🚨 CVE-2026-17045
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized operations and access sensitive information due to improper session management.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform unauthorized operations and access sensitive information due to improper session management.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Digital Certificate Manager
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-17088, CVE-2026-17075, CVE-2026-17071, CVE-2026-17069, CVE-2026-17045, CVE-2026-17043] in Digital Certificate Manager (DCM) as described in the vulnerability details section.
🚨 CVE-2026-17069
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of anti-CSRF tokens.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper validation of anti-CSRF tokens.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Digital Certificate Manager
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-17088, CVE-2026-17075, CVE-2026-17071, CVE-2026-17069, CVE-2026-17045, CVE-2026-17043] in Digital Certificate Manager (DCM) as described in the vulnerability details section.
🚨 CVE-2026-17199
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to unbounded resource allocation.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service due to unbounded resource allocation.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Host Servers
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-17223, CVE-2026-17206, CVE-2026-17208, CVE-2026-16929, CVE-2026-17004, CVE-2026-18846, CVE-2026-17197, CVE-2026-17217, CVE-2026-17199, CVE-2026-17229, CVE-2026-16982] in host servers, and a buffer…
🚨 CVE-2026-17206
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Host Servers
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-17223, CVE-2026-17206, CVE-2026-17208, CVE-2026-16929, CVE-2026-17004, CVE-2026-18846, CVE-2026-17197, CVE-2026-17217, CVE-2026-17199, CVE-2026-17229, CVE-2026-16982] in host servers, and a buffer…
🚨 CVE-2026-17223
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Host Servers
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-17223, CVE-2026-17206, CVE-2026-17208, CVE-2026-16929, CVE-2026-17004, CVE-2026-18846, CVE-2026-17197, CVE-2026-17217, CVE-2026-17199, CVE-2026-17229, CVE-2026-16982] in host servers, and a buffer…
🚨 CVE-2026-18164
An undocumented hard-coded credential, shared by all device units, is authorized to bypass authentication. This allows an attacker within Bluetooth range to arbitrarily manipulate brain stimulation parameters and state.
🎖@cveNotify
An undocumented hard-coded credential, shared by all device units, is authorized to bypass authentication. This allows an attacker within Bluetooth range to arbitrarily manipulate brain stimulation parameters and state.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-18846
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 s vulnerable to a buffer overflow from improperly validating client data. By sending malformed requests to one of the host servers, a remote attacker could leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial-of-server (DoS) for that server.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 s vulnerable to a buffer overflow from improperly validating client data. By sending malformed requests to one of the host servers, a remote attacker could leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial-of-server (DoS) for that server.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: IBM i is Affected By Multiple Vulnerabilities in Host Servers
IBM i is vulnerable to multiple vulnerabilities [CVE-2026-17223, CVE-2026-17206, CVE-2026-17208, CVE-2026-16929, CVE-2026-17004, CVE-2026-18846, CVE-2026-17197, CVE-2026-17217, CVE-2026-17199, CVE-2026-17229, CVE-2026-16982] in host servers, and a buffer…
🚨 CVE-2026-19745
A flaw has been found in Calix GigaSpire 26.1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file utilities_configurationsave.cgi of the component Web Management Interface. Executing a manipulation of the argument sessionKey can lead to denial of service. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw has been found in Calix GigaSpire 26.1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file utilities_configurationsave.cgi of the component Web Management Interface. Executing a manipulation of the argument sessionKey can lead to denial of service. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
Vulnerability Database
CVE-2026-19745 in GigaSpire
A flaw has been found in Calix GigaSpire 26.1.0. This vulnerability is tracked as CVE-2026-19745.
🚨 CVE-2026-19746
A vulnerability has been found in Calix GigaSpire 26.1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file traceroute.cmd. The manipulation leads to denial of service. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability has been found in Calix GigaSpire 26.1.0. The affected element is an unknown function of the file traceroute.cmd. The manipulation leads to denial of service. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
Vulnerability Database
CVE-2026-19746 in GigaSpire
A vulnerability has been found in Calix GigaSpire 26.1.0. This vulnerability is listed as CVE-2026-19746.
🚨 CVE-2026-19747
A weakness has been identified in Tenda CH7, CH7G, CH10, CP3, CP3 Pro, CP7, TC3B14C, TC3B15C, TC3T14C and TC3T15C up to 20260625. This impacts the function CAte::HandleCmd of the file Kylin of the component ATE Module. This manipulation causes command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely.
