🚨 CVE-2026-19387
A heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability was found in the GStreamer gst-plugins-bad adpcmdec element when decoding IMA/DVI ADPCM audio. Insufficient validation of the per-block sample count for multi-channel streams allows a crafted WAV file to cause writes beyond the allocated output buffer. This can lead to application crash, denial of service, memory corruption, or potentially arbitrary code execution when untrusted media is processed.
🎖@cveNotify
A heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability was found in the GStreamer gst-plugins-bad adpcmdec element when decoding IMA/DVI ADPCM audio. Insufficient validation of the per-block sample count for multi-channel streams allows a crafted WAV file to cause writes beyond the allocated output buffer. This can lead to application crash, denial of service, memory corruption, or potentially arbitrary code execution when untrusted media is processed.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-71964
CyberPanel 2.4.3, fixed in commit eca0c3c, contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the file manager component that allows authenticated attackers to read sensitive system files by uploading a crafted ZIP archive containing symbolic links. Attackers can exploit the application's failure to validate symlinks before extraction, causing symbolic links targeting arbitrary filesystem paths outside the user's home directory to persist on disk and be accessed through the web interface.
🎖@cveNotify
CyberPanel 2.4.3, fixed in commit eca0c3c, contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability in the file manager component that allows authenticated attackers to read sensitive system files by uploading a crafted ZIP archive containing symbolic links. Attackers can exploit the application's failure to validate symlinks before extraction, causing symbolic links targeting arbitrary filesystem paths outside the user's home directory to persist on disk and be accessed through the web interface.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
security fixes · usmannasir/cyberpanel@eca0c3c
Cyber Panel - The hosting control panel for OpenLiteSpeed - security fixes · usmannasir/cyberpanel@eca0c3c
🚨 CVE-2026-71965
CyberPanel 2.4.3, fixed in commit eca0c3c, contains an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the remote backup feature that allows authenticated attackers to gain root-level SSH access by supplying a malicious remote server address. Attackers can exploit the unverified SSH public key retrieval process to write an attacker-controlled public key directly to /root/.ssh/authorized_keys, granting persistent root access to the host system.
🎖@cveNotify
CyberPanel 2.4.3, fixed in commit eca0c3c, contains an authenticated remote code execution vulnerability in the remote backup feature that allows authenticated attackers to gain root-level SSH access by supplying a malicious remote server address. Attackers can exploit the unverified SSH public key retrieval process to write an attacker-controlled public key directly to /root/.ssh/authorized_keys, granting persistent root access to the host system.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
security fixes · usmannasir/cyberpanel@eca0c3c
Cyber Panel - The hosting control panel for OpenLiteSpeed - security fixes · usmannasir/cyberpanel@eca0c3c
🚨 CVE-2026-71966
CyberPanel 2.4.3, fixed in commit eca0c3c, contains an authenticated command injection vulnerability in the remote backup transfer feature that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by controlling a remote server's API response. Attackers can inject malicious commands through a crafted directory name in the remote server's API response, which bypasses security middleware validation and is passed unsanitized to the OS command execution function.
