🚨 CVE-2026-70403
XING CPTrans-ME-X contains a Use of Hard-coded Password (CWE-259). Anyone with the knowledge of the credential may log in to the affected device.
🎖@cveNotify
XING CPTrans-ME-X contains a Use of Hard-coded Password (CWE-259). Anyone with the knowledge of the credential may log in to the affected device.
🎖@cveNotify
JOYSOUND.Biz | 業務用カラオケ機器(導入・レンタル)
通信アダプタ CPTrans-ME-X | 業務用カラオケ機器(導入・レンタル)| JOYSOUND.Biz
JOYSOUND 通信アダプタの製品ページです。カラオケ導入ご検討の方は是非ご覧下さい。
🚨 CVE-2026-80180
Stored XSS via markdown HTML processing in Apache Allura.
This issue affects Apache Allura: from through 1.20.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.21.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Stored XSS via markdown HTML processing in Apache Allura.
This issue affects Apache Allura: from through 1.20.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.21.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-81270
Apache Allura: exposure of non-public information via search.
This issue affects Apache Allura: through 1.20.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.21.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Apache Allura: exposure of non-public information via search.
This issue affects Apache Allura: through 1.20.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.21.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-85094
The Canva Android App before 2.376.0 did not restrict the headers returned to an external origin running in a privileged WebView. A threat actor with control of the WebView could access a user’s session.
🎖@cveNotify
The Canva Android App before 2.376.0 did not restrict the headers returned to an external origin running in a privileged WebView. A threat actor with control of the WebView could access a user’s session.
🎖@cveNotify
Canva
Canva Trust & Security Portal | Powered by SafeBase
See how Canva manages their security program with SafeBase.
🚨 CVE-2026-6217
Use of a One-Way hash without a salt vulnerability in Pik Online Software Solutions Inc. Pik Online Portal allows Cryptanalysis.
This issue affects Pik Online Portal: through 3.5.1.
🎖@cveNotify
Use of a One-Way hash without a salt vulnerability in Pik Online Software Solutions Inc. Pik Online Portal allows Cryptanalysis.
This issue affects Pik Online Portal: through 3.5.1.
🎖@cveNotify
siberguvenlik.gov.tr
T.C. Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı resmi web sitesi.
🚨 CVE-2026-80190
Apache Allura: stored XSS via SVN code repositories. Git repositories are not known to be affected. The vulnerability is likely mitigated via default CSP headers.
This issue affects Apache Allura: through 1.20.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.21.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Apache Allura: stored XSS via SVN code repositories. Git repositories are not known to be affected. The vulnerability is likely mitigated via default CSP headers.
This issue affects Apache Allura: through 1.20.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.21.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-81302
PALLET CONTROL products contain an incorrect default permission vulnerability, which may allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges on the affected product.
🎖@cveNotify
PALLET CONTROL products contain an incorrect default permission vulnerability, which may allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges on the affected product.
