🚨 CVE-2026-72532
Joomla! Core - [20260806] - Improper ACL checks for category webservice endpoints in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.7, 6.0.0-6.1.2 - An improper access check allows unauthorized users to create categories via webservices endpoints.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-73337
Joomla! Core - [20260807] - MFA Authentication Bypass in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.7 and 6.0.0-6.1.2 - Insufficient state checks lead to a vector that allows to bypass 2FA checks.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-73371
Joomla! Core - [20260808] - Improper ACL checks for batch copy actions in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.7, 6.0.0-6.1.2 - An improper access check allows unauthorized users to perform copy batch operations on uneditable items.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-73373
Joomla! Core - [20260810] - Unrestricted uploads of SHTML files in Joomla 1.0.0-5.4.7, 6.0.0-6.1.2 - The default list of dangerous files did not include SHTML files. On servers that executed these files, that could lead to code execution.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-18963
A flaw was found in the reset-credentials flow of the keycloak-services component, which is the core engine for identity and access management in Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the password reset process for any user without needing to click the required email verification link. This can result in the attacker gaining full control over target user accounts by directly setting new credentials.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-19869
@neo4j/graphql from 5.2.0 until the patched versions fails to enforce field-level @authentication rules on root custom-resolver fields when a type-level @authentication rule is also present on the same operation type. When both a type-level @authentication (on Query/Mutation) and a field-level @authentication (on a root custom-resolver field within that type) are declared, only the type-level rule is evaluated and the field-level rule is silently discarded. As a result a stricter per-field requirement — such as an admin-role JWT claim (jwt: { roles_INCLUDES: "admin" }) — is never checked, and any client that satisfies the coarser type-level requirement can invoke the more-restricted field. No token forgery is involved: a legitimately issued, correctly signed non-admin token (e.g. roles: ["user"]) is sufficient.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-30250
Cross-site scripting vulnerability in the user documentation field in Beta Systems Software AG ANOW! Automate v.3.3.1.90 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-48744
Saleor is an e-commerce platform. From 3.14.67 until 3.21.67, 3.22.63, and 3.23.22, a broken authorization check in saleor/permission/utils.py can incorrectly authorize unauthenticated GraphQL requests. The flaw permits anonymous callers to use the channelUpdate() mutation to change channel order settings such as allowUnpaidOrders even when the response reports PermissionDenied. The same permission utility can expose hidden objects through the pageType() and translation() queries, including attributes whose visibleInStorefront field is false and that should be visible only to users with management permissions. This issue is fixed in versions 3.21.67, 3.22.63, and 3.23.22.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-49222
Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend product question operations allow a low-privileged Vendor to manage questions under another Vendor's products. The admin/sql/sqlite/product_question.sql queries accept a caller-controlled product_question_id and do not verify product_question.product_id against product.admin_id for the current admin_id. An attacker can read pending question content and moderation data, change question status, edit question content, or delete questions, manipulating product Q&A visibility and integrity. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.8.4.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-49223
Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend product review operations allow a low-privileged Vendor to manage reviews under another Vendor's products. The admin/sql/sqlite/product_review.sql queries accept a caller-controlled product_review_id and do not verify product_review.product_id against product.admin_id for the current admin_id. An attacker can read pending review content, ratings, author information, and moderation state, change review status, edit review content, or delete reviews, manipulating product review visibility and integrity. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.8.4.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-49224
Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend post revision operations allow a low-privileged Author to access revisions for posts owned by another Author. The admin/controller/content/revisions.php controller and admin/sql/sqlite/post_content_revision.sql queries trust caller-controlled post_id, language_id, and created_at values without consistently applying the current admin_id to revision lists, reads, restores, and deletes. An attacker can read historic post content, restore a revision over another Author's live post content, or delete revision records, exposing drafts, corrupting published content, and removing audit history. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.8.4.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-49225
Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend product revision operations allow a low-privileged Vendor to access revisions for products owned by another Vendor. The admin/controller/product/revisions.php route reuses admin/controller/content/revisions.php, while admin/sql/sqlite/product_content_revision.sql trusts caller-controlled product_id, language_id, and created_at values without applying the current admin_id to revision reads, restores, and deletes. An attacker can read historic product content, restore a revision over another Vendor's live product content, or delete revision records, exposing private copy, corrupting product pages, and removing audit history. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.8.4.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-49228
Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend product operations allow a low-privileged Vendor to access products owned by another Vendor. The admin/controller/product/products.php controller accepts a caller-controlled product_id for duplicate and delete actions, and admin/sql/sqlite/product.sql loads and mutates products without consistently applying the current admin_id when view_other_products or edit_other_products is absent. An attacker can read product details, duplicate products, or delete products and related catalog data, exposing commercial information and causing unauthorized copies, catalog pollution, data loss, or business disruption. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.8.4.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-50126
