🚨 CVE-2026-21822
HCLSoftware AppScan 360° was affected by a Path Traversal vulnerability in the ASReportService component. Improper handling of file paths allows an authenticated attacker to read or write files outside the intended directory, potentially enabling file system structure inspection or unauthorized file modification within the application's directory scope.
🎖@cveNotify
HCLSoftware AppScan 360° was affected by a Path Traversal vulnerability in the ASReportService component. Improper handling of file paths allows an authenticated attacker to read or write files outside the intended directory, potentially enabling file system structure inspection or unauthorized file modification within the application's directory scope.
🎖@cveNotify
Hcl-Software
Security Bulletin: HCL AppScan 360° is affected by a path traversal vulnerability (CVE-2026-21822) - Customer Support
A path traversal vulnerability has been identified in HCL AppScan 360° (CVE-2026-21822).
🚨 CVE-2026-40530
An improper neutralization of CRLF sequences ('CRLF injection') vulnerability in User API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to read or write arbitrary files and conduct denial-of-service attacks after the system is rebooted.
🎖@cveNotify
An improper neutralization of CRLF sequences ('CRLF injection') vulnerability in User API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to read or write arbitrary files and conduct denial-of-service attacks after the system is rebooted.
🎖@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
🚨 CVE-2026-40533
An exposure of sensitive information through data queries vulnerability in Desktop API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to obtain non-sensitive information.
🎖@cveNotify
An exposure of sensitive information through data queries vulnerability in Desktop API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to obtain non-sensitive information.
🎖@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
🚨 CVE-2026-40534
An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Video API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to read or write limited files when the player is launched.
🎖@cveNotify
An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Video API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to read or write limited files when the player is launched.
🎖@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
🚨 CVE-2026-40535
An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Desktop API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to write limited files and conduct limited denial-of-service attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Desktop API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to write limited files and conduct limited denial-of-service attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
🚨 CVE-2026-40537
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PersonMail API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive information.
🎖@cveNotify
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PersonMail API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive information.
🎖@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
🚨 CVE-2026-40538
An improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability in Auto block in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to read limited files via brute-force attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
An improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability in Auto block in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to read limited files via brute-force attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
🚨 CVE-2026-40539
An improper certificate validation vulnerability in Email API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read or write arbitrary files and conduct denial-of-service attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
An improper certificate validation vulnerability in Email API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read or write arbitrary files and conduct denial-of-service attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
🚨 CVE-2026-56595
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a CORS Misconfiguration vulnerability due to improperly validated origin headers, which could allow an attacker to craft a malicious web page that interacts with the vulnerable application, enabling unauthorized access to protected resources and restricted APIs on behalf of a victim.
🎖@cveNotify
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a CORS Misconfiguration vulnerability due to improperly validated origin headers, which could allow an attacker to craft a malicious web page that interacts with the vulnerable application, enabling unauthorized access to protected resources and restricted APIs on behalf of a victim.
🎖@cveNotify
Hcl-Software
Security Bulletin: Multiple security vulnerabilities affect HCL BigFix Service Management - Customer Support
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by multiple security vulnerabilities.
🚨 CVE-2026-83561
The Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent Banner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment Content via Elementor Cookie Blocker Regex in all versions up to, and including, 7.5.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Successful exploitation requires an administrator to approve the attacker's comment, and the site must have both the Elementor plugin installed and Complianz configured with the Twitter or Facebook cookie/script blocker enabled.
🎖@cveNotify
The Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent Banner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment Content via Elementor Cookie Blocker Regex in all versions up to, and including, 7.5.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Successful exploitation requires an administrator to approve the attacker's comment, and the site must have both the Elementor plugin installed and Complianz configured with the Twitter or Facebook cookie/script blocker enabled.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-15579
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in some of the Ethernet switches because of improper validation of the username field length during Web login processing. This may allow a remote attacker to submit a specially crafted overly long input, triggering a buffer overflow that can cause the authentication process to crash and result in a Denial of Service (DoS) attack.
🎖@cveNotify
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in some of the Ethernet switches because of improper validation of the username field length during Web login processing. This may allow a remote attacker to submit a specially crafted overly long input, triggering a buffer overflow that can cause the authentication process to crash and result in a Denial of Service (DoS) attack.
