🚨 CVE-2026-40538
An improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability in Auto block in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to read limited files via brute-force attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
An improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability in Auto block in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to read limited files via brute-force attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
🚨 CVE-2026-40539
An improper certificate validation vulnerability in Email API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read or write arbitrary files and conduct denial-of-service attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
An improper certificate validation vulnerability in Email API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read or write arbitrary files and conduct denial-of-service attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
🚨 CVE-2026-56595
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a CORS Misconfiguration vulnerability due to improperly validated origin headers, which could allow an attacker to craft a malicious web page that interacts with the vulnerable application, enabling unauthorized access to protected resources and restricted APIs on behalf of a victim.
🎖@cveNotify
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a CORS Misconfiguration vulnerability due to improperly validated origin headers, which could allow an attacker to craft a malicious web page that interacts with the vulnerable application, enabling unauthorized access to protected resources and restricted APIs on behalf of a victim.
🎖@cveNotify
Hcl-Software
Security Bulletin: Multiple security vulnerabilities affect HCL BigFix Service Management - Customer Support
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by multiple security vulnerabilities.
🚨 CVE-2026-83561
The Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent Banner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment Content via Elementor Cookie Blocker Regex in all versions up to, and including, 7.5.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Successful exploitation requires an administrator to approve the attacker's comment, and the site must have both the Elementor plugin installed and Complianz configured with the Twitter or Facebook cookie/script blocker enabled.
🎖@cveNotify
The Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent Banner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment Content via Elementor Cookie Blocker Regex in all versions up to, and including, 7.5.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Successful exploitation requires an administrator to approve the attacker's comment, and the site must have both the Elementor plugin installed and Complianz configured with the Twitter or Facebook cookie/script blocker enabled.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-15579
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in some of the Ethernet switches because of improper validation of the username field length during Web login processing. This may allow a remote attacker to submit a specially crafted overly long input, triggering a buffer overflow that can cause the authentication process to crash and result in a Denial of Service (DoS) attack.
🎖@cveNotify
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in some of the Ethernet switches because of improper validation of the username field length during Web login processing. This may allow a remote attacker to submit a specially crafted overly long input, triggering a buffer overflow that can cause the authentication process to crash and result in a Denial of Service (DoS) attack.
🎖@cveNotify
Moxa
CVE-2026-15579: Out-of-bounds Write Vulnerability in Ethernet Switch | Moxa
🚨 CVE-2026-92976
A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the profile management functionality of T-Systems’ TAO 2.0 suite. An authenticated user could inject malicious HTML or JavaScript content into the fields containing their personal data. The content entered is stored and displayed without being properly sanitised when another user, including administrative staff, views the affected profile. Successful exploitation could allow JavaScript code to be executed in the victim’s browser, access to information available within the session, or the performance of actions using the victim’s permissions.
🎖@cveNotify
A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the profile management functionality of T-Systems’ TAO 2.0 suite. An authenticated user could inject malicious HTML or JavaScript content into the fields containing their personal data. The content entered is stored and displayed without being properly sanitised when another user, including administrative staff, views the affected profile. Successful exploitation could allow JavaScript code to be executed in the victim’s browser, access to information available within the session, or the performance of actions using the victim’s permissions.
🎖@cveNotify
www.incibe.es
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in T-Systems’ TAO 2.0
INCIBE has coordinated the publication of a medium-severity vulnerability affecting T-Systems’ TAO 2.0
🚨 CVE-2026-81627
A flaw was found in QEMU. The VAPIC setup hypercall in hw/i386/vapic.c does not validate that the writable RAM alias remains within the option ROM window. A privileged guest user on a Q35/KVM machine can position this alias over locked SMRAM, bypassing chipset D_LCK protection and injecting code into System Management Mode memory.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in QEMU. The VAPIC setup hypercall in hw/i386/vapic.c does not validate that the writable RAM alias remains within the option ROM window. A privileged guest user on a Q35/KVM machine can position this alias over locked SMRAM, bypassing chipset D_LCK protection and injecting code into System Management Mode memory.
