๐จ CVE-2026-83616
xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) DOMParser and XMLSerializer module. Prior to @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.8.15 and 0.9.12, and in xmldom version 0.6.0 and earlier, Document.createProcessingInstruction(target, data) in lib/dom.js accepts an unvalidated target, while the requireWellFormed: true serializer checks only for a colon and the reserved case-insensitive xml name on 0.9.x and performs no target check on 0.8.x. Because serialization emits <?target data?>, a target containing >, ?, whitespace, or another invalid XML-name character can break the processing-instruction boundary and inject XML structure. This issue is fixed in @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.8.15 and 0.9.12; no fixed version is available for xmldom.
๐@cveNotify
xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) DOMParser and XMLSerializer module. Prior to @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.8.15 and 0.9.12, and in xmldom version 0.6.0 and earlier, Document.createProcessingInstruction(target, data) in lib/dom.js accepts an unvalidated target, while the requireWellFormed: true serializer checks only for a colon and the reserved case-insensitive xml name on 0.9.x and performs no target check on 0.8.x. Because serialization emits <?target data?>, a target containing >, ?, whitespace, or another invalid XML-name character can break the processing-instruction boundary and inject XML structure. This issue is fixed in @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.8.15 and 0.9.12; no fixed version is available for xmldom.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: prevent XML injection via unsafe processing instruction target sโฆ ยท xmldom/xmldom@1cde3e3
โฆerialization (GHSA-c7q8-3ch8-vqpv)
Under `requireWellFormed`, `serializeToString` now validates a
`ProcessingInstruction` target against the anchored XML `NCName` production (new
`NCName_exact` e...
Under `requireWellFormed`, `serializeToString` now validates a
`ProcessingInstruction` target against the anchored XML `NCName` production (new
`NCName_exact` e...
๐จ CVE-2026-83618
xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) DOMParser and XMLSerializer module. From 0.9.10 until 0.9.12, the requireWellFormed: true serializer validates DocumentType.publicId and DocumentType.systemId with PubidLiteral_match and SystemLiteral_match expressions produced by reg() in lib/grammar.js, which inherit the multiline flag. A complete valid literal on the first line can therefore satisfy the matcher while U+000A, U+000D, U+2028, or U+2029 and breakout markup remain in the emitted <!DOCTYPE ...> declaration. This bypasses the strict-serialization mitigation for the earlier DocumentType injection advisory; creation and direct property assignment remain unvalidated by design. This issue is fixed in @xmldom/xmldom version 0.9.12.
๐@cveNotify
xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) DOMParser and XMLSerializer module. From 0.9.10 until 0.9.12, the requireWellFormed: true serializer validates DocumentType.publicId and DocumentType.systemId with PubidLiteral_match and SystemLiteral_match expressions produced by reg() in lib/grammar.js, which inherit the multiline flag. A complete valid literal on the first line can therefore satisfy the matcher while U+000A, U+000D, U+2028, or U+2029 and breakout markup remain in the emitted <!DOCTYPE ...> declaration. This bypasses the strict-serialization mitigation for the earlier DocumentType injection advisory; creation and direct property assignment remain unvalidated by design. This issue is fixed in @xmldom/xmldom version 0.9.12.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: prevent multiline-anchor bypass of name/id validation by droppinโฆ ยท xmldom/xmldom@7b2ec67
โฆg the reg() m flag (GHSA-jxjr-3g7g-3944, GHSA-vr34-hp96-76pp, GHSA-3px3-54cx-rmw9, GHSA-6h8r-xr42-gp59)
The shared `reg()` builder in `lib/grammar.js` compiled every anchored production with the ...
The shared `reg()` builder in `lib/grammar.js` compiled every anchored production with the ...
๐จ CVE-2026-83619
xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) DOMParser and XMLSerializer module. From 0.7.0 until 0.8.15, the release-0.8.x parser in lib/sax.js trims captured end-tag names with the unanchored global expression /[ \t\n\r]+$/g. For an end tag containing a long whitespace run followed by a non-whitespace character, the expression retries from each possible starting position and backtracks quadratically before failing its end anchor. DOMParser.parseFromString() reaches the path under default options, allowing a small unauthenticated XML input to stall the Node.js event loop; the 0.9.x and unscoped npm lines do not contain this expression. This issue is fixed in @xmldom/xmldom version 0.8.15.
