconds if used on a hot path) and eventually lead to an OOM crash of the application. The symptoms were initially discovered in https://github.com/imsnif/bandwhich/issues/284. That post has lots of details of our investigation. Full details can be read on the GHSA-c827-hfw6-qwvm repo advisory. If a program tries to access a directory with its file descriptor after the file has been unlinked (or any other action that leaves the `Dir` iterator in the stuck state), and the implementation does not break after seeing an error, it can cause a memory explosion. As an example, Linux's various virtual file systems (e.g. `/proc`, `/sys`) can contain directories that spontaneously pop in and out of existence. Attempting to iterate over them using `rustix::fs::Dir` directly or indirectly (e.g. with the `procfs` crate) can trigger this fault condition if the implementation decides to continue on errors. An attacker knowledgeable about the implementation details of a vulnerable target can therefore try to trigger this fault condition via any one or a combination of several available APIs. If successful, the application host will quickly run out of memory, after which the application will likely be terminated by an OOM killer, leading to denial of service. This issue has been addressed in release versions 0.35.15, 0.36.16, 0.37.25, and 0.38.19. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this issue.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
`rustix::fs::Dir` iterator with the `linux_raw` backend can cause memory explosion
### Summary
When using `rustix::fs::Dir` using the `linux_raw` backend, it's possible for the iterator to "get stuck" when an IO error is encountered. Combined with a memory over-a...
When using `rustix::fs::Dir` using the `linux_raw` backend, it's possible for the iterator to "get stuck" when an IO error is encountered. Combined with a memory over-a...
🚨 CVE-2024-28077
A denial-of-service issue was discovered on certain GL-iNet devices. Some websites can detect devices exposed to the external network through DDNS, and consequently obtain the IP addresses and ports of devices that are exposed. By using special usernames and special characters (such as half parentheses or square brackets), one can call the login interface and cause the session-management program to crash, resulting in customers being unable to log into their devices. This affects MT6000 4.5.6, XE3000 4.4.5, X3000 4.4.6, MT3000 4.5.0, MT2500 4.5.0, AXT1800 4.5.0, AX1800 4.5.0, A1300 4.5.0, S200 4.1.4-0300, X750 4.3.7, SFT1200 4.3.7, MT1300 4.3.10, AR750 4.3.10, AR750S 4.3.10, AR300M 4.3.10, AR300M16 4.3.10, B1300 4.3.10, MT300N-V2 4.3.10, and XE300 4.3.16.
🎖@cveNotify
A denial-of-service issue was discovered on certain GL-iNet devices. Some websites can detect devices exposed to the external network through DDNS, and consequently obtain the IP addresses and ports of devices that are exposed. By using special usernames and special characters (such as half parentheses or square brackets), one can call the login interface and cause the session-management program to crash, resulting in customers being unable to log into their devices. This affects MT6000 4.5.6, XE3000 4.4.5, X3000 4.4.6, MT3000 4.5.0, MT2500 4.5.0, AXT1800 4.5.0, AX1800 4.5.0, A1300 4.5.0, S200 4.1.4-0300, X750 4.3.7, SFT1200 4.3.7, MT1300 4.3.10, AR750 4.3.10, AR750S 4.3.10, AR300M 4.3.10, AR300M16 4.3.10, B1300 4.3.10, MT300N-V2 4.3.10, and XE300 4.3.16.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CVE-issues/4.0.0/Denial of service.md at main · gl-inet/CVE-issues
Contribute to gl-inet/CVE-issues development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2024-42906
TestLink before v.1.9.20 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the pop-up on upload file. When uploading a file, the XSS payload can be entered into the file name.
🎖@cveNotify
TestLink before v.1.9.20 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the pop-up on upload file. When uploading a file, the XSS payload can be entered into the file name.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CVEs/CVE-2024-42906.md at main · Alkatraz97/CVEs
My CVEs collection. Contribute to Alkatraz97/CVEs development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2024-44793
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component /managers/multiple_freeleech.php of Gazelle commit 63b3370 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the torrents parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component /managers/multiple_freeleech.php of Gazelle commit 63b3370 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the torrents parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2024-44794
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component /master/auth/OnedriveRedirect.php of PicUploader commit fcf82ea allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the error_description parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component /master/auth/OnedriveRedirect.php of PicUploader commit fcf82ea allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the error_description parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2024-44795
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component /login/disabled.php of Gazelle commit 63b3370 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the username parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component /login/disabled.php of Gazelle commit 63b3370 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the username parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2024-44796
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component /auth/AzureRedirect.php of PicUploader commit fcf82ea allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the error_description parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component /auth/AzureRedirect.php of PicUploader commit fcf82ea allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the error_description parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2024-44797
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component /managers/enable_requests.php of Gazelle commit 63b3370 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the view parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the component /managers/enable_requests.php of Gazelle commit 63b3370 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload injected into the view parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2024-8105
A vulnerability related to the use an insecure Platform Key (PK) has been discovered. An attacker with the compromised PK private key can create malicious UEFI software that is signed with a trusted key that has been compromised.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability related to the use an insecure Platform Key (PK) has been discovered. An attacker with the compromised PK private key can create malicious UEFI software that is signed with a trusted key that has been compromised.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Vulnerability-REsearch/PKfail/BRLY-2024-005.md at main · binarly-io/Vulnerability-REsearch
Binarly Vulnerability Research Advisories. Contribute to binarly-io/Vulnerability-REsearch development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2024-39628
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saturday Drive Ninja Forms.This issue affects Ninja Forms: from n/a through 3.8.6.
