🚨 CVE-2026-81026
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.40 does not verify the amount, receiver, currency or status of a payment notification before marking the corresponding order completed, allowing unauthenticated users to complete full-price orders and gain access to paid content by paying only a token amount.
🎖@cveNotify
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.40 does not verify the amount, receiver, currency or status of a payment notification before marking the corresponding order completed, allowing unauthenticated users to complete full-price orders and gain access to paid content by paying only a token amount.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
MasterStudy LMS < 3.7.40 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via PayPal IPN
See details on MasterStudy LMS < 3.7.40 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via PayPal IPN CVE 2026-81026. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-81200
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.42 does not correctly restrict access to order information, allowing any user with the instructor role to read other users' order billing details, including name, email address, phone number and postal address, by enumerating order IDs.
🎖@cveNotify
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.42 does not correctly restrict access to order information, allowing any user with the instructor role to read other users' order billing details, including name, email address, phone number and postal address, by enumerating order IDs.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
MasterStudy LMS < 3.7.42 - Instructor+ Cross-Tenant Order Billing PII Disclosure via IDOR
See details on MasterStudy LMS < 3.7.42 - Instructor+ Cross-Tenant Order Billing PII Disclosure via IDOR CVE 2026-81200. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
❤1
🚨 CVE-2026-81342
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.43 does not validate a redirect parameter supplied during user registration before using it, allowing unauthenticated attackers to redirect users to arbitrary external URLs.
🎖@cveNotify
The MasterStudy LMS WordPress Plugin WordPress plugin before 3.7.43 does not validate a redirect parameter supplied during user registration before using it, allowing unauthenticated attackers to redirect users to arbitrary external URLs.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
MasterStudy LMS < 3.7.43 - Unauthenticated Open Redirect
See details on MasterStudy LMS < 3.7.43 - Unauthenticated Open Redirect CVE 2026-81342. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-81346
The Frontend Admin by DynamiApps WordPress plugin before 3.29.11 does not perform a capability check on one of its AJAX actions, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to delete arbitrary membership plans.
🎖@cveNotify
The Frontend Admin by DynamiApps WordPress plugin before 3.29.11 does not perform a capability check on one of its AJAX actions, allowing any authenticated user, such as a subscriber, to delete arbitrary membership plans.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
Frontend Admin by DynamiApps < 3.29.11 - Subscriber+ Arbitrary Membership Plan Deletion
See details on Frontend Admin by DynamiApps < 3.29.11 - Subscriber+ Arbitrary Membership Plan Deletion CVE 2026-81346. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-75847
Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_paper_trail allows an attacker with read access to the generated version resource to recover the plaintext of sensitive? attributes.
AshPaperTrail stores the values of tracked sensitive? attributes in the generated version resource's changes map, which is declared public? true and sensitive? false, so the values are returned by the version resource's default read action and printed in logs, inspect output, and error messages instead of being redacted. AshPaperTrail.Resource.Transformers.CreateVersionResource derives the changes map's sensitivity from the ignore_attributes list (the attributes excluded from changes) rather than from the tracked attributes actually stored in it, and ignore_attributes defaults to empty, so the flag is effectively always false.
This issue affects ash_paper_trail: from 0.1.1 before 0.7.0.
🎖@cveNotify
Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_paper_trail allows an attacker with read access to the generated version resource to recover the plaintext of sensitive? attributes.
AshPaperTrail stores the values of tracked sensitive? attributes in the generated version resource's changes map, which is declared public? true and sensitive? false, so the values are returned by the version resource's default read action and printed in logs, inspect output, and error messages instead of being redacted. AshPaperTrail.Resource.Transformers.CreateVersionResource derives the changes map's sensitivity from the ignore_attributes list (the attributes excluded from changes) rather than from the tracked attributes actually stored in it, and ignore_attributes defaults to empty, so the flag is effectively always false.
This issue affects ash_paper_trail: from 0.1.1 before 0.7.0.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-77831
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in ash-project ash_paper_trail allows a user who can submit a large array attribute to a paper-trailed create or update action to cause a denial of service through excessive CPU and memory use.
With full-diff change tracking, AshPaperTrail.ChangeBuilders.FullDiff.ListChange pairs each prior array element against the new list by rebuilding the remaining-elements accumulator with acc ++ [tuple] on every step, copying the growing list each time, so the pairing scales cubically in the array length. Nothing bounds the length and the value comes straight from action input, so one request carrying a large accepted {:array, _} attribute forces tens of seconds of CPU and multi-gigabyte allocations.
