π¨ CVE-2026-16238
Type confusion in PostgreSQL pg_restore_attribute_stats() allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via conflation of range and multirange values. Within major version 18, minor versions before PostgreSQL 18.5 are affected. Versions before PostgreSQL 18 are unaffected.
π@cveNotify
Type confusion in PostgreSQL pg_restore_attribute_stats() allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via conflation of range and multirange values. Within major version 18, minor versions before PostgreSQL 18.5 are affected. Versions before PostgreSQL 18 are unaffected.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-16239
Type confusion in PostgreSQL "portal"/cursor lifecycle allows a user to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via re-creation of a cursor or other portal with different types. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.5, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.
π@cveNotify
Type confusion in PostgreSQL "portal"/cursor lifecycle allows a user to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running the database, via re-creation of a cursor or other portal with different types. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.5, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-18408
Untrusted data inclusion in pg_dump in PostgreSQL allows a malicious superuser of the origin server to inject arbitrary code for restore-time execution as the client operating system account running psql to restore the dump, via psql \restrict meta-command input expansion. The fix for CVE-2025-8714 introduced \restrict and \unrestrict to block this attack, but \unrestrict itself was sufficient for an attack. pg_dumpall is also affected. pg_restore is affected when used to generate a plain-format dump. Non-core use of \restrict would be affected, but we've not identified non-core use. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.5, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.
π@cveNotify
Untrusted data inclusion in pg_dump in PostgreSQL allows a malicious superuser of the origin server to inject arbitrary code for restore-time execution as the client operating system account running psql to restore the dump, via psql \restrict meta-command input expansion. The fix for CVE-2025-8714 introduced \restrict and \unrestrict to block this attack, but \unrestrict itself was sufficient for an attack. pg_dumpall is also affected. pg_restore is affected when used to generate a plain-format dump. Non-core use of \restrict would be affected, but we've not identified non-core use. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.5, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-19385
Heap buffer overflow in PostgreSQL pg_dump of long function transform lists allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running pg_dump, via a crafted transform list. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.5, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.
π@cveNotify
Heap buffer overflow in PostgreSQL pg_dump of long function transform lists allows an object creator to execute arbitrary code as the operating system user running pg_dump, via a crafted transform list. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.5, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-6464
Untrusted data inclusion in PostgreSQL psql COPY may allow a server administrator to elicit execution of data lines as psql commands, via error injection. If the "COPY FROM STDIN" or "\copy FROM STDIN" command fails before the server indicates that it awaits input rows, psql processes the in-line data rows as psql commands. "COPY FROM" with a filename is unaffected. The server administrator has no inherent control over the data rows, so a complete attack requires the attacker to separately acquire control of both the server and the data rows. Alternatively, an attacker controlling data rows alone might complete an attack through a coincidental error that they don't control. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.5, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.
π@cveNotify
Untrusted data inclusion in PostgreSQL psql COPY may allow a server administrator to elicit execution of data lines as psql commands, via error injection. If the "COPY FROM STDIN" or "\copy FROM STDIN" command fails before the server indicates that it awaits input rows, psql processes the in-line data rows as psql commands. "COPY FROM" with a filename is unaffected. The server administrator has no inherent control over the data rows, so a complete attack requires the attacker to separately acquire control of both the server and the data rows. Alternatively, an attacker controlling data rows alone might complete an attack through a coincidental error that they don't control. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.5, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-6471
Missing authorization in PostgreSQL logical decoding allows a non-superuser holding REPLICATION privilege to dlopen any file visible to the operating system account running the server, via the choice of logical decoding plugin. This in turn runs arbitrary code as that account. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.5, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.
π@cveNotify
Missing authorization in PostgreSQL logical decoding allows a non-superuser holding REPLICATION privilege to dlopen any file visible to the operating system account running the server, via the choice of logical decoding plugin. This in turn runs arbitrary code as that account. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.5, 17.11, 16.15, 15.19, and 14.24 are affected.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-53803
rsync before 3.5.0 contains a symlink following vulnerability that allows local attackers to overwrite arbitrary files by placing a symlink at a predictable output path such as --log-file, --write-batch, or daemon-mode log and statistics paths. Attackers can exploit rsync's failure to reject symlinks during ancillary file writes to redirect output to arbitrary filesystem locations, achieving local privilege escalation on installations where rsync runs with elevated privileges such as setuid or privileged daemon configurations.
