🚨 CVE-2026-16821
IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to a format string vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to a format string vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Vulnerabilities in IBM AIX and PowerVM VIOS
Updated Aug 21, 2026: Updated the summary to highlight the additional installation instructions. IBM is providing security updates for supported AIX and VIOS releases that are under active fix support. Delivered through Service Packs (SPs) and Fix Packs (FPs)…
🚨 CVE-2026-17203
IBM Administration Runtime Expert for i 1R1M0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper authentication enforcement.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Administration Runtime Expert for i 1R1M0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper authentication enforcement.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM Application Runtime Expert (ARE) for IBM i is vulnerable to a user gaining elevated privileges and sensitive…
IBM Application Runtime Expert (ARE) for IBM i is vulnerable to a user gaining elevated privileges due to ARE GUI component processing [CVE-2026-18527] and allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information [CVE-2026-17203] as described in the vulnerability…
🚨 CVE-2026-18527
IBM Administration Runtime Expert for i 1R1M0 IBM Application Runtime Expert (ARE) for i could allow a remote attacker to gain elevated privileges, caused by ARE GUI component processing. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to execute actions under another user's authenticated profile gaining elevated privileges on the IBM i system.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Administration Runtime Expert for i 1R1M0 IBM Application Runtime Expert (ARE) for i could allow a remote attacker to gain elevated privileges, caused by ARE GUI component processing. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability to execute actions under another user's authenticated profile gaining elevated privileges on the IBM i system.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM Application Runtime Expert (ARE) for IBM i is vulnerable to a user gaining elevated privileges and sensitive…
IBM Application Runtime Expert (ARE) for IBM i is vulnerable to a user gaining elevated privileges due to ARE GUI component processing [CVE-2026-18527] and allow an attacker to obtain sensitive information [CVE-2026-17203] as described in the vulnerability…
🚨 CVE-2026-18545
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow is affected by multiple authentication bypass, path traversal, authorization, and server-side request…
Langflow contains multiple vulnerabilities in its authentication, authorization, and network request controls across several API surfaces. The MCP project authentication function omits the default auth_type=none value from the set of modes requiring an API…
🚨 CVE-2026-18729
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow is affected by multiple remote code execution vulnerabilities due to insufficient code-execution policy…
Langflow contains multiple vulnerabilities that allow arbitrary Python and operating system command execution on the server. The PythonFunction component lacks the runtime code-execution gate applied to other code-execution components, enabling an authenticated…
🚨 CVE-2026-18891
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary flows and access sensitive information due to improper authentication.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary flows and access sensitive information due to improper authentication.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow is affected by multiple authentication bypass, path traversal, authorization, and server-side request…
Langflow contains multiple vulnerabilities in its authentication, authorization, and network request controls across several API surfaces. The MCP project authentication function omits the default auth_type=none value from the set of modes requiring an API…
🚨 CVE-2026-18899
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to read arbitrary files due to path traversal.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to read arbitrary files due to path traversal.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow is affected by multiple authentication bypass, path traversal, authorization, and server-side request…
Langflow contains multiple vulnerabilities in its authentication, authorization, and network request controls across several API surfaces. The MCP project authentication function omits the default auth_type=none value from the set of modes requiring an API…
🚨 CVE-2026-18904
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and inject unauthorized messages due to a namespace collision between user identifiers.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and inject unauthorized messages due to a namespace collision between user identifiers.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow is affected by multiple authentication bypass, path traversal, authorization, and server-side request…
Langflow contains multiple vulnerabilities in its authentication, authorization, and network request controls across several API surfaces. The MCP project authentication function omits the default auth_type=none value from the set of modes requiring an API…
🚨 CVE-2026-19286
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper enforcement of security restrictions on the A2A public endpoint.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper enforcement of security restrictions on the A2A public endpoint.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow is affected by multiple remote code execution vulnerabilities due to insufficient code-execution policy…