This issue affects ash_paper_trail: from 0.1.1 before 0.7.0.
🎖@cveNotify
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in ash-project ash_paper_trail allows a user who can submit a large array attribute to a paper-trailed create or update action to cause a denial of service through excessive CPU and memory use.
With full-diff change tracking, AshPaperTrail.ChangeBuilders.FullDiff.ListChange pairs each prior array element against the new list by rebuilding the remaining-elements accumulator with acc ++ [tuple] on every step, copying the growing list each time, so the pairing scales cubically in the array length. Nothing bounds the length and the value comes straight from action input, so one request carrying a large accepted {:array, _} attribute forces tens of seconds of CPU and multi-gigabyte allocations.
This issue affects ash_paper_trail: from 0.1.1 before 0.7.0.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-77970
Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_paper_trail allows an attacker with read access to the generated version resource to recover sensitive values nested inside embedded resources, unions, or lists.
sensitive_attributes :redact and :ignore only act on the tracked resource's top-level attributes. maybe_redact_changes/3 and the stored-action-input path in AshPaperTrail.Resource.Changes.CreateNewVersion derive the sensitive set from the resource's own attributes and never descend into embedded, union, or list values, so a non-sensitive attribute or action argument that holds an embed with a sensitive? field (for example an accepted credentials embed carrying a token) is written to the version table in cleartext.
This issue affects ash_paper_trail: from 0.3.0 before 0.7.0.
🎖@cveNotify
Cleartext Storage of Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_paper_trail allows an attacker with read access to the generated version resource to recover sensitive values nested inside embedded resources, unions, or lists.
sensitive_attributes :redact and :ignore only act on the tracked resource's top-level attributes. maybe_redact_changes/3 and the stored-action-input path in AshPaperTrail.Resource.Changes.CreateNewVersion derive the sensitive set from the resource's own attributes and never descend into embedded, union, or list values, so a non-sensitive attribute or action argument that holds an embed with a sensitive? field (for example an accepted credentials embed carrying a token) is written to the version table in cleartext.
This issue affects ash_paper_trail: from 0.3.0 before 0.7.0.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-82562
### Summary
When `qs.parse` is called with `comma: true` and `throwOnLimitExceeded: true`, a comma-separated value under a bracket-push key (`a[]=1,2,3,4`) is split into an array without being compared against `arrayLimit`, while the same value under a flat key (`a=1,2,3,4`), an indexed key (`a[0]=`), a nested key (`a[b]=`), or a dotted key (`a.b=` with `allowDots`) throws the documented `RangeError`. A single parameter such as `a[]=1,2,2,...` therefore produces an inner array of arbitrary length even though the caller opted into the hard limit. This is the `[]=` key form that the fix for CVE-2026-2391 (qs 6.14.2) did not cover.
### Details
In `lib/parse.js`, a comma-separated value under a `[]=` key is split and then wrapped as a single nested element (`val = [val]`, so that each `a[]=x,y` group counts as one element of the outer array). The `arrayLimit` check that 6.14.2 added for comma values runs after that wrap, so for `[]=` parts it only ever saw the wrapper of length 1. 6.15.3 added a pre-split comma count so that an oversized value throws before it is allocated, but gated it on an `isFlatArrayValue` flag that `parseValues` set to `false` for any part containing `[]=`, and did not pass it for object-valued input, so the gap remained.
#### PoC
```js
var qs = require('qs');
var options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 3, throwOnLimitExceeded: true };
qs.parse('a=1,2,3,4', options); // RangeError: Array limit exceeded. Only 3 elements allowed in an array.
qs.parse('a[]=1,2,3,4', options); // { a: [ [ '1', '2', '3', '4' ] ] } (no throw)
qs.parse('a[]=' + '1,'.repeat(1000000) + '1', { comma: true, arrayLimit: 20, throwOnLimitExceeded: true });
// no throw; a 1,000,001-element inner array is allocated
```
#### Fix
`lib/parse.js`, applied in 8859c37 on `main` and released as v6.16.0: the `isFlatArrayValue` gate is removed, so every comma-split value is counted against `arrayLimit` before splitting regardless of key form. An in-limit group under `a[]=` still counts as one element of the outer array, and the default (`throwOnLimitExceeded: false`) path is unchanged.
