π¨ CVE-2026-49988
Repomix is a tool that packs repositories into AI-friendly files. Prior to 1.14.1, the Repomix MCP server attach_packed_output and read_repomix_output flow can register and read arbitrary local .json, .txt, .md, or .xml files without the file_system_read_file runSecretLint() safety check or Repomix packed-output validation, allowing MCP callers to bypass the local file-read secret-scanning boundary. This issue is fixed in version 1.14.1.
π@cveNotify
Repomix is a tool that packs repositories into AI-friendly files. Prior to 1.14.1, the Repomix MCP server attach_packed_output and read_repomix_output flow can register and read arbitrary local .json, .txt, .md, or .xml files without the file_system_read_file runSecretLint() safety check or Repomix packed-output validation, allowing MCP callers to bypass the local file-read secret-scanning boundary. This issue is fixed in version 1.14.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix(mcp): secret-scan attach-sourced outputs before serving them Β· yamadashy/repomix@e447f7d
intent(mcp-attach): fix GHSA-hwpp-h97w-2h3j. attach_packed_output registered an arbitrary local file path under an outputId, and read_repomix_output / grep_repomix_output then returned its content ...
π¨ CVE-2026-68742
A flaw was found in SSSD. The sss_nss_protocol_parse_addr() function in the NSS responder does not validate the addrlen field against the remaining packet body size. A local attacker can exploit this via a crafted GETHOSTBYADDR request to the NSS responder socket, causing an out-of-bounds read and process crash, resulting in a denial of service.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in SSSD. The sss_nss_protocol_parse_addr() function in the NSS responder does not validate the addrlen field against the remaining packet body size. A local attacker can exploit this via a crafted GETHOSTBYADDR request to the NSS responder socket, causing an out-of-bounds read and process crash, resulting in a denial of service.
π@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-68742 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
π¨ CVE-2026-18508
A flaw was found in GNU tar. When extracting an archive with the --one-top-level option, hardlink targets are not confined to the designated top-level directory and may resolve relative to the extraction working directory. A crafted archive can create hardlinks that escape the intended boundary and, when combined with a preexisting symbolic link under the working directory, may allow writing outside that boundary during a single extraction.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in GNU tar. When extracting an archive with the --one-top-level option, hardlink targets are not confined to the designated top-level directory and may resolve relative to the extraction working directory. A crafted archive can create hardlinks that escape the intended boundary and, when combined with a preexisting symbolic link under the working directory, may allow writing outside that boundary during a single extraction.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-68744
A flaw was found in SSSD. The sss_nss_protocol_fill_initgr() function in the NSS responder pre-allocates reply space for all group entries but does not shrink the packet when groups are skipped, causing uninitialized heap bytes to be transmitted to the client. A local attacker can exploit this to disclose cached directory data and heap layout information from the sssd_nss process.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in SSSD. The sss_nss_protocol_fill_initgr() function in the NSS responder pre-allocates reply space for all group entries but does not shrink the packet when groups are skipped, causing uninitialized heap bytes to be transmitted to the client. A local attacker can exploit this to disclose cached directory data and heap layout information from the sssd_nss process.
π@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-68744 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
π¨ CVE-2026-15307
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
GeoDjango spatial lookups optimistically parse the right-hand-side value as a raster by passing it to the `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` constructor. Any value used in a spatial lookup against a `GeometryField` or `RasterField` reaches this constructor, including untrusted input, for example a spatial-field filter submitted through the Django admin changelist query string by a staff user with view permission. A `dict`, or a `str` holding its JSON representation, is opened in write mode regardless of the constructor's `write=False` default, allowing a file with an attacker-chosen name and contents to be written through a file-backed GDAL driver. Any other `str` is treated as a datasource, allowing an outbound network request through a GDAL virtual filesystem handler. Writing a file to a location later imported by the application can result in remote code execution.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Bence Nagy, localhost-detect, and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue.
π@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
GeoDjango spatial lookups optimistically parse the right-hand-side value as a raster by passing it to the `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` constructor. Any value used in a spatial lookup against a `GeometryField` or `RasterField` reaches this constructor, including untrusted input, for example a spatial-field filter submitted through the Django admin changelist query string by a staff user with view permission. A `dict`, or a `str` holding its JSON representation, is opened in write mode regardless of the constructor's `write=False` default, allowing a file with an attacker-chosen name and contents to be written through a file-backed GDAL driver. Any other `str` is treated as a datasource, allowing an outbound network request through a GDAL virtual filesystem handler. Writing a file to a location later imported by the application can result in remote code execution.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Bence Nagy, localhost-detect, and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue.
