🚨 CVE-2026-62986
OpenEXR is the reference implementation and specification for the EXR image file format, widely used in the motion picture industry. In versions 3.3.0 through 3.3.12 and 3.4.0 through 3.4.13, the PyOpenEXR Python bindings return stale heap data when reading a crafted deep scanline EXR that uses layer-prefixed RGB channels. With the default channel coalescing (separate_channels=False), the wrapper groups channels such as left.R, left.G, and left.B into a single RGB sample array, but the lane-offset calculation in PyPart::setDeepSliceData() only recognizes the exact unprefixed names G, B, and A. As a result, prefixed channels like left.G and left.B are decoded into lane 0 while lanes 1 and 2 are left uninitialized and returned to Python. A Python application that reads untrusted deep EXR files through the default OpenEXR.File API and then logs, serializes, previews, or otherwise processes the resulting NumPy sample arrays may expose uninitialized same-process heap contents, in addition to receiving incorrect green and blue channel data. This issue is fixed in versions 3.3.13 and 3.4.14.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenEXR is the reference implementation and specification for the EXR image file format, widely used in the motion picture industry. In versions 3.3.0 through 3.3.12 and 3.4.0 through 3.4.13, the PyOpenEXR Python bindings return stale heap data when reading a crafted deep scanline EXR that uses layer-prefixed RGB channels. With the default channel coalescing (separate_channels=False), the wrapper groups channels such as left.R, left.G, and left.B into a single RGB sample array, but the lane-offset calculation in PyPart::setDeepSliceData() only recognizes the exact unprefixed names G, B, and A. As a result, prefixed channels like left.G and left.B are decoded into lane 0 while lanes 1 and 2 are left uninitialized and returned to Python. A Python application that reads untrusted deep EXR files through the default OpenEXR.File API and then logs, serializes, previews, or otherwise processes the resulting NumPy sample arrays may expose uninitialized same-process heap contents, in addition to receiving incorrect green and blue channel data. This issue is fixed in versions 3.3.13 and 3.4.14.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix name comparison in deep prefixed RGB channel coalescing (#2522) · AcademySoftwareFoundation/openexr@36ff096
setDeepSliceData() used strcmp(c.name(), "G"/"B"/"A") to select the
RGB channel offset, which only matched unprefixed channel names. For
layer-...
RGB channel offset, which only matched unprefixed channel names. For
layer-...
🚨 CVE-2026-78379
Improper neutralization of input used for LLM prompting in the python_repl tool in Amazon Strands Agents Tools before 0.8.5 might allow remote actors to execute arbitrary Python code on the agent's host by bypassing the human consent gate, via a crafted prompt that forwards non_interactive_mode as a keyword argument through the batch tool. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.8.5 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper neutralization of input used for LLM prompting in the python_repl tool in Amazon Strands Agents Tools before 0.8.5 might allow remote actors to execute arbitrary Python code on the agent's host by bypassing the human consent gate, via a crafted prompt that forwards non_interactive_mode as a keyword argument through the batch tool. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.8.5 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-79786
Coroot's unauthenticated MCP OAuth dynamic client registration endpoint accepts any syntactically valid redirect URI without validation, allowing attackers to register clients pointing to attacker-controlled hosts. Attackers can send authorization URLs to signed-in users, capture their authorization codes upon consent approval, and exchange them for access tokens to hijack MCP sessions.
🎖@cveNotify
Coroot's unauthenticated MCP OAuth dynamic client registration endpoint accepts any syntactically valid redirect URI without validation, allowing attackers to register clients pointing to attacker-controlled hosts. Attackers can send authorization URLs to signed-in users, capture their authorization codes upon consent approval, and exchange them for access tokens to hijack MCP sessions.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - coroot/coroot: Coroot is an open-source observability and APM tool with AI-powered Root Cause Analysis. It combines metrics…
Coroot is an open-source observability and APM tool with AI-powered Root Cause Analysis. It combines metrics, logs, traces, continuous profiling, and SLO-based alerting with predefined dashboards a...
🚨 CVE-2026-79787
Alluxio's S3 REST proxy fails to verify AWS Signature Version 4 signatures in its default configuration, allowing unauthenticated attackers to spoof user identity. Attackers can extract usernames from unsigned Authorization headers and impersonate any user, including service accounts, to read, write, and delete arbitrary data.