Langflow contains multiple vulnerabilities that allow arbitrary Python and operating system command execution on the server. The PythonFunction component lacks the runtime code-execution gate applied to other code-execution components, enabling an authenticated…
🚨 CVE-2026-19294
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute and read any user's private flow due to improper authorization.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute and read any user's private flow due to improper authorization.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow is affected by multiple authentication bypass, path traversal, authorization, and server-side request…
Langflow contains multiple vulnerabilities in its authentication, authorization, and network request controls across several API surfaces. The MCP project authentication function omits the default auth_type=none value from the set of modes requiring an API…
🚨 CVE-2026-19295
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands in the server process by saving a flow with a crafted type field value and triggering a build of a wrapper flow that references it. This allowed privilege escalation from "authenticated flow user" to arbitrary OS-level command execution under the server process identity, bypassing the LANGFLOW_ALLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENTS=false policy control.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands in the server process by saving a flow with a crafted type field value and triggering a build of a wrapper flow that references it. This allowed privilege escalation from "authenticated flow user" to arbitrary OS-level command execution under the server process identity, bypassing the LANGFLOW_ALLOW_CUSTOM_COMPONENTS=false policy control.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow is affected by multiple remote code execution vulnerabilities due to insufficient code-execution policy…
Langflow contains multiple vulnerabilities that allow arbitrary Python and operating system command execution on the server. The PythonFunction component lacks the runtime code-execution gate applied to other code-execution components, enabling an authenticated…
🚨 CVE-2026-22056
StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions 11.5 and higher in a non-standard configuration and scenario are susceptible to a Denial of Service vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an attacker with some control over the environment to cause a partial Denial of Service.
🎖@cveNotify
StorageGRID (formerly StorageGRID Webscale) versions 11.5 and higher in a non-standard configuration and scenario are susceptible to a Denial of Service vulnerability. Successful exploit could allow an attacker with some control over the environment to cause a partial Denial of Service.
🎖@cveNotify
Netapp
NetApp Product Security
NetApp is an industry leader in developing and implementing product security standards. Learn how we can help you maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of your data.
🚨 CVE-2026-3686
IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 11.3.0.2 through Interim Fix 001 is vulnerable to a denial of service due to improper limitation of resources.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Cloud Pak for Data System 11.3.0.2 through Interim Fix 001 is vulnerable to a denial of service due to improper limitation of resources.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Vulnerabilities exists in IBM Cloud Pak for Data System (CPDS 1.0)
Vulnerabilities exists in IBM Cloud Pak for Data System (CPDS 1.0) addressed in 11.3.1.2-IF1
🚨 CVE-2026-51661
Incorrect access control in the getPortForwardRules function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain port-forwarding rules via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
Incorrect access control in the getPortForwardRules function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain port-forwarding rules via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CVE-Vendor-Coordination/TOTOLINK/README.md at main · ShengWu00/CVE-Vendor-Coordination
Contribute to ShengWu00/CVE-Vendor-Coordination development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2026-51662
Incorrect access control in the getCloudSrvCheckStatus function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain cloud firmware check status information via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
Incorrect access control in the getCloudSrvCheckStatus function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain cloud firmware check status information via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CVE-Vendor-Coordination/TOTOLINK/README.md at main · ShengWu00/CVE-Vendor-Coordination
Contribute to ShengWu00/CVE-Vendor-Coordination development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2026-51663
Incorrect access control in the getWiFiApcliScan function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger wireless scans and retrieve AP-client scan results via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
Incorrect access control in the getWiFiApcliScan function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger wireless scans and retrieve AP-client scan results via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CVE-Vendor-Coordination/TOTOLINK/README.md at main · ShengWu00/CVE-Vendor-Coordination
Contribute to ShengWu00/CVE-Vendor-Coordination development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2026-51664
Incorrect access control in the getTelnetCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain Telnet service enablement status information via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
