🚨 CVE-2021-43022
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious PNG file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious PNG file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security Updates Available for Adobe Premiere Rush | APSB20-39
🚨 CVE-2021-43023
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious EPS/TIFF file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious EPS/TIFF file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security Updates Available for Adobe Premiere Rush | APSB20-39
🚨 CVE-2021-3179
GGLocker iOS application, contains an insecure data storage of the password hash value which results in an authentication bypass.
🎖@cveNotify
GGLocker iOS application, contains an insecure data storage of the password hash value which results in an authentication bypass.
🎖@cveNotify
Medium
Yet another password manager app, how to better secure it?
Mobile penetration testing is a career where one evaluate the security of a particular mobile application in smartphone platforms such as…
🚨 CVE-2021-43024
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious WAV file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious WAV file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security Updates Available for Adobe Premiere Rush | APSB20-39
🚨 CVE-2021-43025
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious SVG file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious SVG file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security Updates Available for Adobe Premiere Rush | APSB20-39
🚨 CVE-2021-43026
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious MXF file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious MXF file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security Updates Available for Adobe Premiere Rush | APSB20-39
🚨 CVE-2021-43028
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious M4A file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious M4A file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security Updates Available for Adobe Premiere Rush | APSB20-39
🚨 CVE-2021-43029
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious M4A file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe Premiere Rush version 1.5.16 (and earlier) is affected by a memory corruption vulnerability due to insecure handling of a malicious M4A file, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security Updates Available for Adobe Premiere Rush | APSB20-39
🚨 CVE-2021-41028
A combination of a use of hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability [CWE-321] in FortiClientEMS 7.0.1 and below, 6.4.6 and below and an improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-297] in FortiClientWindows, FortiClientLinux and FortiClientMac 7.0.1 and below, 6.4.6 and below may allow an unauthenticated and network adjacent attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack between the EMS and the FCT via the telemetry protocol.
🎖@cveNotify
A combination of a use of hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability [CWE-321] in FortiClientEMS 7.0.1 and below, 6.4.6 and below and an improper certificate validation vulnerability [CWE-297] in FortiClientWindows, FortiClientLinux and FortiClientMac 7.0.1 and below, 6.4.6 and below may allow an unauthenticated and network adjacent attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack between the EMS and the FCT via the telemetry protocol.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2000-0484
Small HTTP Server ver 3.06 contains a memory corruption bug causing a memory overflow. The overflowed buffer crashes into a Structured Exception Handler resulting in a Denial of Service.
🎖@cveNotify
Small HTTP Server ver 3.06 contains a memory corruption bug causing a memory overflow. The overflowed buffer crashes into a Structured Exception Handler resulting in a Denial of Service.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2021-39306
A stack buffer overflow was discovered on Realtek RTL8195AM device before 2.0.10, it exists in the client code when an attacker sends a big size Authentication challenge text in WEP security.
🎖@cveNotify
A stack buffer overflow was discovered on Realtek RTL8195AM device before 2.0.10, it exists in the client code when an attacker sends a big size Authentication challenge text in WEP security.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-11978
An issue was found in Apache Airflow versions 1.10.10 and below. A remote code/command injection vulnerability was discovered in one of the example DAGs shipped with Airflow which would allow any authenticated user to run arbitrary commands as the user running airflow worker/scheduler (depending on the executor in use). If you already have examples disabled by setting load_examples=False in the config then you are not vulnerable.
