π¨ CVE-2026-93493
A flaw was found in Netty's `netty-handler-ssl-ocsp` component. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by providing an Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) response that omits the optional `nextUpdate` field. This omission causes the OCSP validation to be silently skipped, leading to applications proceeding with an unvalidated certificate. This can result in a bypass of security controls where certificate validation is expected.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in Netty's `netty-handler-ssl-ocsp` component. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by providing an Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) response that omits the optional `nextUpdate` field. This omission causes the OCSP validation to be silently skipped, leading to applications proceeding with an unvalidated certificate. This can result in a bypass of security controls where certificate validation is expected.
π@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-93493 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
π¨ CVE-2026-93494
A flaw was found in Netty's StompSubframeDecoder component. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted STOMP frame body without its terminating null byte. This causes the decoder to allocate a ByteBuf (a buffer for bytes) that is never released, leading to a permanent memory leak. Over time, this uncontrolled memory consumption can result in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the application using the affected STOMP codec.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in Netty's StompSubframeDecoder component. A remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted STOMP frame body without its terminating null byte. This causes the decoder to allocate a ByteBuf (a buffer for bytes) that is never released, leading to a permanent memory leak. Over time, this uncontrolled memory consumption can result in a Denial of Service (DoS) for the application using the affected STOMP codec.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-21822
HCLSoftware AppScan 360Β° was affected by a Path Traversal vulnerability in the ASReportService component. Improper handling of file paths allows an authenticated attacker to read or write files outside the intended directory, potentially enabling file system structure inspection or unauthorized file modification within the application's directory scope.
π@cveNotify
HCLSoftware AppScan 360Β° was affected by a Path Traversal vulnerability in the ASReportService component. Improper handling of file paths allows an authenticated attacker to read or write files outside the intended directory, potentially enabling file system structure inspection or unauthorized file modification within the application's directory scope.
π@cveNotify
Hcl-Software
Security Bulletin: HCL AppScan 360Β° is affected by a path traversal vulnerability (CVE-2026-21822) - Customer Support
A path traversal vulnerability has been identified in HCL AppScan 360Β° (CVE-2026-21822).
π¨ CVE-2026-40530
An improper neutralization of CRLF sequences ('CRLF injection') vulnerability in User API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to read or write arbitrary files and conduct denial-of-service attacks after the system is rebooted.
π@cveNotify
An improper neutralization of CRLF sequences ('CRLF injection') vulnerability in User API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to read or write arbitrary files and conduct denial-of-service attacks after the system is rebooted.
π@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
π¨ CVE-2026-40533
An exposure of sensitive information through data queries vulnerability in Desktop API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to obtain non-sensitive information.
π@cveNotify
An exposure of sensitive information through data queries vulnerability in Desktop API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to obtain non-sensitive information.
π@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
π¨ CVE-2026-40534
An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Video API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to read or write limited files when the player is launched.
π@cveNotify
An improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Video API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to read or write limited files when the player is launched.
π@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
π¨ CVE-2026-40535
An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Desktop API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to write limited files and conduct limited denial-of-service attacks.
π@cveNotify
An improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('path traversal') vulnerability in Desktop API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to write limited files and conduct limited denial-of-service attacks.
π@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
π¨ CVE-2026-40537
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PersonMail API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive information.
π@cveNotify
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PersonMail API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive information.
π@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
π¨ CVE-2026-40538
An improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability in Auto block in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to read limited files via brute-force attacks.
π@cveNotify
An improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability in Auto block in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows remote attackers to read limited files via brute-force attacks.
π@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
π¨ CVE-2026-40539
An improper certificate validation vulnerability in Email API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read or write arbitrary files and conduct denial-of-service attacks.
π@cveNotify
An improper certificate validation vulnerability in Email API in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 7.2.1-69057-10, 7.2.2-72806-7 and 7.3.2-86009-2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to read or write arbitrary files and conduct denial-of-service attacks.
π@cveNotify
Synology
Synology_SA_26_06 | Synology Inc.
Synology Product Security Advisory
π¨ CVE-2026-56595
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a CORS Misconfiguration vulnerability due to improperly validated origin headers, which could allow an attacker to craft a malicious web page that interacts with the vulnerable application, enabling unauthorized access to protected resources and restricted APIs on behalf of a victim.
π@cveNotify
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by a CORS Misconfiguration vulnerability due to improperly validated origin headers, which could allow an attacker to craft a malicious web page that interacts with the vulnerable application, enabling unauthorized access to protected resources and restricted APIs on behalf of a victim.
