🚨 CVE-2026-80176
Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains a Plaintext Storage of a Password vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure.
🎖@cveNotify
Dell SCG 5.0 Appliance versions prior to 5.36.00.16 and Dell SCG 5.0 Application versions prior to 5.36.00.00, contains a Plaintext Storage of a Password vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to information disclosure.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-86510
A vulnerability has been found in D-Link DIR-822A A_101. Affected is the function tunnel_set_params of the component L2TP Control Message Parser. Such manipulation leads to out-of-bounds write. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability has been found in D-Link DIR-822A A_101. Affected is the function tunnel_set_params of the component L2TP Control Message Parser. Such manipulation leads to out-of-bounds write. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
🎖@cveNotify
tzh00203 on Notion
D-Link DIR-822A L2TP Host Name AVP Out-of-Bounds Write | Notion
Vulnerability Title: Out-of-Bounds Write in L2TP / L2TPv6 Host Name AVP Parsing of D-Link DIR-822A
🚨 CVE-2026-76561
A flaw was found in Dogtag PKI, as used by FreeIPA's certificate authority component. The certificate profile import functionality does not fully validate uploaded profile content beyond the profile ID. An authenticated user with CA Administrator privileges can exploit Dogtag's ExternalProcessConstraint mechanism to execute arbitrary commands with attacker-controlled environment variables, achieving code execution as the pkiuser account.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in Dogtag PKI, as used by FreeIPA's certificate authority component. The certificate profile import functionality does not fully validate uploaded profile content beyond the profile ID. An authenticated user with CA Administrator privileges can exploit Dogtag's ExternalProcessConstraint mechanism to execute arbitrary commands with attacker-controlled environment variables, achieving code execution as the pkiuser account.
🎖@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-76561 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
🚨 CVE-2026-16502
The Live Composer – Free WordPress Website Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.18 via deserialization of untrusted input . This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software, which means this vulnerability has no impact unless another plugin or theme containing a POP chain is installed on the site. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it may allow the attacker to perform actions like delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code depending on the POP chain present.
🎖@cveNotify
The Live Composer – Free WordPress Website Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.18 via deserialization of untrusted input . This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software, which means this vulnerability has no impact unless another plugin or theme containing a POP chain is installed on the site. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it may allow the attacker to perform actions like delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code depending on the POP chain present.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-18021
The The Beaver Builder Page Builder – Drag and Drop Website Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 2.10.3.1. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes.
🎖@cveNotify
The The Beaver Builder Page Builder – Drag and Drop Website Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 2.10.3.1. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-80219
A flaw was found in hawtio-operator. When deploying Hawtio in cluster mode, the operator creates a cluster-scoped OAuthClient with automatic grant approval (GrantMethod: auto) and no client secret (public client). The redirect URIs are derived from the operator-created Route, whose hostname is tenant-controlled via the Hawtio CR spec.routeHostName field. A malicious tenant can register an arbitrary hostname as a valid OAuth redirect target and, because grants are auto-approved, obtain OpenShift access tokens of any cluster user who visits the crafted authorization URL without any consent prompt.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in hawtio-operator. When deploying Hawtio in cluster mode, the operator creates a cluster-scoped OAuthClient with automatic grant approval (GrantMethod: auto) and no client secret (public client). The redirect URIs are derived from the operator-created Route, whose hostname is tenant-controlled via the Hawtio CR spec.routeHostName field. A malicious tenant can register an arbitrary hostname as a valid OAuth redirect target and, because grants are auto-approved, obtain OpenShift access tokens of any cluster user who visits the crafted authorization URL without any consent prompt.