🎖@cveNotify
Alluxio's S3 REST proxy fails to verify AWS Signature Version 4 signatures in its default configuration, allowing unauthenticated attackers to spoof user identity. Attackers can extract usernames from unsigned Authorization headers and impersonate any user, including service accounts, to read, write, and delete arbitrary data.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - Alluxio/alluxio: Alluxio, data orchestration for analytics and machine learning in the cloud
Alluxio, data orchestration for analytics and machine learning in the cloud - Alluxio/alluxio
🚨 CVE-2026-79788
In Dradis Community Edition, the ProvidersController and AgentsController gate their admin_required before_action on `defined?(Dradis::Pro)`, a constant that is never defined in CE, so the authorization check is never applied. As a result, any authenticated (non-admin) user can create an AI provider pointing to an arbitrary HTTP/HTTPS address (including internal/link-local hosts such as http://169.254.169.254) and reassign the built-in Roslin agent to use it. When an AI interaction is triggered, the server issues a request to the attacker-supplied URL (server-side request forgery). For non-2xx responses, the target's response body is reflected verbatim to the attacker's browser via ActionCable/Turbo Stream error messages, making the SSRF readable.
🎖@cveNotify
In Dradis Community Edition, the ProvidersController and AgentsController gate their admin_required before_action on `defined?(Dradis::Pro)`, a constant that is never defined in CE, so the authorization check is never applied. As a result, any authenticated (non-admin) user can create an AI provider pointing to an arbitrary HTTP/HTTPS address (including internal/link-local hosts such as http://169.254.169.254) and reassign the built-in Roslin agent to use it. When an AI interaction is triggered, the server issues a request to the attacker-supplied URL (server-side request forgery). For non-2xx responses, the target's response body is reflected verbatim to the attacker's browser via ActionCable/Turbo Stream error messages, making the SSRF readable.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - dradis/dradis-ce: Dradis Framework: Collaboration and reporting for IT Security teams
Dradis Framework: Collaboration and reporting for IT Security teams - dradis/dradis-ce
🚨 CVE-2026-80049
Airbyte Platform resolves the workspace used for its authorization decision from a field the caller supplies. AuthorizationServerHandler copies recognised identifiers out of the raw JSON request body into X-Airbyte-* headers, and AuthenticationHeaderResolver.resolveWorkspace consults X-Airbyte-Workspace-Id ahead of every resource-derived header, including those for connection, source and destination identifiers. Endpoints whose declared request bodies carry only a resource identifier are nonetheless reached with an added workspaceId field, because the extractor reads the body rather than the endpoint's schema, so the permission check is performed against the workspace the caller nominated while the handler acts on the resource identifier the caller supplied. Nothing afterwards compares the resource's owning workspace with the one that was authorized. A member of any workspace can therefore read source and destination configuration, trigger and cancel syncs, and delete connections, sources and destinations that belong to workspaces they have no access to, at whatever privilege level their own workspace membership grants them.
🎖@cveNotify
Airbyte Platform resolves the workspace used for its authorization decision from a field the caller supplies. AuthorizationServerHandler copies recognised identifiers out of the raw JSON request body into X-Airbyte-* headers, and AuthenticationHeaderResolver.resolveWorkspace consults X-Airbyte-Workspace-Id ahead of every resource-derived header, including those for connection, source and destination identifiers. Endpoints whose declared request bodies carry only a resource identifier are nonetheless reached with an added workspaceId field, because the extractor reads the body rather than the endpoint's schema, so the permission check is performed against the workspace the caller nominated while the handler acts on the resource identifier the caller supplied. Nothing afterwards compares the resource's owning workspace with the one that was authorized. A member of any workspace can therefore read source and destination configuration, trigger and cancel syncs, and delete connections, sources and destinations that belong to workspaces they have no access to, at whatever privilege level their own workspace membership grants them.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - airbytehq/airbyte-platform: The platform that powers Airbyte. Please file issues in https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte
The platform that powers Airbyte. Please file issues in https://github.com/airbytehq/airbyte - airbytehq/airbyte-platform
🚨 CVE-2026-80050
ContiNew Admin fails to apply file-upload permission checks or file-type allowlist validation to multipart upload endpoints, allowing authenticated users to store files with arbitrary extensions. Attackers can initialize chunked uploads, send file parts, and complete uploads to leave arbitrary files in the storage backend accessible via web server URLs.
