π¨ CVE-2026-70560
Ultimate POS (Stock Management & Point of Sale) contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows low-privileged authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary HTML and script markup by setting a malicious payload in the user first-name field during account creation. Attackers with a low-privileged role such as Cashier can submit a leave request through the HRM/Leave module, causing the unsanitized first-name markup to execute in the browser session of any higher-privileged user who views the leave-application notification pane, enabling cross-user session compromise within the admin origin.
π@cveNotify
Ultimate POS (Stock Management & Point of Sale) contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows low-privileged authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary HTML and script markup by setting a malicious payload in the user first-name field during account creation. Attackers with a low-privileged role such as Cashier can submit a leave request through the HRM/Leave module, causing the unsanitized first-name markup to execute in the browser session of any higher-privileged user who views the leave-application notification pane, enabling cross-user session compromise within the admin origin.
π@cveNotify
CodeCanyon
Ultimate POS - Best ERP, Stock Management, Point of Sale & Invoicing application
Why are our prices higher than other items?
This product is seriously and thoroughly invested by our 10+ years of experience in the business. Weβre adding & improving it continuously for 4+ yea...
This product is seriously and thoroughly invested by our 10+ years of experience in the business. Weβre adding & improving it continuously for 4+ yea...
π¨ CVE-2026-26035
An Improper Authentication vulnerability [CWE-287] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.12 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to login into the Fortiweb GUI/CLI with a random username and password
π@cveNotify
An Improper Authentication vulnerability [CWE-287] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiWeb 7.4.0 through 7.4.11, FortiWeb 7.2.0 through 7.2.12, FortiWeb 7.0.0 through 7.0.12 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to login into the Fortiweb GUI/CLI with a random username and password
π@cveNotify
FortiGuard Labs
PSIRT | FortiGuard Labs
None
π¨ CVE-2026-47226
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, an authenticated Admidio member with upload rights on any one folder can permanently delete files from folders where they have only view access. The authorization check at the top of `modules/documents-files.php` evaluates upload rights against the attacker-supplied `folder_uuid` URL parameter β not the file's actual parent folder. The `file_delete` handler then only verifies view rights on the file's real location, never upload rights. By passing a folder they legitimately own in `folder_uuid` while targeting a file in a restricted folder via `file_uuid`, an attacker bypasses the upload-right check entirely and permanently deletes the file. This is an incomplete fix of GHSA-rmpj-3x5m-9m5f, which was patched in v5.0.7 but remains exploitable in v5.0.9. User should upgrade to v5.0.10 to receive an updated fix.
π@cveNotify
Admidio is an open-source user management solution. Prior to version 5.0.10, an authenticated Admidio member with upload rights on any one folder can permanently delete files from folders where they have only view access. The authorization check at the top of `modules/documents-files.php` evaluates upload rights against the attacker-supplied `folder_uuid` URL parameter β not the file's actual parent folder. The `file_delete` handler then only verifies view rights on the file's real location, never upload rights. By passing a folder they legitimately own in `folder_uuid` while targeting a file in a restricted folder via `file_uuid`, an attacker bypasses the upload-right check entirely and permanently deletes the file. This is an incomplete fix of GHSA-rmpj-3x5m-9m5f, which was patched in v5.0.7 but remains exploitable in v5.0.9. User should upgrade to v5.0.10 to receive an updated fix.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Authorization Bypass in file_delete Enables Cross-Folder File Deletion by Authenticated Members
### Summary
An authenticated Admidio member with upload rights on **any one folder** can permanently delete files from folders where they have only view access. The authorization check at the to...
An authenticated Admidio member with upload rights on **any one folder** can permanently delete files from folders where they have only view access. The authorization check at the to...
π¨ CVE-2026-53996
NetBSD's hdaudio(4) driver in sys/dev/hdaudio/hdaudio.c contains a missing access control vulnerability that allows unprivileged local attackers to invoke the HDAUDIO_FGRP_SETCONFIG ioctl without elevated permissions by exploiting the absence of an access check on /dev/hdaudioN device nodes. Attackers can repeatedly issue HDAUDIO_FGRP_SETCONFIG from one thread while keeping DMA and IRQs live from a second thread to trigger a use-after-free race condition in hdafg_detach() between stream_stop() and stream_disestablish(), where a latched DMA interrupt dereferences a freed callback pointer, resulting in outcomes ranging from audio-subsystem denial of service and kernel panic to potential local kernel privilege escalation.
