🚨 CVE-2026-102781
Joomla Extension - ordasoft.com - Unauthenticated Destructive CRUD in OrdaSoft Touch Slider < 5.4.6 - modOsTouchSliderHelper::getAjax(), wired through Joomla’s core com_ajax dispatcher, is the single handler behind every data-management operation this module exposes. No call to JFactory::getUser(), authorise(), or a CSRF token check exists anywhere in the handler. Two confirmed impact paths: an unauthenticated GET deletes any slider image by guessable sequential IDs, and an unauthenticated multipart upload with a zip file renames and replaces the entire #__os_touch_slider/#__os_touch_slider_text tables site-wide with attacker-supplied content, with no task parameter even required for the second path.
🎖@cveNotify
Joomla Extension - ordasoft.com - Unauthenticated Destructive CRUD in OrdaSoft Touch Slider < 5.4.6 - modOsTouchSliderHelper::getAjax(), wired through Joomla’s core com_ajax dispatcher, is the single handler behind every data-management operation this module exposes. No call to JFactory::getUser(), authorise(), or a CSRF token check exists anywhere in the handler. Two confirmed impact paths: an unauthenticated GET deletes any slider image by guessable sequential IDs, and an unauthenticated multipart upload with a zip file renames and replaces the entire #__os_touch_slider/#__os_touch_slider_text tables site-wide with attacker-supplied content, with no task parameter even required for the second path.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-102782
Joomla Extension - ordasoft.com - Unauthenticated SQL injection in OrdaSoft Simple Membership < 7.4.0 - site/simplemembership.php dispatches task=checkLoginPass with no authentication or access control check of any kind. The handler reads a login request parameter through Joomla’s generic, non-sanitizing input filter, which strips HTML/script tags but never touches quotes or SQL syntax, and concatenates it directly into a query string with no escaping or parameterization:
🎖@cveNotify
Joomla Extension - ordasoft.com - Unauthenticated SQL injection in OrdaSoft Simple Membership < 7.4.0 - site/simplemembership.php dispatches task=checkLoginPass with no authentication or access control check of any kind. The handler reads a login request parameter through Joomla’s generic, non-sanitizing input filter, which strips HTML/script tags but never touches quotes or SQL syntax, and concatenates it directly into a query string with no escaping or parameterization:
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-103416
Out-of-bounds write via the TLS 1.3 handshake message cache in NetX Duo in Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo 6.5.1.202602 allows a handshake message larger than the cache writes past it and on into the rest of the session control block, which holds pointers. A malicious or compromised server can make a TLS 1.3 client produce such a message before certificate authentication completes, so no server certificate is needed to reach it.
🎖@cveNotify
Out-of-bounds write via the TLS 1.3 handshake message cache in NetX Duo in Eclipse ThreadX NetX Duo 6.5.1.202602 allows a handshake message larger than the cache writes past it and on into the rest of the session control block, which holds pointers. A malicious or compromised server can make a TLS 1.3 client produce such a message before certificate authentication completes, so no server certificate is needed to reach it.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Out-of-bounds Write via the TLS 1.3 Handshake Message Cache in NetX Secure
### Summary
`_nx_secure_tls_send_handshake_record` caches every outgoing handshake message in a fixed 500 byte array that lives inside the TLS session control block, and the copy was never bounded...
`_nx_secure_tls_send_handshake_record` caches every outgoing handshake message in a fixed 500 byte array that lives inside the TLS session control block, and the copy was never bounded...
🚨 CVE-2026-107102
This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to improper validation of payment callback parameters and inadequate authentication controls in API endpoint. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the parameter to cause the application to establish an authenticated session for an arbitrary user without valid payment verification.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to other user accounts on the targeted system.
🎖@cveNotify
This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to improper validation of payment callback parameters and inadequate authentication controls in API endpoint. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the parameter to cause the application to establish an authenticated session for an arbitrary user without valid payment verification.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to other user accounts on the targeted system.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-107103
This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to insufficient validation and parameterization of user supplied input in an API endpoint. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted input to the vulnerable endpoint.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform SQL injection attacks on the targeted system.
🎖@cveNotify
This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to insufficient validation and parameterization of user supplied input in an API endpoint. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted input to the vulnerable endpoint.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform SQL injection attacks on the targeted system.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-107104
This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to unsafe deserialization of user controlled data in the affected functionality. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted data to the vulnerable functionality of the targeted system.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code, manipulate application data or perform other unintended actions on the targeted system.