🎖@cveNotify
Moxa
CVE-2026-15579: Out-of-bounds Write Vulnerability in Ethernet Switch | Moxa
🚨 CVE-2026-92976
A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the profile management functionality of T-Systems’ TAO 2.0 suite. An authenticated user could inject malicious HTML or JavaScript content into the fields containing their personal data. The content entered is stored and displayed without being properly sanitised when another user, including administrative staff, views the affected profile. Successful exploitation could allow JavaScript code to be executed in the victim’s browser, access to information available within the session, or the performance of actions using the victim’s permissions.
🎖@cveNotify
A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the profile management functionality of T-Systems’ TAO 2.0 suite. An authenticated user could inject malicious HTML or JavaScript content into the fields containing their personal data. The content entered is stored and displayed without being properly sanitised when another user, including administrative staff, views the affected profile. Successful exploitation could allow JavaScript code to be executed in the victim’s browser, access to information available within the session, or the performance of actions using the victim’s permissions.
🎖@cveNotify
www.incibe.es
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in T-Systems’ TAO 2.0
INCIBE has coordinated the publication of a medium-severity vulnerability affecting T-Systems’ TAO 2.0
🚨 CVE-2026-81627
A flaw was found in QEMU. The VAPIC setup hypercall in hw/i386/vapic.c does not validate that the writable RAM alias remains within the option ROM window. A privileged guest user on a Q35/KVM machine can position this alias over locked SMRAM, bypassing chipset D_LCK protection and injecting code into System Management Mode memory.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in QEMU. The VAPIC setup hypercall in hw/i386/vapic.c does not validate that the writable RAM alias remains within the option ROM window. A privileged guest user on a Q35/KVM machine can position this alias over locked SMRAM, bypassing chipset D_LCK protection and injecting code into System Management Mode memory.
🎖@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-81627 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
🚨 CVE-2026-93561
Memcache binary codec signed/unsigned type mismatch causes frame desynchronization and response smuggling
🎖@cveNotify
Memcache binary codec signed/unsigned type mismatch causes frame desynchronization and response smuggling
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-93563
Unbounded multi-line response accumulation in SmtpResponseDecoder leads to memory-exhaustion DoS
🎖@cveNotify
Unbounded multi-line response accumulation in SmtpResponseDecoder leads to memory-exhaustion DoS
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-93572
## Summary
`RedisArrayAggregator` recently added `maxElements` and `maxNestedArrayDepth` limits to fix public Redis resource-exhaustion advisories. The limits are independent, but the allocator remains eager: every positive nested RESP array header creates `new ArrayList<RedisMessage>(length)` before any child element exists.
With the default constructor, an attacker can send nested array headers with length `1,000,000` until the default nesting limit of `1024` is reached. This can reserve up to `1,024,000,000` child slots from roughly 12 KB of RESP input. This is backing capacity, not logical list size: `ArrayList(int)` constructs an empty list with the specified initial capacity.
## Technical Details
Current `decodeRedisArrayHeader(...)` checks the two limits independently:
```java
if (header.length() > maxElements) {
throw new CodecException("this codec doesn't support longer length than " + maxElements);
}
if (depths.size() >= maxNestedArrayDepth) {
releaseAndClearDepths();
throw new CodecException("max nested array depth exceeded: " + maxNestedArrayDepth);
}
depths.push(new AggregateState((int) header.length()));
```
`AggregateState` i
🎖@cveNotify
## Summary
`RedisArrayAggregator` recently added `maxElements` and `maxNestedArrayDepth` limits to fix public Redis resource-exhaustion advisories. The limits are independent, but the allocator remains eager: every positive nested RESP array header creates `new ArrayList<RedisMessage>(length)` before any child element exists.
With the default constructor, an attacker can send nested array headers with length `1,000,000` until the default nesting limit of `1024` is reached. This can reserve up to `1,024,000,000` child slots from roughly 12 KB of RESP input. This is backing capacity, not logical list size: `ArrayList(int)` constructs an empty list with the specified initial capacity.
## Technical Details
Current `decodeRedisArrayHeader(...)` checks the two limits independently:
```java
if (header.length() > maxElements) {
throw new CodecException("this codec doesn't support longer length than " + maxElements);
}
if (depths.size() >= maxNestedArrayDepth) {
releaseAndClearDepths();
throw new CodecException("max nested array depth exceeded: " + maxNestedArrayDepth);
}
depths.push(new AggregateState((int) header.length()));
```
`AggregateState` i
🎖@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-93572 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
🚨 CVE-2026-93575
### Summary
Netty's fix for CVE-2026-44248 is incomplete. The decoder checks if the MQTT packet's `Remaining Length` exceeds `maxBytesInMessage`, but fails to validate the `Properties Length` against the `Remaining Length`. An attacker can bypass the size limit by sending a small `Remaining Length` but an enormous `Properties Length`. This forces Netty to buffer and parse millions of properties, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger excessive memory and CPU consumption, leading to OutOfMemoryError.