π@cveNotify
NetBSD's hdaudio(4) driver in sys/dev/hdaudio/hdaudio.c contains a missing access control vulnerability that allows unprivileged local attackers to invoke the HDAUDIO_FGRP_SETCONFIG ioctl without elevated permissions by exploiting the absence of an access check on /dev/hdaudioN device nodes. Attackers can repeatedly issue HDAUDIO_FGRP_SETCONFIG from one thread while keeping DMA and IRQs live from a second thread to trigger a use-after-free race condition in hdafg_detach() between stream_stop() and stream_disestablish(), where a latched DMA interrupt dereferences a freed callback pointer, resulting in outcomes ranging from audio-subsystem denial of service and kernel panic to potential local kernel privilege escalation.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-57858
Cal.com Cal.diy versions 2.1.1 through 6.2.0 contain a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the BookingPageTagManager component that allows authenticated event owners to inject arbitrary JavaScript by supplying a malicious analytics tracking ID without sanitization. Attackers can close the inline script string literal with a crafted payload that executes in the browser of every visitor to the affected public booking page, enabling session cookie theft, forged authenticated requests, and wormable propagation by chaining with CSRF-able endpoints to persist payloads on additional events.
π@cveNotify
Cal.com Cal.diy versions 2.1.1 through 6.2.0 contain a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the BookingPageTagManager component that allows authenticated event owners to inject arbitrary JavaScript by supplying a malicious analytics tracking ID without sanitization. Attackers can close the inline script string literal with a crafted payload that executes in the browser of every visitor to the affected public booking page, enabling session cookie theft, forged authenticated requests, and wormable propagation by chaining with CSRF-able endpoints to persist payloads on additional events.
π@cveNotify
Ashtonr
cve-2026-57858: cal.com declines to address stored xss in self-hosted version Β· ashton richards
expect secure software? please pay $16/mo.
π¨ CVE-2026-70466
A incomplete list of disallowed inputs vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiWeb 7.4 all versions, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0 all versions may allow attacker to improper access control via <insert attack vector here>
π@cveNotify
A incomplete list of disallowed inputs vulnerability in Fortinet FortiWeb 8.0.0 through 8.0.2, FortiWeb 7.6.0 through 7.6.5, FortiWeb 7.4 all versions, FortiWeb 7.2 all versions, FortiWeb 7.0 all versions may allow attacker to improper access control via <insert attack vector here>
π@cveNotify
FortiGuard Labs
PSIRT | FortiGuard Labs
None
π¨ CVE-2026-70467
A server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM 7.5.0, FortiSIEM 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiSIEM 7.3.0 through 7.3.5, FortiSIEM 7.2 all versions, FortiSIEM 7.1 all versions, FortiSIEM 7.0 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.7 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.6 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.5 all versions may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here>
π@cveNotify
A server-side request forgery (ssrf) vulnerability in Fortinet FortiSIEM 7.5.0, FortiSIEM 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiSIEM 7.3.0 through 7.3.5, FortiSIEM 7.2 all versions, FortiSIEM 7.1 all versions, FortiSIEM 7.0 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.7 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.6 all versions, FortiSIEM 6.5 all versions may allow attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via <insert attack vector here>
π@cveNotify
FortiGuard Labs
PSIRT | FortiGuard Labs
None
π¨ CVE-2026-70468
A authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 7.6.1, FortiManager 7.4.3 through 7.4.5, FortiManager 7.2.5 through 7.2.9, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.3 through 7.4.5, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.5 through 7.2.9 may allow attacker to improper access control via <insert attack vector here>
π@cveNotify
A authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel vulnerability in Fortinet FortiManager 7.6.1, FortiManager 7.4.3 through 7.4.5, FortiManager 7.2.5 through 7.2.9, FortiManager Cloud 7.6.1, FortiManager Cloud 7.4.3 through 7.4.5, FortiManager Cloud 7.2.5 through 7.2.9 may allow attacker to improper access control via <insert attack vector here>
π@cveNotify
FortiGuard Labs
PSIRT | FortiGuard Labs
None
π¨ CVE-2026-71407
A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6 may allow an unauthenticated attacker who can bypass stack protection and ASLR to execute arbitrary code or commands in the context of the WAD daemon via crafted sockets, only if the explicit proxy is configured with Kerberos authentication and SOCKS enabled.