🎖@cveNotify
A weakness has been identified in Tenda CH7, CH7G, CH10, CP3, CP3 Pro, CP7, TC3B14C, TC3B15C, TC3T14C and TC3T15C up to 20260625. This impacts the function CAte::HandleCmd of the file Kylin of the component ATE Module. This manipulation causes command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Tenda-Smart-Camera-Vulnerability/Tenda Command Injection/Tenda Command Injection.md at main · howitouchyou/Tenda-Smart-Camera-Vulnerability
Contribute to howitouchyou/Tenda-Smart-Camera-Vulnerability development by creating an account on GitHub.
🚨 CVE-2026-45725
compliance-trestle is a tooling platform for managing compliance as code. Prior to versiions 3.12.2 and 4.0.3, the compliance-trestle library's remote fetching cache mechanism (HTTPSFetcher and SFTPFetcher) constructs the local cache file path from the URL path component without sanitizing path traversal sequences (`../`). When a remote OSCAL profile references a URL with traversal in its path, the HTTP response body is written to a location outside the intended cache directory, enabling arbitrary file write with attacker-controlled content to the filesystem. Versions 3.12.3 and 4.0.3 patch the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
compliance-trestle is a tooling platform for managing compliance as code. Prior to versiions 3.12.2 and 4.0.3, the compliance-trestle library's remote fetching cache mechanism (HTTPSFetcher and SFTPFetcher) constructs the local cache file path from the URL path component without sanitizing path traversal sequences (`../`). When a remote OSCAL profile references a URL with traversal in its path, the HTTP response body is written to a location outside the intended cache directory, enabling arbitrary file write with attacker-controlled content to the filesystem. Versions 3.12.3 and 4.0.3 patch the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Merge commit from fork · oscal-compass/compliance-trestle@89f4e53
* fix: write security against .. in remove cache path
Signed-off-by: degenaro <lou.degenaro@gmail.com>
* fix: improve test coverage to 100% for security.py
Signed-off-by: degenaro &...
Signed-off-by: degenaro <lou.degenaro@gmail.com>
* fix: improve test coverage to 100% for security.py
Signed-off-by: degenaro &...
🚨 CVE-2026-45774
compliance-trestle is a tooling platform for managing compliance as code. Prior to versiions 3.12.2 and 4.0.3, the compliance-trestle library's profile import mechanism resolves `trestle://` URIs and relative file paths by joining them with `trestle_root` and calling `.resolve()`, but performs no boundary check to ensure the resolved path stays within the trestle workspace. An attacker can craft a malicious OSCAL profile YAML with `imports[].href` containing path traversal sequences to read arbitrary files from the server filesystem. Versions 3.12.3 and 4.0.3 patch the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
compliance-trestle is a tooling platform for managing compliance as code. Prior to versiions 3.12.2 and 4.0.3, the compliance-trestle library's profile import mechanism resolves `trestle://` URIs and relative file paths by joining them with `trestle_root` and calling `.resolve()`, but performs no boundary check to ensure the resolved path stays within the trestle workspace. An attacker can craft a malicious OSCAL profile YAML with `imports[].href` containing path traversal sequences to read arbitrary files from the server filesystem. Versions 3.12.3 and 4.0.3 patch the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: add path traversal and SSRF security controls for remote cache · oscal-compass/compliance-trestle@5c65c59
Backport security fixes from develop to v3:
- Add PathSecurityValidator for path traversal prevention
- Add URLSecurityValidator for SSRF prevention
- Add local file path validation
- Add SECURITY....
- Add PathSecurityValidator for path traversal prevention
- Add URLSecurityValidator for SSRF prevention
- Add local file path validation
- Add SECURITY....
🚨 CVE-2026-48099
WsgiDAV is a generic and extendable WebDAV server based on WSGI. WsgiDAV 4.3.3 and prior can allow a WebDAV request path containing an encoded parent-directory segment to escape the configured filesystem share root in a specific path layout. The issue is fixed with version 4.3.4.
🎖@cveNotify
WsgiDAV is a generic and extendable WebDAV server based on WSGI. WsgiDAV 4.3.3 and prior can allow a WebDAV request path containing an encoded parent-directory segment to escape the configured filesystem share root in a specific path layout. The issue is fixed with version 4.3.4.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix CVE-2026-48099 · mar10/wsgidav@f894ed8
A generic and extendable WebDAV server based on WSGI - Fix CVE-2026-48099 · mar10/wsgidav@f894ed8
🚨 CVE-2026-49089
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A query expression accepted by a connector reporting operation was processed without any limit on its size, and an oversized expression caused the Kibana process to spend an unbounded amount of time evaluating it. An authenticated user with read-only privileges was able to send a single request that left Kibana unable to serve any user until the process was restarted.