๐@cveNotify
xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) DOMParser and XMLSerializer module. From 0.7.0 until 0.8.15, the release-0.8.x parser in lib/sax.js trims captured end-tag names with the unanchored global expression /[ \t\n\r]+$/g. For an end tag containing a long whitespace run followed by a non-whitespace character, the expression retries from each possible starting position and backtracks quadratically before failing its end anchor. DOMParser.parseFromString() reaches the path under default options, allowing a small unauthenticated XML input to stall the Node.js event loop; the 0.9.x and unscoped npm lines do not contain this expression. This issue is fixed in @xmldom/xmldom version 0.8.15.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: prevent end-tag whitespace-trim ReDoS via anchored trim (GHSA-x4โฆ ยท xmldom/xmldom@3abb093
โฆfp-j954-r2f4)
The end-tag name trim used an unanchored global regex `/[ \t\n\r]+$/g`. On a name
shaped `whitespace-run + one non-whitespace char` (an end tag `</ โฆ x>`), the
eng...
The end-tag name trim used an unanchored global regex `/[ \t\n\r]+$/g`. On a name
shaped `whitespace-run + one non-whitespace char` (an end tag `</ โฆ x>`), the
eng...
๐จ CVE-2026-84110
A vulnerability was detected in Releasit Releasit COD Form & Upsells v1. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component OTP Validation. The manipulation results in client-side enforcement of server-side security. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version v2 is able to resolve this issue. The affected component should be upgraded.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was detected in Releasit Releasit COD Form & Upsells v1. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component OTP Validation. The manipulation results in client-side enforcement of server-side security. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version v2 is able to resolve this issue. The affected component should be upgraded.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - chetansaini53/releasit-cod-otp-bypass-advisory: Public security advisory: client-side OTP bypass in Releasit COD Formโฆ
Public security advisory: client-side OTP bypass in Releasit COD Form & Upsells (Shopify) - CWE-798, CWE-602 - chetansaini53/releasit-cod-otp-bypass-advisory
๐จ CVE-2026-84111
A flaw has been found in Chanjet CRM up to 20260707. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file jxf_dump_table.php. This manipulation of the argument gblOrgID causes sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
๐@cveNotify
A flaw has been found in Chanjet CRM up to 20260707. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file jxf_dump_table.php. This manipulation of the argument gblOrgID causes sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Chanjet CRM SQL Injection Vulnerability Report ยท Issue #1 ยท LittleRedBean/CVE
Chanjet CRM SQL Injection Vulnerability Report AFFECTED PRODUCT Product: Chanjet CRM Affected Component: /tools/jxf_dump_table.php VENDOR INFORMATION Vendor: Chanjet Vendor Website: https://www.cha...
๐จ CVE-2026-84114
A vulnerability has been found in Cleo Harmony up to 5.8.1.10. Impacted is the function LocalUserUtil.getNativeUserByAssertions of the component SAML Authentication. Such manipulation of the argument Email leads to improper authentication. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 5.8.1.11 is recommended to address this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability has been found in Cleo Harmony up to 5.8.1.10. Impacted is the function LocalUserUtil.getNativeUserByAssertions of the component SAML Authentication. Such manipulation of the argument Email leads to improper authentication. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 5.8.1.11 is recommended to address this issue. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
๐@cveNotify
Cleo
Cleo Harmonyยฎ 5.8.1 Release Notes
Important:Cleo product patches often contain security-strengthening capability enhancements and updates. We strongly recommend that customers remain on the latest product version and apply updates ...
๐จ CVE-2026-84115
A vulnerability was found in Cleo Harmony up to 5.8.1.10. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /api/connections of the component JWT Refresh Token Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument Bearer results in improper privilege management. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 5.8.1.11 is sufficient to fix this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was found in Cleo Harmony up to 5.8.1.10. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /api/connections of the component JWT Refresh Token Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument Bearer results in improper privilege management. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 5.8.1.11 is sufficient to fix this issue. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.
๐@cveNotify
Cleo
Cleo Harmonyยฎ 5.8.1 Release Notes
Important:Cleo product patches often contain security-strengthening capability enhancements and updates. We strongly recommend that customers remain on the latest product version and apply updates ...