🎖@cveNotify
jvn.jp
JVN#84094853: PALLET CONTROL products vulnerable to improper access control
Japan Vulnerability Notes
🚨 CVE-2026-85525
Improper OCSP response validation in the Snowflake Python, Go, JDBC, and Node.js drivers allowed a revoked TLS certificate to be accepted as valid, because OCSP responses were not reliably bound to the certificate being validated and definitive verification failures were treated as transient. A man-in-the-middle attacker holding a revoked certificate and its private key for a Snowflake or stage hostname could cause the driver to establish a TLS session to the attacker-controlled endpoint anyway, allowing the attacker to read and modify data transmitted within that connection. Successful exploitation requires that on-path position and the corresponding private key, and impact is limited to data carried within the intercepted connection. The fix is available in the patched versions listed above. Users must manually upgrade.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper OCSP response validation in the Snowflake Python, Go, JDBC, and Node.js drivers allowed a revoked TLS certificate to be accepted as valid, because OCSP responses were not reliably bound to the certificate being validated and definitive verification failures were treated as transient. A man-in-the-middle attacker holding a revoked certificate and its private key for a Snowflake or stage hostname could cause the driver to establish a TLS session to the attacker-controlled endpoint anyway, allowing the attacker to read and modify data transmitted within that connection. Successful exploitation requires that on-path position and the corresponding private key, and impact is limited to data carried within the intercepted connection. The fix is available in the patched versions listed above. Users must manually upgrade.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-85528
Improper input validation of the auto-configuration account identifier in Snowflake JDBC Driver versions 4.2.0 through 4.3.3 allowed a credential-bearing login request to be redirected to an attacker-selected HTTPS endpoint. An attacker able to control the account value could cause the driver to transmit a reusable login credential to a host of their choosing and replay it to obtain the privileges granted to that credential. Successful exploitation requires an application using jdbc:snowflake:auto with a connections.toml section that omits an explicit host and a lower-trust principal able to set the account value; ordinary JDBC URLs are unaffected. The fix is available in Snowflake JDBC Driver version 4.3.4. Users must manually upgrade.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper input validation of the auto-configuration account identifier in Snowflake JDBC Driver versions 4.2.0 through 4.3.3 allowed a credential-bearing login request to be redirected to an attacker-selected HTTPS endpoint. An attacker able to control the account value could cause the driver to transmit a reusable login credential to a host of their choosing and replay it to obtain the privileges granted to that credential. Successful exploitation requires an application using jdbc:snowflake:auto with a connections.toml section that omits an explicit host and a lower-trust principal able to set the account value; ordinary JDBC URLs are unaffected. The fix is available in Snowflake JDBC Driver version 4.3.4. Users must manually upgrade.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-85533
An authorization flaw in MISP allowed an authenticated user to submit a sharing_group_id without verifying that the user was authorized to use the referenced Sharing Group.
In several attribute and Galaxy Cluster creation and editing workflows, validation of the submitted Sharing Group was performed only when the request explicitly set the distribution field to 4 ("Sharing Group"). An attacker could therefore craft a request containing a sharing_group_id while omitting the distribution parameter, or otherwise avoiding the distribution == 4 condition, causing the Sharing Group authorization check to be skipped.
This could allow a user with permission to create or modify the affected MISP objects to associate data with a Sharing Group that they are not authorized to use. Depending on the affected object's existing distribution settings and subsequent processing, this could bypass intended information-sharing boundaries and result in unauthorized placement or distribution of data to members of another Sharing Group.
The issue affected attribute attachment and editing operations as well as Galaxy Cluster creation and editing. The fix ensures that authorization is performed whenever a non-empty sharing_group_id is submitted, independently of the distribution parameter. It also centralizes the authorization decision in SharingGroup::canUse() and explicitly rejects empty Sharing Group identifiers rather than allowing them to be interpreted as an unrestricted query.
🎖@cveNotify
An authorization flaw in MISP allowed an authenticated user to submit a sharing_group_id without verifying that the user was authorized to use the referenced Sharing Group.
In several attribute and Galaxy Cluster creation and editing workflows, validation of the submitted Sharing Group was performed only when the request explicitly set the distribution field to 4 ("Sharing Group"). An attacker could therefore craft a request containing a sharing_group_id while omitting the distribution parameter, or otherwise avoiding the distribution == 4 condition, causing the Sharing Group authorization check to be skipped.
This could allow a user with permission to create or modify the affected MISP objects to associate data with a Sharing Group that they are not authorized to use. Depending on the affected object's existing distribution settings and subsequent processing, this could bypass intended information-sharing boundaries and result in unauthorized placement or distribution of data to members of another Sharing Group.
The issue affected attribute attachment and editing operations as well as Galaxy Cluster creation and editing. The fix ensures that authorization is performed whenever a non-empty sharing_group_id is submitted, independently of the distribution parameter. It also centralizes the authorization decision in SharingGroup::canUse() and explicitly rejects empty Sharing Group identifiers rather than allowing them to be interpreted as an unrestricted query.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: [security] Authorise the sharing group whenever one is submitted · MISP/MISP@9b13639
- a submitted sharing_group_id was only authorised when distribution was also sent as 4; omitting distribution skipped the check
- as reported by elhoim (David André)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus ...