🎖@cveNotify
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A query expression accepted by a connector reporting operation was processed without any limit on its size, and an oversized expression caused the Kibana process to spend an unbounded amount of time evaluating it. An authenticated user with read-only privileges was able to send a single request that left Kibana unable to serve any user until the process was restarted.
🎖@cveNotify
Discuss the Elastic Stack
Kibana 8.19.20, 9.4.5 Security Update (ESA-2026-137)
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling in Kibana Leading to Denial of Service Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling (CWE-770) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A query expression accepted…
🚨 CVE-2026-49096
Uncaught Exception (CWE-248) in Kibana Cases can lead to denial of service via Input Data Manipulation (CAPEC-153). Malformed link syntax stored in a case comment was not rejected or sanitized when the comment was later formatted for display, and the resulting unhandled error prevented the affected case from being displayed. An authenticated user holding privileges to comment on a case could store such a comment, after which that case became inaccessible to every user who opened it until the stored comment was removed.
🎖@cveNotify
Uncaught Exception (CWE-248) in Kibana Cases can lead to denial of service via Input Data Manipulation (CAPEC-153). Malformed link syntax stored in a case comment was not rejected or sanitized when the comment was later formatted for display, and the resulting unhandled error prevented the affected case from being displayed. An authenticated user holding privileges to comment on a case could store such a comment, after which that case became inaccessible to every user who opened it until the stored comment was removed.
🎖@cveNotify
Discuss the Elastic Stack
Kibana 8.19.20, 9.3.5, 9.4.2 Security Update (ESA-2026-136)
Uncaught Exception in Kibana Cases Leading to Denial of Service Uncaught Exception (CWE-248) in Kibana Cases can lead to denial of service via Input Data Manipulation (CAPEC-153). Malformed link syntax stored in a case comment was not rejected or sanitized…
🚨 CVE-2026-49864
wetty provides terminal access in browser over http/https. Prior to version 3.0.4, the wetty client decodes a base64 filename from the file-download escape sequence and interpolates it raw into a Toastify HTML string (`escapeMarkup: false`). Any output the victim renders - a `cat`'d file, a tailed log, an SSH MOTD, a `curl` response - that contains `\x1b[5i...:...\x1b[4i` runs script in the wetty origin and types attacker-chosen keystrokes into the victim's SSH session. Version 3.0.4 fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
wetty provides terminal access in browser over http/https. Prior to version 3.0.4, the wetty client decodes a base64 filename from the file-download escape sequence and interpolates it raw into a Toastify HTML string (`escapeMarkup: false`). Any output the victim renders - a `cat`'d file, a tailed log, an SSH MOTD, a `curl` response - that contains `\x1b[5i...:...\x1b[4i` runs script in the wetty origin and types attacker-chosen keystrokes into the victim's SSH session. Version 3.0.4 fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
DOM XSS via file-download filename
### Summary
The wetty client decodes a base64 filename from the file-download escape sequence and interpolates it raw into a Toastify HTML string (`escapeMarkup: false`). Any output the victim r...
The wetty client decodes a base64 filename from the file-download escape sequence and interpolates it raw into a Toastify HTML string (`escapeMarkup: false`). Any output the victim r...
🚨 CVE-2026-59714
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.5 before 0.10.0, any authenticated user can overwrite the content of a message in a channel they do not belong to (including private and DM channels) by sending a chat completion request with a channel:-prefixed chat_id and a target message_id. The channel: path routes pipeline output through _make_channel_emitter, which writes to the Messages table using the caller-supplied message_id without binding it to the channel. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.
🎖@cveNotify
Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.9.5 before 0.10.0, any authenticated user can overwrite the content of a message in a channel they do not belong to (including private and DM channels) by sending a chat completion request with a channel:-prefixed chat_id and a target message_id. The channel: path routes pipeline output through _make_channel_emitter, which writes to the Messages table using the caller-supplied message_id without binding it to the channel. This issue is fixed in version 0.10.0.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
refac · open-webui/open-webui@ac3449c
User-friendly AI Interface (Supports Ollama, OpenAI API, ...) - refac · open-webui/open-webui@ac3449c
🚨 CVE-2026-72629
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized cross-space access via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). The result is disclosure of inference output from a trained model in a different space that the user is not authorized to list, read, or use, which exposes the behavior of a model. The same pattern also reached the deployment stop and deployment update operations, allowing an active trained model deployment in another space to be stopped or to have its allocated resources altered.