🎖@cveNotify
An issue was found in Apache Airflow versions 1.10.10 and below. A remote code/command injection vulnerability was discovered in one of the example DAGs shipped with Airflow which would allow any authenticated user to run arbitrary commands as the user running airflow worker/scheduler (depending on the executor in use). If you already have examples disabled by setting load_examples=False in the config then you are not vulnerable.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2021-4010
A flaw was found in xorg-x11-server in versions before 21.1.2 and before 1.20.14. An out-of-bounds access can occur in the SProcScreenSaverSuspend function. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in xorg-x11-server in versions before 21.1.2 and before 1.20.14. An out-of-bounds access can occur in the SProcScreenSaverSuspend function. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2021-4011
A flaw was found in xorg-x11-server in versions before 21.1.2 and before 1.20.14. An out-of-bounds access can occur in the SwapCreateRegister function. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in xorg-x11-server in versions before 21.1.2 and before 1.20.14. An out-of-bounds access can occur in the SwapCreateRegister function. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-11202
Buffer overflow/underflow occurs when typecasting the buffer passed by CPU internally in the library which is not aligned with the actual size of the structure' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile in QCM6125, QCS410, QCS603, QCS605, QCS610, QCS6125, SA6145P, SA6155, SA6155P, SA8155, SA8155P, SDA640, SDA670, SDA845, SDM640, SDM670, SDM710, SDM830, SDM845, SDX50M, SDX55, SDX55M, SM6125, SM6150, SM6150P, SM6250, SM6250P, SM7125, SM7150, SM7150P, SM8150, SM8150P
🎖@cveNotify
Buffer overflow/underflow occurs when typecasting the buffer passed by CPU internally in the library which is not aligned with the actual size of the structure' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile in QCM6125, QCS410, QCS603, QCS605, QCS610, QCS6125, SA6145P, SA6155, SA6155P, SA8155, SA8155P, SDA640, SDA670, SDA845, SDM640, SDM670, SDM710, SDM830, SDM845, SDX50M, SDX55, SDX55M, SM6125, SM6150, SM6150P, SM6250, SM6250P, SM7125, SM7150, SM7150P, SM8150, SM8150P
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2020-11987
Apache Batik 1.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the NodePickerPanel. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests.
🎖@cveNotify
Apache Batik 1.13 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, caused by improper input validation by the NodePickerPanel. By using a specially-crafted argument, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to cause the underlying server to make arbitrary GET requests.
🎖@cveNotify
xmlgraphics.apache.org
The Apache(tm) XML Graphics Project - Security
🚨 CVE-2021-43853
Ajax.NET Professional (AjaxPro) is an AJAX framework available for Microsoft ASP.NET. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to JavaScript object injection which may result in cross site scripting when leveraged by a malicious user. The affected core relates to JavaScript object creation when parsing json input. Releases before version 21.12.22.1 are affected. A workaround exists that replaces one of the core JavaScript files embedded in the library. See the GHSA-5q7q-qqw2-hjq7 for workaround details.
🎖@cveNotify
Ajax.NET Professional (AjaxPro) is an AJAX framework available for Microsoft ASP.NET. Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to JavaScript object injection which may result in cross site scripting when leveraged by a malicious user. The affected core relates to JavaScript object creation when parsing json input. Releases before version 21.12.22.1 are affected. A workaround exists that replaces one of the core JavaScript files embedded in the library. See the GHSA-5q7q-qqw2-hjq7 for workaround details.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Cross-Site Scripting Security Vulnerability
### Overview
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data due to the possibility of deserialization of arbitrary JavaScript objects.
### Description
...
Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Deserialization of Untrusted Data due to the possibility of deserialization of arbitrary JavaScript objects.
### Description
...
🚨 CVE-2021-4009
A flaw was found in xorg-x11-server in versions before 21.1.2 and before 1.20.14. An out-of-bounds access can occur in the SProcXFixesCreatePointerBarrier function. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in xorg-x11-server in versions before 21.1.2 and before 1.20.14. An out-of-bounds access can occur in the SProcXFixesCreatePointerBarrier function. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2021-4008
A flaw was found in xorg-x11-server in versions before 21.1.2 and before 1.20.14. An out-of-bounds access can occur in the SProcRenderCompositeGlyphs function. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in xorg-x11-server in versions before 21.1.2 and before 1.20.14. An out-of-bounds access can occur in the SProcRenderCompositeGlyphs function. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2021-43814
Rizin is a UNIX-like reverse engineering framework and command-line toolset. In versions up to and including 0.3.1 there is a heap-based out of bounds write in parse_die() when reversing an AMD64 ELF binary with DWARF debug info. When a malicious AMD64 ELF binary is opened by a victim user, Rizin may crash or execute unintended actions. No workaround are known and users are advised to upgrade.
🎖@cveNotify
Rizin is a UNIX-like reverse engineering framework and command-line toolset. In versions up to and including 0.3.1 there is a heap-based out of bounds write in parse_die() when reversing an AMD64 ELF binary with DWARF debug info. When a malicious AMD64 ELF binary is opened by a victim user, Rizin may crash or execute unintended actions. No workaround are known and users are advised to upgrade.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Heap-based OOB write when parsing dwarf die info · Issue #2083 · rizinorg/rizin
Work environment Questions Answers OS/arch/bits (mandatory) Ubuntu 20.04 amd64 File format of the file you reverse (mandatory) ELF64 Architecture/bits of the file (mandatory) amd64 rizin -v full ou...