π@cveNotify
Django Project
Archive of security issues | Django documentation
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
π¨ CVE-2026-15337
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.
π@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.
π@cveNotify
Django Project
Archive of security issues | Django documentation
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
π¨ CVE-2026-15830
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
GeoDjango's `django.contrib.gis.geos.GEOSGeometry` is subject to a potential denial-of-service when parsing deeply nested `GEOMETRYCOLLECTION` objects supplied as well-known text (WKT), well-known binary (WKB), or hex-encoded WKB, which triggers unbounded recursion and a segmentation fault in the underlying GEOS library. Spatial field lookups and the `django.contrib.gis.forms.GeometryField` form field are also affected.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Andrew MacPherson and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue.
π@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
GeoDjango's `django.contrib.gis.geos.GEOSGeometry` is subject to a potential denial-of-service when parsing deeply nested `GEOMETRYCOLLECTION` objects supplied as well-known text (WKT), well-known binary (WKB), or hex-encoded WKB, which triggers unbounded recursion and a segmentation fault in the underlying GEOS library. Spatial field lookups and the `django.contrib.gis.forms.GeometryField` form field are also affected.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Andrew MacPherson and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue.
π@cveNotify
Django Project
Archive of security issues | Django documentation
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
π¨ CVE-2026-14298
Mattermost versions 11.9.x <= 11.9.0, 11.8.x <= 11.8.4, 11.7.x <= 11.7.7, 10.11.x <= 10.11.22 fail to properly limit resource consumption when processing certain user-supplied input, which allows an authenticated user to cause a denial of service. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00713
π@cveNotify
Mattermost versions 11.9.x <= 11.9.0, 11.8.x <= 11.8.4, 11.7.x <= 11.7.7, 10.11.x <= 10.11.22 fail to properly limit resource consumption when processing certain user-supplied input, which allows an authenticated user to cause a denial of service. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00713
π@cveNotify
Mattermost.com
Security Updates
Find information about Mattermost security updates, sign up for our Security Bulletin, read our Responsible Disclosure Policy, and more.
π¨ CVE-2026-6846
A flaw was found in binutils. A heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability exists when processing a specially crafted XCOFF (Extended Common Object File Format) object file during linking. A local attacker could trick a user into processing this malicious file, which could lead to arbitrary code execution, allowing the attacker to run unauthorized commands, or cause a denial of service, making the system unavailable.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in binutils. A heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability exists when processing a specially crafted XCOFF (Extended Common Object File Format) object file during linking. A local attacker could trick a user into processing this malicious file, which could lead to arbitrary code execution, allowing the attacker to run unauthorized commands, or cause a denial of service, making the system unavailable.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-17084
The "stringprep" module didn't process characters from RFC 3454 tables
B.2 or B.3 correctly: the latest Unicode codepoint attributes were used
instead of the specified Unicode 3.2.0. This behavior would cause
mismatches when processing domain names using IDNA 2003 (the "idna"
codec) and the in_table_b2() function of the "stringprep" module. This
only affects domain names containing characters that were not previously
registered or had their Unicode attributes such as case-folding
behavior updated since Unicode 3.2.0.
π@cveNotify
The "stringprep" module didn't process characters from RFC 3454 tables
B.2 or B.3 correctly: the latest Unicode codepoint attributes were used
instead of the specified Unicode 3.2.0. This behavior would cause
mismatches when processing domain names using IDNA 2003 (the "idna"
codec) and the in_table_b2() function of the "stringprep" module. This
only affects domain names containing characters that were not previously
registered or had their Unicode attributes such as case-folding
behavior updated since Unicode 3.2.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
stringprep and IDNA 2003 incorrectly handles some characters Β· Issue #155292 Β· python/cpython
Linked PRs gh-155293 gh-156017
π¨ CVE-2026-18534
ArcSearch for iOS versions prior to 1.48.0 could keep the address bar hidden after a page-initiated scroll, allowing attacker-controlled content to imitate browser interface elements and increasing spoofing risk.
π@cveNotify
ArcSearch for iOS versions prior to 1.48.0 could keep the address bar hidden after a page-initiated scroll, allowing attacker-controlled content to imitate browser interface elements and increasing spoofing risk.