🎖@cveNotify
ContiNew Admin fails to apply file-upload permission checks or file-type allowlist validation to multipart upload endpoints, allowing authenticated users to store files with arbitrary extensions. Attackers can initialize chunked uploads, send file parts, and complete uploads to leave arbitrary files in the storage backend accessible via web server URLs.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - continew-org/continew-admin: 🔥Almost最佳后端规范🔥页面现代美观,且专注设计与代码细节的高质量多租户中后台管理系统框架。开箱即用,持续迭代优化,持续提供舒适的开发体验。当前采用技术栈:SpringBoot…
🔥Almost最佳后端规范🔥页面现代美观,且专注设计与代码细节的高质量多租户中后台管理系统框架。开箱即用,持续迭代优化,持续提供舒适的开发体验。当前采用技术栈:SpringBoot v3.4.x (Java17)、Vue3 & ArcoDesign、TS、Vite5 、SaToken、MyBatisPlus、Redisson、FastExcel、CosId、JetCache、...
🚨 CVE-2026-18848
IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, and FW950.00 through FW950.H2 is affected by a vulnerability in the ASMI web interface. An attacker who can lure a logged-in ASMI administrator to visit a crafted web page can, under specific conditions, silently perform administrative actions on the FSP on behalf of that administrator, resulting in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Power Systems Firmware FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, and FW950.00 through FW950.H2 is affected by a vulnerability in the ASMI web interface. An attacker who can lure a logged-in ASMI administrator to visit a crafted web page can, under specific conditions, silently perform administrative actions on the FSP on behalf of that administrator, resulting in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: This Power System update is being released to address CVE-2026-18848
Power Systems Firmware is affected by a vulnerability in the ASMI web interface. An attacker who can lure a logged-in ASMI administrator to visit a crafted web page can, under specific conditions, silently perform administrative actions on the FSP on behalf…
🚨 CVE-2026-19321
Power Systems Firmware FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, and FW1060.00 through FW1060.80 is affected by a vulnerability in the host firmware. An attacker with service access to the service processor can supply a carefully crafted command that could leak the contents of hardware registers that should be inaccessible to the service processor. Successful exploitation could result in limited confidentiality or availability impacts to the affected host system.
🎖@cveNotify
Power Systems Firmware FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, and FW1060.00 through FW1060.80 is affected by a vulnerability in the host firmware. An attacker with service access to the service processor can supply a carefully crafted command that could leak the contents of hardware registers that should be inaccessible to the service processor. Successful exploitation could result in limited confidentiality or availability impacts to the affected host system.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: This Power System update is being released to address CVE-2026-19321
Power Systems Firmware is affected by a vulnerability in the host firmware. An attacker with service access to the service processor can supply a carefully crafted command that could leak the contents of hardware registers that should be inaccessible to the…
🚨 CVE-2026-16661
IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, and FW950.00 through FW950.H2 is affected by a vulnerability in the service processor mailbox interface. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can exploit this vulnerability, allowing arbitrary code to be executed in the host firmware runtime, giving full control over the managed system, resulting in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, and FW950.00 through FW950.H2 is affected by a vulnerability in the service processor mailbox interface. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can exploit this vulnerability, allowing arbitrary code to be executed in the host firmware runtime, giving full control over the managed system, resulting in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: This Power System update is being released to address CVE-2026-16661
Power Systems Firmware is affected by a vulnerability in the service processor mailbox interface. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can exploit this vulnerability, allowing arbitrary code to be executed in the host firmware runtime…
🚨 CVE-2026-16707
IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, and FW950.00 through FW950.H2 is affected by a vulnerability in the service processor mailbox interface. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can send a specially crafted mailbox message to read or modify arbitrary regions of Hostboot memory, compromising the host firmware boot stack and the hypervisor subsequently loaded by it. Successful exploitation results in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM PowerVM Hypervisor FW1120.00, FW1110.00 through FW1110.30, FW1060.00 through FW1060.80, and FW950.00 through FW950.H2 is affected by a vulnerability in the service processor mailbox interface. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can send a specially crafted mailbox message to read or modify arbitrary regions of Hostboot memory, compromising the host firmware boot stack and the hypervisor subsequently loaded by it. Successful exploitation results in a confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact to the managed system.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: This Power System update is being released to address CVE-2026-16707
