🚨 CVE-2026-100584
OpenClaw is an npm-distributed agent runtime. In versions >= 2026.2.26 and < 2026.7.1, PowerShell command analysis on Windows hosts running in exec allowlist mode could approve an exact executable resolved from PATH but subsequently execute a same-named executable located in the workspace directory. If lower-trust content can place an executable with an approved basename into an agent-writable workspace and steer an approved PowerShell command that uses a bare executable name, OpenClaw may run the workspace file instead of the allowlisted path, executing arbitrary code with the privileges of the Gateway or node-host user. The issue does not require replacement of the approved executable itself. Version 2026.7.1 contains a fix; as a workaround, avoid bare executable names in approved PowerShell commands and keep executable files out of agent-writable workspaces.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw is an npm-distributed agent runtime. In versions >= 2026.2.26 and < 2026.7.1, PowerShell command analysis on Windows hosts running in exec allowlist mode could approve an exact executable resolved from PATH but subsequently execute a same-named executable located in the workspace directory. If lower-trust content can place an executable with an approved basename into an agent-writable workspace and steer an approved PowerShell command that uses a bare executable name, OpenClaw may run the workspace file instead of the allowlisted path, executing arbitrary code with the privileges of the Gateway or node-host user. The issue does not require replacement of the approved executable itself. Version 2026.7.1 contains a fix; as a workaround, avoid bare executable names in approved PowerShell commands and keep executable files out of agent-writable workspaces.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Windows allowlist execution could use workspace shadows
### Summary
Windows allowlist execution could use workspace shadows. In affected versions, PowerShell command analysis could approve an exact executable from `PATH` but later run a same-named exec...
Windows allowlist execution could use workspace shadows. In affected versions, PowerShell command analysis could approve an exact executable from `PATH` but later run a same-named exec...
🚨 CVE-2026-100585
OpenClaw (npm package `openclaw`) before 2026.7.1 fails to enforce the owner-only authorization requirement for Claude Code permission prompts delivered through the MCP channel bridge. An authorized non-owner channel sender with channel command access can approve or deny a pending permission request intended for the owner, causing the requested action to proceed without owner consent. The practical impact depends on the pending action and the host capabilities requested by the Claude Code run. The issue is fixed in version 2026.7.1.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw (npm package `openclaw`) before 2026.7.1 fails to enforce the owner-only authorization requirement for Claude Code permission prompts delivered through the MCP channel bridge. An authorized non-owner channel sender with channel command access can approve or deny a pending permission request intended for the owner, causing the requested action to proceed without owner consent. The practical impact depends on the pending action and the host capabilities requested by the Claude Code run. The issue is fixed in version 2026.7.1.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Claude permission replies could omit owner authorization
### Summary
Claude permission replies could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner channel sender could approve or deny a pending Claude Code permission request th...
Claude permission replies could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner channel sender could approve or deny a pending Claude Code permission request th...
🚨 CVE-2026-100586
OpenClaw Codex before 2026.7.1 fails to properly enforce owner authorization when creating native conversation bindings. Non-owner channel senders with command access can create bindings to the native Codex runtime and execute host-capable turns with access to files, tools, and processes.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw Codex before 2026.7.1 fails to properly enforce owner authorization when creating native conversation bindings. Non-owner channel senders with command access can create bindings to the native Codex runtime and execute host-capable turns with access to files, tools, and processes.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Codex bind could omit owner authorization
### Summary
Codex bind could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner channel sender could create a native Codex conversation binding and start host-capable Codex tu...
Codex bind could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner channel sender could create a native Codex conversation binding and start host-capable Codex tu...
🚨 CVE-2026-100587
OpenClaw versions before 2026.7.1 fail to properly validate owner authorization in the Codex computer-use installation command. Non-owner channel senders can install arbitrary plugins and execute MCP processes with OpenClaw user privileges, affecting host confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw versions before 2026.7.1 fail to properly validate owner authorization in the Codex computer-use installation command. Non-owner channel senders can install arbitrary plugins and execute MCP processes with OpenClaw user privileges, affecting host confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Codex computer-use install could omit owner authorization
### Summary
Codex computer-use install could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner channel sender could install a Codex plugin and cause its configured MCP proces...
Codex computer-use install could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner channel sender could install a Codex plugin and cause its configured MCP proces...