🎖@cveNotify
This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to unsafe deserialization of user controlled data in the affected functionality. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted data to the vulnerable functionality of the targeted system.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code, manipulate application data or perform other unintended actions on the targeted system.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-15894
The Bluetooth Mesh On-Demand Private Proxy solicitation handler in subsys/bluetooth/mesh/solicitation.c copies a received Solicitation PDU into a fixed 17-byte stack buffer without bounding the source length. In sol_pdu_decrypt(), out is allocated as NET_BUF_SIMPLE(17) and then filled with net_buf_simple_add_mem(out, in->data, in->len); net_buf_simple_add() guards its tailroom only with __ASSERT_NO_MSG, which is compiled out in production builds, so when in->len > 17 the underlying memcpy writes attacker-controlled bytes past the 17-byte stack buffer. The copy occurs before any decryption or authentication, so no key material is required to trigger it.
The oversized length arises because the mesh scan callback in subsys/bluetooth/mesh/adv.c calls net_buf_simple_restore() before dispatching to bt_mesh_sol_recv(), leaving buf->len covering the entire remaining advertising payload rather than just the Solicitation Service Data. After the parser locates the Service Data AD and consumes the Identification Type byte, the remaining buf->len is the 17-octet Network PDU plus any trailing advertising bytes, and prior to this fix there was no maximum-length check (only a minimum). An attacker can therefore append extra AD structures or padding after the Solicitation Service Data to make buf->len exceed 17.
bt_mesh_scan_cb() is registered directly as the BLE scan callback, so buf is raw, unauthenticated advertising data received over the air. Any device in radio range can send a non-connectable advertisement carrying a crafted mesh Proxy Solicitation to a node that has CONFIG_BT_MESH_OD_PRIV_PROXY_SRV enabled and is currently eligible to be solicited (GATT proxy disabled, On-Demand Private Proxy enabled), with no pairing, bonding, or provisioning. The result is an attacker-controlled stack overwrite — plausibly leading to remote code execution and at minimum a reliable remote denial of service. The fix trims buf->len to the spec-fixed 17 octets (dropping the PDU if fewer remain) before decryption.
🎖@cveNotify
The Bluetooth Mesh On-Demand Private Proxy solicitation handler in subsys/bluetooth/mesh/solicitation.c copies a received Solicitation PDU into a fixed 17-byte stack buffer without bounding the source length. In sol_pdu_decrypt(), out is allocated as NET_BUF_SIMPLE(17) and then filled with net_buf_simple_add_mem(out, in->data, in->len); net_buf_simple_add() guards its tailroom only with __ASSERT_NO_MSG, which is compiled out in production builds, so when in->len > 17 the underlying memcpy writes attacker-controlled bytes past the 17-byte stack buffer. The copy occurs before any decryption or authentication, so no key material is required to trigger it.
The oversized length arises because the mesh scan callback in subsys/bluetooth/mesh/adv.c calls net_buf_simple_restore() before dispatching to bt_mesh_sol_recv(), leaving buf->len covering the entire remaining advertising payload rather than just the Solicitation Service Data. After the parser locates the Service Data AD and consumes the Identification Type byte, the remaining buf->len is the 17-octet Network PDU plus any trailing advertising bytes, and prior to this fix there was no maximum-length check (only a minimum). An attacker can therefore append extra AD structures or padding after the Solicitation Service Data to make buf->len exceed 17.
bt_mesh_scan_cb() is registered directly as the BLE scan callback, so buf is raw, unauthenticated advertising data received over the air. Any device in radio range can send a non-connectable advertisement carrying a crafted mesh Proxy Solicitation to a node that has CONFIG_BT_MESH_OD_PRIV_PROXY_SRV enabled and is currently eligible to be solicited (GATT proxy disabled, On-Demand Private Proxy enabled), with no pairing, bonding, or provisioning. The result is an attacker-controlled stack overwrite — plausibly leading to remote code execution and at minimum a reliable remote denial of service. The fix trims buf->len to the spec-fixed 17 octets (dropping the PDU if fewer remain) before decryption.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
bluetooth: mesh: clamp solicitation PDU length before decryption · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr@4416ad1
The encrypted Solicitation PDU is defined by Mesh Protocol 1.1.1
section 6.9.1 as a fixed 17-octet Network PDU (CTL=1, TTL=0, empty
TransportPDU, 8-octet NetMIC).