π@cveNotify
rsync before 3.5.0 contains a symlink following vulnerability that allows local attackers to overwrite arbitrary files by placing a symlink at a predictable output path such as --log-file, --write-batch, or daemon-mode log and statistics paths. Attackers can exploit rsync's failure to reject symlinks during ancillary file writes to redirect output to arbitrary filesystem locations, achieving local privilege escalation on installations where rsync runs with elevated privileges such as setuid or privileged daemon configurations.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Release v3.5.0 Β· RsyncProject/rsync
What's Changed
This is a major security release. For details see https://download.samba.org/pub/rsync/NEWS#3.5.0
Full Changelog: v3.4.4...v3.5.0
This is a major security release. For details see https://download.samba.org/pub/rsync/NEWS#3.5.0
Full Changelog: v3.4.4...v3.5.0
π¨ CVE-2026-73570
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.20 when the optional zimbra-snmp package is installed and SNMP notifications are enabled. Due to improper sanitization of untrusted input during SNMP notification processing, an unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted SMTP requests that may result in execution of arbitrary operating system commands as the Zimbra user.
π@cveNotify
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.20 when the optional zimbra-snmp package is installed and SNMP notifications are enabled. Due to improper sanitization of untrusted input during SNMP notification processing, an unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted SMTP requests that may result in execution of arbitrary operating system commands as the Zimbra user.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-67614
CyberPanel before 3.0.0 contains a hard-coded JWT secret vulnerability in the WebTerminal FastAPI SSH service that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to forge valid authentication tokens and obtain an interactive root shell via WebSocket on port 8888. Attackers can craft a forged JWT signed with the hardcoded secret value, specifying ssh_user=root, to authenticate to the terminal service without any valid credentials and receive a root shell.
π@cveNotify
CyberPanel before 3.0.0 contains a hard-coded JWT secret vulnerability in the WebTerminal FastAPI SSH service that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to forge valid authentication tokens and obtain an interactive root shell via WebSocket on port 8888. Attackers can craft a forged JWT signed with the hardcoded secret value, specifying ssh_user=root, to authenticate to the terminal service without any valid credentials and receive a root shell.
π@cveNotify
Knowledge Base
Change Logs - Knowledge Base
Dated: 9th August 2026
π¨ CVE-2026-17197
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of client-asserted identity.
π@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of client-asserted identity.
π@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Host Servers
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-17223, CVE-2026-17206, CVE-2026-17208, CVE-2026-16929, CVE-2026-17004, CVE-2026-18846, CVE-2026-17197, CVE-2026-17217, CVE-2026-17199, CVE-2026-17229, CVE-2026-16982] in host servers, and a bufferβ¦
π¨ CVE-2026-18071
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management.
π@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper privilege management.
π@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By An Improper Management Vulnerability in HTTP Server [CVE-2026-18071]
IBM i is vulnerable to elevated privileges due to improper privilege management [CVE-2026-18071] in HTTP Server as described in the vulnerability details section.
π¨ CVE-2026-16967
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to system objects due to a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition involving symbolic links.
π@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to system objects due to a time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition involving symbolic links.
π@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple SQL Vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-16908, CVE-2026-16967]
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-16908, CVE-2026-16967] in SQL as described in the vulnerability details section.
π¨ CVE-2026-16975
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a heap-based buffer overflow.
π@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a heap-based buffer overflow.
π@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By A Remote Code Execution Vulnerability [CVE-2026-16975]
IBM i is vulnerable to remote code execution due to a heap-based buffer overflow [CVE-2026-16975] as described in the vulnerability details section.
π¨ CVE-2026-17029
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write.
π@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds write.
π@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Java Secure Sockets Extension
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-17029, CVE-2026-18511, CVE-2026-18068, CVE-2026-18086] in Java Secure Sockets Extension (JSSE) as described in the vulnerability details section.
π¨ CVE-2026-17069
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of anti-CSRF tokens.
π@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of anti-CSRF tokens.
π@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Digital Certificate Manager
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-17088, CVE-2026-17075, CVE-2026-17071, CVE-2026-17069, CVE-2026-17045, CVE-2026-17043] in Digital Certificate Manager (DCM) as described in the vulnerability details section.
π¨ CVE-2026-17206
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.
π@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.
π@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Host Servers
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-17223, CVE-2026-17206, CVE-2026-17208, CVE-2026-16929, CVE-2026-17004, CVE-2026-18846, CVE-2026-17197, CVE-2026-17217, CVE-2026-17199, CVE-2026-17229, CVE-2026-16982] in host servers, and a bufferβ¦
π¨ CVE-2026-17223
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.
π@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.