π@cveNotify
A Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability [CWE-121] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.1 through 7.6.6 may allow an unauthenticated attacker who can bypass stack protection and ASLR to execute arbitrary code or commands in the context of the WAD daemon via crafted sockets, only if the explicit proxy is configured with Kerberos authentication and SOCKS enabled.
π@cveNotify
FortiGuard Labs
PSIRT | FortiGuard Labs
None
π¨ CVE-2026-71408
A allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions may allow attacker to denial of service via <insert attack vector here>
π@cveNotify
A allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.6, FortiOS 7.4 all versions, FortiOS 7.2 all versions may allow attacker to denial of service via <insert attack vector here>
π@cveNotify
FortiGuard Labs
PSIRT | FortiGuard Labs
None
π¨ CVE-2026-20267
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XE Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities.
The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20267 are related to improper access control issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-284.
π@cveNotify
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XE Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities.
The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20267 are related to improper access control issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-284.
π@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS XE Software Security Hardening Release: August 2026
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XE Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internallyβ¦
π¨ CVE-2026-20268
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XE Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities.
The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20268 are related to issues with improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-119.
π@cveNotify
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XE Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities.
The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20268 are related to issues with improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-119.
π@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS XE Software Security Hardening Release: August 2026
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XE Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internallyβ¦
π¨ CVE-2026-20269
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XE Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities.
The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20269 are related to issues with improper control of a resource through its lifetime that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-664.
π@cveNotify
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XE Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities.
The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20269 are related to issues with improper control of a resource through its lifetime that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-664.
π@cveNotify
Cisco
Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco IOS XE Software Security Hardening Release: August 2026
As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco IOS XE Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in software hardening releases that address multiple internallyβ¦
π¨ CVE-2026-10682
The userspace verifier z_vrfy_log_filter_set() for the log_filter_set syscall in subsys/logging/log_mgmt.c performed a signed comparison against the int16_t src_id parameter: src_id < (int16_t)log_src_cnt_get(domain_id). Any negative value for src_id (e.g. -1) trivially satisfied this check and was forwarded into z_impl_log_filter_set, where it propagated to filter_set() and ultimately to get_dynamic_filter(), which uses source_id as an unsigned index into the linker-section array &TYPE_SECTION_START(log_dynamic)[source_id].filters.
After implicit conversion through uint32_t, an int16_t -1 becomes 0xFFFFFFFF, indexing log_dynamic far out of bounds and causing the kernel to perform an OOB read and an OOB read-modify-write (LOG_FILTER_SLOT_GET/SET) against memory adjacent to the log_dynamic section.
The written value is a constrained 3-bit log level slot within the targeted 32-bit word, but the target address is attacker-chosen (a small negative offset from log_dynamic) and the write occurs in supervisor mode following a syscall from an unprivileged user thread, providing a kernel memory-corruption / privilege-escalation primitive.
The defect is reachable on any build with CONFIG_USERSPACE=y and CONFIG_LOG_RUNTIME_FILTERING=y. Present from Zephyr v3.3.0 through v4.4.1. The fix replaces the signed bound check with an unsigned comparison: (uint32_t)src_id < log_src_cnt_get(domain_id), which correctly rejects negative inputs.
π@cveNotify
The userspace verifier z_vrfy_log_filter_set() for the log_filter_set syscall in subsys/logging/log_mgmt.c performed a signed comparison against the int16_t src_id parameter: src_id < (int16_t)log_src_cnt_get(domain_id). Any negative value for src_id (e.g. -1) trivially satisfied this check and was forwarded into z_impl_log_filter_set, where it propagated to filter_set() and ultimately to get_dynamic_filter(), which uses source_id as an unsigned index into the linker-section array &TYPE_SECTION_START(log_dynamic)[source_id].filters.