🎖@cveNotify
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saturday Drive Ninja Forms.This issue affects Ninja Forms: from n/a through 3.8.6.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
WordPress Ninja Forms plugin <= 3.8.6 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack
Patchstack is the leading open source vulnerability research organization. Find information and protection for all WordPress, Drupal and Joomla security issues.
🚨 CVE-2024-39641
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress LearnPress.This issue affects LearnPress: from n/a through 4.2.6.8.2.
🎖@cveNotify
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThimPress LearnPress.This issue affects LearnPress: from n/a through 4.2.6.8.2.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
WordPress LearnPress plugin <= 4.2.6.8.2 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack
Hand curated, verified and enriched vulnerability information by Patchstack security experts. Find all WordPress plugin, theme and core security issues.
🚨 CVE-2024-39645
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themeum Tutor LMS.This issue affects Tutor LMS: from n/a through 2.7.2.
🎖@cveNotify
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Themeum Tutor LMS.This issue affects Tutor LMS: from n/a through 2.7.2.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
WordPress Tutor LMS plugin <= 2.7.2 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack
Hand curated, verified and enriched vulnerability information by Patchstack security experts. Find all WordPress plugin, theme and core security issues.
🚨 CVE-2024-39657
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sender Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce.This issue affects Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.6.18.
🎖@cveNotify
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sender Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce.This issue affects Sender – Newsletter, SMS and Email Marketing Automation for WooCommerce: from n/a through 2.6.18.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
WordPress Sender plugin <= 2.6.18 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack
Hand curated, verified and enriched vulnerability information by Patchstack security experts. Find all WordPress plugin, theme and core security issues.
🚨 CVE-2024-43116
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 10up Simple Local Avatars.This issue affects Simple Local Avatars: from n/a through 2.7.10.
🎖@cveNotify
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in 10up Simple Local Avatars.This issue affects Simple Local Avatars: from n/a through 2.7.10.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
WordPress Simple Local Avatars plugin <= 2.7.10 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack
Hand curated, verified and enriched vulnerability information by Patchstack security experts. Find all WordPress plugin, theme and core security issues.
🚨 CVE-2024-43117
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPMU DEV Hummingbird.This issue affects Hummingbird: from n/a through 3.9.1.
🎖@cveNotify
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPMU DEV Hummingbird.This issue affects Hummingbird: from n/a through 3.9.1.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
WordPress Hummingbird plugin <= 3.9.1 - Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability - Patchstack
Hand curated, verified and enriched vulnerability information by Patchstack security experts. Find all WordPress plugin, theme and core security issues.
🚨 CVE-2024-43214
Missing Authorization vulnerability in myCred.This issue affects myCred: from n/a through 2.7.2.
🎖@cveNotify
Missing Authorization vulnerability in myCred.This issue affects myCred: from n/a through 2.7.2.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
WordPress myCred plugin <= 2.7.2 - Sensitive Data Exposure vulnerability - Patchstack
Hand curated, verified and enriched vulnerability information by Patchstack security experts. Find all WordPress plugin, theme and core security issues.
🚨 CVE-2024-43230
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Shared Files – File Upload Form Shared Files.This issue affects Shared Files: from n/a through 1.7.28.
🎖@cveNotify
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Shared Files – File Upload Form Shared Files.This issue affects Shared Files: from n/a through 1.7.28.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
WordPress Shared Files – Premium Download Manager & Secure File Sharing with Frontend File Upload plugin <= 1.7.28 - Sensitive…
Hand curated, verified and enriched vulnerability information by Patchstack security experts. Find all WordPress plugin, theme and core security issues.
🚨 CVE-2024-43251
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Bit Apps Bit Form Pro.This issue affects Bit Form Pro: from n/a through 2.6.4.
🎖@cveNotify
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Bit Apps Bit Form Pro.This issue affects Bit Form Pro: from n/a through 2.6.4.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
WordPress Bit Form Pro plugin <= 2.6.4 - Authenticated Sensitive Data Exposure vulnerability - Patchstack
Hand curated, verified and enriched vulnerability information by Patchstack security experts. Find all WordPress plugin, theme and core security issues.
🚨 CVE-2024-6518
The Contact Form Plugin by Fluent Forms for Quiz, Survey, and Drag & Drop WP Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.19 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
🎖@cveNotify
The Contact Form Plugin by Fluent Forms for Quiz, Survey, and Drag & Drop WP Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.19 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2024-6520
The Contact Form Plugin by Fluent Forms for Quiz, Survey, and Drag & Drop WP Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.19 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
🎖@cveNotify
The Contact Form Plugin by Fluent Forms for Quiz, Survey, and Drag & Drop WP Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.19 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2024-6521
The Contact Form Plugin by Fluent Forms for Quiz, Survey, and Drag & Drop WP Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.19 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
🎖@cveNotify
The Contact Form Plugin by Fluent Forms for Quiz, Survey, and Drag & Drop WP Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.19 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
🎖@cveNotify