π@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Host Servers
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-17223, CVE-2026-17206, CVE-2026-17208, CVE-2026-16929, CVE-2026-17004, CVE-2026-18846, CVE-2026-17197, CVE-2026-17217, CVE-2026-17199, CVE-2026-17229, CVE-2026-16982] in host servers, and a bufferβ¦
π¨ CVE-2026-72630
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). Fleet restricts some callers to managing integration policies for one specific integration. When an existing integration policy was updated, that restriction was evaluated against the integration recorded on the stored policy rather than against the replacement integration supplied with the update. An authenticated user holding only the Elastic Defend endpoint policy management privilege was therefore able to convert an endpoint policy they administer into a policy for a different integration, and to supply that integration's configuration at the same time.
π@cveNotify
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). Fleet restricts some callers to managing integration policies for one specific integration. When an existing integration policy was updated, that restriction was evaluated against the integration recorded on the stored policy rather than against the replacement integration supplied with the update. An authenticated user holding only the Elastic Defend endpoint policy management privilege was therefore able to convert an endpoint policy they administer into a policy for a different integration, and to supply that integration's configuration at the same time.
π@cveNotify
Discuss the Elastic Stack
Kibana 8.19.20, 9.4.5, 9.5.1 Security Update (ESA-2026-127)
Incorrect Authorization in Kibana Fleet Leading to Privilege Escalation Description: Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). Fleet restricts some callers to managing integrationβ¦
π¨ CVE-2026-72631
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Escalation (CAPEC-233). An integration policy may optionally declare extra data streams that the integration writes to, which Fleet adds to the Elasticsearch API key issued to Elastic Agents enrolled in the corresponding agent policy. The resulting key allows new documents to be inserted and index mappings to be extended for specific indices. The key does not allow reading, updating, or deleting existing documents
π@cveNotify
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Escalation (CAPEC-233). An integration policy may optionally declare extra data streams that the integration writes to, which Fleet adds to the Elasticsearch API key issued to Elastic Agents enrolled in the corresponding agent policy. The resulting key allows new documents to be inserted and index mappings to be extended for specific indices. The key does not allow reading, updating, or deleting existing documents
π@cveNotify
Discuss the Elastic Stack
Kibana 9.4.5, 9.5.1 Security Update (ESA-2026-128)
Improper Privilege Management in Kibana Fleet Leading to Over-Scoped Elastic Agent API Keys Description: Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Escalation (CAPEC-233). An integration policyβ¦
π¨ CVE-2026-72642
The native inference process that Elasticsearch uses to evaluate uploaded machine learning models accepts a model operation that computes a memory address from an offset supplied inside the model, without validating that the offset stays within the bounds of the underlying storage. A user with the privileges required to upload and deploy a trained model can craft a model that reads and writes memory outside the intended allocation. The result is heap corruption that crashes the inference process, and, with sufficient control over the heap layout, could allow arbitrary code execution in the context of that process.
π@cveNotify
The native inference process that Elasticsearch uses to evaluate uploaded machine learning models accepts a model operation that computes a memory address from an offset supplied inside the model, without validating that the offset stays within the bounds of the underlying storage. A user with the privileges required to upload and deploy a trained model can craft a model that reads and writes memory outside the intended allocation. The result is heap corruption that crashes the inference process, and, with sufficient control over the heap layout, could allow arbitrary code execution in the context of that process.
π@cveNotify
Discuss the Elastic Stack
Elasticsearch 8.19.20, 9.4.5, 9.5.1 Security Update (ESA-2026-123)
Use of Out-of-range Pointer Offset in the Elasticsearch Machine Learning Native Inference Process The native inference process that Elasticsearch uses to evaluate uploaded machine learning models accepts a model operation that computes a memory address fromβ¦
π¨ CVE-2026-72658
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation via Cross Site Request Forgery (CAPEC-62). A user who is permitted to create visualizations can save a specially crafted Vega visualization that, when it is opened by another user, causes authenticated requests to be issued to Kibana in the context of the viewing user's session.
π@cveNotify
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation via Cross Site Request Forgery (CAPEC-62). A user who is permitted to create visualizations can save a specially crafted Vega visualization that, when it is opened by another user, causes authenticated requests to be issued to Kibana in the context of the viewing user's session.
π@cveNotify
Discuss the Elastic Stack
Kibana 8.19.20 and 9.4.5 Security Update (ESA-2026-99)
Cross-Site Request Forgery in Kibana Leading to Privilege Escalation Cross-Site Request Forgery (CWE-352) in Kibana can lead to privilege escalation via Cross Site Request Forgery (CAPEC-62). A user who is permitted to create visualizations can save a speciallyβ¦