After implicit conversion through uint32_t, an int16_t -1 becomes 0xFFFFFFFF, indexing log_dynamic far out of bounds and causing the kernel to perform an OOB read and an OOB read-modify-write (LOG_FILTER_SLOT_GET/SET) against memory adjacent to the log_dynamic section.
The written value is a constrained 3-bit log level slot within the targeted 32-bit word, but the target address is attacker-chosen (a small negative offset from log_dynamic) and the write occurs in supervisor mode following a syscall from an unprivileged user thread, providing a kernel memory-corruption / privilege-escalation primitive.
The defect is reachable on any build with CONFIG_USERSPACE=y and CONFIG_LOG_RUNTIME_FILTERING=y. Present from Zephyr v3.3.0 through v4.4.1. The fix replaces the signed bound check with an unsigned comparison: (uint32_t)src_id < log_src_cnt_get(domain_id), which correctly rejects negative inputs.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
logging: Fix z_vrfy_log_filter_set() check Β· zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr@56a1511
Updates the 'src_id' check in z_vrfy_log_filter_check() so that
negative values are also excluded.
Signed-off-by: Peter Mitsis <peter.mitsis@intel.com>
negative values are also excluded.
Signed-off-by: Peter Mitsis <peter.mitsis@intel.com>
π¨ CVE-2026-10683
In the Synopsys DesignWare I2C driver (drivers/i2c/i2c_dw.c) operating in target/slave mode, the rx_full interrupt handler gates the write_requested() callback on dw->state != CMD_SEND, and dw->state is only reset to READY on a STOP interrupt. The START_DET interrupt, whose handler in i2c_dw_slave_read_clear_intr_bits() would reset the state on every (re)START, was never added to the enabled interrupt mask in i2c_dw_slave_register(), so that recovery path was dead code.
As a result, if the STOP interrupt is lost (bus glitch/reset, or a concurrent master driving STOP) or the bus master issues a legal WRITE-repeated-START-WRITE sequence with the same direction, the driver remains in CMD_SEND permanently and never invokes write_requested() again for the life of the target.
An I2C master on the same physical bus can deliberately trigger this, causing the I2C target function to malfunction for all subsequent write transactions and desynchronizing consumer framing state (e.g. MCTP-over-I2C), a recoverable-by-reset denial of service of the target peripheral.
The fix unmasks START_DET so the state is reset at every bus (re)START. Impact is availability-only over a local board-level bus; no memory corruption results in the in-tree consumer, whose per-byte buffer write is independently bounds-checked.
π@cveNotify
In the Synopsys DesignWare I2C driver (drivers/i2c/i2c_dw.c) operating in target/slave mode, the rx_full interrupt handler gates the write_requested() callback on dw->state != CMD_SEND, and dw->state is only reset to READY on a STOP interrupt. The START_DET interrupt, whose handler in i2c_dw_slave_read_clear_intr_bits() would reset the state on every (re)START, was never added to the enabled interrupt mask in i2c_dw_slave_register(), so that recovery path was dead code.
As a result, if the STOP interrupt is lost (bus glitch/reset, or a concurrent master driving STOP) or the bus master issues a legal WRITE-repeated-START-WRITE sequence with the same direction, the driver remains in CMD_SEND permanently and never invokes write_requested() again for the life of the target.
An I2C master on the same physical bus can deliberately trigger this, causing the I2C target function to malfunction for all subsequent write transactions and desynchronizing consumer framing state (e.g. MCTP-over-I2C), a recoverable-by-reset denial of service of the target peripheral.
The fix unmasks START_DET so the state is reset at every bus (re)START. Impact is availability-only over a local board-level bus; no memory corruption results in the in-tree consumer, whose per-byte buffer write is independently bounds-checked.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
drivers: i2c: i2c_dw: unmask START_DET to recover from stuck target s⦠· zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr@06e2053
β¦tate
The target ISR gates write_requested() on `dw->state != CMD_SEND` so
that back-to-back rx_full interrupts during a single write do not
re-enter the callback. However, dw->state...
The target ISR gates write_requested() on `dw->state != CMD_SEND` so
that back-to-back rx_full interrupts during a single write do not
re-enter the callback. However, dw->state...