🎖@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-81627 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
🚨 CVE-2026-93561
Memcache binary codec signed/unsigned type mismatch causes frame desynchronization and response smuggling
🎖@cveNotify
Memcache binary codec signed/unsigned type mismatch causes frame desynchronization and response smuggling
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-93563
Unbounded multi-line response accumulation in SmtpResponseDecoder leads to memory-exhaustion DoS
🎖@cveNotify
Unbounded multi-line response accumulation in SmtpResponseDecoder leads to memory-exhaustion DoS
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-93572
## Summary
`RedisArrayAggregator` recently added `maxElements` and `maxNestedArrayDepth` limits to fix public Redis resource-exhaustion advisories. The limits are independent, but the allocator remains eager: every positive nested RESP array header creates `new ArrayList<RedisMessage>(length)` before any child element exists.
With the default constructor, an attacker can send nested array headers with length `1,000,000` until the default nesting limit of `1024` is reached. This can reserve up to `1,024,000,000` child slots from roughly 12 KB of RESP input. This is backing capacity, not logical list size: `ArrayList(int)` constructs an empty list with the specified initial capacity.
## Technical Details
Current `decodeRedisArrayHeader(...)` checks the two limits independently:
```java
if (header.length() > maxElements) {
throw new CodecException("this codec doesn't support longer length than " + maxElements);
}
if (depths.size() >= maxNestedArrayDepth) {
releaseAndClearDepths();
throw new CodecException("max nested array depth exceeded: " + maxNestedArrayDepth);
}
depths.push(new AggregateState((int) header.length()));
```
`AggregateState` i
🎖@cveNotify
## Summary
`RedisArrayAggregator` recently added `maxElements` and `maxNestedArrayDepth` limits to fix public Redis resource-exhaustion advisories. The limits are independent, but the allocator remains eager: every positive nested RESP array header creates `new ArrayList<RedisMessage>(length)` before any child element exists.
With the default constructor, an attacker can send nested array headers with length `1,000,000` until the default nesting limit of `1024` is reached. This can reserve up to `1,024,000,000` child slots from roughly 12 KB of RESP input. This is backing capacity, not logical list size: `ArrayList(int)` constructs an empty list with the specified initial capacity.
## Technical Details
Current `decodeRedisArrayHeader(...)` checks the two limits independently:
```java
if (header.length() > maxElements) {
throw new CodecException("this codec doesn't support longer length than " + maxElements);
}
if (depths.size() >= maxNestedArrayDepth) {
releaseAndClearDepths();
throw new CodecException("max nested array depth exceeded: " + maxNestedArrayDepth);
}
depths.push(new AggregateState((int) header.length()));
```
`AggregateState` i
🎖@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-93572 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
🚨 CVE-2026-93575
### Summary
Netty's fix for CVE-2026-44248 is incomplete. The decoder checks if the MQTT packet's `Remaining Length` exceeds `maxBytesInMessage`, but fails to validate the `Properties Length` against the `Remaining Length`. An attacker can bypass the size limit by sending a small `Remaining Length` but an enormous `Properties Length`. This forces Netty to buffer and parse millions of properties, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger excessive memory and CPU consumption, leading to OutOfMemoryError.
### Details
In `io.netty.handler.codec.mqtt.MqttDecoder`, the `decodeProperties()` helper method reads `totalPropertiesLength` and attempts to parse that many bytes. If the buffer lacks the full length, a `Signal` is thrown. The `catch` block inside `decode()` only enforces `maxBytesInMessage` against `bytesRemainingBeforeVariableHeader` (the packet's `Remaining Length`).
By sending a `CONNECT` packet with a small `Remaining Length` but a huge `Properties Length`, the size check passes. `ReplayingDecoder` then buffers data from the network until the huge `Properties Length` is reached, parsing millions of `UserProperty` objects and exhausting CPU and memory.