The mesh scan callback in adv.c r...
section 6.9.1 as a fixed 17-octet Network PDU (CTL=1, TTL=0, empty
TransportPDU, 8-octet NetMIC).
The mesh scan callback in adv.c r...
🚨 CVE-2026-19186
ieee802154_decipher_data_frame() in subsys/net/l2/ieee802154/ieee802154_frame.c computed payload_len = net_pkt_get_len(pkt) - ll_hdr_len - authtag_len without first checking that the received frame is at least ll_hdr_len + authtag_len bytes long. All three variables are uint8_t, so a frame whose payload is shorter than the configured authentication tag makes the subtraction wrap around to a large value (up to 255).
The wrapped length is passed unchanged to ieee802154_decrypt_auth() and on to the CCM operation as cipher_pkt.in_len/out_buf_max, with apkt->tag pointing at frame + ll_hdr_len + payload_len. Because the receive buffer is allocated to the exact length of the frame received from the radio driver, the crypto layer then reads several hundred bytes past the end of the packet buffer and writes the same number of decrypted bytes back over it in place. The frame's authentication tag is only verified after this processing has taken place, so no key material, association or prior authentication is needed — a single crafted short frame from any device in radio range is sufficient. Frame validation in ieee802154_validate_frame() does not prevent it: a data frame is accepted with a one-byte payload.
The result is an out-of-bounds read and an out-of-bounds write of up to roughly 240 bytes into the adjacent network-buffer pool, corrupting other packets or allocator metadata and typically faulting the target. The out-of-bounds content is not attacker-chosen (it is ciphertext XOR keystream over out-of-bounds memory) and the frame is dropped when tag verification fails, so the primary impact is memory corruption and denial of service rather than information disclosure.
Exposure is limited to configurations that enable the experimental CONFIG_NET_L2_IEEE802154_SECURITY option, select a crypto device via CONFIG_NET_L2_IEEE802154_SECURITY_CRYPTO_DEV_NAME, and have established a security session with a level other than IEEE802154_SECURITY_LEVEL_NONE; with security disabled or at level NONE the tag length is zero and no underflow occurs. The fix rejects frames shorter than ll_hdr_len + authtag_len before the subtraction, and adds the matching guard on the transmit side in ieee802154_create_data_frame().
🎖@cveNotify
ieee802154_decipher_data_frame() in subsys/net/l2/ieee802154/ieee802154_frame.c computed payload_len = net_pkt_get_len(pkt) - ll_hdr_len - authtag_len without first checking that the received frame is at least ll_hdr_len + authtag_len bytes long. All three variables are uint8_t, so a frame whose payload is shorter than the configured authentication tag makes the subtraction wrap around to a large value (up to 255).
The wrapped length is passed unchanged to ieee802154_decrypt_auth() and on to the CCM operation as cipher_pkt.in_len/out_buf_max, with apkt->tag pointing at frame + ll_hdr_len + payload_len. Because the receive buffer is allocated to the exact length of the frame received from the radio driver, the crypto layer then reads several hundred bytes past the end of the packet buffer and writes the same number of decrypted bytes back over it in place. The frame's authentication tag is only verified after this processing has taken place, so no key material, association or prior authentication is needed — a single crafted short frame from any device in radio range is sufficient. Frame validation in ieee802154_validate_frame() does not prevent it: a data frame is accepted with a one-byte payload.
The result is an out-of-bounds read and an out-of-bounds write of up to roughly 240 bytes into the adjacent network-buffer pool, corrupting other packets or allocator metadata and typically faulting the target. The out-of-bounds content is not attacker-chosen (it is ciphertext XOR keystream over out-of-bounds memory) and the frame is dropped when tag verification fails, so the primary impact is memory corruption and denial of service rather than information disclosure.
Exposure is limited to configurations that enable the experimental CONFIG_NET_L2_IEEE802154_SECURITY option, select a crypto device via CONFIG_NET_L2_IEEE802154_SECURITY_CRYPTO_DEV_NAME, and have established a security session with a level other than IEEE802154_SECURITY_LEVEL_NONE; with security disabled or at level NONE the tag length is zero and no underflow occurs. The fix rejects frames shorter than ll_hdr_len + authtag_len before the subtraction, and adds the matching guard on the transmit side in ieee802154_create_data_frame().
