🚨 CVE-2026-82252
gitoxide before 0.52.1 follows symlinks when reading the worktree .gitmodules file, allowing attackers to inject out-of-repository bytes into submodule metadata. Attackers can create a malicious repository with a symlinked .gitmodules pointing outside the repository tree, causing gitoxide to parse arbitrary external files as submodule configuration and expose attacker-controlled name, path, and url values.
🎖@cveNotify
gitoxide before 0.52.1 follows symlinks when reading the worktree .gitmodules file, allowing attackers to inject out-of-repository bytes into submodule metadata. Attackers can create a malicious repository with a symlinked .gitmodules pointing outside the repository tree, causing gitoxide to parse arbitrary external files as submodule configuration and expose attacker-controlled name, path, and url values.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
symlinked .gitmodules is followed and parsed from outside the repository
## Summary
attachments:
[pocs.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/26431422/pocs.zip)
When `Repository::submodules()` loads submodule metadata, it prefers the worktree `.gitmodules...
attachments:
[pocs.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/26431422/pocs.zip)
When `Repository::submodules()` loads submodule metadata, it prefers the worktree `.gitmodules...
🚨 CVE-2026-82253
gitoxide (Rust crates gix <= 0.72.0 and gix-validate <= 0.10.0) contains a path traversal vulnerability. The submodule name validation function in gix-validate only checks the first occurrence of '..' via name.find(b".."), allowing crafted names such as 'a..b/../../../.git/' to bypass the check; additionally this validation is never invoked in production code paths. Combined with a trust inheritance flaw in Submodule::open(), where the parent repository's git_dir_trust (Trust::Full) is cloned and the ownership verification is skipped, an attacker can craft a malicious .gitmodules file so that a victim tool built on gitoxide reads arbitrary git repository configuration (including embedded credentials) with full trust, bypassing safe-directory protections. Fixed in gix 0.82.0 and gix-validate 0.11.1.
🎖@cveNotify
gitoxide (Rust crates gix <= 0.72.0 and gix-validate <= 0.10.0) contains a path traversal vulnerability. The submodule name validation function in gix-validate only checks the first occurrence of '..' via name.find(b".."), allowing crafted names such as 'a..b/../../../.git/' to bypass the check; additionally this validation is never invoked in production code paths. Combined with a trust inheritance flaw in Submodule::open(), where the parent repository's git_dir_trust (Trust::Full) is cloned and the ownership verification is skipped, an attacker can craft a malicious .gitmodules file so that a victim tool built on gitoxide reads arbitrary git repository configuration (including embedded credentials) with full trust, bypassing safe-directory protections. Fixed in gix 0.82.0 and gix-validate 0.11.1.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Submodule name validation bypass + trust inheritance flaw enables path traversal and credential disclosure
### Summary
Submodule name validation bypass plus missing validation in production code paths allows path traversal via crafted `.gitmodules`. Combined with a trust inheritance flaw in `Submodul...
Submodule name validation bypass plus missing validation in production code paths allows path traversal via crafted `.gitmodules`. Combined with a trust inheritance flaw in `Submodul...
🚨 CVE-2026-82255
gitoxide versions from 0.25.4 contain an HTTP credential leak vulnerability in the curl-based transport backend where credentials are sent to attacker-controlled servers after HTTP redirects. The vulnerability occurs because credential validation checks the original URL instead of the effective URL after redirect, allowing attackers to steal authentication tokens through cross-domain redirects or HTTPS-to-HTTP downgrades.
🎖@cveNotify
gitoxide versions from 0.25.4 contain an HTTP credential leak vulnerability in the curl-based transport backend where credentials are sent to attacker-controlled servers after HTTP redirects. The vulnerability occurs because credential validation checks the original URL instead of the effective URL after redirect, allowing attackers to steal authentication tokens through cross-domain redirects or HTTPS-to-HTTP downgrades.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
gix-transport: HTTP credentials leaked to redirected host in curl backend
## Summary
The curl-based HTTP transport in `gix-transport` sends user credentials (passwords, tokens) to an attacker-controlled server after an HTTP redirect. When a server responds with a 302 ...
The curl-based HTTP transport in `gix-transport` sends user credentials (passwords, tokens) to an attacker-controlled server after an HTTP redirect. When a server responds with a 302 ...
🚨 CVE-2026-82256
SvelteKit before 2.69.1 fails to properly validate remote form function payload sizes, allowing attackers to crash the Node process by sending large payloads. Repeated exploitation causes denial of service by repeatedly crashing the application process.