Adaguc-server is an open source geographical information system to visualize, combine, compare and share real-time meteorological, climatological and remote sensing data via OGC standards. Versions prior to 7.2.2 crash with a memory-safety fault when it parses a GeoJSON document whose geometry contains a malformed coordinate. The coordinate parser in `adagucserverEC/CConvertGeoJSON.cpp` indexes `pt.u.array.values[0]` and `pt.u.array.values[1]` and uses `polygon.u.array.length` as a loop bound without first validating the JSON node type or the coordinate length. A coordinate that is an empty array, a one-element array, a scalar, or `null` leads to an out-of-bounds heap read or a NULL pointer dereference. The same unchecked pattern is present in four geometry branches: `Polygon`, `LineString`, `MultiLineString` and `MultiPolygon`. The vulnerable parser runs whenever the server processes a local GeoJSON file, either a configured GeoJSON dataset or a GeoJSON file exposed through the `AutoResource` feature and requested by an unauthenticated WMS request. A crafted GeoJSON file reliably crashes the backend process that handles that request. Version 7.2.2 patches the vulnerability.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-50576
ePA 3.x Integration implements the authorization workflow and writes Medical Information Objects to Germany's electronic patient record. Prior to 1.3.0, ePA 3.x Integration does not neutralize CRLF characters in values used by app/vau/VAUProtokoll.py to construct VAU inner HTTP requests. The build_inner_header function interpolates the uri, host, accept_type, content_type, content_length, USER_AGENT, and insurant_id values into request lines and headers, including x-useragent and x-insurantid. An authenticated attacker who controls a value can inject additional headers into the inner request. Depending on ePA server handling, an injected x-insurantid header can expose another patient's records, and injected Authorization headers can bypass the intended authentication or authorization context. Session-derived USER_AGENT input can also poison requests across the session. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.0.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-50577
ePA 3.x Integration implements the authorization workflow and writes Medical Information Objects to Germany's electronic patient record. Prior to 1.3.0, ePA 3.x Integration leaves request_counter unchanged in app/vau/VAUProtokoll.py while constructing VAU messages. The frozen client request counter causes the server side to reuse AES-GCM nonce and key combinations across responses. A network attacker who collects repeated ciphertexts can recover the XOR of plaintexts and use predictable inner HTTP headers and JSON fields to recover sensitive data, including patient health records. Repeated nonces can also enable recovery of the GHASH authentication key through the Joux forbidden attack, allowing forged AES-GCM messages and injection of malicious responses. The response-counter check also fails to maintain last_response_counter, weakening replay and ordering validation. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.0.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-52606
A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in reportico-web <= 8.1.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the web browser of a user by including a malicious payload in the loadTemplate parameter in conjunction with the execute_mode=PREPARE parameter of run.php.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-52723
ePA 3.x Integration implements the authorization workflow and writes Medical Information Objects to Germany's electronic patient record. Prior to 1.3.0, ePA 3.x Integration performs VAU server certificate validation in app/vau/VAUProtokoll.py without anchoring the signed_vau_server_pub_keys and AUT_VAU_CertData certificate path to independent trusted material. A network-positioned attacker between the DiGA backend and the ePA system can intercept the VAU handshake, supply attacker-controlled certificate and key material, and satisfy the circular trust relationship. Because TLS certificate verification is also disabled in affected versions, no independent server-authentication layer prevents the attack. The attacker can impersonate the VAU server, control the negotiated session keys, and read or modify all encrypted VAU traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.0.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-54730
authentik is an open-source identity provider. Prior to 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5, the enterprise Google Chrome device-trust stages advance the flow without confirming that the out-of-band device attestation actually ran. Affected enterprise deployments place either a Google Chrome Endpoint stage with mode set to REQUIRED or the deprecated Google Chrome Device Trust Connector stage in an authentication flow. The device attestation occurs in a verification iframe that calls the Google Verified Access API and records the verified device on success, but the vulnerable stages treat the flow as passed as soon as the stage is submitted. An attacker who can reach such a stage, including after primary username and password authentication, can skip the verification iframe and authenticate from a device that was never verified. Where device trust is the only additional factor, that protection is fully bypassed, while other configured factors remain in force. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-55106
authentik is an open-source identity provider. Prior to 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5, a diagnostic action on the LDAP Source API does not enforce the object-level read-authorization filter used by the rest of the API. Any party able to reach the API, including an unauthenticated client, can invoke the diagnostic action against a configured LDAP Source. The server then connects to the upstream directory using the source's configured bind credentials and returns a bounded set of directory entries. The response exposes the distinguished names of those entries and the names of the attributes present on them, revealing directory structure, naming conventions, and the existence of specific accounts and groups, but not attribute values. Deployments without a configured LDAP Source are not affected. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-57580
authentik is an open-source identity provider. Prior to 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5, an inbound SAML Source configured with the non-default USERNAME_LINK or EMAIL_LINK user-matching mode interprets an XML comment in a NameID differently from the identity provider's signed assertion. An attacker with an account on the source identity provider who can set the account's NameID can inject an XML comment that truncates the value used by authentik to the text before the comment while the signed assertion remains valid. A crafted NameID can therefore truncate to a victim's username or email and bind the attacker's external identity to the victim's existing account. This grants full takeover without the victim's password or the identity provider's private key, and the malicious link persists so later logins succeed without the comment. Sources using the default unique-identifier matching mode and authentik's outbound SAML Provider role are not affected. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.2.6 and 2026.5.5.

🎖@cveNotify