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
net: ieee802154: guard authtag_len subtraction in encrypt/decrypt paths · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr@6d721de
ieee802154_create_data_frame() and ieee802154_decrypt_data() computed
payload_len = total_len - ll_hdr_len - authtag_len without verifying
that total_len >= ll_hdr_len + authtag_len. A craft...
payload_len = total_len - ll_hdr_len - authtag_len without verifying
that total_len >= ll_hdr_len + authtag_len. A craft...
🚨 CVE-2026-58069
This vulnerability in Veeam Backup & Replication allows an authenticated Cloud Connect tenant to read arbitrary files on the service provider host.
🎖@cveNotify
This vulnerability in Veeam Backup & Replication allows an authenticated Cloud Connect tenant to read arbitrary files on the service provider host.
🎖@cveNotify
Veeam Software
KB4902: Vulnerabilities Resolved in Veeam Backup & Replication 13.1
🚨 CVE-2026-5703
Path traversal vulnerability in the Satel Iberia SenNet Datalogger Serie 200, specifically in the web portal provided by the device, which allows an authenticated user to read any file or list any directory accessible to the system user running the web server. This is possible by modifying the URL to include a path traversal payload. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to access critical system files containing confidential information.
🎖@cveNotify
Path traversal vulnerability in the Satel Iberia SenNet Datalogger Serie 200, specifically in the web portal provided by the device, which allows an authenticated user to read any file or list any directory accessible to the system user running the web server. This is possible by modifying the URL to include a path traversal payload. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow an attacker to access critical system files containing confidential information.
🎖@cveNotify
www.incibe.es
Path Traversal in Satel Iberia SenNet Datalogger Serie 200
INCIBE has coordinated the publication of a high severity vulnerability affecting SenNet Datalogger Se
🚨 CVE-2026-89417
The OMGF | GDPR/DSGVO Compliant, Faster Google Fonts. Easy. plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 's' Search Parameter via comments-atom Feed in all versions up to, and including, 6.3.10 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Successful exploitation requires that the front-end server serves the retained .tmp file without a Content-Type or X-Content-Type-Options header, enabling MIME-sniffing browsers such as Chromium to execute the injected script — a condition present by default on many Apache and nginx/php-fpm deployments.
🎖@cveNotify
The OMGF | GDPR/DSGVO Compliant, Faster Google Fonts. Easy. plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 's' Search Parameter via comments-atom Feed in all versions up to, and including, 6.3.10 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Successful exploitation requires that the front-end server serves the retained .tmp file without a Content-Type or X-Content-Type-Options header, enabling MIME-sniffing browsers such as Chromium to execute the injected script — a condition present by default on many Apache and nginx/php-fpm deployments.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-90466
Path traversal of 'trusted_jar_paths' in Impala 4.5.2 allows an attacker-controlled JAR to be loaded via a relative path where the prefix matches a path specified in 'trusted_jar_paths'.
The startup flag 'trusted_jar_paths' references URIs for loading files from local or remote filesystems. Path traversal can't override the schema, but can result in loading a JAR that has been uploaded to a different location in that filesystem via Impala DDLs such as CREATE DATA SOURCE and CREATE TABLE. Path traversal can only be used if a trusted path exists, so this attack requires 'trusted_jar_paths' have a non-empty value configured by the Impala admin.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.5.3, which fixes this issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Path traversal of 'trusted_jar_paths' in Impala 4.5.2 allows an attacker-controlled JAR to be loaded via a relative path where the prefix matches a path specified in 'trusted_jar_paths'.
The startup flag 'trusted_jar_paths' references URIs for loading files from local or remote filesystems. Path traversal can't override the schema, but can result in loading a JAR that has been uploaded to a different location in that filesystem via Impala DDLs such as CREATE DATA SOURCE and CREATE TABLE. Path traversal can only be used if a trusted path exists, so this attack requires 'trusted_jar_paths' have a non-empty value configured by the Impala admin.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.5.3, which fixes this issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-93026
This vulnerability in Veeam Backup & Replication allows a Backup Viewer to modify the Enterprise Manager master key and stored antivirus update credentials.