### Affected versions
`>=6.14.2 <6.16.0`, fixed in v6.16.0.
v6.14.2 introduced `arrayLimit` enforcement for comma values (the fix for CVE-2026-2391) but only for values not under a `[]=` key, and every release from v6.14.2 through v6.15.3 has the same gap. v6.14.0 and v6.14.1, where `throwOnLimitExceeded` exists but does not apply to any comma form, are covered by CVE-2026-2391 rather than this record. Earlier lines (6.7.x through 6.13.x) have `comma` but no `throwOnLimitExceeded`, so there is no hard cap on any comma path to bypass; releases before 6.7.0 have no `comma` option.
### Impact
An unauthenticated attacker who can reach an application that parses untrusted query strings or urlencoded bodies with both `comma: true` and `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` (both non-default) can bypass the configured limit with a single `a[]=` parameter and force the parser to allocate an array proportional to the request size. The cost is strictly linear in the attacker-supplied bytes (about 0.1 microseconds and 6 to 7 retained bytes per input byte; the same out-of-memory threshold as the documented default `throwOnLimitExceeded: false` path), so a transport-layer request or body size limit bounds it completely (and node's default maximum HTTP header size of 16 KB already bounds the request line, so multi-megabyte payloads need a body parser). The impact is that an opt-in hard limit fails open on one key spelling, not unbounded allocation from a small input.
🎖@cveNotify
### Summary
When `qs.parse` is called with `comma: true` and `throwOnLimitExceeded: true`, a comma-separated value under a bracket-push key (`a[]=1,2,3,4`) is split into an array without being compared against `arrayLimit`, while the same value under a flat key (`a=1,2,3,4`), an indexed key (`a[0]=`), a nested key (`a[b]=`), or a dotted key (`a.b=` with `allowDots`) throws the documented `RangeError`. A single parameter such as `a[]=1,2,2,...` therefore produces an inner array of arbitrary length even though the caller opted into the hard limit. This is the `[]=` key form that the fix for CVE-2026-2391 (qs 6.14.2) did not cover.
### Details
In `lib/parse.js`, a comma-separated value under a `[]=` key is split and then wrapped as a single nested element (`val = [val]`, so that each `a[]=x,y` group counts as one element of the outer array). The `arrayLimit` check that 6.14.2 added for comma values runs after that wrap, so for `[]=` parts it only ever saw the wrapper of length 1. 6.15.3 added a pre-split comma count so that an oversized value throws before it is allocated, but gated it on an `isFlatArrayValue` flag that `parseValues` set to `false` for any part containing `[]=`, and did not pass it for object-valued input, so the gap remained.
#### PoC
```js
var qs = require('qs');
var options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 3, throwOnLimitExceeded: true };
qs.parse('a=1,2,3,4', options); // RangeError: Array limit exceeded. Only 3 elements allowed in an array.
qs.parse('a[]=1,2,3,4', options); // { a: [ [ '1', '2', '3', '4' ] ] } (no throw)
qs.parse('a[]=' + '1,'.repeat(1000000) + '1', { comma: true, arrayLimit: 20, throwOnLimitExceeded: true });
// no throw; a 1,000,001-element inner array is allocated
```
#### Fix
`lib/parse.js`, applied in 8859c37 on `main` and released as v6.16.0: the `isFlatArrayValue` gate is removed, so every comma-split value is counted against `arrayLimit` before splitting regardless of key form. An in-limit group under `a[]=` still counts as one element of the outer array, and the default (`throwOnLimitExceeded: false`) path is unchanged.
### Affected versions
`>=6.14.2 <6.16.0`, fixed in v6.16.0.
v6.14.2 introduced `arrayLimit` enforcement for comma values (the fix for CVE-2026-2391) but only for values not under a `[]=` key, and every release from v6.14.2 through v6.15.3 has the same gap. v6.14.0 and v6.14.1, where `throwOnLimitExceeded` exists but does not apply to any comma form, are covered by CVE-2026-2391 rather than this record. Earlier lines (6.7.x through 6.13.x) have `comma` but no `throwOnLimitExceeded`, so there is no hard cap on any comma path to bypass; releases before 6.7.0 have no `comma` option.