๐จ CVE-2026-84233
A flaw was found in rpm. A local attacker could supply a specially crafted `.gem` filename containing RPM macro syntax. When a user or automated workflow invokes `rpmuncompress -x` on this file, the macro expansion occurs during command construction. This allows the attacker to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the invoking account, leading to a compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
๐@cveNotify
A flaw was found in rpm. A local attacker could supply a specially crafted `.gem` filename containing RPM macro syntax. When a user or automated workflow invokes `rpmuncompress -x` on this file, the macro expansion occurs during command construction. This allows the attacker to execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the invoking account, leading to a compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
๐@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-84233 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
๐จ CVE-2026-67307
Wazuh 5.0.0-beta1 (fixed in 5.0.0-beta3) does not validate or override the cluster_name and cluster_node fields in inventory-sync Start FlatBuffer messages, while validating only the agentid against the authenticated agent identity. This allows a low-privileged enrolled agent to spoof cluster attribution in indexed inventory and vulnerability documents by forging wazuh.cluster.name values and influencing the document _id prefix, potentially tampering with inventory records or, in shared-indexer multi-cluster deployments, poisoning another cluster's records when numeric agent IDs collide.
๐@cveNotify
Wazuh 5.0.0-beta1 (fixed in 5.0.0-beta3) does not validate or override the cluster_name and cluster_node fields in inventory-sync Start FlatBuffer messages, while validating only the agentid against the authenticated agent identity. This allows a low-privileged enrolled agent to spoof cluster attribution in indexed inventory and vulnerability documents by forging wazuh.cluster.name values and influencing the document _id prefix, potentially tampering with inventory records or, in shared-indexer multi-cluster deployments, poisoning another cluster's records when numeric agent IDs collide.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Merge pull request #36833 from wazuh/enhancement/36315-review-wazuh-mโฆ ยท wazuh/wazuh@b3dae02
โฆanager-5x-documentation-coverage
Update manager 5x documentation
Update manager 5x documentation
๐จ CVE-2026-67312
axios versions from 0.28.0 before 0.33.0 and from 1.0.0 before 1.18.0 contain uncontrolled recursion in formDataToJSON (exposed as axios.formToJSON() and used internally when serializing FormData with Content-Type: application/json). When an application passes attacker-controlled FormData field names, a field name with thousands of nested bracket-delimited segments causes unbounded recursion in buildPath(), exhausting the JavaScript call stack (RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded) and causing denial of service for that request, or process termination in applications without appropriate error handling.
๐@cveNotify
axios versions from 0.28.0 before 0.33.0 and from 1.0.0 before 1.18.0 contain uncontrolled recursion in formDataToJSON (exposed as axios.formToJSON() and used internally when serializing FormData with Content-Type: application/json). When an application passes attacker-controlled FormData field names, a field name with thousands of nested bracket-delimited segments causes unbounded recursion in buildPath(), exhausting the JavaScript call stack (RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded) and causing denial of service for that request, or process termination in applications without appropriate error handling.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Deep formToJSON Key Recursion Can Cause Denial of Service
## Summary
Axios versions starting with `0.28.0` contain uncontrolled recursion in `formDataToJSON`, which is exposed as `axios.formToJSON()` and used internally when axios serialises `FormData`...
Axios versions starting with `0.28.0` contain uncontrolled recursion in `formDataToJSON`, which is exposed as `axios.formToJSON()` and used internally when axios serialises `FormData`...
๐จ CVE-2026-67313
axios versions 0.28.0 and later contain uncontrolled recursion in formDataToJSON when processing FormData field names with deeply nested bracket segments. Attackers can supply FormData with field names containing thousands of nested brackets to exhaust the JavaScript call stack and trigger RangeError, causing request failure or process termination in applications that do not handle the exception.
๐@cveNotify
axios versions 0.28.0 and later contain uncontrolled recursion in formDataToJSON when processing FormData field names with deeply nested bracket segments. Attackers can supply FormData with field names containing thousands of nested brackets to exhaust the JavaScript call stack and trigger RangeError, causing request failure or process termination in applications that do not handle the exception.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Excessive recursion in formDataToJSON can cause denial of service
## Summary
Axios versions `0.28.0` and later contain uncontrolled recursion in `formDataToJSON`, the helper behind the public `axios.formToJSON()` / named `formToJSON` API and the default request ...
Axios versions `0.28.0` and later contain uncontrolled recursion in `formDataToJSON`, the helper behind the public `axios.formToJSON()` / named `formToJSON` API and the default request ...
๐จ CVE-2026-67314
axios versions >=1.15.2 and <1.18.0 contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling (lib/adapters/http.js and lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js). When an application is already affected by a separate prototype-pollution primitive and makes an axios request with an own auth object that omits the username and/or password properties, axios reads the inherited Object.prototype.username and Object.prototype.password values and uses them to construct an outbound 'Authorization: Basic ...' header. axios itself does not pollute prototypes. The practical impact is outbound request tampering: an attacker who controls the polluted prototype values can inject attacker-chosen Basic auth credentials or replace an existing Authorization header. Credential disclosure is only possible under additional application-specific conditions.