🎖@cveNotify
SvelteKit before 2.69.1 fails to properly validate remote form function payload sizes, allowing attackers to crash the Node process by sending large payloads. Repeated exploitation causes denial of service by repeatedly crashing the application process.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Big remote form function payloads can cause Node process to crash
Big remote form function payloads can cause the Node process to crash. Doing this repeatedly can cause DoS.
🚨 CVE-2026-82257
SvelteKit versions before 2.69.1 contain a prototype pollution vulnerability in remote form functions with file input fields that accept arbitrary user-controlled path names. Attackers can manipulate the deletion path to remove methods on the prototype, potentially disabling application functionality.
🎖@cveNotify
SvelteKit versions before 2.69.1 contain a prototype pollution vulnerability in remote form functions with file input fields that accept arbitrary user-controlled path names. Attackers can manipulate the deletion path to remove methods on the prototype, potentially disabling application functionality.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Prototype pollution in file input deletion path in remote-function forms
If you use remote form functions, have an input field of type `file`, and accept arbitrary user-controlled path names for the field, then you are vulnerable to a prototype pollution attack where th...
🚨 CVE-2026-82258
SvelteKit versions from 2.38.0 before 2.60.1 contain a race condition in query.batch that allows concurrent requests from different users to merge under a single request context. Attackers can exploit specific timing conditions to access sensitive data from other users' concurrent requests.
🎖@cveNotify
SvelteKit versions from 2.38.0 before 2.60.1 contain a race condition in query.batch that allows concurrent requests from different users to merge under a single request context. Attackers can exploit specific timing conditions to access sensitive data from other users' concurrent requests.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
`query.batch` cross-talk
`query.batch()` could, under very rare and specific timings, cause concurrent requests from different users to merge and resolve under single request context, enabling cross-user data disclosure.
🚨 CVE-2026-82259
SvelteKit versions from 2.49.0 through 2.53.2 (fixed in 2.53.3) contain a deserialization expansion issue in the experimental form remote function. When an application enables experimental.remoteFunctions and uses the form function to process the files array without validating files.length or individual file sizes, an attacker can submit relatively small inputs that expand into very large file arrays, leading to expensive processing and denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
SvelteKit versions from 2.49.0 through 2.53.2 (fixed in 2.53.3) contain a deserialization expansion issue in the experimental form remote function. When an application enables experimental.remoteFunctions and uses the form function to process the files array without validating files.length or individual file sizes, an attacker can submit relatively small inputs that expand into very large file arrays, leading to expensive processing and denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Deserialization expansion in unvalidated SvelteKit `form` remote function leads to denial of service (experimental only)
Some relatively small inputs can cause very large files arrays in `form` handlers. If the SvelteKit application code doesn't check `files.length` or individual files' sizes and performs exp...
🚨 CVE-2026-82260
SvelteKit (@sveltejs/kit) versions >=2.49.0 and <=2.52.1 with experimental remote functions (experimental.remoteFunctions) and form enabled contain a memory exhaustion vulnerability in remote form deserialization. Malformed form data can cause excessive memory allocation, crashing the server process and resulting in denial of service. Fixed in 2.52.2.
🎖@cveNotify
SvelteKit (@sveltejs/kit) versions >=2.49.0 and <=2.52.1 with experimental remote functions (experimental.remoteFunctions) and form enabled contain a memory exhaustion vulnerability in remote form deserialization. Malformed form data can cause excessive memory allocation, crashing the server process and resulting in denial of service. Fixed in 2.52.2.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Memory exhaustion in SvelteKit remote form deserialization (experimental only)
Versions of `@sveltejs/kit` prior to 2.52.2 with remote functions enabled can be vulnerable to memory exhaustion. Malformed form data can cause the server process to crash due to excessive memory a...
🚨 CVE-2026-82261
SvelteKit (@sveltejs/kit) versions >=2.49.0 and <=2.52.1 with experimental remote functions and form enabled contain a CPU exhaustion vulnerability in form deserialization. An attacker can send malformed form data to cause the server to become unresponsive while processing the request, resulting in denial of service. Fixed in 2.52.2.
🎖@cveNotify
SvelteKit (@sveltejs/kit) versions >=2.49.0 and <=2.52.1 with experimental remote functions and form enabled contain a CPU exhaustion vulnerability in form deserialization. An attacker can send malformed form data to cause the server to become unresponsive while processing the request, resulting in denial of service. Fixed in 2.52.2.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
CPU exhaustion in SvelteKit remote form deserialization (experimental only)
Versions of `@sveltejs/kit` prior to 2.52.2 with remote functions enabled are vulnerable to CPU exhaustion. Malformed form data can cause the server to become unresponsive while processing a reques...