- as reported by elhoim (David André)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus ...
🚨 CVE-2026-85538
An incorrect authorization vulnerability in MISP allowed authenticated users to delete attributes from events despite lacking the required perm_modify or perm_modify_org permissions.
The affected attribute deletion paths relied on organization membership checks performed by MispAttribute::deleteAttribute() but did not consistently enforce MISP's event modification authorization rules. Consequently, a user belonging to the organization associated with an event could potentially delete individual attributes or perform bulk attribute deletion even when their assigned role was not authorized to modify the event.
This created an inconsistency between attribute editing and deletion: editing an attribute correctly used MISP's ACL::canModifyEvent() authorization logic, whereas the affected deletion operations could bypass these permission checks.
An authenticated attacker with access to an affected MISP instance and membership in the organization owning an event could exploit this flaw to remove attributes from that event, potentially causing unauthorized modification or loss of threat intelligence data.
The patch introduces a common authorization check for all affected deletion paths. Before deletion, MISP now resolves the associated events and verifies that the current user is authorized to modify each event using the same authorization mechanism used by normal event and attribute modification operations.
🎖@cveNotify
An incorrect authorization vulnerability in MISP allowed authenticated users to delete attributes from events despite lacking the required perm_modify or perm_modify_org permissions.
The affected attribute deletion paths relied on organization membership checks performed by MispAttribute::deleteAttribute() but did not consistently enforce MISP's event modification authorization rules. Consequently, a user belonging to the organization associated with an event could potentially delete individual attributes or perform bulk attribute deletion even when their assigned role was not authorized to modify the event.
This created an inconsistency between attribute editing and deletion: editing an attribute correctly used MISP's ACL::canModifyEvent() authorization logic, whereas the affected deletion operations could bypass these permission checks.
An authenticated attacker with access to an affected MISP instance and membership in the organization owning an event could exploit this flaw to remove attributes from that event, potentially causing unauthorized modification or loss of threat intelligence data.
The patch introduces a common authorization check for all affected deletion paths. Before deletion, MISP now resolves the associated events and verifies that the current user is authorized to modify each event using the same authorization mechanism used by normal event and attribute modification operations.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: [security] Enforce perm_modify on the attribute delete paths · MISP/MISP@d0a6f96
- the attribute delete paths checked org membership only, never perm_modify or perm_modify_org
- as reported by elhoim (David André)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@ant...
- as reported by elhoim (David André)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@ant...
🚨 CVE-2026-84469
fastify versions before 5.12.2 decide whether to compile a request schema based on JavaScript truthiness, but JSON Schema Draft 7 defines the boolean false as a valid schema that rejects every instance. When an application assigns false to a route's body, querystring, params, or headers schema to deny all input, fastify treats it as a missing schema, compiles no validator, and runs the route handler on any request. An unauthenticated remote client can therefore reach a handler that a valid deny-all schema was intended to make unreachable, a complete validation bypass that can lead to unauthorized state changes or execution of disabled operations. Users should upgrade to fastify 5.12.2 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
fastify versions before 5.12.2 decide whether to compile a request schema based on JavaScript truthiness, but JSON Schema Draft 7 defines the boolean false as a valid schema that rejects every instance. When an application assigns false to a route's body, querystring, params, or headers schema to deny all input, fastify treats it as a missing schema, compiles no validator, and runs the route handler on any request. An unauthenticated remote client can therefore reach a handler that a valid deny-all schema was intended to make unreachable, a complete validation bypass that can lead to unauthorized state changes or execution of disabled operations. Users should upgrade to fastify 5.12.2 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
cna.openjsf.org
Security Advisories | OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority
The OpenJS Foundation's CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
🚨 CVE-2026-85184