🎖@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-80219 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
🚨 CVE-2026-16497
NVIDIA Triton Inference Server for Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause excessive iteration. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
NVIDIA Triton Inference Server for Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause excessive iteration. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
product-security/2026/5875 at main · NVIDIA/product-security
Starting October 1, 2026, NVIDIA PSIRT will only publish security bulletins on GitHub in Markdown, CSAF, and CVE formats to meet industry demand for easier integration. - NVIDIA/product-security
🚨 CVE-2026-20293
A vulnerability in the Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) Shell implementation of Cisco UCS Servers and UCS-based appliances could allow an authenticated attacker with valid credentials for a user account with the role of user or admin or an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to an affected device to bypass UEFI Secure Boot validation checks and execute unauthorized software.
This vulnerability is due to the availability of memory write commands in the UEFI Shell while UEFI Secure Boot is enabled on a device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by selecting the UEFI Shell boot option at boot time and using available shell commands to modify UEFI memory variables. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to manipulate the preboot environment, overwrite UEFI Secure Boot-related memory values, and execute unauthorized software on the affected device.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability in the Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) Shell implementation of Cisco UCS Servers and UCS-based appliances could allow an authenticated attacker with valid credentials for a user account with the role of user or admin or an unauthenticated attacker with physical access to an affected device to bypass UEFI Secure Boot validation checks and execute unauthorized software.
This vulnerability is due to the availability of memory write commands in the UEFI Shell while UEFI Secure Boot is enabled on a device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by selecting the UEFI Shell boot option at boot time and using available shell commands to modify UEFI memory variables. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to manipulate the preboot environment, overwrite UEFI Secure Boot-related memory values, and execute unauthorized software on the affected device.
🎖@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco UCS and UCS-Based Appliances UEFI Shell Secure Boot Bypass Vulnerability
A vulnerability in the Unified Extensible Firmware Interface (UEFI) Shell implementation of Cisco UCS Servers and UCS-based appliances could allow an authenticated attacker with valid credentials for a user account with the role of user or admin or an unauthenticated…
🚨 CVE-2026-22575
An improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.10, FortiManager Cloud 7.2 all versions may allow an administrator to bypass the approval process for workflow sessions via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests.
🎖@cveNotify
An improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.4, FortiManager 7.4.0 through 7.4.10, FortiManager 7.2 all versions, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.2 through 7.6.4, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.1 through 7.4.10, FortiManager Cloud 7.2 all versions may allow an administrator to bypass the approval process for workflow sessions via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-26084
A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow attacker to access sensitive information via crafted HTTP requests.
🎖@cveNotify
A improper access control vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSandbox 5.0.0 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox 4.4.0 through 4.4.8, FortiSandbox Cloud 5.0.4 through 5.0.5, FortiSandbox PaaS 5.0.4 through 5.0.5 may allow attacker to access sensitive information via crafted HTTP requests.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-47625
NVIDIA Triton Inference Server for Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker could abuse missing authorization. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure, data tampering, and denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
NVIDIA Triton Inference Server for Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker could abuse missing authorization. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure, data tampering, and denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
product-security/2026/5875 at main · NVIDIA/product-security
Starting October 1, 2026, NVIDIA PSIRT will only publish security bulletins on GitHub in Markdown, CSAF, and CVE formats to meet industry demand for easier integration. - NVIDIA/product-security
🚨 CVE-2026-52307
An authenticated stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Column Management component of ClassCMS 1CMS v5.6 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via injecting a crafted payload into the title field.
🎖@cveNotify
An authenticated stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Column Management component of ClassCMS 1CMS v5.6 allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via injecting a crafted payload into the title field.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-75156
Apache Airflow FAB provider versions 3.7.3 through 3.8.0 do not validate the issuer or audience of Azure AD `id_token`s during OAuth login. Deployments are affected only when the FAB auth manager is configured with Azure AD as an OAuth provider. Because the signing keys are fetched from Microsoft's **multi-tenant** JWKS endpoint, an `id_token` minted in *any* Azure tenant — including one the attacker creates — passes signature verification, and the username and role assignments are then read from that attacker-controlled token. Anyone able to register an Azure tenant can therefore authenticate to the Airflow UI with no prior access to the deployment.