π@cveNotify
Hcl-Software
Security Bulletin: Multiple security vulnerabilities affect HCL BigFix Service Management - Customer Support
HCL BigFix Service Management is affected by multiple security vulnerabilities.
π¨ CVE-2026-83561
The Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent Banner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment Content via Elementor Cookie Blocker Regex in all versions up to, and including, 7.5.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Successful exploitation requires an administrator to approve the attacker's comment, and the site must have both the Elementor plugin installed and Complianz configured with the Twitter or Facebook cookie/script blocker enabled.
π@cveNotify
The Complianz GDPR/CCPA Cookie Consent Banner plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Comment Content via Elementor Cookie Blocker Regex in all versions up to, and including, 7.5.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Successful exploitation requires an administrator to approve the attacker's comment, and the site must have both the Elementor plugin installed and Complianz configured with the Twitter or Facebook cookie/script blocker enabled.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-15579
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in some of the Ethernet switches because of improper validation of the username field length during Web login processing. This may allow a remote attacker to submit a specially crafted overly long input, triggering a buffer overflow that can cause the authentication process to crash and result in a Denial of Service (DoS) attack.
π@cveNotify
An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in some of the Ethernet switches because of improper validation of the username field length during Web login processing. This may allow a remote attacker to submit a specially crafted overly long input, triggering a buffer overflow that can cause the authentication process to crash and result in a Denial of Service (DoS) attack.
π@cveNotify
Moxa
CVE-2026-15579: Out-of-bounds Write Vulnerability in Ethernet Switch | Moxa
π¨ CVE-2026-92976
A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the profile management functionality of T-Systemsβ TAO 2.0 suite. An authenticated user could inject malicious HTML or JavaScript content into the fields containing their personal data. The content entered is stored and displayed without being properly sanitised when another user, including administrative staff, views the affected profile. Successful exploitation could allow JavaScript code to be executed in the victimβs browser, access to information available within the session, or the performance of actions using the victimβs permissions.
π@cveNotify
A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the profile management functionality of T-Systemsβ TAO 2.0 suite. An authenticated user could inject malicious HTML or JavaScript content into the fields containing their personal data. The content entered is stored and displayed without being properly sanitised when another user, including administrative staff, views the affected profile. Successful exploitation could allow JavaScript code to be executed in the victimβs browser, access to information available within the session, or the performance of actions using the victimβs permissions.
π@cveNotify
www.incibe.es
Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in T-Systemsβ TAO 2.0
INCIBE has coordinated the publication of a medium-severity vulnerability affecting T-Systemsβ TAO 2.0
π¨ CVE-2026-81627
A flaw was found in QEMU. The VAPIC setup hypercall in hw/i386/vapic.c does not validate that the writable RAM alias remains within the option ROM window. A privileged guest user on a Q35/KVM machine can position this alias over locked SMRAM, bypassing chipset D_LCK protection and injecting code into System Management Mode memory.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in QEMU. The VAPIC setup hypercall in hw/i386/vapic.c does not validate that the writable RAM alias remains within the option ROM window. A privileged guest user on a Q35/KVM machine can position this alias over locked SMRAM, bypassing chipset D_LCK protection and injecting code into System Management Mode memory.
π@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-81627 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
π¨ CVE-2026-93561
Memcache binary codec signed/unsigned type mismatch causes frame desynchronization and response smuggling
π@cveNotify
Memcache binary codec signed/unsigned type mismatch causes frame desynchronization and response smuggling
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-93563
Unbounded multi-line response accumulation in SmtpResponseDecoder leads to memory-exhaustion DoS
π@cveNotify
Unbounded multi-line response accumulation in SmtpResponseDecoder leads to memory-exhaustion DoS
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-93572
## Summary
`RedisArrayAggregator` recently added `maxElements` and `maxNestedArrayDepth` limits to fix public Redis resource-exhaustion advisories. The limits are independent, but the allocator remains eager: every positive nested RESP array header creates `new ArrayList<RedisMessage>(length)` before any child element exists.
With the default constructor, an attacker can send nested array headers with length `1,000,000` until the default nesting limit of `1024` is reached. This can reserve up to `1,024,000,000` child slots from roughly 12 KB of RESP input. This is backing capacity, not logical list size: `ArrayList(int)` constructs an empty list with the specified initial capacity.