🎖@cveNotify
CyberPanel 2.4.3, fixed in commit eca0c3c, contains an authenticated command injection vulnerability in the remote backup transfer feature that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands by controlling a remote server's API response. Attackers can inject malicious commands through a crafted directory name in the remote server's API response, which bypasses security middleware validation and is passed unsanitized to the OS command execution function.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
security fixes · usmannasir/cyberpanel@eca0c3c
Cyber Panel - The hosting control panel for OpenLiteSpeed - security fixes · usmannasir/cyberpanel@eca0c3c
🚨 CVE-2026-63622
A flaw was found in libvirt. A local attacker, specifically a process running as the confined `swtpm` user, could exploit a symlink-following vulnerability in the `virFileChownFiles()` function. By planting a symbolic link within the `swtpm` state directory, the attacker could trick the root-level libvirt daemon into changing the ownership of an arbitrary file to the `swtpm` user. This allows for privilege escalation from the `swtpm` sandbox to root-level file ownership control.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in libvirt. A local attacker, specifically a process running as the confined `swtpm` user, could exploit a symlink-following vulnerability in the `virFileChownFiles()` function. By planting a symbolic link within the `swtpm` state directory, the attacker could trick the root-level libvirt daemon into changing the ownership of an arbitrary file to the `swtpm` user. This allows for privilege escalation from the `swtpm` sandbox to root-level file ownership control.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-58230
SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate certain token content under specific configurations. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted token to cause sensitive credential material to be sent to an attacker-controlled destination. The attack complexity is high due to non-default preconditions required in the target environment. This results in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate certain token content under specific configurations. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted token to cause sensitive credential material to be sent to an attacker-controlled destination. The attack complexity is high due to non-default preconditions required in the target environment. This results in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-58237
WebSocket of SAP Approuter does not perform sufficient authorization checks in certain functionality. An attacker with low privileges could exploit this to access restricted functionality. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read sensitive information and perform limited modifications, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability.
🎖@cveNotify
WebSocket of SAP Approuter does not perform sufficient authorization checks in certain functionality. An attacker with low privileges could exploit this to access restricted functionality. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read sensitive information and perform limited modifications, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-58238
SAP Approuter does not sufficiently handle certain requests under specific conditions. An unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted input that causes the component to crash and restart. Successful exploitation requires specific runtime conditions to be met, making the attack complex to execute. This results in a high impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality and integrity.
🎖@cveNotify
SAP Approuter does not sufficiently handle certain requests under specific conditions. An unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted input that causes the component to crash and restart. Successful exploitation requires specific runtime conditions to be met, making the attack complex to execute. This results in a high impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality and integrity.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-58239
SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate tenant context in inbound requests. An unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted requests to spoof the tenant context under conditions not fully within their control. Successful exploitation could allow limited access to another tenant's information, resulting in a low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate tenant context in inbound requests. An unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted requests to spoof the tenant context under conditions not fully within their control. Successful exploitation could allow limited access to another tenant's information, resulting in a low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66760
SAP Approuter does not correctly validate client certificates in certain callback flows. An attacker with low privileges, holding a certificate from the same trusted authority with matching subject values, could bypass the identity check. This complexity makes the attack difficult to execute. Successful exploitation could allow impersonation of a trusted internal component, resulting in a high impact on integrity and a low impact on confidentiality and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
SAP Approuter does not correctly validate client certificates in certain callback flows. An attacker with low privileges, holding a certificate from the same trusted authority with matching subject values, could bypass the identity check. This complexity makes the attack difficult to execute. Successful exploitation could allow impersonation of a trusted internal component, resulting in a high impact on integrity and a low impact on confidentiality and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66761
SAP Approuter does not enforce sufficient flow control in certain functionality. An attacker with low privileges could send high volumes of data without consuming responses, causing unbounded memory growth. This results in a low impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality and integrity.
🎖@cveNotify
SAP Approuter does not enforce sufficient flow control in certain functionality. An attacker with low privileges could send high volumes of data without consuming responses, causing unbounded memory growth. This results in a low impact on availability. There is no impact on confidentiality and integrity.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66775
SAP Approuter does not enforce cross-site request forgery protection on the authentication flow by default. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link and trick a victim into following it. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to bind the victim's session to an attacker-controlled identity, resulting in a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
SAP Approuter does not enforce cross-site request forgery protection on the authentication flow by default. An unauthenticated attacker could craft a malicious link and trick a victim into following it. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to bind the victim's session to an attacker-controlled identity, resulting in a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on confidentiality and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66776
SAP Approuter does not consistently enforce integrity verification on certain session-related request headers under specific conditions. An attacker with low privileges could send a specially crafted request that bypasses the integrity check and loads another user's session context. Successful exploitation requires the attacker to have previously observed matching session values out-of-band, which makes the attack complex to execute. This could result in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability.