@fastify/middie versions >= 9.1.0 and before 9.3.4 decide whether to run path-scoped middleware by matching against the raw request target, while the Fastify router resolves an absolute-form request target to its path before dispatching. Because the two layers evaluate different strings, a request using an absolute-form target reaches the route handler while the path-scoped middleware, such as authentication or authorization, is skipped. An unauthenticated network attacker can use this to bypass path-based access controls in a Fastify application that relies on middie for those controls. Users should upgrade to @fastify/middie 9.3.4 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
@fastify/middie versions >= 9.1.0 and before 9.3.4 decide whether to run path-scoped middleware by matching against the raw request target, while the Fastify router resolves an absolute-form request target to its path before dispatching. Because the two layers evaluate different strings, a request using an absolute-form target reaches the route handler while the path-scoped middleware, such as authentication or authorization, is skipped. An unauthenticated network attacker can use this to bypass path-based access controls in a Fastify application that relies on middie for those controls. Users should upgrade to @fastify/middie 9.3.4 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
cna.openjsf.org
Security Advisories | OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority
The OpenJS Foundation's CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
🚨 CVE-2026-85540
DreamMaker developed by Interinfo has a SQL Injection vulnerability. Authenticated remote attackers can inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents.
🎖@cveNotify
DreamMaker developed by Interinfo has a SQL Injection vulnerability. Authenticated remote attackers can inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-85546
MISP contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the sharing group quick-edit functionality. The addOrg, removeOrg, addServer, and removeServer actions share the __initialiseSGQuickEdit() helper, where the HTTP method validation intended to restrict these operations to POST requests was commented out.
As a result, these state-changing actions could be invoked using GET requests. An attacker could craft a URL targeting one of the affected actions and cause an authenticated MISP user with sufficient privileges to request it, for example through a malicious link or embedded web resource.
Successful exploitation could modify the membership of a MISP sharing group without the victim intentionally performing the operation. Depending on the action performed, an attacker could add or remove organisations or servers from a sharing group, potentially granting unintended access to information distributed through that sharing group or disrupting legitimate information sharing.
The patch restores HTTP method enforcement centrally in __initialiseSGQuickEdit() by calling allowMethod(['post']), ensuring that all four affected quick-edit operations require POST requests and are therefore subject to the application's normal protections for state-changing requests.
🎖@cveNotify
MISP contains a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the sharing group quick-edit functionality. The addOrg, removeOrg, addServer, and removeServer actions share the __initialiseSGQuickEdit() helper, where the HTTP method validation intended to restrict these operations to POST requests was commented out.
As a result, these state-changing actions could be invoked using GET requests. An attacker could craft a URL targeting one of the affected actions and cause an authenticated MISP user with sufficient privileges to request it, for example through a malicious link or embedded web resource.
Successful exploitation could modify the membership of a MISP sharing group without the victim intentionally performing the operation. Depending on the action performed, an attacker could add or remove organisations or servers from a sharing group, potentially granting unintended access to information distributed through that sharing group or disrupting legitimate information sharing.
The patch restores HTTP method enforcement centrally in __initialiseSGQuickEdit() by calling allowMethod(['post']), ensuring that all four affected quick-edit operations require POST requests and are therefore subject to the application's normal protections for state-changing requests.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: [security] Require POST for the sharing-group quick-edit actions · MISP/MISP@3060d93
- the addOrg/removeOrg/addServer/removeServer method guard was commented out, so membership changed on GET
- as reported by Scottish Government - National Cyber Team
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5...
- as reported by Scottish Government - National Cyber Team
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5...
🚨 CVE-2026-82728
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a remote HTTP server to exhaust memory on the client host and cause a denial of service.
