🚨 CVE-2026-84385
A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow attacker to escalation of privilege via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSOAR PaaS 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR PaaS 7.3 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.5.0 through 7.5.3, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.4 all versions, FortiSOAR on-premise 7.3 all versions may allow attacker to escalation of privilege via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-84386
A unverified ownership vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiClientWindows 7.2 all versions may allow attacker to improper access control via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
A unverified ownership vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows 7.4.0 through 7.4.7, FortiClientWindows 7.2 all versions may allow attacker to improper access control via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-84387
A improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.2.0, FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.9 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
A improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.2.0, FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.6, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.9 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-84389
A url redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.1, FortiSIEM 7.4.1 through 7.4.2 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
A url redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM 7.5.0 through 7.5.1, FortiSIEM 7.4.1 through 7.4.2 may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-84391
A use of uninitialized variable vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.3 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to denial of service via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
A use of uninitialized variable vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer 7.6.3 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to denial of service via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-84392
A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability [CWE-476] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.9.0, FortiPAM 1.8 all versions, FortiPAM 1.7 all versions, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to crash the httpsd daemon via crafted HTTP requests.
🎖@cveNotify
A NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability [CWE-476] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.9.0, FortiPAM 1.8 all versions, FortiPAM 1.7 all versions, FortiPAM 1.6 all versions, FortiPAM 1.5 all versions, FortiPAM 1.4 all versions, FortiPAM 1.3 all versions, FortiPAM 1.2 all versions, FortiPAM 1.1 all versions, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.4 all versions, FortiProxy 7.2 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to crash the httpsd daemon via crafted HTTP requests.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-84393
A improper validation of certificate with host mismatch vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.6.2 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
A improper validation of certificate with host mismatch vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6, FortiProxy 7.6.2 through 7.6.6 may allow attacker to information disclosure via <insert attack vector here>
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-86073
n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to 2.37.7 and 2.38.1, the OAuth token endpoint bound an authorization code's first access token to the consented resource but did not bind its refresh token. Refreshing checked only that the requested resource was registered, not that it matched the original grant. An OAuth client approved for one workflow could substitute a different workflow URL in the resource parameter and obtain a valid token for an unapproved workflow accessible to the consenting user. This issue is fixed in versions 2.37.7 and 2.38.1.
🎖@cveNotify
n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to 2.37.7 and 2.38.1, the OAuth token endpoint bound an authorization code's first access token to the consented resource but did not bind its refresh token. Refreshing checked only that the requested resource was registered, not that it matched the original grant. An OAuth client approved for one workflow could substitute a different workflow URL in the resource parameter and obtain a valid token for an unapproved workflow accessible to the consenting user. This issue is fixed in versions 2.37.7 and 2.38.1.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
chore: Bundle 2.x (backport to release-candidate/2.37.x) (#37588) · n8n-io/n8n@1845848
Co-authored-by: n8n-assistant[bot] <100856346+n8n-assistant[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Matsu <matias.huhta@n8n.io>
Co-authored-by: Matsu <matias.huhta@n8n.io>
🚨 CVE-2026-86667
A weakness has been identified in aircheng-org iWebShop-5 up to 5.15. The affected element is the function member_list of the file controllers/member.php. This manipulation of the argument Search causes sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
🎖@cveNotify
A weakness has been identified in aircheng-org iWebShop-5 up to 5.15. The affected element is the function member_list of the file controllers/member.php. This manipulation of the argument Search causes sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - aircheng-org/iWebShop-5: iWebShop是一款基于PHP语言及MYSQL数据库开发的B2B2C多用户商城系统,支持自营和多商家入驻、集成微信商城、手机商城、移动端APP商城、三级分销、电商直播、微信小程序,它…
iWebShop是一款基于PHP语言及MYSQL数据库开发的B2B2C多用户商城系统,支持自营和多商家入驻、集成微信商城、手机商城、移动端APP商城、三级分销、电商直播、微信小程序,它可以承载大数据量且性能优良,代码支持二次开发是电商建站首选。 - aircheng-org/iWebShop-5
🚨 CVE-2026-86668
A security vulnerability has been detected in aircheng-org iWebShop-5 up to 5.15. The impacted element is the function uploadFile of the file controllers/pic.php. Such manipulation of the argument outerSrc/selectPhoto leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
🎖@cveNotify
A security vulnerability has been detected in aircheng-org iWebShop-5 up to 5.15. The impacted element is the function uploadFile of the file controllers/pic.php. Such manipulation of the argument outerSrc/selectPhoto leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - aircheng-org/iWebShop-5: iWebShop是一款基于PHP语言及MYSQL数据库开发的B2B2C多用户商城系统,支持自营和多商家入驻、集成微信商城、手机商城、移动端APP商城、三级分销、电商直播、微信小程序,它…
iWebShop是一款基于PHP语言及MYSQL数据库开发的B2B2C多用户商城系统,支持自营和多商家入驻、集成微信商城、手机商城、移动端APP商城、三级分销、电商直播、微信小程序,它可以承载大数据量且性能优良,代码支持二次开发是电商建站首选。 - aircheng-org/iWebShop-5
🚨 CVE-2026-84352
Use after free in WebGL in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
🎖@cveNotify
Use after free in WebGL in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
🎖@cveNotify
Chrome Releases
Stable Channel Update for Desktop
The Stable channel has been updated to 152.0.7977.75/.76 for Windows and Mac and 152.0.7977.75 for Linux, which will roll out over the comi...