🎖@cveNotify
SAP Approuter does not consistently enforce integrity verification on certain session-related request headers under specific conditions. An attacker with low privileges could send a specially crafted request that bypasses the integrity check and loads another user's session context. Successful exploitation requires the attacker to have previously observed matching session values out-of-band, which makes the attack complex to execute. This could result in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66777
SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate certain incoming requests before forwarding them to backend destinations. Due to the complexity of the required conditions, an attacker with low privileges could send specially crafted requests to bypass authorization checks and reach protected resources beyond their assigned scope. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read sensitive data and perform limited modifications on protected resources, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability.
🎖@cveNotify
SAP Approuter does not sufficiently validate certain incoming requests before forwarding them to backend destinations. Due to the complexity of the required conditions, an attacker with low privileges could send specially crafted requests to bypass authorization checks and reach protected resources beyond their assigned scope. Successful exploitation could allow the attacker to read sensitive data and perform limited modifications on protected resources, resulting in a high impact on confidentiality and a low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66778
SAP Approuter does not sufficiently sanitize certain request headers before forwarding traffic to internal components. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request to obtain limited unauthorized access to information. This results in a low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
SAP Approuter does not sufficiently sanitize certain request headers before forwarding traffic to internal components. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request to obtain limited unauthorized access to information. This results in a low impact on confidentiality. There is no impact on integrity and availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-72747
AVideo fails to sanitize the phone field during user registration, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that persists in the database. When administrators visit the users management page, the unsanitized phone value is rendered via innerHTML, executing the injected script in the admin's browser session.
🎖@cveNotify
AVideo fails to sanitize the phone field during user registration, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript that persists in the database. When administrators visit the users management page, the unsanitized phone value is rendered via innerHTML, executing the injected script in the admin's browser session.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Harden user input handling by stripping tags from phone numbers to pr… · WWBN/AVideo@1adcb75
…event stored XSS vulnerabilities in user registration and admin grid.
https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-cfvq-r985-84wj
https://github.com/WWBN/AVideo/security/advisories/GHSA-cfvq-r985-84wj
🚨 CVE-2026-72748
AVideo contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file write vulnerability in the aVideoEncoderChunk.json.php endpoint that allows remote attackers to write up to 4 GB of arbitrary content to the server filesystem via HTTP PUT requests without authentication. Attackers can exhaust disk space causing denial of service, poison the video encoding pipeline, or chain this with local file inclusion to achieve remote code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
AVideo contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file write vulnerability in the aVideoEncoderChunk.json.php endpoint that allows remote attackers to write up to 4 GB of arbitrary content to the server filesystem via HTTP PUT requests without authentication. Attackers can exhaust disk space causing denial of service, poison the video encoding pipeline, or chain this with local file inclusion to achieve remote code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Add encoder chunk token generation and enhance authentication for chu… · WWBN/AVideo@1b55a9b
…nk uploads
🚨 CVE-2026-72779
Craft CMS 5.0.0-RC1 before 5.10.6 and 4.0.0-RC1 before 4.18.2 contain an arbitrary file read vulnerability. The create() Twig function restricts class instantiation using a 5-entry blocklist that does not include SplFileObject, allowing an authenticated administrator (with allowAdminChanges=true) to configure a malicious entry type title or URI format that instantiates SplFileObject in a non-sandboxed template context. When a user subsequently creates an entry in the affected section, arbitrary files on the server (such as .env containing the security key and database credentials) are read and rendered as entry titles.