### Details
In `io.netty.handler.codec.mqtt.MqttDecoder`, the `decodeProperties()` helper method reads `totalPropertiesLength` and attempts to parse that many bytes. If the buffer lacks the full length, a `Signal` is thrown. The `catch` block inside `decode()` only enforces `maxBytesInMessage` against `bytesRemainingBeforeVariableHeader` (the packet's `Remaining Length`).
By sending a `CONNECT` packet with a small `Remaining Length` but a huge `Properties Length`, the size check passes. `ReplayingDecoder` then buffers data from the network until the huge `Properties Length` is reached, parsing millions of `UserProperty` objects and exhausting CPU and memory.
#
🎖@cveNotify
### Summary
Netty's fix for CVE-2026-44248 is incomplete. The decoder checks if the MQTT packet's `Remaining Length` exceeds `maxBytesInMessage`, but fails to validate the `Properties Length` against the `Remaining Length`. An attacker can bypass the size limit by sending a small `Remaining Length` but an enormous `Properties Length`. This forces Netty to buffer and parse millions of properties, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger excessive memory and CPU consumption, leading to OutOfMemoryError.
### Details
In `io.netty.handler.codec.mqtt.MqttDecoder`, the `decodeProperties()` helper method reads `totalPropertiesLength` and attempts to parse that many bytes. If the buffer lacks the full length, a `Signal` is thrown. The `catch` block inside `decode()` only enforces `maxBytesInMessage` against `bytesRemainingBeforeVariableHeader` (the packet's `Remaining Length`).
By sending a `CONNECT` packet with a small `Remaining Length` but a huge `Properties Length`, the size check passes. `ReplayingDecoder` then buffers data from the network until the huge `Properties Length` is reached, parsing millions of `UserProperty` objects and exhausting CPU and memory.
#
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-93578
Missing Extended Key Usage (EKU) check in OCSP Client allows certificate revocation bypass
🎖@cveNotify
Missing Extended Key Usage (EKU) check in OCSP Client allows certificate revocation bypass
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2025-20224
A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) module of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a memory leak, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to improper parsing of IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a continuous stream of crafted IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to partially exhaust system memory, causing system instability like being unable to establish new IKEv2 VPN sessions. A manual reboot of the device is required to recover from this condition.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) module of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a memory leak, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to improper parsing of IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a continuous stream of crafted IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to partially exhaust system memory, causing system instability like being unable to establish new IKEv2 VPN sessions. A manual reboot of the device is required to recover from this condition.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS, IOS XE, Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance, and Secure Firewall Threat Defense Software…
Multiple vulnerabilities in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) feature of Cisco IOS Software, Cisco IOS XE Software, Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software, and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow…
🚨 CVE-2025-20149
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow. An attacker with a low-privileged account could exploit this vulnerability by using crafted commands at the CLI prompt. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to a buffer overflow. An attacker with a low-privileged account could exploit this vulnerability by using crafted commands at the CLI prompt. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software CLI Denial of Service Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the CLI of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to a buffer…
This vulnerability is due to a buffer…
🚨 CVE-2025-20160
A vulnerability in the implementation of the TACACS+ protocol in Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive data or bypass authentication.
This vulnerability exists because the system does not properly check whether the required TACACS+ shared secret is configured. A machine-in-the-middle attacker could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting and reading unencrypted TACACS+ messages or impersonating the TACACS+ server and falsely accepting arbitrary authentication requests. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view sensitive information in a TACACS+ message or bypass authentication and gain access to the affected device.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the implementation of the TACACS+ protocol in Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive data or bypass authentication.
This vulnerability exists because the system does not properly check whether the required TACACS+ shared secret is configured. A machine-in-the-middle attacker could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting and reading unencrypted TACACS+ messages or impersonating the TACACS+ server and falsely accepting arbitrary authentication requests. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to view sensitive information in a TACACS+ message or bypass authentication and gain access to the affected device.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS and IOS XE Software TACACS+ Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the implementation of the TACACS+ protocol in Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to view sensitive data or bypass authentication.
This vulnerability exists because the system does…
This vulnerability exists because the system does…