🚨 CVE-2026-100589
OpenClaw versions before 2026.7.1 contain a sandbox bypass vulnerability in the browser tool that allows sandboxed sessions to access paired node browser actions despite allowHostControl=false configuration. Attackers with control over sandboxed agent input can select a paired node and perform host browser operations, inspecting or manipulating the connected browser profile and its authenticated state.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw versions before 2026.7.1 contain a sandbox bypass vulnerability in the browser tool that allows sandboxed sessions to access paired node browser actions despite allowHostControl=false configuration. Attackers with control over sandboxed agent input can select a paired node and perform host browser operations, inspecting or manipulating the connected browser profile and its authenticated state.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Browser node targets could bypass sandbox host control
### Summary
Browser node targets could bypass sandbox host control. In affected versions, a sandboxed browser tool could select a paired node and reach host browser actions despite `allowHostContr...
Browser node targets could bypass sandbox host control. In affected versions, a sandboxed browser tool could select a paired node and reach host browser actions despite `allowHostContr...
🚨 CVE-2026-100590
OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the /voice set command that allows non-owner external-channel senders to persist Gateway voice configuration. Attackers with command access can change the voice used by Talk responses for the configured provider, affecting configuration integrity without exposing credentials or granting additional host capabilities.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the /voice set command that allows non-owner external-channel senders to persist Gateway voice configuration. Attackers with command access can change the voice used by Talk responses for the configured provider, affecting configuration integrity without exposing credentials or granting additional host capabilities.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Talk Voice changes could omit admin authorization
### Summary
Talk Voice changes could omit admin authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner external-channel sender could use `/voice set` to persist the Gateway's configured ...
Talk Voice changes could omit admin authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner external-channel sender could use `/voice set` to persist the Gateway's configured ...
🚨 CVE-2026-100591
OpenClaw is an npm-distributed agent gateway. In versions before 2026.7.1, the global Active Memory toggle mutations could omit owner checks. An authorized non-owner external-channel sender could therefore persistently enable or disable Active Memory for the Gateway, disabling memory recall for future sessions or re-enabling global recall where the owner expected it to remain disabled. The issue is limited to persistent global on/off mutations; session-level controls and read-only status remain governed by existing command policy. The issue is fixed in version 2026.7.1. (Suggested title: "OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 missing owner authorization check on Active Memory global toggles".)
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw is an npm-distributed agent gateway. In versions before 2026.7.1, the global Active Memory toggle mutations could omit owner checks. An authorized non-owner external-channel sender could therefore persistently enable or disable Active Memory for the Gateway, disabling memory recall for future sessions or re-enabling global recall where the owner expected it to remain disabled. The issue is limited to persistent global on/off mutations; session-level controls and read-only status remain governed by existing command policy. The issue is fixed in version 2026.7.1. (Suggested title: "OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 missing owner authorization check on Active Memory global toggles".)
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Active Memory global toggles could omit owner checks
### Summary
Active Memory global toggles could omit owner checks. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner external-channel sender could enable or disable Active Memory for the Gateway.
This...
Active Memory global toggles could omit owner checks. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner external-channel sender could enable or disable Active Memory for the Gateway.
This...
🚨 CVE-2026-100592
OpenClaw is an agent gateway distributed via npm. In versions >= 2026.4.10 and < 2026.7.1, persistent memory dreaming mutations omit owner permission checks. An authorized but non-owner external-channel sender can issue the persistent '/dreaming on' and '/dreaming off' commands to enable or disable the Gateway's Memory Core dreaming behavior, disabling background memory processing or re-enabling durable memory promotion where the owner expected it to remain disabled; the practical confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact depends on stored conversation material and subsequent memory use. Read-only status and help commands remain governed by normal command policy. The issue is fixed in version 2026.7.1. As a workaround, disable dreaming commands in external channels or restrict channel command access to owners.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw is an agent gateway distributed via npm. In versions >= 2026.4.10 and < 2026.7.1, persistent memory dreaming mutations omit owner permission checks. An authorized but non-owner external-channel sender can issue the persistent '/dreaming on' and '/dreaming off' commands to enable or disable the Gateway's Memory Core dreaming behavior, disabling background memory processing or re-enabling durable memory promotion where the owner expected it to remain disabled; the practical confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact depends on stored conversation material and subsequent memory use. Read-only status and help commands remain governed by normal command policy. The issue is fixed in version 2026.7.1. As a workaround, disable dreaming commands in external channels or restrict channel command access to owners.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Memory dreaming changes could omit owner checks
### Summary
Memory dreaming changes could omit owner checks. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner external-channel sender could enable or disable the Gateway's persistent Memory Core ...