🚨 CVE-2023-49105
An issue was discovered in ownCloud owncloud/core before 10.13.1. An attacker can access, modify, or delete any file without authentication if the username of a victim is known, and the victim has no signing-key configured. This occurs because pre-signed URLs can be accepted even when no signing-key is configured for the owner of the files. The earliest affected version is 10.6.0.
🎖@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in ownCloud owncloud/core before 10.13.1. An attacker can access, modify, or delete any file without authentication if the username of a victim is known, and the victim has no signing-key configured. This occurs because pre-signed URLs can be accepted even when no signing-key is configured for the owner of the files. The earliest affected version is 10.6.0.
🎖@cveNotify
ownCloud
WebDAV Api Authentication Bypass using Pre-Signed URLs - ownCloud
Deny the use of pre-signed urls if no signing-key is configured for the owner of the files.
🚨 CVE-2026-53362
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path
In __ip6_append_data(), when the paged-allocation branch is taken
(MSG_MORE / NETIF_F_SG / large fraglen), alloclen and pagedlen are
computed as
alloclen = fragheaderlen + transhdrlen;
pagedlen = datalen - transhdrlen;
datalen already includes fraggap (datalen = length + fraggap). When
fraggap is non-zero, this is not the first skb and transhdrlen is zero.
The fraggap bytes carried over from the previous skb are copied just past
the fragment headers in the new skb's linear area. The linear area is
therefore undersized by fraggap bytes while pagedlen is overstated by the
same amount, and the copy writes past skb->end into the trailing
skb_shared_info.
An unprivileged user can trigger this via a UDPv6 socket using
MSG_MORE together with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES.
The bad accounting was introduced by commit 773ba4fe9104 ("ipv6:
avoid partial copy for zc"). Before commit ce650a166335 ("udp6: Fix
__ip6_append_data()'s handling of MSG_SPLICE_PAGES"), the negative
copy value caused -EINVAL to be returned. That later commit allowed
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to proceed in this case, making the corruption
triggerable.
The non-paged branch sets alloclen to fraglen, which already accounts
for fraggap because datalen does. Bring the paged branch in line by
adding fraggap to alloclen and subtracting it from pagedlen.
After this adjustment, copy no longer collapses to -fraggap on the
paged path, so remove the stale comment describing that old arithmetic.
Since a negative copy is no longer expected for a valid MSG_SPLICE_PAGES
case, remove the MSG_SPLICE_PAGES exception from the negative copy check.
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ipv6: account for fraggap on the paged allocation path
In __ip6_append_data(), when the paged-allocation branch is taken
(MSG_MORE / NETIF_F_SG / large fraglen), alloclen and pagedlen are
computed as
alloclen = fragheaderlen + transhdrlen;
pagedlen = datalen - transhdrlen;
datalen already includes fraggap (datalen = length + fraggap). When
fraggap is non-zero, this is not the first skb and transhdrlen is zero.
The fraggap bytes carried over from the previous skb are copied just past
the fragment headers in the new skb's linear area. The linear area is
therefore undersized by fraggap bytes while pagedlen is overstated by the
same amount, and the copy writes past skb->end into the trailing
skb_shared_info.
An unprivileged user can trigger this via a UDPv6 socket using
MSG_MORE together with MSG_SPLICE_PAGES.
The bad accounting was introduced by commit 773ba4fe9104 ("ipv6:
avoid partial copy for zc"). Before commit ce650a166335 ("udp6: Fix
__ip6_append_data()'s handling of MSG_SPLICE_PAGES"), the negative
copy value caused -EINVAL to be returned. That later commit allowed
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES to proceed in this case, making the corruption
triggerable.
The non-paged branch sets alloclen to fraglen, which already accounts
for fraggap because datalen does. Bring the paged branch in line by
adding fraggap to alloclen and subtracting it from pagedlen.
After this adjustment, copy no longer collapses to -fraggap on the
paged path, so remove the stale comment describing that old arithmetic.
Since a negative copy is no longer expected for a valid MSG_SPLICE_PAGES
case, remove the MSG_SPLICE_PAGES exception from the negative copy check.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66384
An authenticated user may write data outside the intended Docker cache path under specific remote-repository conditions.
🎖@cveNotify
An authenticated user may write data outside the intended Docker cache path under specific remote-repository conditions.
