🚨 CVE-2026-68861
Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote execution.
🎖@cveNotify
Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote execution.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-68863
Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-71172
Dell Cloud Disaster Recovery, versions 20.2 and prior, contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery.
🎖@cveNotify
Dell Cloud Disaster Recovery, versions 20.2 and prior, contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-74770
Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-74771
Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering.
🎖@cveNotify
Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-74774
Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass.
🎖@cveNotify
Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-79938
Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery, versions prior to 20.3, contain an Improper Authentication vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access.
🎖@cveNotify
Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery, versions prior to 20.3, contain an Improper Authentication vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Unauthorized access.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-79939
Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery, versions Prior to 20.3, contain an UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Script injection.
🎖@cveNotify
Dell PowerProtect Cyber Recovery, versions Prior to 20.3, contain an UNIX Symbolic Link (Symlink) Following vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Script injection.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-15973
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Survey Menu Entries administration page. An authenticated user with the global settings:read permission can create a survey menu entry containing attacker-controlled data. The value is stored in the surveymenu_entries.data field and later inserted into a single-quoted HTML title attribute without context-appropriate encoding.
This issue affects LimeSurvey: 7.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Survey Menu Entries administration page. An authenticated user with the global settings:read permission can create a survey menu entry containing attacker-controlled data. The value is stored in the surveymenu_entries.data field and later inserted into a single-quoted HTML title attribute without context-appropriate encoding.
This issue affects LimeSurvey: 7.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
Fluidattacks
LimeSurvey 7.0.5 - Stored XSS in Survey Menu Entries | Fluid Attacks
CVE-2026-15973:
🚨 CVE-2026-16809
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the survey quota creation workflow. An authenticated low-privileged user who can create and manage their own survey can store malicious JavaScript in a quota message.
This issue affects LimeSurvey: 7.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the survey quota creation workflow. An authenticated low-privileged user who can create and manage their own survey can store malicious JavaScript in a quota message.
This issue affects LimeSurvey: 7.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
Fluidattacks
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5 - Stored XSS in quota message rendering | Fluid Attacks
AppSec solution that integrates AI, automated tools, and pentesters to help you prevent, detect, manage, and fix vulnerabilities continuously across your SDLC.
🚨 CVE-2026-63360
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5+260623 contains an authenticated reflected Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the user activation confirmation endpoint. The action query parameter is copied into the response and inserted into a hidden input attribute without HTML attribute encoding.
This issue affects LimeSurvey: 7.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5+260623 contains an authenticated reflected Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the user activation confirmation endpoint. The action query parameter is copied into the response and inserted into a hidden input attribute without HTML attribute encoding.
This issue affects LimeSurvey: 7.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
Fluidattacks
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5 - Reflected XSS in user activation confirmation endpoint | Fluid Attacks
CVE-2026-63360: LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5 contains an authenticated reflected Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability in the user activation confirmation endpoint. The action query parameter is copied into the response and inserted into a hidden input…
🚨 CVE-2026-65930
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5 contains an authenticated stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the replacement-fields dialog used by the administrative question editor.This issue affects LimeSurvey: 7.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5 contains an authenticated stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the replacement-fields dialog used by the administrative question editor.This issue affects LimeSurvey: 7.0.5.
🎖@cveNotify
Fluidattacks
LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5 - Stored XSS in replacement-fields | Fluid Attacks
CVE-2026-65930: LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.0.5 contains an authenticated stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the replacement-fields dialog used by the administrative question editor.
🚨 CVE-2025-62341
HCL Connections is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) when an internal server is compromised possibly allowing an attacker to send unauthorized requests in certain scenarios leading to information disclosure or security bypass.
🎖@cveNotify
HCL Connections is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) when an internal server is compromised possibly allowing an attacker to send unauthorized requests in certain scenarios leading to information disclosure or security bypass.
🎖@cveNotify
Hcl-Software
Security Bulletin: HCL Connections Security Update for SSRF Vulnerability (CVE-2025-62341) - Customer Support
HCL Connections is vulnerable to an SSRF vulnerability (CVE-2025-62341) , see details below for description
🚨 CVE-2026-74848
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') vulnerability in Apache APISIX.
An attacker could make other clients receive attacker-chosen or other users' responses on serverless-plugin routes.
This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 2.12.0 through 3.17.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') vulnerability in Apache APISIX.
An attacker could make other clients receive attacker-chosen or other users' responses on serverless-plugin routes.
This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 2.12.0 through 3.17.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-75005
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in Apache APISIX.
A single small request can pin a gateway worker at 100% CPU for an extended period in graphql-limit-count routes.
This issue affects Apache APISIX: 3.17.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity vulnerability in Apache APISIX.
A single small request can pin a gateway worker at 100% CPU for an extended period in graphql-limit-count routes.
This issue affects Apache APISIX: 3.17.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-75020
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an LDAP Query ('LDAP Injection') vulnerability in Apache APISIX.
A caller who holds valid credentials for one entry in the LDAP directory can authenticate through APISIX as a consumer mapped to a different entry, one the plugin's configured scope was meant to keep out of reach.