Memory dreaming changes could omit owner checks. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner external-channel sender could enable or disable the Gateway's persistent Memory Core ...
🚨 CVE-2026-100593
OpenClaw (npm package `openclaw`) before 2026.7.1 does not enforce the documented owner-only requirement for persistent `/activation` policy changes in group channels. An authorized non-owner channel sender can change whether the agent requires mention-based activation, causing the agent to respond more broadly in the group (exposing its responses to additional group traffic) or suppressing expected activation behavior until an owner restores the intended setting. The issue is fixed in version 2026.7.1.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw (npm package `openclaw`) before 2026.7.1 does not enforce the documented owner-only requirement for persistent `/activation` policy changes in group channels. An authorized non-owner channel sender can change whether the agent requires mention-based activation, causing the agent to respond more broadly in the group (exposing its responses to additional group traffic) or suppressing expected activation behavior until an owner restores the intended setting. The issue is fixed in version 2026.7.1.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Group activation changes could omit owner authorization
### Summary
Group activation changes could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner channel sender could change whether a group required mention-based activation.
T...
Group activation changes could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner channel sender could change whether a group required mention-based activation.
T...
🚨 CVE-2026-100594
OpenClaw versions before 2026.7.1 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the /export-trajectory endpoint that allows non-owner senders to request and receive owner-only trajectory bundles. Attackers can access prompts, model messages, tool schemas, runtime events, and local path metadata from affected sessions by exploiting insufficient authorization checks.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw versions before 2026.7.1 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the /export-trajectory endpoint that allows non-owner senders to request and receive owner-only trajectory bundles. Attackers can access prompts, model messages, tool schemas, runtime events, and local path metadata from affected sessions by exploiting insufficient authorization checks.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Trajectory export could omit owner authorization
### Summary
Trajectory export could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner sender in a direct conversation could request, approve, and receive an owner-only trajec...
Trajectory export could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner sender in a direct conversation could request, approve, and receive an owner-only trajec...
🚨 CVE-2026-100595
OpenClaw versions before 2026.7.1 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the diagnostics export command that allows non-owner channel senders to access owner-only host diagnostic bundles. Attackers can request and receive diagnostic details about the host, configuration, runtime, and connected services intended only for owners.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw versions before 2026.7.1 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the diagnostics export command that allows non-owner channel senders to access owner-only host diagnostic bundles. Attackers can request and receive diagnostic details about the host, configuration, runtime, and connected services intended only for owners.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Diagnostics export could omit owner authorization
### Summary
Diagnostics export could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner channel sender could request and receive an owner-only host diagnostics bundle.
This a...
Diagnostics export could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner channel sender could request and receive an owner-only host diagnostics bundle.
This a...
🚨 CVE-2026-100596
OpenClaw versions before 2026.7.1 fail to properly authorize non-owner users executing MCP configuration changes through /mcp set and /mcp unset commands. Attackers can persist arbitrary stdio MCP commands that execute with OpenClaw process privileges when configuration loads, compromising host confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw versions before 2026.7.1 fail to properly authorize non-owner users executing MCP configuration changes through /mcp set and /mcp unset commands. Attackers can persist arbitrary stdio MCP commands that execute with OpenClaw process privileges when configuration loads, compromising host confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
MCP configuration changes could omit owner authorization
### Summary
MCP configuration changes could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner external-channel sender could use `/mcp set` or `/mcp unset` to persist Gateway ...
MCP configuration changes could omit owner authorization. In affected versions, an authorized non-owner external-channel sender could use `/mcp set` or `/mcp unset` to persist Gateway ...