Power Systems Firmware is affected by a vulnerability in the service processor mailbox interface. An attacker with authenticated service-level access to the FSP can send a specially crafted mailbox message to read or modify arbitrary regions of Hostboot memory…
🚨 CVE-2026-19446
IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted UDP packet to a reachable RPC service, resulting in complete system unavailability and requiring an LPAR restart.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted UDP packet to a reachable RPC service, resulting in complete system unavailability and requiring an LPAR restart.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Vulnerabilities in IBM AIX and PowerVM VIOS
Updated Aug 21, 2026: Updated the summary to highlight the additional installation instructions. IBM is providing security updates for supported AIX and VIOS releases that are under active fix support. Delivered through Service Packs (SPs) and Fix Packs (FPs)…
🚨 CVE-2026-19783
IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to cause kernel memory corruption due to insufficient validation. A crafted filesystem image can trigger an out-of-bounds kernel-stack write during directory reads, causing a system crash or potentially enabling privilege escalation.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to cause kernel memory corruption due to insufficient validation. A crafted filesystem image can trigger an out-of-bounds kernel-stack write during directory reads, causing a system crash or potentially enabling privilege escalation.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Vulnerabilities in IBM AIX and PowerVM VIOS
Updated Aug 21, 2026: Updated the summary to highlight the additional installation instructions. IBM is providing security updates for supported AIX and VIOS releases that are under active fix support. Delivered through Service Packs (SPs) and Fix Packs (FPs)…
🚨 CVE-2024-5647
Multiple plugins for WordPress are vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's bundled Magnific Popups library (version 1.1.0) in various versions due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. NOTE: This vulnerability was fixed in the upstream library (Magnific Popups version 1.2.0) by disabling the loading of HTML within certain fields by default.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple plugins for WordPress are vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's bundled Magnific Popups library (version 1.1.0) in various versions due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. NOTE: This vulnerability was fixed in the upstream library (Magnific Popups version 1.2.0) by disabling the loading of HTML within certain fields by default.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Release 1.2.0 · dimsemenov/Magnific-Popup
This update fixes jQuery deprecated functions and potential security vulnerabilities if you aren't fully sanitizing user input (for example, if your users can create HTML elements with attribut...
🚨 CVE-2026-7141
A vulnerability was found in vLLM up to 0.19.0. The affected element is the function has_mamba_layers of the file vllm/v1/kv_cache_interface.py of the component KV Block Handler. Performing a manipulation results in uninitialized resource. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The existence of this vulnerability is still disputed at present. The proposed patch did not fix the issue. A 3rd party explains: "The divergence could be explained by a benign and expected vLLM behavior where vLLM server could group concurrent requests together resulting in different input shapes based on varying request arrival time. The differences in grouped input shapes could call different kernels with could produce difference results due to rounding and differences in order of operations. There is an environment variable VLLM_BATCH_INVARIANT=1 for users that desire to have deterministic output with temperature 0.0."
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability was found in vLLM up to 0.19.0. The affected element is the function has_mamba_layers of the file vllm/v1/kv_cache_interface.py of the component KV Block Handler. Performing a manipulation results in uninitialized resource. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The attack is considered to have high complexity. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The existence of this vulnerability is still disputed at present. The proposed patch did not fix the issue. A 3rd party explains: "The divergence could be explained by a benign and expected vLLM behavior where vLLM server could group concurrent requests together resulting in different input shapes based on varying request arrival time. The differences in grouped input shapes could call different kernels with could produce difference results due to rounding and differences in order of operations. There is an environment variable VLLM_BATCH_INVARIANT=1 for users that desire to have deterministic output with temperature 0.0."
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
[Bug]: KV block corruption in base scheduler, Non-deterministic output at temperature=0 without prefix caching · Issue #39146 ·…
Your current environment The output of python collect_env.py /nfshomes/yunze/miniconda3/envs/vllm-fuzz/lib/python3.11/site-packages/torch/cuda/__init__.py:63: FutureWarning: The pynvml package is d...