🎖@cveNotify
Release Information
Artifactory Self-Hosted Releases
This section contains the Release Notes for Artifactory Self-Hosted releases.
🚨 CVE-2026-73575
In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the Exchange Web Services (EWS) endpoint of Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) due to insufficient validation of request content types. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by causing an authenticated user to submit a crafted request, potentially allowing unauthorized actions to be performed on behalf of the victim.
🎖@cveNotify
In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the Exchange Web Services (EWS) endpoint of Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) due to insufficient validation of request content types. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by causing an authenticated user to submit a crafted request, potentially allowing unauthorized actions to be performed on behalf of the victim.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-73576
In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, weak cryptographic key generation vulnerability exists in the OnlyOffice integration. The zimbraDocumentEditingJwtSecret is generated using an insecure random number generator, resulting in insufficient entropy. An attacker who obtains a JWT signed with the generated secret may be able to recover the JWT signing secret through offline brute-force, potentially enabling JWT forgery.
🎖@cveNotify
In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, weak cryptographic key generation vulnerability exists in the OnlyOffice integration. The zimbraDocumentEditingJwtSecret is generated using an insecure random number generator, resulting in insufficient entropy. An attacker who obtains a JWT signed with the generated secret may be able to recover the JWT signing secret through offline brute-force, potentially enabling JWT forgery.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-73574
In Zimbra Collaboration before 10.1.17, a local file inclusion (LFI) vulnerability exists in the Zimbra Classic Web Client due to improper validation of the fu request parameter. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted path, potentially allowing unauthorized disclosure of protected files, such as WEB-INF/web.xml, within the web application directory. This occurs in the Forward servlet.
🎖@cveNotify
In Zimbra Collaboration before 10.1.17, a local file inclusion (LFI) vulnerability exists in the Zimbra Classic Web Client due to improper validation of the fu request parameter. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted path, potentially allowing unauthorized disclosure of protected files, such as WEB-INF/web.xml, within the web application directory. This occurs in the Forward servlet.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-20901
Improper input validation for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) processors within firmware may allow an escalation of privilege. Startup code and smm adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable data alteration. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (high) and availability (none) impacts.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper input validation for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) processors within firmware may allow an escalation of privilege. Startup code and smm adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable data alteration. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (high) and availability (none) impacts.
🎖@cveNotify
Intel
INTEL-SA-01442
🚨 CVE-2026-73571
An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17 due to improper authorization validation in delegated email sending functionality. An authenticated attacker can send specially crafted SOAP requests to impersonate another user and send emails without possessing the required delegation or send-as permissions. This occurs in the SaveDraftRequest SOAP handler.
🎖@cveNotify
An authorization bypass vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17 due to improper authorization validation in delegated email sending functionality. An authenticated attacker can send specially crafted SOAP requests to impersonate another user and send emails without possessing the required delegation or send-as permissions. This occurs in the SaveDraftRequest SOAP handler.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-73572
In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Zimbra Classic Web Client due to insufficient sanitization of specific attachment content during inline preview. An attacker can send a crafted email containing a malicious attachment that, when previewed by a user, executes arbitrary JavaScript within the victim's browser session. Successful exploitation may allow an attacker to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim user, potentially leading to data exfiltration or unauthorized access to sensitive information.
🎖@cveNotify
In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Zimbra Classic Web Client due to insufficient sanitization of specific attachment content during inline preview. An attacker can send a crafted email containing a malicious attachment that, when previewed by a user, executes arbitrary JavaScript within the victim's browser session. Successful exploitation may allow an attacker to perform unauthorized actions on behalf of the victim user, potentially leading to data exfiltration or unauthorized access to sensitive information.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-73573
In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, a path traversal vulnerability exists in the Zimbra Briefcase document editing functionality due to improper validation of the packages parameter. An authenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted path traversal sequence, potentially allowing unauthorized disclosure of sensitive files within the web application directory.
🎖@cveNotify
In Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.17, a path traversal vulnerability exists in the Zimbra Briefcase document editing functionality due to improper validation of the packages parameter. An authenticated attacker can exploit this vulnerability by supplying a crafted path traversal sequence, potentially allowing unauthorized disclosure of sensitive files within the web application directory.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-61268
Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Business Logic Infra SEC). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).
🎖@cveNotify
Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Business Logic Infra SEC). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N).
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-61273
Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Installation Security). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
🎖@cveNotify
Vulnerability in the JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools product of Oracle JD Edwards (component: Installation Security). Supported versions that are affected are 9.2.0.0-9.2.26.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Tools. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
🎖@cveNotify