This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 2.11.0 through 3.17.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an LDAP Query ('LDAP Injection') vulnerability in Apache APISIX.
A caller who holds valid credentials for one entry in the LDAP directory can authenticate through APISIX as a consumer mapped to a different entry, one the plugin's configured scope was meant to keep out of reach.
This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 2.11.0 through 3.17.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.18.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-17562
Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Summit Security Systems AdisyonPro allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.
This issue affects AdisyonPro: before v5.21.0.
🎖@cveNotify
Authorization bypass through User-Controlled key vulnerability in Summit Security Systems AdisyonPro allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.
This issue affects AdisyonPro: before v5.21.0.
🎖@cveNotify
siberguvenlik.gov.tr
T.C. Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı resmi web sitesi.
🚨 CVE-2026-5218
Improper neutralization of Script-Related HTML tags in a web page (basic XSS) vulnerability in Softtr Informatics Technology Trading Limited Company E-Commerce Pack allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).
This issue affects E-Commerce Pack: before 5.03.01.49.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper neutralization of Script-Related HTML tags in a web page (basic XSS) vulnerability in Softtr Informatics Technology Trading Limited Company E-Commerce Pack allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).
This issue affects E-Commerce Pack: before 5.03.01.49.
🎖@cveNotify
siberguvenlik.gov.tr
T.C. Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı resmi web sitesi.
🚨 CVE-2026-81659
Affected versions of Flowintel allow attacker-controlled note content to be processed by Pandoc and XeLaTeX during PDF export in a way that can cause local files on the Flowintel server to be read and incorporated into the generated export.
🎖@cveNotify
Affected versions of Flowintel allow attacker-controlled note content to be processed by Pandoc and XeLaTeX during PDF export in a way that can cause local files on the Flowintel server to be read and incorporated into the generated export.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: [security] note export · flowintel/flowintel@16f618f
Arbitrary file read through note pdf export
🚨 CVE-2026-81662
Affected versions of Flowintel improperly trust configuration keys supplied to the alerts settings update endpoint. While configuration values were normalized to Python literals, the corresponding keys were used directly when constructing and replacing lines in conf/config_module.py.
The vulnerable code used requester-controlled keys in both the regular expression and the generated assignment:
f'{key} = {py_val}'
and appended an assignment if the key was not already present. The modified Python configuration module was subsequently reloaded using importlib.reload(). This creates a code-generation boundary in which specially crafted configuration keys can alter the Python source structure and result in execution of attacker-controlled Python statements.
Version impacted >=3.3.0
🎖@cveNotify
Affected versions of Flowintel improperly trust configuration keys supplied to the alerts settings update endpoint. While configuration values were normalized to Python literals, the corresponding keys were used directly when constructing and replacing lines in conf/config_module.py.
The vulnerable code used requester-controlled keys in both the regular expression and the generated assignment:
f'{key} = {py_val}'
and appended an assignment if the key was not already present. The modified Python configuration module was subsequently reloaded using importlib.reload(). This creates a code-generation boundary in which specially crafted configuration keys can alter the Python source structure and result in execution of attacker-controlled Python statements.
Version impacted >=3.3.0
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: [security] Remote code execution through settings alerts config · flowintel/flowintel@d36171e
Values are “normalized”, keys are just written as provided by the requester.
🚨 CVE-2026-81743
Affected versions of Flowintel allow the LOG_FILE configuration value to be modified through system settings without restricting it to a filename inside the intended log directory.
Because the application constructs the log destination from this configurable value, an administrator could set LOG_FILE to an arbitrary filesystem path. Since attackers can influence logged content, this enables controlled data to be written into unintended files. The upstream commit specifically describes an exploitation chain in which an attacker injects a template into a chosen file and subsequently abuses application rendering behavior to execute code.
The patch removes LOG_FILE from the web-editable settings, introduces validate_log_file_name() to reject absolute paths, traversal, Windows paths, null bytes, and directory components, and centralizes log path construction through resolve_log_file_path().
Version impacted: >=3.3.0
🎖@cveNotify
Affected versions of Flowintel allow the LOG_FILE configuration value to be modified through system settings without restricting it to a filename inside the intended log directory.
Because the application constructs the log destination from this configurable value, an administrator could set LOG_FILE to an arbitrary filesystem path. Since attackers can influence logged content, this enables controlled data to be written into unintended files. The upstream commit specifically describes an exploitation chain in which an attacker injects a template into a chosen file and subsequently abuses application rendering behavior to execute code.
The patch removes LOG_FILE from the web-editable settings, introduces validate_log_file_name() to reject absolute paths, traversal, Windows paths, null bytes, and directory components, and centralizes log path construction through resolve_log_file_path().
Version impacted: >=3.3.0
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: [security] RCE through log path · flowintel/flowintel@13785ee
Log path can be set to any file as admin.
An attacker can manipulate what is logged, and inject a template that is rendered by abusing this.
An attacker can manipulate what is logged, and inject a template that is rendered by abusing this.