๐@cveNotify
axios versions >=1.15.2 and <1.18.0 contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling (lib/adapters/http.js and lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js). When an application is already affected by a separate prototype-pollution primitive and makes an axios request with an own auth object that omits the username and/or password properties, axios reads the inherited Object.prototype.username and Object.prototype.password values and uses them to construct an outbound 'Authorization: Basic ...' header. axios itself does not pollute prototypes. The practical impact is outbound request tampering: an attacker who controls the polluted prototype values can inject attacker-chosen Basic auth credentials or replace an existing Authorization header. Credential disclosure is only possible under additional application-specific conditions.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Prototype pollution auth subfields can inject Basic auth
## Summary
Axios versions after the `GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj` fix still contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling. If a host application is already affected by pr...
Axios versions after the `GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj` fix still contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling. If a host application is already affected by pr...
๐จ CVE-2026-67315
axios versions 0.31.0 before 0.33.0 and 1.15.0 before 1.18.0 fail to recognize 0.0.0.0 as a loopback address in shouldBypassProxy.js, allowing requests to 0.0.0.0 to bypass NO_PROXY rules. Attackers can supply 0.0.0.0 URLs to route requests through configured proxies, potentially exposing local services when the proxy can reach the destination.
๐@cveNotify
axios versions 0.31.0 before 0.33.0 and 1.15.0 before 1.18.0 fail to recognize 0.0.0.0 as a loopback address in shouldBypassProxy.js, allowing requests to 0.0.0.0 to bypass NO_PROXY rules. Attackers can supply 0.0.0.0 URLs to route requests through configured proxies, potentially exposing local services when the proxy can reach the destination.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
NO_PROXY bypass for 0.0.0.0 local addresses in axios
## Summary
Axios versions containing `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js` do not treat `0.0.0.0` as a local address when evaluating `NO_PROXY` rules. In Node.js applications that use `HTTP_PROXY` ...
Axios versions containing `lib/helpers/shouldBypassProxy.js` do not treat `0.0.0.0` as a local address when evaluating `NO_PROXY` rules. In Node.js applications that use `HTTP_PROXY` ...
๐จ CVE-2026-67316
axios is vulnerable to read-side prototype-pollution gadgets that can alter request construction when Object.prototype has already been polluted by a separate vulnerability or dependency. In the bodyless method aliases (axios.get(), axios.delete(), axios.head(), axios.options()), inherited data is read via (config || {}).data before config normalization, causing an attacker-controlled body to be sent on requests that did not set one. Additional low-level paths, only reachable when calling exported adapters/helpers (e.g. lib/adapters/http.js, unsafe/helpers/resolveConfig.js) directly with plain configs and no own proxy or paramsSerializer, can inherit polluted proxy values (routing requests through an attacker-controlled proxy) or paramsSerializer values (attacker-controlled URL serialization). These low-level gadgets do not reproduce through normal high-level axios calls on 1.15.2+. The issue is fixed in axios 1.18.0 and 0.33.0.
๐@cveNotify
axios is vulnerable to read-side prototype-pollution gadgets that can alter request construction when Object.prototype has already been polluted by a separate vulnerability or dependency. In the bodyless method aliases (axios.get(), axios.delete(), axios.head(), axios.options()), inherited data is read via (config || {}).data before config normalization, causing an attacker-controlled body to be sent on requests that did not set one. Additional low-level paths, only reachable when calling exported adapters/helpers (e.g. lib/adapters/http.js, unsafe/helpers/resolveConfig.js) directly with plain configs and no own proxy or paramsSerializer, can inherit polluted proxy values (routing requests through an attacker-controlled proxy) or paramsSerializer values (attacker-controlled URL serialization). These low-level gadgets do not reproduce through normal high-level axios calls on 1.15.2+. The issue is fixed in axios 1.18.0 and 0.33.0.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Prototype pollution gadgets can alter axios request construction
## Summary
axios is vulnerable to read-side prototype-pollution gadgets when `Object.prototype` has already been polluted by another vulnerability or dependency. The most broadly reachable issue...
axios is vulnerable to read-side prototype-pollution gadgets when `Object.prototype` has already been polluted by another vulnerability or dependency. The most broadly reachable issue...