## Technical Details
Current `decodeRedisArrayHeader(...)` checks the two limits independently:
```java
if (header.length() > maxElements) {
throw new CodecException("this codec doesn't support longer length than " + maxElements);
}
if (depths.size() >= maxNestedArrayDepth) {
releaseAndClearDepths();
throw new CodecException("max nested array depth exceeded: " + maxNestedArrayDepth);
}
depths.push(new AggregateState((int) header.length()));
```
`AggregateState` i
π@cveNotify
## Summary
`RedisArrayAggregator` recently added `maxElements` and `maxNestedArrayDepth` limits to fix public Redis resource-exhaustion advisories. The limits are independent, but the allocator remains eager: every positive nested RESP array header creates `new ArrayList<RedisMessage>(length)` before any child element exists.
With the default constructor, an attacker can send nested array headers with length `1,000,000` until the default nesting limit of `1024` is reached. This can reserve up to `1,024,000,000` child slots from roughly 12 KB of RESP input. This is backing capacity, not logical list size: `ArrayList(int)` constructs an empty list with the specified initial capacity.
## Technical Details
Current `decodeRedisArrayHeader(...)` checks the two limits independently:
```java
if (header.length() > maxElements) {
throw new CodecException("this codec doesn't support longer length than " + maxElements);
}
if (depths.size() >= maxNestedArrayDepth) {
releaseAndClearDepths();
throw new CodecException("max nested array depth exceeded: " + maxNestedArrayDepth);
}
depths.push(new AggregateState((int) header.length()));
```
`AggregateState` i
π@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-93572 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
π¨ CVE-2026-93575
### Summary
Netty's fix for CVE-2026-44248 is incomplete. The decoder checks if the MQTT packet's `Remaining Length` exceeds `maxBytesInMessage`, but fails to validate the `Properties Length` against the `Remaining Length`. An attacker can bypass the size limit by sending a small `Remaining Length` but an enormous `Properties Length`. This forces Netty to buffer and parse millions of properties, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger excessive memory and CPU consumption, leading to OutOfMemoryError.
### Details
In `io.netty.handler.codec.mqtt.MqttDecoder`, the `decodeProperties()` helper method reads `totalPropertiesLength` and attempts to parse that many bytes. If the buffer lacks the full length, a `Signal` is thrown. The `catch` block inside `decode()` only enforces `maxBytesInMessage` against `bytesRemainingBeforeVariableHeader` (the packet's `Remaining Length`).
By sending a `CONNECT` packet with a small `Remaining Length` but a huge `Properties Length`, the size check passes. `ReplayingDecoder` then buffers data from the network until the huge `Properties Length` is reached, parsing millions of `UserProperty` objects and exhausting CPU and memory.
#
π@cveNotify
### Summary
Netty's fix for CVE-2026-44248 is incomplete. The decoder checks if the MQTT packet's `Remaining Length` exceeds `maxBytesInMessage`, but fails to validate the `Properties Length` against the `Remaining Length`. An attacker can bypass the size limit by sending a small `Remaining Length` but an enormous `Properties Length`. This forces Netty to buffer and parse millions of properties, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger excessive memory and CPU consumption, leading to OutOfMemoryError.
### Details
In `io.netty.handler.codec.mqtt.MqttDecoder`, the `decodeProperties()` helper method reads `totalPropertiesLength` and attempts to parse that many bytes. If the buffer lacks the full length, a `Signal` is thrown. The `catch` block inside `decode()` only enforces `maxBytesInMessage` against `bytesRemainingBeforeVariableHeader` (the packet's `Remaining Length`).
By sending a `CONNECT` packet with a small `Remaining Length` but a huge `Properties Length`, the size check passes. `ReplayingDecoder` then buffers data from the network until the huge `Properties Length` is reached, parsing millions of `UserProperty` objects and exhausting CPU and memory.
#
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-93578
Missing Extended Key Usage (EKU) check in OCSP Client allows certificate revocation bypass
π@cveNotify
Missing Extended Key Usage (EKU) check in OCSP Client allows certificate revocation bypass
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2025-20224
A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) module of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a memory leak, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to improper parsing of IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a continuous stream of crafted IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to partially exhaust system memory, causing system instability like being unable to establish new IKEv2 VPN sessions. A manual reboot of the device is required to recover from this condition.
π@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) module of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to trigger a memory leak, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition.
This vulnerability is due to improper parsing of IKEv2 packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a continuous stream of crafted IKEv2 packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to partially exhaust system memory, causing system instability like being unable to establish new IKEv2 VPN sessions. A manual reboot of the device is required to recover from this condition.
π@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS, IOS XE, Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance, and Secure Firewall Threat Defense Softwareβ¦
Multiple vulnerabilities in the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) feature of Cisco IOS Software, Cisco IOS XE Software, Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software, and Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allowβ¦