🎖@cveNotify
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized cross-space access via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). The result is disclosure of inference output from a trained model in a different space that the user is not authorized to list, read, or use, which exposes the behavior of a model. The same pattern also reached the deployment stop and deployment update operations, allowing an active trained model deployment in another space to be stopped or to have its allocated resources altered.
🎖@cveNotify
Discuss the Elastic Stack
Kibana 8.19.20, 9.4.5, 9.5.1 Security Update (ESA-2026-126)
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in Kibana Leading to Cross-Space Access to Machine Learning Trained Models Description: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to unauthorized cross-space access via…
🚨 CVE-2026-72630
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). Fleet restricts some callers to managing integration policies for one specific integration. When an existing integration policy was updated, that restriction was evaluated against the integration recorded on the stored policy rather than against the replacement integration supplied with the update. An authenticated user holding only the Elastic Defend endpoint policy management privilege was therefore able to convert an endpoint policy they administer into a policy for a different integration, and to supply that integration's configuration at the same time.
🎖@cveNotify
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). Fleet restricts some callers to managing integration policies for one specific integration. When an existing integration policy was updated, that restriction was evaluated against the integration recorded on the stored policy rather than against the replacement integration supplied with the update. An authenticated user holding only the Elastic Defend endpoint policy management privilege was therefore able to convert an endpoint policy they administer into a policy for a different integration, and to supply that integration's configuration at the same time.
🎖@cveNotify
Discuss the Elastic Stack
Kibana 8.19.20, 9.4.5, 9.5.1 Security Update (ESA-2026-127)
Incorrect Authorization in Kibana Fleet Leading to Privilege Escalation Description: Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Abuse (CAPEC-122). Fleet restricts some callers to managing integration…
🚨 CVE-2026-72631
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Escalation (CAPEC-233). An integration policy may optionally declare extra data streams that the integration writes to, which Fleet adds to the Elasticsearch API key issued to Elastic Agents enrolled in the corresponding agent policy. The resulting key allows new documents to be inserted and index mappings to be extended for specific indices. The key does not allow reading, updating, or deleting existing documents
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Escalation (CAPEC-233). An integration policy may optionally declare extra data streams that the integration writes to, which Fleet adds to the Elasticsearch API key issued to Elastic Agents enrolled in the corresponding agent policy. The resulting key allows new documents to be inserted and index mappings to be extended for specific indices. The key does not allow reading, updating, or deleting existing documents
🎖@cveNotify
Discuss the Elastic Stack
Kibana 9.4.5, 9.5.1 Security Update (ESA-2026-128)
Improper Privilege Management in Kibana Fleet Leading to Over-Scoped Elastic Agent API Keys Description: Improper Privilege Management (CWE-269) in Kibana Fleet can lead to privilege escalation via Privilege Escalation (CAPEC-233). An integration policy…
🚨 CVE-2026-72632
Observable Discrepancy (CWE-203) in Kibana Fleet can lead to information disclosure via Excavation (CAPEC-116). Fleet removes the Elasticsearch API key value of an enrolled Elastic Agent from the responses of its agent listing capability, but that capability accepted caller-supplied filter expressions over the stored field that holds the value, and evaluated them with Kibana's own internal Elasticsearch privileges rather than the caller's. Because the number of matching agents is reported back to the caller, the difference between a matching and a non-matching filter formed a side channel from which the full API key value could be reconstructed one character at a time with a short sequence of requests.
🎖@cveNotify
Observable Discrepancy (CWE-203) in Kibana Fleet can lead to information disclosure via Excavation (CAPEC-116). Fleet removes the Elasticsearch API key value of an enrolled Elastic Agent from the responses of its agent listing capability, but that capability accepted caller-supplied filter expressions over the stored field that holds the value, and evaluated them with Kibana's own internal Elasticsearch privileges rather than the caller's. Because the number of matching agents is reported back to the caller, the difference between a matching and a non-matching filter formed a side channel from which the full API key value could be reconstructed one character at a time with a short sequence of requests.
🎖@cveNotify
Discuss the Elastic Stack
Kibana 8.19.20, 9.4.5, 9.5.1 Security Update (ESA-2026-129)
Observable Discrepancy in Kibana Fleet Leading to Disclosure of Elastic Agent Elasticsearch API Keys Description: Observable Discrepancy (CWE-203) in Kibana Fleet can lead to information disclosure via Excavation (CAPEC-116). Fleet removes the Elasticsearch…