๐จ CVE-2026-67317
axios versions 1.7.0 before 1.18.0 fail to enforce maxBodyLength for WHATWG ReadableStream request bodies in the fetch adapter when Content-Length cannot be determined. Attackers can supply unknown-length stream data to bypass upload size limits and cause uncontrolled network egress or resource exhaustion.
๐@cveNotify
axios versions 1.7.0 before 1.18.0 fail to enforce maxBodyLength for WHATWG ReadableStream request bodies in the fetch adapter when Content-Length cannot be determined. Attackers can supply unknown-length stream data to bypass upload size limits and cause uncontrolled network egress or resource exhaustion.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Fetch adapter `ReadableStream` uploads bypass `maxBodyLength`
## Summary
axiosโ fetch adapter does not enforce `maxBodyLength` for live WHATWG `ReadableStream` request bodies whose size cannot be determined before dispatch. Applications that use `adapter: ...
axiosโ fetch adapter does not enforce `maxBodyLength` for live WHATWG `ReadableStream` request bodies whose size cannot be determined before dispatch. Applications that use `adapter: ...
๐จ CVE-2026-67318
axios versions >=1.13.0 (Node.js HTTP adapter) fail to enforce the configured maxBodyLength limit on streamed request bodies when requests are sent with httpVersion: 2. Because Node's HTTP/2 request API does not honor the maxBodyLength option and axios's byte-counting stream wrapper is gated on maxRedirects === 0, an attacker who controls a stream passed to axios can cause the application to transmit outbound data exceeding the configured finite maxBodyLength. Impact is limited to resource consumption and policy bypass (excess egress, upstream quota consumption, limited availability); it does not enable code execution, credential disclosure, or request-destination control. Calls using the default maxBodyLength: -1 and browser adapters are not affected.
๐@cveNotify
axios versions >=1.13.0 (Node.js HTTP adapter) fail to enforce the configured maxBodyLength limit on streamed request bodies when requests are sent with httpVersion: 2. Because Node's HTTP/2 request API does not honor the maxBodyLength option and axios's byte-counting stream wrapper is gated on maxRedirects === 0, an attacker who controls a stream passed to axios can cause the application to transmit outbound data exceeding the configured finite maxBodyLength. Impact is limited to resource consumption and policy bypass (excess egress, upstream quota consumption, limited availability); it does not enable code execution, credential disclosure, or request-destination control. Calls using the default maxBodyLength: -1 and browser adapters are not affected.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
HTTP/2 streamed uploads bypass `maxBodyLength`
## Summary
Axios versions with Node.js HTTP/2 support allow streamed request bodies to bypass `maxBodyLength` enforcement when requests are sent with `httpVersion: 2`.
This affects applic...
Axios versions with Node.js HTTP/2 support allow streamed request bodies to bypass `maxBodyLength` enforcement when requests are sent with `httpVersion: 2`.
This affects applic...
๐จ CVE-2026-67319
axios before 0.33.0 (and 1.x before 1.18.0) can consume inherited properties from nested request option objects when the JavaScript process's Object.prototype has already been polluted by another component. While the top-level merged config uses a null prototype, nested plain objects such as auth and paramsSerializer are cloned into ordinary objects and read without own-property checks. When an application passes placeholder nested objects such as auth: {} or paramsSerializer: {}, inherited username/password values can cause silent injection of an Authorization: Basic header, and inherited encode/serialize values can alter query-string serialization (full serializer replacement requires a function-valued pollution primitive). This is exploitable only in the presence of pre-existing prototype pollution.
๐@cveNotify
axios before 0.33.0 (and 1.x before 1.18.0) can consume inherited properties from nested request option objects when the JavaScript process's Object.prototype has already been polluted by another component. While the top-level merged config uses a null prototype, nested plain objects such as auth and paramsSerializer are cloned into ordinary objects and read without own-property checks. When an application passes placeholder nested objects such as auth: {} or paramsSerializer: {}, inherited username/password values can cause silent injection of an Authorization: Basic header, and inherited encode/serialize values can alter query-string serialization (full serializer replacement requires a function-valued pollution primitive). This is exploitable only in the presence of pre-existing prototype pollution.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Nested axios option objects can consume polluted prototype values
## Summary
Axios can consume inherited properties from nested request option objects when the JavaScript process already has a polluted `Object.prototype`.
The top-level merged config is prot...
Axios can consume inherited properties from nested request option objects when the JavaScript process already has a polluted `Object.prototype`.
The top-level merged config is prot...
