🚨 CVE-2026-10582
Hugo's security.http.urls allowlist is the only control on outbound fetches made by resources.GetRemote, and it inspects the URL text alone. CheckAllowedHTTPURL in config/security/securityConfig.go applies the configured pattern list and then re-checks a canonicalised form of an integer, hex or octal IPv4 host, but it never resolves the hostname and never inspects the address the HTTP client actually connects to. The client constructed in resources/resource_factories/create/create.go installs no dial-time hook, so no check occurs at connection time either. A hostname that resolves to a loopback, private or cloud-metadata address therefore satisfies the policy, and the response body is embedded in the generated site. An attacker who can supply a URL through content, for example a front-matter field or a CMS field, can make the build fetch an internal endpoint and publish the response in the static output, so the build artifact itself carries the data out.
🎖@cveNotify
Hugo's security.http.urls allowlist is the only control on outbound fetches made by resources.GetRemote, and it inspects the URL text alone. CheckAllowedHTTPURL in config/security/securityConfig.go applies the configured pattern list and then re-checks a canonicalised form of an integer, hex or octal IPv4 host, but it never resolves the hostname and never inspects the address the HTTP client actually connects to. The client constructed in resources/resource_factories/create/create.go installs no dial-time hook, so no check occurs at connection time either. A hostname that resolves to a loopback, private or cloud-metadata address therefore satisfies the policy, and the response body is embedded in the generated site. An attacker who can supply a URL through content, for example a front-matter field or a CMS field, can make the build fetch an internal endpoint and publish the response in the static output, so the build artifact itself carries the data out.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - gohugoio/hugo: The world’s fastest framework for building websites.
The world’s fastest framework for building websites. - gohugoio/hugo
🚨 CVE-2026-76843
The official Flair wheels for 0.15.0 and 0.15.1 still contain flair/models/clustering.py, whose ClusteringModel.load static method returns pickle.loads(joblib.load(str(model_file))) and so executes arbitrary Python while loading a model file. Loading a model supplied by an attacker therefore runs that attacker's code with the privileges of the loading process. This is the same sink and the same file as CVE-2024-10073, which records 0.15.0 as the fixed version on the basis that clustering support was dropped in that release; the module was removed from the documented API but remains present in the distributed artifact and reachable by importing flair.models.clustering directly, so the earlier record's fixed version does not hold for the shipped package.
🎖@cveNotify
The official Flair wheels for 0.15.0 and 0.15.1 still contain flair/models/clustering.py, whose ClusteringModel.load static method returns pickle.loads(joblib.load(str(model_file))) and so executes arbitrary Python while loading a model file. Loading a model supplied by an attacker therefore runs that attacker's code with the privileges of the loading process. This is the same sink and the same file as CVE-2024-10073, which records 0.15.0 as the fixed version on the basis that clustering support was dropped in that release; the module was removed from the documented API but remains present in the distributed artifact and reachable by importing flair.models.clustering directly, so the earlier record's fixed version does not hold for the shipped package.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - flairNLP/flair: A very simple framework for state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing (NLP)
A very simple framework for state-of-the-art Natural Language Processing (NLP) - flairNLP/flair
🚨 CVE-2026-76070
Netis NC63 firmware through V3.0.0.3327 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to overwrite saved stack state by submitting an oversized Base64-encoded password to the login handler in /bin/netis.cgi. Attackers can exploit the custom Base64 decoder's lack of output length validation against the fixed-size stack buffer to achieve remote code execution with root privileges, as the Boa web server executes the CGI environment as root.
🎖@cveNotify
Netis NC63 firmware through V3.0.0.3327 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to overwrite saved stack state by submitting an oversized Base64-encoded password to the login handler in /bin/netis.cgi. Attackers can exploit the custom Base64 decoder's lack of output length validation against the fixed-size stack buffer to achieve remote code execution with root privileges, as the Boa web server executes the CGI environment as root.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - ozcanpng/CVE-2026-76070: Original research and non-destructive PoC for a pre-auth Base64-decoded password stack buffer…
Original research and non-destructive PoC for a pre-auth Base64-decoded password stack buffer overflow in Netis NC63 login.cgi - ozcanpng/CVE-2026-76070
🚨 CVE-2026-71905
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the ExportSettings function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the backupkey, backuptype, and realtime fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the ExportSettings function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the backupkey, backuptype, and realtime fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71907
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the setcamset function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the selectSlaves field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the setcamset function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the selectSlaves field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71910
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the CMD0, CMD3, and CMD6 fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the CMD0, CMD3, and CMD6 fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71912
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks during memory copy operations involving the CMD6 field. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks during memory copy operations involving the CMD6 field. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71915
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the jsonstatus function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the usescript, usefile, and option fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the jsonstatus function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the usescript, usefile, and option fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71917
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the pingtrace function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the host field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the pingtrace function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the host field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71920
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a null pointer dereference vulnerability in the formlogout function. The vulnerability is caused by missing checks for an empty or absent Cookie header before string handling. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via a crafted request to crash the service and cause a denial of service. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a null pointer dereference vulnerability in the formlogout function. The vulnerability is caused by missing checks for an empty or absent Cookie header before string handling. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via a crafted request to crash the service and cause a denial of service. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71922