#
🎖@cveNotify
### Summary
Netty's fix for CVE-2026-44248 is incomplete. The decoder checks if the MQTT packet's `Remaining Length` exceeds `maxBytesInMessage`, but fails to validate the `Properties Length` against the `Remaining Length`. An attacker can bypass the size limit by sending a small `Remaining Length` but an enormous `Properties Length`. This forces Netty to buffer and parse millions of properties, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger excessive memory and CPU consumption, leading to OutOfMemoryError.
### Details
In `io.netty.handler.codec.mqtt.MqttDecoder`, the `decodeProperties()` helper method reads `totalPropertiesLength` and attempts to parse that many bytes. If the buffer lacks the full length, a `Signal` is thrown. The `catch` block inside `decode()` only enforces `maxBytesInMessage` against `bytesRemainingBeforeVariableHeader` (the packet's `Remaining Length`).
By sending a `CONNECT` packet with a small `Remaining Length` but a huge `Properties Length`, the size check passes. `ReplayingDecoder` then buffers data from the network until the huge `Properties Length` is reached, parsing millions of `UserProperty` objects and exhausting CPU and memory.
#
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-93578
Missing Extended Key Usage (EKU) check in OCSP Client allows certificate revocation bypass
🎖@cveNotify
Missing Extended Key Usage (EKU) check in OCSP Client allows certificate revocation bypass
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-20224
A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) module of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a memory leak, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to improper parsing of IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a continuous stream of crafted IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to partially exhaust system memory, causing system instability like being unable to establish new IKEv2 VPN sessions. A manual reboot of the device is required to recover from this condition.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) module of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a memory leak, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to improper parsing of IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a continuous stream of crafted IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to partially exhaust system memory, causing system instability like being unable to establish new IKEv2 VPN sessions. A manual reboot of the device is required to recover from this condition.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS, IOS XE, Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance, and Secure Firewall Threat Defense Software…
Multiple vulnerabilities in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) feature of Cisco IOS Software, Cisco IOS XE Software, Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software, and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow…
🚨 CVE-2025-20149
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow. An attacker with a low-privileged account could exploit this vulnerability by using crafted commands at the CLI prompt. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow. An attacker with a low-privileged account could exploit this vulnerability by using crafted commands at the CLI prompt. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software CLI Denial of Service Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to a buffer…
This vulnerability is due to a buffer…
🚨 CVE-2025-20160
A vulnerability in the implementation of the TACACS+ protocol in Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive data or bypass authentication.
This vulnerability exists because the system does not properly check whether the required TACACS+ shared secret is configured. A machine-in-the-middle attacker could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting and reading unencrypted TACACS+ messages or impersonating the TACACS+ server and falsely accepting arbitrary authentication requests. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view sensitive information in a TACACS+ message or bypass authentication and gain access to the affected device.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the implementation of the TACACS+ protocol in Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive data or bypass authentication.
This vulnerability exists because the system does not properly check whether the required TACACS+ shared secret is configured. A machine-in-the-middle attacker could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting and reading unencrypted TACACS+ messages or impersonating the TACACS+ server and falsely accepting arbitrary authentication requests. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view sensitive information in a TACACS+ message or bypass authentication and gain access to the affected device.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software TACACS+ Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the implementation of the TACACS+ protocol in Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive data or bypass authentication.
This vulnerability exists because the system does…
This vulnerability exists because the system does…
🚨 CVE-2026-81665
A heap-based buffer overflow was found in Corosync's Totem Process Group (totempg) message reassembly. When processing fragmented multicast messages, the buffer used to reassemble fragments lacks a runtime bounds check in release builds. A network-adjacent attacker able to send crafted multicast protocol messages to the cluster could cause a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled data. This can crash the Corosync daemon, causing a denial of service to the entire cluster, and may potentially allow further exploitation given sufficient heap-corruption control.
🎖@cveNotify
A heap-based buffer overflow was found in Corosync's Totem Process Group (totempg) message reassembly. When processing fragmented multicast messages, the buffer used to reassemble fragments lacks a runtime bounds check in release builds. A network-adjacent attacker able to send crafted multicast protocol messages to the cluster could cause a heap buffer overflow with attacker-controlled data. This can crash the Corosync daemon, causing a denial of service to the entire cluster, and may potentially allow further exploitation given sufficient heap-corruption control.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-86910
A permissions issue was addressed with improved path validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An application may be able to access restricted files.