π¨ CVE-2026-18497
A heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability exists in the nothings stb TrueType library, up to version 1.26, that is used for parsing TrueType font files. The vulnerability exists in the stbtt__GetGlyphShapeTT() function within the nothings stb_truetype.h library when parsing malformed TTF (TrueType Font) files. The vulnerability resides in the glyph data parsing path.
An attacker can craft a malformed TTF file with an inflated endPtsOfContours value and truncate the remaining glyph data. When an application utilizing stb_truetype.h (such as various game engines or graphics software) attempts to load, bake, or render this malformed font via stbtt_GetGlyphShape(), the parser will attempt to read past the end of the glyph data buffer, triggering the out-of-bounds read.
π@cveNotify
A heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability exists in the nothings stb TrueType library, up to version 1.26, that is used for parsing TrueType font files. The vulnerability exists in the stbtt__GetGlyphShapeTT() function within the nothings stb_truetype.h library when parsing malformed TTF (TrueType Font) files. The vulnerability resides in the glyph data parsing path.
An attacker can craft a malformed TTF file with an inflated endPtsOfContours value and truncate the remaining glyph data. When an application utilizing stb_truetype.h (such as various game engines or graphics software) attempts to load, bake, or render this malformed font via stbtt_GetGlyphShape(), the parser will attempt to read past the end of the glyph data buffer, triggering the out-of-bounds read.
π@cveNotify
cwe.mitre.org
CWE -
CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow (4.20)
CWE-122: Heap-based Buffer Overflow (4.20)
Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) is a list of software weaknesses.
π¨ CVE-2026-21065
Out-of-bounds write in libcodec2secqcelpdec.so prior to SMR Aug-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to write out-of-bounds memory.
π@cveNotify
Out-of-bounds write in libcodec2secqcelpdec.so prior to SMR Aug-2026 Release 1 allows local attackers to write out-of-bounds memory.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-19546
A flaw was found in DBI. This is a fix for a partial fix for CVE-2026-14380 for RHEL 9.8.z and 10.2.z.
For a detailed Statement, Description and Mitigation please reffer to the original https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2026-19546.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in DBI. This is a fix for a partial fix for CVE-2026-14380 for RHEL 9.8.z and 10.2.z.
For a detailed Statement, Description and Mitigation please reffer to the original https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2026-19546.
π@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-19546 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
π¨ CVE-2025-0041
Uncontrolled search paths in the Vitisβ’ Embedded Single File Download (SFD) for local Windows installation could allow a low-privileged user to create arbitrary code execution.
π@cveNotify
Uncontrolled search paths in the Vitisβ’ Embedded Single File Download (SFD) for local Windows installation could allow a low-privileged user to create arbitrary code execution.
π@cveNotify
AMD
Vitisβ’ Vulnerabilities
π¨ CVE-2025-31356
Insufficient verification of data authenticity for some Intel(R) Trust Domain Extensions (Intel(R) TDX) within Ring 0: Hypervisor may allow an information disclosure. A system software adversary with a privileged user access combined with a high complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without any user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (low) and no effect on availability. Subsequent system impacts include reduced confidentiality (low), integrity (low), and no effect on availability.
π@cveNotify
Insufficient verification of data authenticity for some Intel(R) Trust Domain Extensions (Intel(R) TDX) within Ring 0: Hypervisor may allow an information disclosure. A system software adversary with a privileged user access combined with a high complexity attack may enable data exposure. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without any user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (low) and no effect on availability. Subsequent system impacts include reduced confidentiality (low), integrity (low), and no effect on availability.
π@cveNotify
Intel
INTEL-SA-01419
π¨ CVE-2025-31936
Improper handling of overlap between protected memory ranges for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processors when using Intel(R) TDX within SMM may allow an escalation of privilege. SMM adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
π@cveNotify
Improper handling of overlap between protected memory ranges for some Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6 processors when using Intel(R) TDX within SMM may allow an escalation of privilege. SMM adversary with a privileged user combined with a high complexity attack may enable escalation of privilege. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present with special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (none) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (none), integrity (none) and availability (none) impacts.
π@cveNotify
Intel
INTEL-SA-01379