🎖@cveNotify
Craft CMS 5.0.0-RC1 before 5.10.6 and 4.0.0-RC1 before 4.18.2 contain an arbitrary file read vulnerability. The create() Twig function restricts class instantiation using a 5-entry blocklist that does not include SplFileObject, allowing an authenticated administrator (with allowAdminChanges=true) to configure a malicious entry type title or URI format that instantiates SplFileObject in a non-sandboxed template context. When a user subsequently creates an entry in the affected section, arbitrary files on the server (such as .env containing the security key and database credentials) are read and rendered as entry titles.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Arbitrary file read via SplFileObject in non-sandboxed template contexts
The `create()` Twig function (introduced in 5.9.0) allows instantiation of arbitrary PHP classes from template code, restricted only by a 5-entry blocklist. `SplFileObject` is not in the blocklist,...
🚨 CVE-2026-72781
Craft CMS versions >= 5.0.0-RC1 before 5.10.7 and >= 4.0.0-RC1 before 4.18.3 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the Twig sandbox mechanism. Because Craft marks the ElementInterface as safe (via the AllowedInSandbox attribute) and the sandbox allowlisting extends to the entire class hierarchy (craft\base\Component up to yii\base\Component), an authenticated attacker with permission to access the control panel can render a malicious Twig template that abuses the yii\base\Component arbitrary function-call gadget to execute arbitrary code, even when the Twig sandbox is enabled via enableTwigSandbox().
🎖@cveNotify
Craft CMS versions >= 5.0.0-RC1 before 5.10.7 and >= 4.0.0-RC1 before 4.18.3 contain a remote code execution vulnerability in the Twig sandbox mechanism. Because Craft marks the ElementInterface as safe (via the AllowedInSandbox attribute) and the sandbox allowlisting extends to the entire class hierarchy (craft\base\Component up to yii\base\Component), an authenticated attacker with permission to access the control panel can render a malicious Twig template that abuses the yii\base\Component arbitrary function-call gadget to execute arbitrary code, even when the Twig sandbox is enabled via enableTwigSandbox().
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Authenticated RCE through Twig sandbox escape
The Twig sandbox mechanism in Craft CMS is configured to allow dangerous functionality from the Yii framework, leading to authenticated RCE in a manner similar to previously disclosed vulnerabiliti...
🚨 CVE-2026-72784
Craft CMS versions >= 5.0.0-RC1 before 5.10.6 and >= 4.0.0-RC1 before 4.18.2 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the GraphQL save<Volume>Asset mutation, which fetches an attacker-supplied URL server-side. The anti-SSRF validation is incomplete: validateIp() does not cover CGNAT (100.64.0.0/10) or NAT64 (64:ff9b::/96) ranges, and the only IP check runs after the request has already been issued. An attacker holding a GraphQL token scoped only to asset-creation permissions can disclose internal HTTP content from CGNAT/NAT64 targets, force outbound GET requests to internal hosts (including RFC1918, loopback, and metadata endpoints), and enumerate internal services.
🎖@cveNotify
Craft CMS versions >= 5.0.0-RC1 before 5.10.6 and >= 4.0.0-RC1 before 4.18.2 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the GraphQL save<Volume>Asset mutation, which fetches an attacker-supplied URL server-side. The anti-SSRF validation is incomplete: validateIp() does not cover CGNAT (100.64.0.0/10) or NAT64 (64:ff9b::/96) ranges, and the only IP check runs after the request has already been issued. An attacker holding a GraphQL token scoped only to asset-creation permissions can disclose internal HTTP content from CGNAT/NAT64 targets, force outbound GET requests to internal hosts (including RFC1918, loopback, and metadata endpoints), and enumerate internal services.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
SSRF in GQL asset mutation - incomplete IP denylist + post-fetch validation
The GraphQL mutation `save<Volume>Asset(_file: { url: ... })` fetches an attacker-supplied URL server-side. The anti-SSRF logic introduced by prior advisories (GHSA-gp2f-7wcm-5fhx, GHSA-v2gc-...
🚨 CVE-2026-21269
ColdFusion is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.
🎖@cveNotify
ColdFusion is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security updates available for Adobe ColdFusion | APSB26-119