### Impact
An unauthenticated attacker who can reach an application that parses untrusted query strings or urlencoded bodies with both `comma: true` and `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` (both non-default) can bypass the configured limit with a single `a[]=` parameter and force the parser to allocate an array proportional to the request size. The cost is strictly linear in the attacker-supplied bytes (about 0.1 microseconds and 6 to 7 retained bytes per input byte; the same out-of-memory threshold as the documented default `throwOnLimitExceeded: false` path), so a transport-layer request or body size limit bounds it completely (and node's default maximum HTTP header size of 16 KB already bounds the request line, so multi-megabyte payloads need a body parser). The impact is that an opt-in hard limit fails open on one key spelling, not unbounded allocation from a small input.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
[Fix] `parse`: enforce `arrayLimit` on comma groups under `[]=` when … · ljharb/qs@8859c37
…`throwOnLimitExceeded` is set
With `comma: true` and `throwOnLimitExceeded: true`,
`parseArrayValue` only ran the pre-split comma count for flat values
(`isFlatArrayValue`);
a comma group under a...
With `comma: true` and `throwOnLimitExceeded: true`,
`parseArrayValue` only ran the pre-split comma count for flat values
(`isFlatArrayValue`);
a comma group under a...
🚨 CVE-2026-75759
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in erlef oidcc allows an unauthenticated attacker to impersonate an arbitrary user via an encrypted ID token or JARM response carrying no nested signature. OpenID Connect Core 1.0 section 2 requires that an encrypted ID token be signed then encrypted, with the result being a Nested JWT, and JARM processing rule 5 requires the client to check the signature unconditionally. oidcc instead accepted a JWE wrapping unsigned claims as fully validated, so anyone holding the relying party's public encryption key could mint a token with an arbitrary sub, iss, and aud without possessing the provider's signing key.
In oidcc_jwt_util:verify_decrypted_token/4, a decrypted payload that is not a signed JWS fell back to parsing the plaintext claims and returning them with no verifying key. oidcc_token:int_validate_jwt/4 then matched on the JOSE structure type rather than on whether a signature had been verified, and returned success. The JARM path in oidcc_token:validate_jarm/3 is reachable through the browser front channel. UserInfo responses are not affected, because OpenID Connect Core 1.0 section 5.3.2 permits them to be encrypted without also being signed.
This issue affects oidcc: from 3.2.0-beta.1 before 3.9.0.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability in erlef oidcc allows an unauthenticated attacker to impersonate an arbitrary user via an encrypted ID token or JARM response carrying no nested signature. OpenID Connect Core 1.0 section 2 requires that an encrypted ID token be signed then encrypted, with the result being a Nested JWT, and JARM processing rule 5 requires the client to check the signature unconditionally. oidcc instead accepted a JWE wrapping unsigned claims as fully validated, so anyone holding the relying party's public encryption key could mint a token with an arbitrary sub, iss, and aud without possessing the provider's signing key.
In oidcc_jwt_util:verify_decrypted_token/4, a decrypted payload that is not a signed JWS fell back to parsing the plaintext claims and returning them with no verifying key. oidcc_token:int_validate_jwt/4 then matched on the JOSE structure type rather than on whether a signature had been verified, and returned success. The JARM path in oidcc_token:validate_jarm/3 is reachable through the browser front channel. UserInfo responses are not affected, because OpenID Connect Core 1.0 section 5.3.2 permits them to be encrypted without also being signed.
This issue affects oidcc: from 3.2.0-beta.1 before 3.9.0.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-77846
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic vulnerability in ash-project ash_sqlite allows an attacker who controls a get_path/2 segment to traverse into nested JSON the application never exposed, disclosing private or sensitive? embedded fields.
AshSqlite.SqlImplementation builds the SQLite json_extract path with "$." <> Enum.join(right, "."), so a single segment containing ., [, ], or $ re-interprets the JSON path (for example "private.secret" descends two levels instead of naming one key). The path is bound as a parameter, so this is confined to the JSON-path grammar rather than SQL. Any endpoint that lets user input reach a get_path segment (a common pick-a-field pattern) can read nested values it never meant to expose.
This issue affects ash_sqlite: from 0.1.2-rc.0 before 0.2.18.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Data Query Logic vulnerability in ash-project ash_sqlite allows an attacker who controls a get_path/2 segment to traverse into nested JSON the application never exposed, disclosing private or sensitive? embedded fields.
AshSqlite.SqlImplementation builds the SQLite json_extract path with "$." <> Enum.join(right, "."), so a single segment containing ., [, ], or $ re-interprets the JSON path (for example "private.secret" descends two levels instead of naming one key). The path is bound as a parameter, so this is confined to the JSON-path grammar rather than SQL. Any endpoint that lets user input reach a get_path segment (a common pick-a-field pattern) can read nested values it never meant to expose.
