🚨 CVE-2026-13213
The Hearing Access Service (HAS) GATT server in subsys/bluetooth/audio/has.c installs a connection-callback set unconditionally via BT_CONN_CB_DEFINE, so security_changed() runs for every connection that establishes security even before the application has called bt_has_register(). The service attribute pointers hearing_aid_features_attr, preset_control_point_attr, and active_preset_index_attr remain NULL until bt_has_register() resolves them and sets has.registered.
With CONFIG_BT_SETTINGS, settings_set_cb() restores each bonded client's persisted context at boot and unconditionally sets context->flags to BONDED_CLIENT_INIT_FLAGS (non-zero). When a previously bonded peer reconnects and re-establishes security during the startup window before bt_has_register() has been called, security_changed() sees the non-zero flags and schedules notify_work_handler, which calls bt_gatt_is_subscribed() with a still-NULL attribute pointer. That triggers an assertion (__ASSERT(attr, ...) in bt_gatt_is_subscribed()), or a NULL dereference of attr->uuid when assertions are compiled out.
The result is a remotely triggerable (Bluetooth, adjacent) crash of the HAS peripheral. Exploitation requires the peer to have previously bonded with the device and to reconnect within the boot-time race window before the application registers the service; a peer that reconnects persistently can prolong the outage. Impact is denial of service only, with no memory corruption or information disclosure.
The fix adds an early if (!has.registered) { return; } guard in security_changed(), so no notification work is scheduled until the GATT service is registered and its attribute pointers are valid.
🎖@cveNotify
The Hearing Access Service (HAS) GATT server in subsys/bluetooth/audio/has.c installs a connection-callback set unconditionally via BT_CONN_CB_DEFINE, so security_changed() runs for every connection that establishes security even before the application has called bt_has_register(). The service attribute pointers hearing_aid_features_attr, preset_control_point_attr, and active_preset_index_attr remain NULL until bt_has_register() resolves them and sets has.registered.
With CONFIG_BT_SETTINGS, settings_set_cb() restores each bonded client's persisted context at boot and unconditionally sets context->flags to BONDED_CLIENT_INIT_FLAGS (non-zero). When a previously bonded peer reconnects and re-establishes security during the startup window before bt_has_register() has been called, security_changed() sees the non-zero flags and schedules notify_work_handler, which calls bt_gatt_is_subscribed() with a still-NULL attribute pointer. That triggers an assertion (__ASSERT(attr, ...) in bt_gatt_is_subscribed()), or a NULL dereference of attr->uuid when assertions are compiled out.
The result is a remotely triggerable (Bluetooth, adjacent) crash of the HAS peripheral. Exploitation requires the peer to have previously bonded with the device and to reconnect within the boot-time race window before the application registers the service; a peer that reconnects persistently can prolong the outage. Impact is denial of service only, with no memory corruption or information disclosure.
The fix adds an early if (!has.registered) { return; } guard in security_changed(), so no notification work is scheduled until the GATT service is registered and its attribute pointers are valid.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Bluetooth: HAS: Add check for has.registered in security cb · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr@cb2329e
If we had a bond with a device and the flags were non-zero,
and we power cycled but where bt_has_register was not called
before the bonded device reconnected then in the
security_changed we would c...
and we power cycled but where bt_has_register was not called
before the bonded device reconnected then in the
security_changed we would c...
🚨 CVE-2026-16348
An authenticated command injection vulnerability in TP-Link Archer BE800 V1 allows an attacker with administrative access to execute arbitrary system commands with root privileges by injecting shell metacharacters via a VPN connection.
Successful exploitation may enable persistent backdoors, credential theft, LAN reconnaissance, and router-assisted attacks against connected devices.
🎖@cveNotify
An authenticated command injection vulnerability in TP-Link Archer BE800 V1 allows an attacker with administrative access to execute arbitrary system commands with root privileges by injecting shell metacharacters via a VPN connection.
Successful exploitation may enable persistent backdoors, credential theft, LAN reconnaissance, and router-assisted attacks against connected devices.
🎖@cveNotify
TP-Link
Download for Archer BE800 | TP-Link
TP Link - Download Center Detail
🚨 CVE-2026-34491
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Johnson Controls Metasys 14 and Johnson Controls Metasys 15 allows Cross Site Scripting.