🚨 CVE-2026-100597
OpenClaw (npm package 'openclaw') before 2026.7.1 is vulnerable to a time-of-check time-of-use race condition in OpenShell local mirror filesystem mutation operations. The remove, mkdir, and rename operations could act on a different filesystem target after OpenClaw completed its sandbox path-safety check, if the path is changed concurrently. An attacker able to win the race can cause a sandboxed operation to delete, create, or rename a host path outside the intended mirror root with the permissions of the OpenClaw process user. This does not require an operator to have granted host filesystem access outside the sandbox. The issue is fixed in 2026.7.1.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw (npm package 'openclaw') before 2026.7.1 is vulnerable to a time-of-check time-of-use race condition in OpenShell local mirror filesystem mutation operations. The remove, mkdir, and rename operations could act on a different filesystem target after OpenClaw completed its sandbox path-safety check, if the path is changed concurrently. An attacker able to win the race can cause a sandboxed operation to delete, create, or rename a host path outside the intended mirror root with the permissions of the OpenClaw process user. This does not require an operator to have granted host filesystem access outside the sandbox. The issue is fixed in 2026.7.1.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
OpenShell filesystem mutations could race path validation
### Summary
OpenShell filesystem mutations could race path validation. In affected versions, `remove`, `mkdir`, or `rename` could act on a different filesystem target after OpenClaw completed its ...
OpenShell filesystem mutations could race path validation. In affected versions, `remove`, `mkdir`, or `rename` could act on a different filesystem target after OpenClaw completed its ...
🚨 CVE-2026-100598
OpenClaw (npm package openclaw) before 2026.7.1 incorrectly binds Signal approval reactions. In affected versions, a reaction intended to resolve a structured approval request could instead attach to ordinary outbound text when unrelated outbound messages and a pending approval are present in the same conversation. As a result, an approver's reaction to unrelated text could be interpreted as approving or denying a pending host action; the practical impact depends on the pending request, conversation timing, and the actions available to the OpenClaw process. The issue does not change the authority of correctly identified approvers. This is fixed in version 2026.7.1.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw (npm package openclaw) before 2026.7.1 incorrectly binds Signal approval reactions. In affected versions, a reaction intended to resolve a structured approval request could instead attach to ordinary outbound text when unrelated outbound messages and a pending approval are present in the same conversation. As a result, an approver's reaction to unrelated text could be interpreted as approving or denying a pending host action; the practical impact depends on the pending request, conversation timing, and the actions available to the OpenClaw process. The issue does not change the authority of correctly identified approvers. This is fixed in version 2026.7.1.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Signal reactions could bind to the wrong approval
### Summary
Signal reactions could bind to the wrong approval. In affected versions, an approval reaction could attach to ordinary outbound text instead of the structured approval request it was i...
Signal reactions could bind to the wrong approval. In affected versions, an approval reaction could attach to ordinary outbound text instead of the structured approval request it was i...
🚨 CVE-2026-100599
OpenClaw versions 2026.5.1 through 2026.7.0 fail to apply the configured exec approval path to Google Meet node commands. The googlemeet.chrome command accepts caller-supplied audio command arrays and executes them on a paired node without going through the normal system.run approval flow. In deployments with the Google Meet plugin enabled, a paired Chrome node, and the googlemeet.chrome node command allowed, a tool-enabled agent able to invoke that command can execute attacker-selected processes on the paired node, impacting files, credentials, browser profiles, and availability on that node. The issue is fixed in 2026.7.1; as a workaround, remove googlemeet.chrome from allowed node commands or disable the Google Meet plugin.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenClaw versions 2026.5.1 through 2026.7.0 fail to apply the configured exec approval path to Google Meet node commands. The googlemeet.chrome command accepts caller-supplied audio command arrays and executes them on a paired node without going through the normal system.run approval flow. In deployments with the Google Meet plugin enabled, a paired Chrome node, and the googlemeet.chrome node command allowed, a tool-enabled agent able to invoke that command can execute attacker-selected processes on the paired node, impacting files, credentials, browser profiles, and availability on that node. The issue is fixed in 2026.7.1; as a workaround, remove googlemeet.chrome from allowed node commands or disable the Google Meet plugin.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Google Meet node commands could skip exec approvals
### Summary
Google Meet node commands could skip exec approvals. In affected versions, `googlemeet.chrome` accepted caller-supplied audio command arrays and executed them on a paired node outside ...
Google Meet node commands could skip exec approvals. In affected versions, `googlemeet.chrome` accepted caller-supplied audio command arrays and executed them on a paired node outside ...