Incorrect access control in the getTelnetCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain Telnet service enablement status information via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CVE-Vendor-Coordination/TOTOLINK/README.md at main · ShengWu00/CVE-Vendor-Coordination
Contribute to ShengWu00/CVE-Vendor-Coordination development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2026-51665
Incorrect access control in the getTracerouteCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain traceroute diagnostic logs via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
Incorrect access control in the getTracerouteCfg function of TOTOLINK T6 4.1.5cu.748_B20211015 allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain traceroute diagnostic logs via sending a crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CVE-Vendor-Coordination/TOTOLINK/README.md at main · ShengWu00/CVE-Vendor-Coordination
Contribute to ShengWu00/CVE-Vendor-Coordination development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2026-55678
Arc is an open, SQL-native time-series database for telemetry. From 26.02.1 until 26.06.2, Arc Enterprise clustering accepts cluster join requests without authentication when cluster.enabled is true but cluster.shared_secret is not configured. The defaults in internal/config/config.go set cluster.enabled to false, cluster.cluster_name to arc-cluster, cluster.coordinator_addr to :9100, cluster.shared_secret to an empty value, and cluster.tls_enabled to false, while cmd/arc/main.go requires cluster.shared_secret only when cluster.replication_enabled is true. JoinRequest in internal/cluster/protocol/messages.go accepts attacker-controlled node_id, role, raft_addr, api_addr, and coord_addr values, plus optional auth_nonce, auth_timestamp, and auth_hmac fields. The join path in internal/cluster/coordinator.go validates HMAC authentication only when the configured shared secret is non-empty and otherwise proceeds after only the cluster-name check. An accepted node is marked healthy, added as a Raft voter or registered locally, and becomes available through internal/cluster/registry.go to the routing logic in internal/cluster/router.go. The forwardRequest path in internal/cluster/router.go builds its target from node.APIAddress and copies Authorization and x-api-key headers with the request, so a rogue node selected for a forwarded query or write can receive authentication headers, request bodies, database and measurement names, and operational metadata. Heartbeat in internal/cluster/protocol/messages.go also lacks HMAC fields, and internal/cluster/coordinator.go updates node state from supplied node_id and state values without authentication. An unauthenticated network attacker who can reach the coordinator port and knows the cluster name can therefore become a trusted cluster node, mutate cluster membership, be submitted as a Raft voter, intercept topology-dependent forwarded requests, divert or forge operations, and blackhole or delay traffic. The default standalone configuration is not reachable because cluster.enabled is false, but Enterprise cluster deployments with clustering enabled and no shared secret are affected. This issue is fixed in version 26.06.2.
🎖@cveNotify
Arc is an open, SQL-native time-series database for telemetry. From 26.02.1 until 26.06.2, Arc Enterprise clustering accepts cluster join requests without authentication when cluster.enabled is true but cluster.shared_secret is not configured. The defaults in internal/config/config.go set cluster.enabled to false, cluster.cluster_name to arc-cluster, cluster.coordinator_addr to :9100, cluster.shared_secret to an empty value, and cluster.tls_enabled to false, while cmd/arc/main.go requires cluster.shared_secret only when cluster.replication_enabled is true. JoinRequest in internal/cluster/protocol/messages.go accepts attacker-controlled node_id, role, raft_addr, api_addr, and coord_addr values, plus optional auth_nonce, auth_timestamp, and auth_hmac fields. The join path in internal/cluster/coordinator.go validates HMAC authentication only when the configured shared secret is non-empty and otherwise proceeds after only the cluster-name check. An accepted node is marked healthy, added as a Raft voter or registered locally, and becomes available through internal/cluster/registry.go to the routing logic in internal/cluster/router.go. The forwardRequest path in internal/cluster/router.go builds its target from node.APIAddress and copies Authorization and x-api-key headers with the request, so a rogue node selected for a forwarded query or write can receive authentication headers, request bodies, database and measurement names, and operational metadata. Heartbeat in internal/cluster/protocol/messages.go also lacks HMAC fields, and internal/cluster/coordinator.go updates node state from supplied node_id and state values without authentication. An unauthenticated network attacker who can reach the coordinator port and knows the cluster name can therefore become a trusted cluster node, mutate cluster membership, be submitted as a Raft voter, intercept topology-dependent forwarded requests, divert or forge operations, and blackhole or delay traffic. The default standalone configuration is not reachable because cluster.enabled is false, but Enterprise cluster deployments with clustering enabled and no shared secret are affected. This issue is fixed in version 26.06.2.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix(cluster): require shared secret for clustering, authenticate hear… · Basekick-Labs/arc@38402ad
…tbeats (GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw) (#505)
* fix(cluster): require shared secret for clustering, authenticate heartbeats (GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw)
An Arc Enterprise cluster started with cluster.enabled=tru...