Two HTTP/1 response-parser states accumulate server data without any cap. In lib/mint/http1.ex, decode_status_line/4 stores the unconsumed data in conn.buffer when the status line is incomplete, and decode_body/5 does the same for an unterminated chunk-extension line. Both wait for a CRLF the server never has to send, and conn.buffer is prepended to every subsequent socket message. The :max_header_list_size budget is wired only into decode_headers/5 and decode_trailer_headers/4, so neither of these states is covered by it. A malicious server, or one reached through an attacker-controlled redirect or a fetched URL, streams bytes indefinitely until the BEAM node is killed by the operating system out-of-memory handler. The chunk-extension variant is reached after a valid status line and a complete, valid header section, so an intermediary inspecting only headers sees an ordinary 200 response.
This issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.10.0.
🎖@cveNotify
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a remote HTTP server to exhaust memory on the client host and cause a denial of service.
Two HTTP/1 response-parser states accumulate server data without any cap. In lib/mint/http1.ex, decode_status_line/4 stores the unconsumed data in conn.buffer when the status line is incomplete, and decode_body/5 does the same for an unterminated chunk-extension line. Both wait for a CRLF the server never has to send, and conn.buffer is prepended to every subsequent socket message. The :max_header_list_size budget is wired only into decode_headers/5 and decode_trailer_headers/4, so neither of these states is covered by it. A malicious server, or one reached through an attacker-controlled redirect or a fetched URL, streams bytes indefinitely until the BEAM node is killed by the operating system out-of-memory handler. The chunk-extension variant is reached after a valid status line and a complete, valid header section, so an intermediary inspecting only headers sees an ordinary 200 response.
This issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.10.0.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-82729
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a remote HTTP server to exhaust CPU on the client host and cause a denial of service.
parse_hex_prefix/2 in lib/mint/http1/parse.ex folds each hex digit of a chunked response's chunk-size field into an arbitrary-precision accumulator with acc * 16 + digit and imposes no limit on the digit count. Because the accumulator grows without bound, the multiplication is not constant time and one pass over N digits costs O(N squared). handle_data/2 prepends conn.buffer and re-parses from the start on every socket message, so a server that dribbles the digits out in small packets makes the client pay that cost repeatedly. A run of roughly 512,000 hex digits costs over ten seconds of CPU in a single pass, measured on stock defaults. The parser reaches this state after a valid status line and a complete, valid header section, so an intermediary inspecting only headers sees an ordinary 200 response.
This issue affects mint: from 1.9.3 before 1.10.0.
🎖@cveNotify
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a remote HTTP server to exhaust CPU on the client host and cause a denial of service.
parse_hex_prefix/2 in lib/mint/http1/parse.ex folds each hex digit of a chunked response's chunk-size field into an arbitrary-precision accumulator with acc * 16 + digit and imposes no limit on the digit count. Because the accumulator grows without bound, the multiplication is not constant time and one pass over N digits costs O(N squared). handle_data/2 prepends conn.buffer and re-parses from the start on every socket message, so a server that dribbles the digits out in small packets makes the client pay that cost repeatedly. A run of roughly 512,000 hex digits costs over ten seconds of CPU in a single pass, measured on stock defaults. The parser reaches this state after a valid status line and a complete, valid header section, so an intermediary inspecting only headers sees an ordinary 200 response.
This issue affects mint: from 1.9.3 before 1.10.0.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-75160
An issue in X-Serie Gateway Firmware V6_00_05 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the endpoints /cgi-bin/wwwugw.cgi and /cgi-bin/ugwdownload.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
An issue in X-Serie Gateway Firmware V6_00_05 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the endpoints /cgi-bin/wwwugw.cgi and /cgi-bin/ugwdownload.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
MBS GmbH
MBS GmbH - MBS GmbH
🚨 CVE-2026-75164
An arbitrary file read vulnerability in /cgi-bin/ugwdownload.cgi of MBS-Solutions X-Serie Gateway firmware V6_00_05 allows a remote authenticated user with the low-privileged Standard role to retrieve arbitrary files from the device filesystem via the file query string parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
An arbitrary file read vulnerability in /cgi-bin/ugwdownload.cgi of MBS-Solutions X-Serie Gateway firmware V6_00_05 allows a remote authenticated user with the low-privileged Standard role to retrieve arbitrary files from the device filesystem via the file query string parameter.