The fix for **CVE-2026-59243** was incomplete, and this advisory closes the remaining gap: that fix made the provider verify the `id_token` signature, but did not add issuer or audience checks. Operators who already applied the CVE-2026-59243 fix are **still affected and must upgrade again** — 3.7.3 is the release that shipped that fix, so every version containing it falls inside this affected range. Upgrade to apache-airflow-providers-fab `3.8.1` or later.
🎖@cveNotify
Apache Airflow FAB provider versions 3.7.3 through 3.8.0 do not validate the issuer or audience of Azure AD `id_token`s during OAuth login. Deployments are affected only when the FAB auth manager is configured with Azure AD as an OAuth provider. Because the signing keys are fetched from Microsoft's **multi-tenant** JWKS endpoint, an `id_token` minted in *any* Azure tenant — including one the attacker creates — passes signature verification, and the username and role assignments are then read from that attacker-controlled token. Anyone able to register an Azure tenant can therefore authenticate to the Airflow UI with no prior access to the deployment.
The fix for **CVE-2026-59243** was incomplete, and this advisory closes the remaining gap: that fix made the provider verify the `id_token` signature, but did not add issuer or audience checks. Operators who already applied the CVE-2026-59243 fix are **still affected and must upgrade again** — 3.7.3 is the release that shipped that fix, so every version containing it falls inside this affected range. Upgrade to apache-airflow-providers-fab `3.8.1` or later.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Validate issuer and audience of Azure AD id_tokens in FAB auth manager by potiuk · Pull Request #71735 · apache/airflow
The Azure id_token signature is verified against Microsoft's key set, but the decode call passes no claims_options, so authlib's claims.validate() enforces neither the issuer nor th...
🚨 CVE-2026-78216
AshLua exposes Ash read actions to Lua scripts run through an eval action. A read call accepts an operation (list, min, max, first, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value.
Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A script could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate instead of as a field. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The prior hardening only enforced the exposed-field allow-list (field visibility), which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.
The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.
This issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.2.
🎖@cveNotify
AshLua exposes Ash read actions to Lua scripts run through an eval action. A read call accepts an operation (list, min, max, first, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value.
Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A script could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate instead of as a field. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The prior hardening only enforced the exposed-field allow-list (field visibility), which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.
The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.
This issue affects ash_lua: from 0.1.0 before 0.2.2.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-78230
AshAi exposes Ash read actions to language-model tool calls. The read tool accepts an aggregate result type (min, max, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value.
Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A tool caller could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate; min/max in particular return an actual field value. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The tool's existing check only required the field to be public, which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.
The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.
This issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.3.
🎖@cveNotify
AshAi exposes Ash read actions to language-model tool calls. The read tool accepts an aggregate result type (min, max, sum, avg) that builds an ad-hoc Ash.Query.Aggregate over a named field and returns its raw value.
Ash field policies redact forbidden fields on returned records (replacing them with %Ash.ForbiddenField{}), but that redaction does not apply to aggregate values. A tool caller could therefore read a field the calling actor's field policies forbid by requesting it as an aggregate; min/max in particular return an actual field value. This includes fields that are public? true but restricted per-actor by a field policy, such as sensitive PII. The tool's existing check only required the field to be public, which is a separate axis from per-actor field-policy authorization.
The fix authorizes the aggregated field against the resource's field policies, so aggregating over a field the actor may not see is refused or scoped to the rows where it is visible.
This issue affects ash_ai: from 0.1.0 before 1.0.3.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-78997
UC Browser for Android (package com.UCMobile.intl, version 13.7.8.1314) contains a Universal Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of any origin. An attacker hosts a specially crafted URL on a UC-owned domain (via a reflected XSS) that leverages the browser's internal JavaScript bridge to register a deferred callback, navigate the tab to a victim site, and then execute attacker-controlled code on that site when a login dialog is dismissed.