🎖@cveNotify
This vulnerability in Veeam Backup & Replication allows a Backup Viewer to modify the Enterprise Manager master key and stored antivirus update credentials.
🎖@cveNotify
Veeam Software
KB4934: Vulnerabilities Resolved in Veeam Backup & Replication 12.3.2 P4
🚨 CVE-2026-93684
An SQL user using Impala up to and including version 4.5.2 with only SELECT permission can put JavaScript in a table alias and make it run in another user's browser when that user opens the query plan in Impala's Web UI. This is stored XSS (CWE-79). Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.5.3.
🎖@cveNotify
An SQL user using Impala up to and including version 4.5.2 with only SELECT permission can put JavaScript in a table alias and make it run in another user's browser when that user opens the query plan in Impala's Web UI. This is stored XSS (CWE-79). Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.5.3.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-97720
Incorrect implementation of JWT/OAuth authentication in Impala executors in Apache Impala versions up to and including 4.5.2 which allows attacked to access resources served by the executor's webserver when that webserver is configured to accept JWT/OAuth tokens. Bearer token (JWT) signatures are not validated resulting in the webserver accepting any valid JWT.
Users are recommended to either disable JWT/OAuth auth for Impala executors or upgrade to version 4.5.3, which fixes this issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Incorrect implementation of JWT/OAuth authentication in Impala executors in Apache Impala versions up to and including 4.5.2 which allows attacked to access resources served by the executor's webserver when that webserver is configured to accept JWT/OAuth tokens. Bearer token (JWT) signatures are not validated resulting in the webserver accepting any valid JWT.
Users are recommended to either disable JWT/OAuth auth for Impala executors or upgrade to version 4.5.3, which fixes this issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-30633
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in AA-Team Amazon Native Shopping Recommendations allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Amazon Native Shopping Recommendations: from n/a through 1.3.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in AA-Team Amazon Native Shopping Recommendations allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Amazon Native Shopping Recommendations: from n/a through 1.3.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
SQL Injection in WordPress Amazon Native Shopping Recommendations Plugin
Patchstack is the leading open source vulnerability research organization. Find information and protection for all WordPress and Drupal security issues.
🚨 CVE-2025-31044
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in AA-Team Premium SEO Pack allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Premium SEO Pack: from n/a through 3.3.2.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in AA-Team Premium SEO Pack allows SQL Injection.This issue affects Premium SEO Pack: from n/a through 3.3.2.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-31046
Missing Authorization vulnerability in WPvibes AnyWhere Elementor Pro allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects AnyWhere Elementor Pro: from n/a through 2.29.
🎖@cveNotify
Missing Authorization vulnerability in WPvibes AnyWhere Elementor Pro allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects AnyWhere Elementor Pro: from n/a through 2.29.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
Broken Access Control in WordPress AnyWhere Elementor Pro Theme
Patchstack is the leading open source vulnerability research organization. Find information and protection for all WordPress and Drupal security issues.
🚨 CVE-2025-31047
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Themify Themify Edmin allows Object Injection.This issue affects Themify Edmin: from n/a through 2.0.0.
🎖@cveNotify
Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Themify Themify Edmin allows Object Injection.This issue affects Themify Edmin: from n/a through 2.0.0.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
PHP Object Injection in WordPress Themify Edmin Theme
Patchstack is the leading open source vulnerability research organization. Find information and protection for all WordPress and Drupal security issues.
🚨 CVE-2025-31048
Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in Themify Shopo allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects Shopo: from n/a through 1.1.4.
🎖@cveNotify
Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in Themify Shopo allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects Shopo: from n/a through 1.1.4.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
Arbitrary File Upload in WordPress Shopo Theme
Patchstack is the leading open source vulnerability research organization. Find information and protection for all WordPress and Drupal security issues.
🚨 CVE-2025-68014
Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in awethemes AweBooking awebooking allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects AweBooking: from n/a through <= 3.2.26.
🎖@cveNotify
Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in awethemes AweBooking awebooking allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects AweBooking: from n/a through <= 3.2.26.
🎖@cveNotify
Patchstack
Sensitive Data Exposure in WordPress AweBooking Plugin
Patchstack is the leading open source vulnerability research organization. Find information and protection for all WordPress and Drupal security issues.