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a pre-authentication null pointer dereference vulnerability in the setget.cgi interface. The vulnerability is caused by missing validation when the pass field is absent. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via a crafted request to crash the service and cause a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a pre-authentication null pointer dereference vulnerability in the setget.cgi interface. The vulnerability is caused by missing validation when the pass field is absent. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via a crafted request to crash the service and cause a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71925
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the getDetail function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the username and password fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the getDetail function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the username and password fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71927
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the rebDevice function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the username and password fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the rebDevice function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the username and password fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71932
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a directory traversal vulnerability in the getSyslogFile function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the option field. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input containing path traversal sequences to access arbitrary files on the device. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a directory traversal vulnerability in the getSyslogFile function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the option field. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input containing path traversal sequences to access arbitrary files on the device. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71935
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the webBackupAction function. The vulnerability is caused by repeated string concatenation of the pathN, valueN, key, and option fields into fixed-size stack buffers without total length checks. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the webBackupAction function. The vulnerability is caused by repeated string concatenation of the pathN, valueN, key, and option fields into fixed-size stack buffers without total length checks. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71937
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the poe_schedule_profile function. The vulnerability is caused by repeated concatenation of the start_date, start_time, duration_time, how_often, weekdays, monthly_date, and cycle_duration fields into small fixed-size buffers without proper length checks. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the poe_schedule_profile function. The vulnerability is caused by repeated concatenation of the start_date, start_time, duration_time, how_often, weekdays, monthly_date, and cycle_duration fields into small fixed-size buffers without proper length checks. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71940
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the acl_general_setup Edit ACE function. The vulnerability is caused by copying the name field into a fixed-size buffer without length validation. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the acl_general_setup Edit ACE function. The vulnerability is caused by copying the name field into a fixed-size buffer without length validation. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71942
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the mail_mailalert function. The vulnerability is caused by concatenating multiple smtpReceiver email addresses into a fixed-size buffer without checking the remaining buffer size. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the mail_mailalert function. The vulnerability is caused by concatenating multiple smtpReceiver email addresses into a fixed-size buffer without checking the remaining buffer size. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-76072
The Continue CLI applies an incomplete denylist as its only barrier to destructive shell commands when running unattended. In headless mode and auto mode the default policy in extensions/cli/src/permissions/defaultPolicies.ts grants the Bash tool the allow permission, and permissionChecker.ts hard-blocks a command only when the terminal-security evaluator returns a disabled verdict, so isCriticalCommand in packages/terminal-security/src/evaluateTerminalCommandSecurity.ts is the sole control. Its dangerous-path test matches only /, /*, ~, ~/*, /usr, /etc, /bin and /sbin and their prefixes, so a recursive forced removal of /home, /root, /var, /opt or /srv is not disabled. The command line is parsed with shell-quote, which reduces $HOME to an empty token, so rm -rf $HOME also fails the dangerous-path test while the shell re-expands the variable when the command is spawned. find with -delete is rated high risk rather than disabled, and shred, wipefs, truncate and pkexec are not handled. Because the agent autonomously reads content it does not control, including fetched web pages, repository files and issue text, an indirect prompt injection in that content can cause an unattended run to destroy the invoking user's data.
🎖@cveNotify
The Continue CLI applies an incomplete denylist as its only barrier to destructive shell commands when running unattended. In headless mode and auto mode the default policy in extensions/cli/src/permissions/defaultPolicies.ts grants the Bash tool the allow permission, and permissionChecker.ts hard-blocks a command only when the terminal-security evaluator returns a disabled verdict, so isCriticalCommand in packages/terminal-security/src/evaluateTerminalCommandSecurity.ts is the sole control. Its dangerous-path test matches only /, /*, ~, ~/*, /usr, /etc, /bin and /sbin and their prefixes, so a recursive forced removal of /home, /root, /var, /opt or /srv is not disabled. The command line is parsed with shell-quote, which reduces $HOME to an empty token, so rm -rf $HOME also fails the dangerous-path test while the shell re-expands the variable when the command is spawned. find with -delete is rated high risk rather than disabled, and shred, wipefs, truncate and pkexec are not handled. Because the agent autonomously reads content it does not control, including fetched web pages, repository files and issue text, an indirect prompt injection in that content can cause an unattended run to destroy the invoking user's data.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - continuedev/continue: open-source coding agent
open-source coding agent. Contribute to continuedev/continue development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2025-26237
D-Link DI-7001 MINI_5G 19.10.31A1 contains a code execution vulnerability in the flag parameter of msp_info, which can be exploited to run arbitrary commands.
🎖@cveNotify
D-Link DI-7001 MINI_5G 19.10.31A1 contains a code execution vulnerability in the flag parameter of msp_info, which can be exploited to run arbitrary commands.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
iot/CVE/dlink/DI_7001_MINI_5G.md/DI_7001_MINI_5G.md at main · REYu6/iot
Contribute to REYu6/iot development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2025-26238
In D-Link DI-8100G 17.12.20A1, the flag parameter in msp_info can be exploited to execute arbitrary code.
🎖@cveNotify
In D-Link DI-8100G 17.12.20A1, the flag parameter in msp_info can be exploited to execute arbitrary code.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
iot/CVE/dlink/DI_8100G-17.12.20A1.md/DI_8100G-17.12.20A1.md at main · REYu6/iot
Contribute to REYu6/iot development by creating an account on GitHub.