🎖@cveNotify
MBS GmbH
MBS GmbH - MBS GmbH
🚨 CVE-2026-82911
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the OrderConfirmController at GET /order/confirm/{order_number} in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.15.11 allows an unauthenticated attacker to confirm any order on behalf of an authenticated user by directing them to a crafted page. Laravel's VerifyCsrfToken middleware enforces CSRF tokens only on POST, PUT, PATCH, and DELETE requests; the Route::get declaration leaves this state-changing action unprotected. Session cookies configured with SameSite=Lax are automatically included in top-level cross-site navigation, so a single link click triggers OrderConfirmController::confirm() and transitions the target order from pending to confirmed without user authorization. Because order numbers are sequential integers, an attacker can enumerate and confirm all existing orders in a single automated sweep.
🎖@cveNotify
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the OrderConfirmController at GET /order/confirm/{order_number} in Roskus Prospero Flow CRM before 5.15.11 allows an unauthenticated attacker to confirm any order on behalf of an authenticated user by directing them to a crafted page. Laravel's VerifyCsrfToken middleware enforces CSRF tokens only on POST, PUT, PATCH, and DELETE requests; the Route::get declaration leaves this state-changing action unprotected. Session cookies configured with SameSite=Lax are automatically included in top-level cross-site navigation, so a single link click triggers OrderConfirmController::confirm() and transitions the target order from pending to confirmed without user authorization. Because order numbers are sequential integers, an attacker can enumerate and confirm all existing orders in a single automated sweep.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix(security): add CSRF protection to order confirmation endpoint (#265) · Roskus/prospero-flow-crm@a90c0c8
Changed the order confirmation endpoint from GET to POST to prevent CSRF attacks.
GET requests bypass Laravel's CSRF middleware (VerifyCsrfToken only protects
POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE metho...
GET requests bypass Laravel's CSRF middleware (VerifyCsrfToken only protects
POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE metho...
🚨 CVE-2026-85008
undici's cache interceptor documents that only safe HTTP methods are cached, but its logic to skip caching is built by subtracting the configured methods from the set of safe methods, so an unsafe method such as POST, PUT, or DELETE is never placed in the skip list and instead falls through to the full cache-read path. The response-storage gate also lacked a method check, so a response to an unsafe request that is heuristically cacheable or carries an explicit Cache-Control directive is stored and later replayed from cache. Because response headers from a remote origin are untrusted, an origin can answer once with a cacheable status and then have the client's own subsequent state-changing requests to that path served from the stale cache entry without ever reaching the origin, an integrity failure that occurs under the interceptor's default configuration. This affects undici versions from 7.0.0 up to 7.29.1 and from 8.0.0 up to 8.10.2. Users should upgrade to undici 7.29.1 or 8.10.2.
🎖@cveNotify
undici's cache interceptor documents that only safe HTTP methods are cached, but its logic to skip caching is built by subtracting the configured methods from the set of safe methods, so an unsafe method such as POST, PUT, or DELETE is never placed in the skip list and instead falls through to the full cache-read path. The response-storage gate also lacked a method check, so a response to an unsafe request that is heuristically cacheable or carries an explicit Cache-Control directive is stored and later replayed from cache. Because response headers from a remote origin are untrusted, an origin can answer once with a cacheable status and then have the client's own subsequent state-changing requests to that path served from the stale cache entry without ever reaching the origin, an integrity failure that occurs under the interceptor's default configuration. This affects undici versions from 7.0.0 up to 7.29.1 and from 8.0.0 up to 8.10.2. Users should upgrade to undici 7.29.1 or 8.10.2.
🎖@cveNotify
cna.openjsf.org
Security Advisories | OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority
The OpenJS Foundation's CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)