🚨 CVE-2026-57031
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the packet forwarding engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows adjacent subscribers to bypass configured firewall filters.
On MX Series devices with MPC10/11, LC4800/9600, and MX304 with subscribers configured on static interfaces, ingress firewall filters are not enforced, so that neither protocol level nor upstream bandwidth limitation are in effect.
This issue affects Junos OS on MX with MPC10/11, LC4800/9600/4802, and MX304:
* 23.2 versions from 23.2R2-S1 before 23.2R2-S7,
* 23.4 versions from 23.4R2 before 23.4R2-S7,
* 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S3,
* 24.4 versions before 24.4R2-S2,
* 25.2 versions before 25.2R2.
🎖@cveNotify
An Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions vulnerability in the packet forwarding engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on MX Series allows adjacent subscribers to bypass configured firewall filters.
On MX Series devices with MPC10/11, LC4800/9600, and MX304 with subscribers configured on static interfaces, ingress firewall filters are not enforced, so that neither protocol level nor upstream bandwidth limitation are in effect.
This issue affects Junos OS on MX with MPC10/11, LC4800/9600/4802, and MX304:
* 23.2 versions from 23.2R2-S1 before 23.2R2-S7,
* 23.4 versions from 23.4R2 before 23.4R2-S7,
* 24.2 versions before 24.2R2-S3,
* 24.4 versions before 24.4R2-S2,
* 25.2 versions before 25.2R2.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-28849
The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.5. A maliciously crafted ZIP archive may bypass Gatekeeper checks.
🎖@cveNotify
The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.5. A maliciously crafted ZIP archive may bypass Gatekeeper checks.
🎖@cveNotify
Apple Support
About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.5 - Apple Support
This document describes the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.5.
🚨 CVE-2026-28900
A file quarantine bypass was addressed with additional checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.5. A maliciously crafted ZIP archive may bypass Gatekeeper checks.
🎖@cveNotify
A file quarantine bypass was addressed with additional checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.5. A maliciously crafted ZIP archive may bypass Gatekeeper checks.
🎖@cveNotify
Apple Support
About the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.5 - Apple Support
This document describes the security content of macOS Tahoe 26.5.
🚨 CVE-2026-28912
A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.7, macOS Tahoe 26.6. A user may be able to elevate privileges.
🎖@cveNotify
A logic issue was addressed with improved restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.7, macOS Tahoe 26.6. A user may be able to elevate privileges.
🎖@cveNotify
Apple Support
About the security content of macOS Sonoma 14.8.7 - Apple Support
This document describes the security content of macOS Sonoma 14.8.7.
🚨 CVE-2026-39877
A memory corruption issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.7.10 and iPadOS 18.7.10, iOS 26.5 and iPadOS 26.5, macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.5, tvOS 26.5, visionOS 26.5, watchOS 26.5. An app may be able to disclose kernel memory.
🎖@cveNotify
A memory corruption issue was addressed with improved memory handling. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.7.10 and iPadOS 18.7.10, iOS 26.5 and iPadOS 26.5, macOS Sequoia 15.7.8, macOS Sonoma 14.8.8, macOS Tahoe 26.5, tvOS 26.5, visionOS 26.5, watchOS 26.5. An app may be able to disclose kernel memory.
🎖@cveNotify
Apple Support
About the security content of iOS 26.5 and iPadOS 26.5 - Apple Support
This document describes the security content of iOS 26.5 and iPadOS 26.5.
🚨 CVE-2026-64732
This issue was addressed through improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.7.10 and iPadOS 18.7.10, iOS 26.6 and iPadOS 26.6, macOS Sequoia 15.7.7. An attacker with physical access may be able to access sensitive user data during iPhone Mirroring.
🎖@cveNotify
This issue was addressed through improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.7.10 and iPadOS 18.7.10, iOS 26.6 and iPadOS 26.6, macOS Sequoia 15.7.7. An attacker with physical access may be able to access sensitive user data during iPhone Mirroring.
🎖@cveNotify
Apple Support
About the security content of macOS Sequoia 15.7.7 - Apple Support
This document describes the security content of macOS Sequoia 15.7.7.