This issue affects ash_sqlite: from 0.1.2-rc.0 before 0.2.18.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-15980
The MyHome Core plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 4.4.5. This is due to missing authorization in the send_link() AJAX handler and improper token validation in the activate() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to generate an activation token for an unconfirmed user account and obtain a valid authentication cookie for that account, including administrators. Successful exploitation requires the MyHome theme to be configured in legacy/WPBakery mode with frontend registration and confirmation email enabled, and the target account must not already have the myhome_agent_confirmed user meta set.
🎖@cveNotify
The MyHome Core plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass in all versions up to, and including, 4.4.5. This is due to missing authorization in the send_link() AJAX handler and improper token validation in the activate() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to generate an activation token for an unconfirmed user account and obtain a valid authentication cookie for that account, including administrators. Successful exploitation requires the MyHome theme to be configured in legacy/WPBakery mode with frontend registration and confirmation email enabled, and the target account must not already have the myhome_agent_confirmed user meta set.
🎖@cveNotify
ThemeForest
MyHome - Real Estate WordPress Theme
MyHome Real Estate WordPress Theme
Welcome to MyHome 4, the most innovative Real Estate WordPress Theme trusted by 7,000+ real estate professionals worldwide. With a 4.9-star rating, 350+ five-sta...
Welcome to MyHome 4, the most innovative Real Estate WordPress Theme trusted by 7,000+ real estate professionals worldwide. With a 4.9-star rating, 350+ five-sta...
🚨 CVE-2026-82478
A vulnerability was determined in NASA Trick 19.6.0. This issue affects the function JSONVariableServerThread::parse_request of the file trick_source/sim_services/JSONVariableServer/JSONVariableServerThread.cpp of the component TCP Socket Handler. This manipulation causes stack-based buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability was determined in NASA Trick 19.6.0. This issue affects the function JSONVariableServerThread::parse_request of the file trick_source/sim_services/JSONVariableServer/JSONVariableServerThread.cpp of the component TCP Socket Handler. This manipulation causes stack-based buffer overflow. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-82479
A vulnerability was identified in NASA cFS up to 7.0.1. Impacted is the function OS_read of the file modules/protocol/tcp/fsw/src/sbn_tcp_if.c of the component SBN TCP Module. Such manipulation of the argument MsgSz leads to buffer overflow. The attack must be carried out from within the local network. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability was identified in NASA cFS up to 7.0.1. Impacted is the function OS_read of the file modules/protocol/tcp/fsw/src/sbn_tcp_if.c of the component SBN TCP Module. Such manipulation of the argument MsgSz leads to buffer overflow. The attack must be carried out from within the local network. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
Vulnerability Database
CVE-2026-82479 in cFS
A vulnerability was identified in NASA cFS up to 7.0.1. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2026-82479.
🚨 CVE-2026-82480
A security flaw has been discovered in NASA cFS up to 7.0.1. The affected element is the function CFE_SB_GetUserDataLength of the file src/cFS/cfe/modules/sb/fsw/src/cfe_sb_util.c of the component cFE Software Bus. Performing a manipulation of the argument TotalMsgSize/HdrSize results in integer underflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
A security flaw has been discovered in NASA cFS up to 7.0.1. The affected element is the function CFE_SB_GetUserDataLength of the file src/cFS/cfe/modules/sb/fsw/src/cfe_sb_util.c of the component cFE Software Bus. Performing a manipulation of the argument TotalMsgSize/HdrSize results in integer underflow. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
Vulnerability Database
CVE-2026-82480 in cFS
A security flaw has been discovered in NASA cFS up to 7.0.1. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2026-82480.
🚨 CVE-2026-80598
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ntfs3: fix out-of-bounds read in decompress_lznt
decompress_lznt() does not validate array index bounds before accessing
the decompression table. A corrupted NTFS3 image with invalid compressed
data can trigger an out-of-bounds read.
Add index bounds checking to prevent the OOB access.
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ntfs3: fix out-of-bounds read in decompress_lznt
decompress_lznt() does not validate array index bounds before accessing
the decompression table. A corrupted NTFS3 image with invalid compressed
data can trigger an out-of-bounds read.
Add index bounds checking to prevent the OOB access.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-80703
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdkfd: Fix missing authorization check in KFD_IOC_DBG_TRAP_DISABLE
Prevent unauthorized termination of active GPU debug sessions.
