🚨 CVE-2021-4391
The Ultimate Gift Cards for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the mwb_wgm_save_post() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify product gift card details via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
The Ultimate Gift Cards for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the mwb_wgm_save_post() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify product gift card details via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
Wordfence
Ultimate Gift Cards for WooCommerce <= 2.1.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass — Wordfence Intelligence
🚨 CVE-2021-4390
The Contact Form 7 Style plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the manage_wp_posts_be_qe_save_post() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to quick edit templates via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
The Contact Form 7 Style plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 3.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the manage_wp_posts_be_qe_save_post() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to quick edit templates via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
NinTechNet's updates and security announcements.
Multiple WordPress plugins fixed CSRF vulnerabilities (part 4).
Multiple WordPress plugins were found to be vulnerable to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks.
🚨 CVE-2023-26136
Versions of the package tough-cookie before 4.1.3 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution due to improper handling of Cookies when using CookieJar in rejectPublicSuffixes=false mode. This issue arises from the manner in which the objects are initialized.
🎖@cveNotify
Versions of the package tough-cookie before 4.1.3 are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution due to improper handling of Cookies when using CookieJar in rejectPublicSuffixes=false mode. This issue arises from the manner in which the objects are initialized.
🎖@cveNotify
Learn more about npm with Snyk Open Source Vulnerability Database
Prototype Pollution in tough-cookie | CVE-2023-26136 | Snyk
Medium severity (6.5) Prototype Pollution in tough-cookie | CVE-2023-26136
🚨 CVE-2021-4392
The eCommerce Product Catalog Plugin for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.9.43. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the implecode_save_products_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save product meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
The eCommerce Product Catalog Plugin for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.9.43. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the implecode_save_products_meta() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to save product meta data via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
Wordfence
eCommerce Product Catalog Plugin for WordPress <= 2.9.43 - Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass — Wordfence Intelligence
🚨 CVE-2021-4399
The Edwiser Bridge plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including,2.0.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the user_data_synchronization_initiater(), course_synchronization_initiater(), users_link_to_moodle_synchronization(), connection_test_initiater(), admin_menus(), and subscribe_handler() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform unauthorized actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
The Edwiser Bridge plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including,2.0.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the user_data_synchronization_initiater(), course_synchronization_initiater(), users_link_to_moodle_synchronization(), connection_test_initiater(), admin_menus(), and subscribe_handler() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform unauthorized actions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2021-4402
The Multiple Roles plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.3.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the mu_add_roles_in_signup_meta() and mu_add_roles_in_signup_meta_recently() functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add additional roles to users via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
The Multiple Roles plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.3.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the mu_add_roles_in_signup_meta() and mu_add_roles_in_signup_meta_recently() functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add additional roles to users via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
Wordfence
Multiple Roles <= 1.3.1- Cross-Site Request Forgery Bypass — Wordfence Intelligence
🚨 CVE-2021-4401
The Style Kits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.8.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the update_posts_stylekit() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update style kits for posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
The Style Kits plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.8.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the update_posts_stylekit() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update style kits for posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2021-4400
The Better Search plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bsearch_process_settings_import() and bsearch_process_settings_export() functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to import and export settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
The Better Search plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.5.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the bsearch_process_settings_import() and bsearch_process_settings_export() functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to import and export settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2023-3553
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in GitHub repository nilsteampassnet/teampass prior to 3.0.10.
🎖@cveNotify
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in GitHub repository nilsteampassnet/teampass prior to 3.0.10.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2023-3552
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output in GitHub repository nilsteampassnet/teampass prior to 3.0.10.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output in GitHub repository nilsteampassnet/teampass prior to 3.0.10.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
3.0.10 · nilsteampassnet/TeamPass@8acb4da
Fix possible xss in folder page
🚨 CVE-2023-3551
Code Injection in GitHub repository nilsteampassnet/teampass prior to 3.0.10.
🎖@cveNotify
Code Injection in GitHub repository nilsteampassnet/teampass prior to 3.0.10.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2023-37288
SmartBPM.NET has a vulnerability of using hard-coded authentication key. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to access system with regular user privilege to read application data, and execute submission and approval processes.