π@cveNotify
arc.net
Security Bulletin
Experience a calmer, more personal internet in this browser designed for you. Let go of the clicks, the clutter, the distractions.
π¨ CVE-2026-71574
Joomla! Core - [20260803] - Inconsistent ACL checks for mutating webservice endpoints in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.7, 6.0.0-6.1.2 - An improper access check allows unauthorized users to perform mutation actions in webservice endpoints, where the same mutation was restricted in the backend UI.
π@cveNotify
Joomla! Core - [20260803] - Inconsistent ACL checks for mutating webservice endpoints in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.7, 6.0.0-6.1.2 - An improper access check allows unauthorized users to perform mutation actions in webservice endpoints, where the same mutation was restricted in the backend UI.
π@cveNotify
Joomla! Developer Networkβ’
Joomla! Developer Network
The Flexible Platform Empowering Website Creators
π¨ CVE-2026-72532
Joomla! Core - [20260806] - Improper ACL checks for category webservice endpoints in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.7, 6.0.0-6.1.2 - An improper access check allows unauthorized users to create categories via webservices endpoints.
π@cveNotify
Joomla! Core - [20260806] - Improper ACL checks for category webservice endpoints in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.7, 6.0.0-6.1.2 - An improper access check allows unauthorized users to create categories via webservices endpoints.
π@cveNotify
Joomla! Developer Networkβ’
Joomla! Developer Network
The Flexible Platform Empowering Website Creators
π¨ CVE-2026-73337
Joomla! Core - [20260807] - MFA Authentication Bypass in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.7 and 6.0.0-6.1.2 - Insufficient state checks lead to a vector that allows to bypass 2FA checks.
π@cveNotify
Joomla! Core - [20260807] - MFA Authentication Bypass in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.7 and 6.0.0-6.1.2 - Insufficient state checks lead to a vector that allows to bypass 2FA checks.
π@cveNotify
Joomla! Developer Networkβ’
Joomla! Developer Network
The Flexible Platform Empowering Website Creators
π¨ CVE-2026-73371
Joomla! Core - [20260808] - Improper ACL checks for batch copy actions in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.7, 6.0.0-6.1.2 - An improper access check allows unauthorized users to perform copy batch operations on uneditable items.
π@cveNotify
Joomla! Core - [20260808] - Improper ACL checks for batch copy actions in Joomla 4.0.0-5.4.7, 6.0.0-6.1.2 - An improper access check allows unauthorized users to perform copy batch operations on uneditable items.
π@cveNotify
Joomla! Developer Networkβ’
Joomla! Developer Network
The Flexible Platform Empowering Website Creators
π¨ CVE-2026-73373
Joomla! Core - [20260810] - Unrestricted uploads of SHTML files in Joomla 1.0.0-5.4.7, 6.0.0-6.1.2 - The default list of dangerous files did not include SHTML files. On servers that executed these files, that could lead to code execution.
π@cveNotify
Joomla! Core - [20260810] - Unrestricted uploads of SHTML files in Joomla 1.0.0-5.4.7, 6.0.0-6.1.2 - The default list of dangerous files did not include SHTML files. On servers that executed these files, that could lead to code execution.
π@cveNotify
Joomla! Developer Networkβ’
Joomla! Developer Network
The Flexible Platform Empowering Website Creators
π¨ CVE-2026-18963
A flaw was found in the reset-credentials flow of the keycloak-services component, which is the core engine for identity and access management in Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the password reset process for any user without needing to click the required email verification link. This can result in the attacker gaining full control over target user accounts by directly setting new credentials.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in the reset-credentials flow of the keycloak-services component, which is the core engine for identity and access management in Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the password reset process for any user without needing to click the required email verification link. This can result in the attacker gaining full control over target user accounts by directly setting new credentials.
π@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-18963 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
π¨ CVE-2026-19869
@neo4j/graphql from 5.2.0 until the patched versions fails to enforce field-level @authentication rules on root custom-resolver fields when a type-level @authentication rule is also present on the same operation type. When both a type-level @authentication (on Query/Mutation) and a field-level @authentication (on a root custom-resolver field within that type) are declared, only the type-level rule is evaluated and the field-level rule is silently discarded. As a result a stricter per-field requirement β such as an admin-role JWT claim (jwt: { roles_INCLUDES: "admin" }) β is never checked, and any client that satisfies the coarser type-level requirement can invoke the more-restricted field. No token forgery is involved: a legitimately issued, correctly signed non-admin token (e.g. roles: ["user"]) is sufficient.