๐จ CVE-2026-67320
axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.proxy, affected requests can be routed through an attacker-controlled proxy. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are >=0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0).
๐@cveNotify
axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.proxy, affected requests can be routed through an attacker-controlled proxy. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are >=0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0).
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
chore(release): prepare release 1.16.0 (#10834) ยท axios/axios@df53d7d
* 1.16.0
* chore(release): prepare release 1.16.0
---------
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jasonsaayman <...
* chore(release): prepare release 1.16.0
---------
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jasonsaayman <...
๐จ CVE-2026-67321
axios versions 0.31.1 before 0.33.0 and 1.15.1 before 1.18.0 contain an incomplete depth-limit bypass in toFormData.js when serializing objects with top-level keys ending in '{}'. Attackers who control object keys and nested values passed to axios form or parameter serialization can trigger a RangeError from JSON.stringify, causing denial of service in the affected request path.
๐@cveNotify
axios versions 0.31.1 before 0.33.0 and 1.15.1 before 1.18.0 contain an incomplete depth-limit bypass in toFormData.js when serializing objects with top-level keys ending in '{}'. Attackers who control object keys and nested values passed to axios form or parameter serialization can trigger a RangeError from JSON.stringify, causing denial of service in the affected request path.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Axios form serializer maxDepth bypass via {} metatoken
## Summary
Axios versions in the fixed lines for GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9 still contain an incomplete depth-limit bypass in `lib/helpers/toFormData.js`. When serializing an object with a top-level ke...
Axios versions in the fixed lines for GHSA-62hf-57xw-28j9 still contain an incomplete depth-limit bypass in `lib/helpers/toFormData.js`. When serializing an object with a top-level ke...
๐จ CVE-2026-39931
OpenEMR through 8.2.0 contains an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the backup configuration import feature that allows administrators with admin or super ACL privileges to execute arbitrary DDL and DML statements against the application database by uploading a crafted SQL file at the form_step=202 parameter in backup.php. Attackers can exploit the unfiltered shell_exec invocation of the mysql command-line client to extract credential hashes, modify access control tables, inject backdoor accounts, create persistent triggers or stored procedures, and write arbitrary files to the filesystem where MySQL FILE privileges and permissive secure_file_priv settings are configured.
๐@cveNotify
OpenEMR through 8.2.0 contains an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability in the backup configuration import feature that allows administrators with admin or super ACL privileges to execute arbitrary DDL and DML statements against the application database by uploading a crafted SQL file at the form_step=202 parameter in backup.php. Attackers can exploit the unfiltered shell_exec invocation of the mysql command-line client to extract credential hashes, modify access control tables, inject backdoor accounts, create persistent triggers or stored procedures, and write arbitrary files to the filesystem where MySQL FILE privileges and permissive secure_file_priv settings are configured.
๐@cveNotify
Jiva Security
The Pipe: Arbitrary SQL Execution via Admin Backup Import in OpenEMR 8.0.0.3 โ Jiva Security
OpenEMR 8.0.0.3's backup configuration import feature pipes uploaded SQL files directly to the mysql command-line client without any content validation. An authenticated admin can execute arbitrary SQL against the application database โ extracting credentialโฆ
๐จ CVE-2026-39932
OpenEMR through 8.2.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the document category tree component (library/classes/Tree.class.php) that allows authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary operating system commands by injecting PHP payloads into the categories database table. Attackers can chain arbitrary SQL execution to alter the id column type to VARCHAR and insert a malicious PHP payload, which is then executed via an unsanitized eval() call whenever any page instantiates CategoryTree, including unauthenticated and low-privilege pages, resulting in command execution as the web server user.
๐@cveNotify
OpenEMR through 8.2.0 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the document category tree component (library/classes/Tree.class.php) that allows authenticated administrators to execute arbitrary operating system commands by injecting PHP payloads into the categories database table. Attackers can chain arbitrary SQL execution to alter the id column type to VARCHAR and insert a malicious PHP payload, which is then executed via an unsanitized eval() call whenever any page instantiates CategoryTree, including unauthenticated and low-privilege pages, resulting in command execution as the web server user.
๐@cveNotify
Jiva Security
The eval() That Nobody Was Supposed to Find: SQL Import Chains to OS Command Execution in OpenEMR 8.0.0.3 โ Jiva Security
The OpenEMR document category tree uses PHP eval() to construct nested arrays from database rows. The SQL import primitive from Part 3 lets an admin alter the id column to VARCHAR and insert a PHP payload โ when any page loads the document category tree,โฆ