🚨 CVE-2026-84353
Use after free in Shared Tab Groups in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
🎖@cveNotify
Use after free in Shared Tab Groups in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.75 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
🎖@cveNotify
Chrome Releases
Stable Channel Update for Desktop
The Stable channel has been updated to 152.0.7977.75/.76 for Windows and Mac and 152.0.7977.75 for Linux, which will roll out over the comi...
🚨 CVE-2026-16660
IBM Db2 Mirror for i 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to an out-of-bounds read.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Db2 Mirror for i 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to an out-of-bounds read.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM Db2 Mirror for i is affected by multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-18567, CVE-2026-16660, CVE-2026-17483]
IBM Db2 Mirror for i is affected by multiple vulnerabilities as described in the vulnerability details section.
🚨 CVE-2026-16689
IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.1, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.28 and IBM Integration Bus for z/OS 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.0.7 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper logging of credentials.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM App Connect Enterprise 13.0.1.0 through 13.0.8.1, and 12.0.1.0 through 12.0.12.28 and IBM Integration Bus for z/OS 10.1.0.0 through 10.1.0.7 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper logging of credentials.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM App Connect Enterprise and IBM Integration Bus for z/OS Adapter nodes are vulnerable to multiple CVEs
IBM App Connect Enterprise and IBM Integration Bus for z/OS Adapter nodes are vulnerable to multiple CVEs.
🚨 CVE-2026-16693
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of hardcoded cryptographic constants to obfuscate encryption keys.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to the use of hardcoded cryptographic constants to obfuscate encryption keys.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Cryptographic Algorithm Weakness in DCM [CVE-2026-16693]
IBM i is vulnerable to allowing an authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information [CVE-2026-16693] in Digital Certificate Manager (DCM) as described in the vulnerability details section.
🚨 CVE-2026-16826
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Debug Server
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-16826, CVE-2026-17499, CVE-2026-17273, CVE-2026-17259, CVE-2026-18076, CVE-2026-17274, CVE-2026-17270, CVE-2026-18073] in Debug Server as described in the vulnerability details section.
🚨 CVE-2026-16892
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication during service-name matching.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authentication during service-name matching.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By An Improper Authentication Vulnerability in Network Authentication Service [CVE-2026-16892]
IBM i is vulnerable to allowing a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions [CVE-2026-16892] in Network Authentication Service (NAS) as described in the vulnerability details section.
🚨 CVE-2026-16941
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, and 7.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify certain system messages due to improper authorization.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, and 7.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to modify certain system messages due to improper authorization.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By An Incorrect Authorization Vulnerability [CVE-2026-16941]
IBM i is vulnerable to allowing a remote authenticated attacker to modify certain system messages [CVE-2026-16941] as described in the vulnerability details section.
🚨 CVE-2026-17057
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service and affect data integrity due to missing authentication for critical functions.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service and affect data integrity due to missing authentication for critical functions.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Denial of Service Vulnerabilities in NFS [CVE-2026-17057, CVE-2026-17207]
IBM i is vulnerable to denial of service due to missing authentication and a buffer overflow [CVE-2026-17057, CVE-2026-17207] in Network File System (NFS) as described in the vulnerability details section.
🚨 CVE-2025-38352
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()
If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand().
If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be
able to detect timer->it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or
lock_task_sighand() will fail.
Add the tsk->exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this.
This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because
exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still
makes sense, task_work_add(&tsk->posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail
anyway in this case.
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
posix-cpu-timers: fix race between handle_posix_cpu_timers() and posix_cpu_timer_del()
If an exiting non-autoreaping task has already passed exit_notify() and
calls handle_posix_cpu_timers() from IRQ, it can be reaped by its parent
or debugger right after unlock_task_sighand().
If a concurrent posix_cpu_timer_del() runs at that moment, it won't be
able to detect timer->it.cpu.firing != 0: cpu_timer_task_rcu() and/or
lock_task_sighand() will fail.
Add the tsk->exit_state check into run_posix_cpu_timers() to fix this.
This fix is not needed if CONFIG_POSIX_CPU_TIMERS_TASK_WORK=y, because
exit_task_work() is called before exit_notify(). But the check still
makes sense, task_work_add(&tsk->posix_cputimers_work.work) will fail
anyway in this case.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-11837
A local privilege escalation vulnerability was found in the ansible.posix authorized_key module. The module's keyfile() function uses os.chown() instead of os.lchown() and opens files without O_NOFOLLOW when managing SSH authorized keys. An unprivileged local user can pre-stage symbolic links in their ~/.ssh directory to redirect file ownership changes to arbitrary system paths when an operator runs the authorized_key task as root, leading to local privilege escalation.
🎖@cveNotify
A local privilege escalation vulnerability was found in the ansible.posix authorized_key module. The module's keyfile() function uses os.chown() instead of os.lchown() and opens files without O_NOFOLLOW when managing SSH authorized keys. An unprivileged local user can pre-stage symbolic links in their ~/.ssh directory to redirect file ownership changes to arbitrary system paths when an operator runs the authorized_key task as root, leading to local privilege escalation.
🎖@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-11837 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App