This issue affects Metasys 14: before 14.1.5; Metasys 15: before 15.0.1.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Johnson Controls Metasys 14 and Johnson Controls Metasys 15 allows Cross Site Scripting.
This issue affects Metasys 14: before 14.1.5; Metasys 15: before 15.0.1.
🎖@cveNotify
Johnsoncontrols
Security Advisories
Check out the listed Security Advisories (SA) about identified security vulnerabilities in Johnson Controls' products and the mitigation measures taken.
🚨 CVE-2026-71904
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the tr069TestInform function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of dangerous characters before the event_code field is concatenated into a system command. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the tr069TestInform function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of dangerous characters before the event_code field is concatenated into a system command. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71905
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the ExportSettings function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the backupkey, backuptype, and realtime fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the ExportSettings function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the backupkey, backuptype, and realtime fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71906
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the setLan function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the lanIp and lanNetmask fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the setLan function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the lanIp and lanNetmask fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71907
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the setcamset function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the selectSlaves field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the setcamset function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the selectSlaves field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71908
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the mesh_start_speed_test function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient sanitization of the meshdevice_index and meshdevice_ip fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the mesh_start_speed_test function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient sanitization of the meshdevice_index and meshdevice_ip fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71909
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the InquierTime function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the time field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the InquierTime function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the time field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71910
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the CMD0, CMD3, and CMD6 fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the CMD0, CMD3, and CMD6 fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71911
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the setLan function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks during memory copy operations involving the lanVlanId0, lanIp, and lanNetmask fields. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the setLan function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks during memory copy operations involving the lanVlanId0, lanIp, and lanNetmask fields. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71912
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks during memory copy operations involving the CMD6 field. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the apautotest function. The vulnerability is caused by missing length checks during memory copy operations involving the CMD6 field. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input, causing a denial of service or potentially executing arbitrary commands. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71913
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the upload_settings.cgi interface. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering before the restorekey field is concatenated into a shell command. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorAP models contain a command injection vulnerability in the upload_settings.cgi interface. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering before the restorekey field is concatenated into a shell command. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Remote Code Execution and Buffer Overflow Vulnerabilities in VigorAP Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71915
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the jsonstatus function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the usescript, usefile, and option fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the jsonstatus function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the usescript, usefile, and option fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71916
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the commandTable function. The vulnerability is caused by incomplete filtering of dangerous characters such as backticks, newline characters, and single quotes in the parameter field. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the commandTable function. The vulnerability is caused by incomplete filtering of dangerous characters such as backticks, newline characters, and single quotes in the parameter field. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71917
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the pingtrace function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the host field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the pingtrace function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient validation of the host field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71918
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the webBackupAction function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the option, key, pw_encode, pathN, and valueN fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the webBackupAction function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the option, key, pw_encode, pathN, and valueN fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71919
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the sysreboot function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the config, act, pathN, and valueN fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a command injection vulnerability in the sysreboot function. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the config, act, pathN, and valueN fields before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71920
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a null pointer dereference vulnerability in the formlogout function. The vulnerability is caused by missing checks for an empty or absent Cookie header before string handling. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via a crafted request to crash the service and cause a denial of service. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a null pointer dereference vulnerability in the formlogout function. The vulnerability is caused by missing checks for an empty or absent Cookie header before string handling. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via a crafted request to crash the service and cause a denial of service. Exploitation requires valid administrative credentials for the device's web management interface.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71921
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a pre-authentication command injection vulnerability in the setget.cgi interface. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the pass field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a pre-authentication command injection vulnerability in the setget.cgi interface. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient filtering of the pass field before command execution. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via crafted input to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series
🚨 CVE-2026-71922
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a pre-authentication null pointer dereference vulnerability in the setget.cgi interface. The vulnerability is caused by missing validation when the pass field is absent. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via a crafted request to crash the service and cause a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
Multiple DrayTek VigorSwitch models contain a pre-authentication null pointer dereference vulnerability in the setget.cgi interface. The vulnerability is caused by missing validation when the pass field is absent. A remote attacker can trigger this vulnerability via a crafted request to crash the service and cause a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
Draytek
Multiple Vulnerabilities in VigorSwitch Series