🎖@cveNotify
UC Browser for Android (package com.UCMobile.intl, version 13.7.8.1314) contains a Universal Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability that allows an attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the context of any origin. An attacker hosts a specially crafted URL on a UC-owned domain (via a reflected XSS) that leverages the browser's internal JavaScript bridge to register a deferred callback, navigate the tab to a victim site, and then execute attacker-controlled code on that site when a login dialog is dismissed.
🎖@cveNotify
Gist
ucbrowser-uxss.md
GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets.
🚨 CVE-2026-79569
Movie_Recommend v1.0.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the sort parameter at /loadingmore. This vulnerability allows attackers to access sensitive database information via a crafted SQL statement.
🎖@cveNotify
Movie_Recommend v1.0.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the sort parameter at /loadingmore. This vulnerability allows attackers to access sensitive database information via a crafted SQL statement.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CVE/movie/sql.md at main · fangtang7/CVE
CVE. Contribute to fangtang7/CVE development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2026-79570
mfish-nocode-pro v1.0.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the tableName parameter at /sys/dbConnect/data. This vulnerability allows attackers to access sensitive database information via a crafted SQL statement.
🎖@cveNotify
mfish-nocode-pro v1.0.0 was discovered to contain a SQL injection vulnerability in the tableName parameter at /sys/dbConnect/data. This vulnerability allows attackers to access sensitive database information via a crafted SQL statement.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CVE/mfish-nocode/sql.md at main · fangtang7/CVE
CVE. Contribute to fangtang7/CVE development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2026-81531
An information
disclosure vulnerability has been identified in Omada Controller. An API endpoint intended for Controller initialization
remains accessible after completion and may disclose account-related
information to unauthenticated remote users.
Successful
exploitation may allow an attacker to remote query the affected endpoint that
may facilitate user enumeration and subsequent attacks targeting administrative
accounts.
🎖@cveNotify
An information
disclosure vulnerability has been identified in Omada Controller. An API endpoint intended for Controller initialization
remains accessible after completion and may disclose account-related
information to unauthenticated remote users.
Successful
exploitation may allow an attacker to remote query the affected endpoint that
may facilitate user enumeration and subsequent attacks targeting administrative
accounts.
🎖@cveNotify
Omadanetworks
Download Omada Software Controller | Omada Network Support
Free on-premises controller for the Omada Software Defined Networking (SDN) platform, provides centralized management of Omada access points, switches, and routers.
🚨 CVE-2026-82052
The $regexFindAll expression can be used by an authenticated user who can run aggregation pipeline stages to crash a MongoDB server (mongod). Under certain specific conditions the regex match can start in the middle of a multi-code-unit character, triggering an assertion during query execution.
🎖@cveNotify
The $regexFindAll expression can be used by an authenticated user who can run aggregation pipeline stages to crash a MongoDB server (mongod). Under certain specific conditions the regex match can start in the middle of a multi-code-unit character, triggering an assertion during query execution.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-82054
A security issue exists in MongoDB server's JSON Pointer parser used during $jsonSchema query filter processing. When a find command includes a specially crafted $jsonSchema filter field, the parser processes the input without enforcing adequate limits on iteration count or total allocation size, resulting in significant memory amplification. Under concurrent request load, the cumulative memory consumption can exhaust available heap memory, causing the server's out-of-memory handler to terminate the mongod process and deny service to all connected clients.
🎖@cveNotify
A security issue exists in MongoDB server's JSON Pointer parser used during $jsonSchema query filter processing. When a find command includes a specially crafted $jsonSchema filter field, the parser processes the input without enforcing adequate limits on iteration count or total allocation size, resulting in significant memory amplification. Under concurrent request load, the cumulative memory consumption can exhaust available heap memory, causing the server's out-of-memory handler to terminate the mongod process and deny service to all connected clients.
🎖@cveNotify