🎖@cveNotify
SmartBPM.NET has a vulnerability of using hard-coded authentication key. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to access system with regular user privilege to read application data, and execute submission and approval processes.
🎖@cveNotify
TWCERT/CC台灣電腦網路危機處理暨協調中心|企業資安通報協處|資安情資分享|漏洞通報|資安聯盟|資安電子報
慧智科技 SmartBPM.NET - Path Traversal-TWCERT/CC台灣電腦網路危機處理暨協調中心|企業資安通報協處|資安情資分享|漏洞通報|資安聯盟|資安電子報-資安服務-台灣漏洞揭露平台 (TVN)-TVN (Taiwan Vulnerability…
🚨 CVE-2023-37287
SmartBPM.NET has a vulnerability of using hard-coded authentication key. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to access system with regular user privilege to read application data, and execute submission and approval processes.
🎖@cveNotify
SmartBPM.NET has a vulnerability of using hard-coded authentication key. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to access system with regular user privilege to read application data, and execute submission and approval processes.
🎖@cveNotify
TWCERT/CC台灣電腦網路危機處理暨協調中心|企業資安通報協處|資安情資分享|漏洞通報|資安聯盟|資安電子報
慧智科技 SmartBPM.NET - Use of Hard-Coded Credentials - 2-TWCERT/CC台灣電腦網路危機處理暨協調中心|企業資安通報協處|資安情資分享|漏洞通報|資安聯盟|資安電子報-資安服務-台灣漏洞揭露平台 (TVN)…
🚨 CVE-2023-37286
SmartSoft SmartBPM.NET has a vulnerability of using hard-coded machine key. An unauthenticated remote attacker can use the machine key to send serialized payload to the server to execute arbitrary code and disrupt service.
🎖@cveNotify
SmartSoft SmartBPM.NET has a vulnerability of using hard-coded machine key. An unauthenticated remote attacker can use the machine key to send serialized payload to the server to execute arbitrary code and disrupt service.
🎖@cveNotify
TWCERT/CC台灣電腦網路危機處理暨協調中心|企業資安通報協處|資安情資分享|漏洞通報|資安聯盟|資安電子報
慧智科技 SmartBPM.NET - Use of Hard-Coded Credentials - 1-TWCERT/CC台灣電腦網路危機處理暨協調中心|企業資安通報協處|資安情資分享|漏洞通報|資安聯盟|資安電子報-資安服務-台灣漏洞揭露平台 (TVN)…
🚨 CVE-2023-20760
In apu, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07629578; Issue ID: ALPS07629578.
🎖@cveNotify
In apu, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07629578; Issue ID: ALPS07629578.
🎖@cveNotify
MediaTek
July 2023
🚨 CVE-2023-20759
In cmdq, there is a possible memory corruption due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07636133; Issue ID: ALPS07634601.
🎖@cveNotify
In cmdq, there is a possible memory corruption due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07636133; Issue ID: ALPS07634601.
🎖@cveNotify
MediaTek
July 2023
🚨 CVE-2023-20768
In ion, there is a possible out of bounds read due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07560720; Issue ID: ALPS07559800.
🎖@cveNotify
In ion, there is a possible out of bounds read due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07560720; Issue ID: ALPS07559800.
🎖@cveNotify
MediaTek
July 2023
🚨 CVE-2023-20758
In cmdq, there is a possible memory corruption due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07636133; Issue ID: ALPS07636130.
🎖@cveNotify
In cmdq, there is a possible memory corruption due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local denial of service with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07636133; Issue ID: ALPS07636130.
🎖@cveNotify
MediaTek
July 2023
🚨 CVE-2023-20757
In cmdq, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07636133; Issue ID: ALPS07636133.
🎖@cveNotify
In cmdq, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07636133; Issue ID: ALPS07636133.
🎖@cveNotify
MediaTek
July 2023
🚨 CVE-2023-20767
In pqframework, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07629585; Issue ID: ALPS07629584.
🎖@cveNotify
In pqframework, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07629585; Issue ID: ALPS07629584.
🎖@cveNotify
MediaTek
July 2023
🚨 CVE-2023-20761
In ril, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07628604; Issue ID: ALPS07628582.
🎖@cveNotify
In ril, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07628604; Issue ID: ALPS07628582.
🎖@cveNotify
MediaTek
July 2023