🚨 CVE-2026-15273
The Automatic.css plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via REQUEST_URI in all version 4.0.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts that will execute whenever an administrator accesses the Activity Log settings page.
🎖@cveNotify
The Automatic.css plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via REQUEST_URI in all version 4.0.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts that will execute whenever an administrator accesses the Activity Log settings page.
🎖@cveNotify
Automatic.css
Changelog
🚨 CVE-2026-65660
Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-67279
RouterOS SSH enters the connection protocol after a client-requested rekey even though user authentication was never attempted, allowing an unauthenticated client to open a session channel and send an exec request. On affected builds the server dispatches the command, enabling unauthenticated creation, overwrite, and reconstruction of files in the RouterOS managed file namespace, including support files containing configuration and diagnostic data.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)
🎖@cveNotify
RouterOS SSH enters the connection protocol after a client-requested rekey even though user authentication was never attempted, allowing an unauthenticated client to open a session channel and send an exec request. On affected builds the server dispatches the command, enabling unauthenticated creation, overwrite, and reconstruction of files in the RouterOS managed file namespace, including support files containing configuration and diagnostic data.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)
🎖@cveNotify
cert.pl
Vulnerabilities in Mikrotik RouterOS software
CERT Polska has found 6 vulnerabilities (from CVE-2026-67276 to CVE-2026-67279, CVE-2026-67281 and CVE-2026-86060) in Mikrotik RouterOS software.
🚨 CVE-2026-69865
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Container Registry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Container Registry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-87902
An unauthenticated attacker can make `get_page_template()` page-template resolution include a chosen readable local `.php` file outside the active theme directories. If relevant pre-conditions for both the server and the active theme are met, this can lead to RCE.
🎖@cveNotify
An unauthenticated attacker can make `get_page_template()` page-template resolution include a chosen readable local `.php` file outside the active theme directories. If relevant pre-conditions for both the server and the active theme are met, this can lead to RCE.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Unauthenticated path traversal in page-template resolution leading to conditional RCE
An unauthenticated attacker can make `get_page_template()` page-template resolution include a chosen readable local `.php` file outside the active theme directories. If relevant pre-conditions for ...
🚨 CVE-2026-89325
An uncontrolled search path element in InsightVM assessment content in Rapid7 Insight Agent on Windows allows a local, low-privileged user to execute arbitrary code as SYSTEM via a planted executable resolved from the machine PATH.
Assessment content at or below version 0.0.261.0 included a check that invoked the `code` command without a fully qualified path from a process running as SYSTEM. The command was resolved against the machine PATH environment variable at execution time. Where the machine PATH contained a directory writable by non-administrative users and ordered ahead of the legitimate Visual Studio Code installation, a local user could place an executable named `code` in that directory and cause the agent to execute it with SYSTEM privileges.
The version range above refers to InsightVM assessment content versions, not Insight Agent versions. All Insight Agent versions were affected while running assessment content at or below 0.0.261.0. Assessment content is delivered to all Insight Agents via the Rapid7 Insight Platform independently of the Insight Agent version and is not customer-managed.
This issue was resolved in assessment content version 0.0.269.0, which was made generally available on September 15, 2026. Remediation was deployed automatically and no customer action is required.
🎖@cveNotify
An uncontrolled search path element in InsightVM assessment content in Rapid7 Insight Agent on Windows allows a local, low-privileged user to execute arbitrary code as SYSTEM via a planted executable resolved from the machine PATH.
Assessment content at or below version 0.0.261.0 included a check that invoked the `code` command without a fully qualified path from a process running as SYSTEM. The command was resolved against the machine PATH environment variable at execution time. Where the machine PATH contained a directory writable by non-administrative users and ordered ahead of the legitimate Visual Studio Code installation, a local user could place an executable named `code` in that directory and cause the agent to execute it with SYSTEM privileges.
The version range above refers to InsightVM assessment content versions, not Insight Agent versions. All Insight Agent versions were affected while running assessment content at or below 0.0.261.0. Assessment content is delivered to all Insight Agents via the Rapid7 Insight Platform independently of the Insight Agent version and is not customer-managed.
This issue was resolved in assessment content version 0.0.269.0, which was made generally available on September 15, 2026. Remediation was deployed automatically and no customer action is required.
🎖@cveNotify