🎖@cveNotify
A permissions issue was addressed with improved path validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An application may be able to access restricted files.
🎖@cveNotify
Apple Support
About the security content of macOS Golden Gate 27 - Apple Support
This document describes the security content of macOS Golden Gate 27.
🚨 CVE-2026-81340
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.50 does not perform per-object ownership or capability checks when updating orders through its REST API, allowing users with the Instructor role to modify any order on the site, granting free course enrolment, revoking other users' paid enrolments, and tampering with order notes.
🎖@cveNotify
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.50 does not perform per-object ownership or capability checks when updating orders through its REST API, allowing users with the Instructor role to modify any order on the site, granting free course enrolment, revoking other users' paid enrolments, and tampering with order notes.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
MasterStudy LMS < 3.7.50 - Instructor+ Order Status Manipulation via IDOR
See details on MasterStudy LMS < 3.7.50 - Instructor+ Order Status Manipulation via IDOR CVE 2026-81340. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-81810
The All-in-One WP Migration and Backup WordPress plugin before 7.111 does not perform any capability check on several of its AJAX actions, gating them only on an installation-wide secret which it discloses to any user permitted to export the site, allowing such a user to import an arbitrary site archive and gain administrator access. Exploitation requires an administrator to have granted the export capability to a role that does not hold the All-in-One WP Migration and Backup WordPress plugin before 7.111's own import capability, which is not a default configuration.
🎖@cveNotify
The All-in-One WP Migration and Backup WordPress plugin before 7.111 does not perform any capability check on several of its AJAX actions, gating them only on an installation-wide secret which it discloses to any user permitted to export the site, allowing such a user to import an arbitrary site archive and gain administrator access. Exploitation requires an administrator to have granted the export capability to a role that does not hold the All-in-One WP Migration and Backup WordPress plugin before 7.111's own import capability, which is not a default configuration.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
All-in-One WP Migration and Backup < 7.111 - Authenticated Privilege Escalation to Admin via Import Secret Key Disclosure
See details on All-in-One WP Migration and Backup < 7.111 - Authenticated Privilege Escalation to Admin via Import Secret Key Disclosure CVE 2026-81810. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-84738
The AF Companion WordPress plugin before 2.2.0 does not validate the type of files uploaded through one of its import features, allowing users with a low-privileged store-management role to upload arbitrary files, including PHP ones, leading to Remote Code Execution.
🎖@cveNotify
The AF Companion WordPress plugin before 2.2.0 does not validate the type of files uploaded through one of its import features, allowing users with a low-privileged store-management role to upload arbitrary files, including PHP ones, leading to Remote Code Execution.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
AF Companion < 2.2.0 - Shop Manager+ Arbitrary File Upload to RCE
See details on AF Companion < 2.2.0 - Shop Manager+ Arbitrary File Upload to RCE CVE 2026-84738. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-84902
The King Addons for Elementor WordPress plugin before 51.1.81 does not perform an object-level authorization check when importing template content into a page, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to overwrite the Elementor content of arbitrary posts and pages, including those owned by administrators, and to inject JavaScript through a widget setting that is output without escaping, resulting in Stored Cross-Site Scripting that executes in the session of any user who views the affected page.
🎖@cveNotify
The King Addons for Elementor WordPress plugin before 51.1.81 does not perform an object-level authorization check when importing template content into a page, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to overwrite the Elementor content of arbitrary posts and pages, including those owned by administrators, and to inject JavaScript through a widget setting that is output without escaping, resulting in Stored Cross-Site Scripting that executes in the session of any user who views the affected page.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
King Addons for Elementor < 51.1.81 - Contributor+ Stored XSS via Template Catalog Import
See details on King Addons for Elementor < 51.1.81 - Contributor+ Stored XSS via Template Catalog Import CVE 2026-84902. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.