π@cveNotify
@neo4j/graphql from 5.2.0 until the patched versions fails to enforce field-level @authentication rules on root custom-resolver fields when a type-level @authentication rule is also present on the same operation type. When both a type-level @authentication (on Query/Mutation) and a field-level @authentication (on a root custom-resolver field within that type) are declared, only the type-level rule is evaluated and the field-level rule is silently discarded. As a result a stricter per-field requirement β such as an admin-role JWT claim (jwt: { roles_INCLUDES: "admin" }) β is never checked, and any client that satisfies the coarser type-level requirement can invoke the more-restricted field. No token forgery is involved: a legitimately issued, correctly signed non-admin token (e.g. roles: ["user"]) is sufficient.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Privilege Escalation via Dropped Field-Level @authentication on Root Custom-Resolver Fields in @neo4j/graphql
### Summary
`@neo4j/graphql` from `5.2.0` until the patched versions fails to enforce field-level `@authentication` rules on root custom-resolver fields when a type-level `@authentication` rule is...
`@neo4j/graphql` from `5.2.0` until the patched versions fails to enforce field-level `@authentication` rules on root custom-resolver fields when a type-level `@authentication` rule is...
π¨ CVE-2026-30250
Cross-site scripting vulnerability in the user documentation field in Beta Systems Software AG ANOW! Automate v.3.3.1.90 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code
π@cveNotify
Cross-site scripting vulnerability in the user documentation field in Beta Systems Software AG ANOW! Automate v.3.3.1.90 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Vulnerability-Disclosures/2026/20260127_ANOW-Automate-3.3.1.90_Stored-XSS at main Β· cert-rit/Vulnerability-Disclosures
This repository contains write-ups to responsible disclosures of vulnerabilities in different software products. - cert-rit/Vulnerability-Disclosures
π¨ CVE-2026-48744
Saleor is an e-commerce platform. From 3.14.67 until 3.21.67, 3.22.63, and 3.23.22, a broken authorization check in saleor/permission/utils.py can incorrectly authorize unauthenticated GraphQL requests. The flaw permits anonymous callers to use the channelUpdate() mutation to change channel order settings such as allowUnpaidOrders even when the response reports PermissionDenied. The same permission utility can expose hidden objects through the pageType() and translation() queries, including attributes whose visibleInStorefront field is false and that should be visible only to users with management permissions. This issue is fixed in versions 3.21.67, 3.22.63, and 3.23.22.
π@cveNotify
Saleor is an e-commerce platform. From 3.14.67 until 3.21.67, 3.22.63, and 3.23.22, a broken authorization check in saleor/permission/utils.py can incorrectly authorize unauthenticated GraphQL requests. The flaw permits anonymous callers to use the channelUpdate() mutation to change channel order settings such as allowUnpaidOrders even when the response reports PermissionDenied. The same permission utility can expose hidden objects through the pageType() and translation() queries, including attributes whose visibleInStorefront field is false and that should be visible only to users with management permissions. This issue is fixed in versions 3.21.67, 3.22.63, and 3.23.22.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix CVE-2026-48744 Β· saleor/saleor@11efb4e
Saleor Core: the high performance, composable, headless commerce API. - Fix CVE-2026-48744 Β· saleor/saleor@11efb4e
π¨ CVE-2026-49222
Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend product question operations allow a low-privileged Vendor to manage questions under another Vendor's products. The admin/sql/sqlite/product_question.sql queries accept a caller-controlled product_question_id and do not verify product_question.product_id against product.admin_id for the current admin_id. An attacker can read pending question content and moderation data, change question status, edit question content, or delete questions, manipulating product Q&A visibility and integrity. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.8.4.
π@cveNotify
Vvveb is a powerful and easy to use CMS with page builder to build websites, blogs or ecommerce stores. Prior to 1.0.8.4, Vvveb backend product question operations allow a low-privileged Vendor to manage questions under another Vendor's products. The admin/sql/sqlite/product_question.sql queries accept a caller-controlled product_question_id and do not verify product_question.product_id against product.admin_id for the current admin_id. An attacker can read pending question content and moderation data, change question status, edit question content, or delete questions, manipulating product Q&A visibility and integrity. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.8.4.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Added edit_other_product capability check for product questions to al⦠· givanz/Vvveb@1f2b117
β¦low list, read, approve, edit, or delete, reported by @Mitchell45