Previously, users with /dev/kfd access could terminate another process's
debug session without proper ownership or ptrace authorization.
(cherry picked from commit 4db4c5ffd5585b72622ecf6ffedf2da258ee23f5)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdkfd: Fix missing authorization check in KFD_IOC_DBG_TRAP_DISABLE
Prevent unauthorized termination of active GPU debug sessions.
Previously, users with /dev/kfd access could terminate another process's
debug session without proper ownership or ptrace authorization.
(cherry picked from commit 4db4c5ffd5585b72622ecf6ffedf2da258ee23f5)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-80721
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: ISO: ensure no dangling hcon references in iso_conn
After iso_conn_del(), ISO sockets should not dereference the hcon any
more. Currently, clearing iso_conn::hcon relies on iso_conn_del()
releasing the last reference to the iso_conn.
Simplify this by explicitly clearing conn->hcon in iso_conn_del(), to
avoid more complex reasoning on races about who holds the last
reference.
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: ISO: ensure no dangling hcon references in iso_conn
After iso_conn_del(), ISO sockets should not dereference the hcon any
more. Currently, clearing iso_conn::hcon relies on iso_conn_del()
releasing the last reference to the iso_conn.
Simplify this by explicitly clearing conn->hcon in iso_conn_del(), to
avoid more complex reasoning on races about who holds the last
reference.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-14307
The geotargetingwp WordPress plugin before 3.5.6.2 does not sanitise or escape several parameters before reflecting them back in AJAX responses that are served with an HTML content type, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts that execute when a victim is tricked into submitting a crafted request.
🎖@cveNotify
The geotargetingwp WordPress plugin before 3.5.6.2 does not sanitise or escape several parameters before reflecting them back in AJAX responses that are served with an HTML content type, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts that execute when a victim is tricked into submitting a crafted request.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
Geotargeting WP < 3.5.6.2 - Reflected XSS
See details on Geotargeting WP < 3.5.6.2 - Reflected XSS CVE 2026-14307. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-14835
The SOGO Add Script to Individual Pages Header Footer WordPress plugin through 3.9 does not sanitise or escape the custom header/footer script values saved from its post metabox, and does not restrict them to users with the unfiltered_html capability, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to store JavaScript that executes in the browser of any administrator who reviews the post and of any visitor once the post is published.
🎖@cveNotify
The SOGO Add Script to Individual Pages Header Footer WordPress plugin through 3.9 does not sanitise or escape the custom header/footer script values saved from its post metabox, and does not restrict them to users with the unfiltered_html capability, allowing users with contributor-level access and above to store JavaScript that executes in the browser of any administrator who reviews the post and of any visitor once the post is published.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
SOGO Add Script to Individual Pages Header Footer <= 3.9 - Contributor+ Stored XSS via Post Metabox
See details on SOGO Add Script to Individual Pages Header Footer <= 3.9 - Contributor+ Stored XSS via Post Metabox CVE 2026-14835. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-19722
The WPvivid — Backup, Migration & Staging WordPress plugin before 0.9.133 does not validate the destination of files extracted from a backup package during restoration, allowing high privilege users such as administrators to write arbitrary files outside the intended restore directory, which can lead to code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
The WPvivid — Backup, Migration & Staging WordPress plugin before 0.9.133 does not validate the destination of files extracted from a backup package during restoration, allowing high privilege users such as administrators to write arbitrary files outside the intended restore directory, which can lead to code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
WPvivid Backup & Migration < 0.9.133 - Admin+ Arbitrary File Write via Zip Slip in Backup Restore
See details on WPvivid Backup & Migration < 0.9.133 - Admin+ Arbitrary File Write via Zip Slip in Backup Restore CVE 2026-19722. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-76585
The Customer Reviews for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 5.118.0 does not sanitise and escape the content of customer reviews received via one of its endpoints, which could allow unauthenticated users to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
The Customer Reviews for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 5.118.0 does not sanitise and escape the content of customer reviews received via one of its endpoints, which could allow unauthenticated users to perform Stored Cross-Site Scripting attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
Customer Reviews for WooCommerce < 5.118.0 - Unauthenticated Stored XSS via 'comment' Parameter
See details on Customer Reviews for WooCommerce < 5.118.0 - Unauthenticated Stored XSS via 'comment' Parameter CVE 2026-76585. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.