* fix(cluster): require shared secret for clustering, authenticate heartbeats (GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw)
An Arc Enterprise cluster started with cluster.enabled=tru...
🚨 CVE-2026-55696
PrivateBin is an online pastebin where the server has zero knowledge of pasted data. Prior to 2.0.5, AttachmentViewer.setAttachment in js/privatebin.js uses getAttachmentMimeType to accept attacker-controlled MIME types and uses getBlobUrl to create a same-origin blob before setting attachmentLink's href for the Download attachment link. The SVG-only sanitization branch updates only the preview blob, so text/html, image/svg, application/xhtml+xml, and text/xml attachments can remain active in the download blob. On an instance with fileupload = true and a weakened, stripped, or absent Content Security Policy, an anonymous attacker can create such an attachment, and a victim who opens the link in a new tab causes inline JavaScript to execute in the PrivateBin origin. The script can read origin-scoped local storage and issue same-origin requests, including requests to applications co-hosted on the same domain. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
PrivateBin is an online pastebin where the server has zero knowledge of pasted data. Prior to 2.0.5, AttachmentViewer.setAttachment in js/privatebin.js uses getAttachmentMimeType to accept attacker-controlled MIME types and uses getBlobUrl to create a same-origin blob before setting attachmentLink's href for the Download attachment link. The SVG-only sanitization branch updates only the preview blob, so text/html, image/svg, application/xhtml+xml, and text/xml attachments can remain active in the download blob. On an instance with fileupload = true and a weakened, stripped, or absent Content Security Policy, an anonymous attacker can create such an attachment, and a victim who opens the link in a new tab causes inline JavaScript to execute in the PrivateBin origin. The script can read origin-scoped local storage and issue same-origin requests, including requests to applications co-hosted on the same domain. This issue is fixed in version 2.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: prevent browsers from rendering unsafe attachments like HTML in … · PrivateBin/PrivateBin@7f1f408
…a new tab
We do not want to santitize them with DOMPurify, as an attached file should
be returned exactly as it has been attached by the creator. And sharing HTML files
is IMHO a legitimate use c...
We do not want to santitize them with DOMPurify, as an attached file should
be returned exactly as it has been attached by the creator. And sharing HTML files
is IMHO a legitimate use c...
🚨 CVE-2026-55763
Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.19, processPercentageRoyaltiesTransfer in core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go calls SubFromBalance after the split loop and after the royaltiesToPay <= 0 early return. computeSplitRoyalties rejects only when splitToPay > royaltiesToPay, so a valid PercentTransferPercentage = 10000 split consumes exactly 100 percent of the royalty pool, sets royaltiesToPay to zero, and returns before the source account is debited. The split recipient receives the full royaltyAmount while the sender pays nothing and the supply counter is not updated, allowing unbounded off-the-books inflation of the transferred KDA. A KDA owner must configure a TransferPercentage royalty with a 100 percent split, after which any holder's transfer of the asset triggers the mint; the sibling processFixedRoyaltiesTransfer path is not affected because it debits the source before distribution. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.19.
🎖@cveNotify
Klever-Go is the Go implementation of the Klever blockchain protocol. Prior to 1.7.19, processPercentageRoyaltiesTransfer in core/kapp/accounts/accounts.go calls SubFromBalance after the split loop and after the royaltiesToPay <= 0 early return. computeSplitRoyalties rejects only when splitToPay > royaltiesToPay, so a valid PercentTransferPercentage = 10000 split consumes exactly 100 percent of the royalty pool, sets royaltiesToPay to zero, and returns before the source account is debited. The split recipient receives the full royaltyAmount while the sender pays nothing and the supply counter is not updated, allowing unbounded off-the-books inflation of the transferred KDA. A KDA owner must configure a TransferPercentage royalty with a 100 percent split, after which any holder's transfer of the asset triggers the mint; the sibling processFixedRoyaltiesTransfer path is not affected because it debits the source before distribution. This issue is fixed in version 1.7.19.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Merge commit from fork · klever-io/klever-go@8bcc600
* fix(market): prevent buy settlement from paying out more than the bid
executeBuyMarket split a buyer's payment into referral, royalties and the
market-order owner shares, paying referral...
executeBuyMarket split a buyer's payment into referral, royalties and the
market-order owner shares, paying referral...