๐จ CVE-2026-19346
A vulnerability was determined in Tenda CH22 1.0.0.1. This vulnerability affects the function formCertListInfo of the file /goform/CertListInfo. This manipulation of the argument Name causes command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was determined in Tenda CH22 1.0.0.1. This vulnerability affects the function formCertListInfo of the file /goform/CertListInfo. This manipulation of the argument Name causes command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
๐@cveNotify
candle-throne-f75 on Notion
Tenda-CH22-formCertListInfo | Notion
Overview
๐จ CVE-2026-19347
A vulnerability was identified in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /viewdoctor.php. Such manipulation of the argument delid leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was identified in itsourcecode Hospital Management System 1.0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /viewdoctor.php. Such manipulation of the argument delid leads to sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
itsourcecode Hospital Management System V1.0 SQL Injection Vulnerability ยท Issue #17 ยท ltranquility/submit_vuln
itsourcecode Hospital Management System V1.0 SQL Injection Vulnerability NAME OF AFFECTED PRODUCT(S) Hospital Management System Vendor Homepage https://itsourcecode.com/free-projects/php-project/ho...
๐จ CVE-2026-19348
A security flaw has been discovered in Shenzhen Aitemi M300 Wi-Fi Repeater r0-ea7890a. Impacted is the function sprintf of the file /protocol.csp?fname=net&opt=smacfilter_conf&function=set&act=add&name=test&enable=1. Performing a manipulation of the argument enable/name/mac results in command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
๐@cveNotify
A security flaw has been discovered in Shenzhen Aitemi M300 Wi-Fi Repeater r0-ea7890a. Impacted is the function sprintf of the file /protocol.csp?fname=net&opt=smacfilter_conf&function=set&act=add&name=test&enable=1. Performing a manipulation of the argument enable/name/mac results in command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - IEATASICS/m300-repeater-bugs: 0 days located on the M300 mt02 wifi repeater that have not been publicly released.
0 days located on the M300 mt02 wifi repeater that have not been publicly released. - IEATASICS/m300-repeater-bugs
๐จ CVE-2026-19350
A vulnerability has been found in Dolibarr ERP up to 23.0.3. Affected is the function fail of the file htdocs/takepos/invoice.php of the component TakePOS Module. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The name of the patch is 8992ce8704da947b6abe7b65a6fe59aed736bb81. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability has been found in Dolibarr ERP up to 23.0.3. Affected is the function fail of the file htdocs/takepos/invoice.php of the component TakePOS Module. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The name of the patch is 8992ce8704da947b6abe7b65a6fe59aed736bb81. It is advisable to implement a patch to correct this issue.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix #38949 enforce takepos editlines permission on all line actions (โฆ ยท Dolibarr/dolibarr@8992ce8
โฆ#38999)
* Fix #38949 enforce takepos editlines permission on all line actions
addline, freezone, addnote, deleteline, updateqty, updateprice, updatereduction
and update_reduction_global all muta...
* Fix #38949 enforce takepos editlines permission on all line actions
addline, freezone, addnote, deleteline, updateqty, updateprice, updatereduction
and update_reduction_global all muta...
๐จ CVE-2026-19351
A vulnerability was found in dresende node-sql-query 0.1.25/0.1.26/0.1.27/0.1.28. Affected by this vulnerability is the function SelectQuery.from/SelectQuery.build in the library lib/Select.js of the component Request Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation results in sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 0.1.29 addresses this issue. The patch is named 3414c42f6de89826fa1f5f36f6139d1e6552778e. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was found in dresende node-sql-query 0.1.25/0.1.26/0.1.27/0.1.28. Affected by this vulnerability is the function SelectQuery.from/SelectQuery.build in the library lib/Select.js of the component Request Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation results in sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 0.1.29 addresses this issue. The patch is named 3414c42f6de89826fa1f5f36f6139d1e6552778e. Upgrading the affected component is recommended.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - dresende/node-sql-query: NodeJS SQL query builder
NodeJS SQL query builder. Contribute to dresende/node-sql-query development by creating an account on GitHub.
๐1
๐จ CVE-2026-19352
A vulnerability was determined in mifi lossless-cut up to 3.69.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file src/main/httpServer.ts of the component Built-in HTTP API Service. Executing a manipulation can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack requires access to the local network. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called 260802348955231442c4bae6c2d9d8ede947af0a. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue. The project maintainer provides this view: "I'm not sure that this is a critical vulnerability, because it is behind an experimental CLI flag and the NTLM behavior isn't really a LosslessCut bug." The CVSS vector reflects the high level of pre-requisites.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was determined in mifi lossless-cut up to 3.69.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file src/main/httpServer.ts of the component Built-in HTTP API Service. Executing a manipulation can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack requires access to the local network. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. This patch is called 260802348955231442c4bae6c2d9d8ede947af0a. It is best practice to apply a patch to resolve this issue. The project maintainer provides this view: "I'm not sure that this is a critical vulnerability, because it is behind an experimental CLI flag and the NTLM behavior isn't really a LosslessCut bug." The CVSS vector reflects the high level of pre-requisites.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - mifi/lossless-cut: The swiss army knife of lossless video/audio editing
The swiss army knife of lossless video/audio editing - mifi/lossless-cut
๐จ CVE-2026-19353
A vulnerability has been found in DedeCMS up to 5.7.118 UTF8SP2. The affected element is the function _4_Setup of the file install/index.php of the component Installation Wizard. Such manipulation leads to file inclusion. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability has been found in DedeCMS up to 5.7.118 UTF8SP2. The affected element is the function _4_Setup of the file install/index.php of the component Installation Wizard. Such manipulation leads to file inclusion. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is described as difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
dedecms_install_rce ยท Issue #9 ยท I4m6da/CVE
Vulnerability Report: DedeCMS v5.7.118 โ Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Installation Wizard CVE ID Pending assignment Vendor ไธๆตทๅๅ็ฝ็ป็งๆๆ้ๅ
ฌๅธ (DesDev, Inc.) Product DedeCMS (็ปๆขฆๅ
ๅฎน็ฎก็็ณป็ป) Versio...
๐จ CVE-2026-18651
A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. During SASL PLAIN authentication, the server installs connection-level bind credentials before performing the account-lock check. If the account is subsequently found to be locked, the bind is reported as failed to the client, but the already-installed authenticated state on the connection is not reverted. A client that supplies valid credentials for an account that has been administratively locked can continue to use the same connection with that account's privileges, defeating account lock as an access-revocation control.
๐@cveNotify
A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. During SASL PLAIN authentication, the server installs connection-level bind credentials before performing the account-lock check. If the account is subsequently found to be locked, the bind is reported as failed to the client, but the already-installed authenticated state on the connection is not reverted. A client that supplies valid credentials for an account that has been administratively locked can continue to use the same connection with that account's privileges, defeating account lock as an access-revocation control.
๐@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-18651 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
๐จ CVE-2024-6832
The account locking mechanism fails to trigger when secondary user stores are inaccessible. The software does not maintain a consistent state for account locking if it cannot reach all configured user stores, allowing an attacker to repeatedly attempt authentication with invalid credentials without triggering the lockout mechanism for users within active stores.
When the account locking mechanism is bypassed due to the inaccessibility of secondary user stores, users in accessible user stores are left vulnerable to brute force attacks. A malicious actor can exploit this by attempting numerous invalid password combinations against a user account without the expected account lockout consequence.
๐@cveNotify
The account locking mechanism fails to trigger when secondary user stores are inaccessible. The software does not maintain a consistent state for account locking if it cannot reach all configured user stores, allowing an attacker to repeatedly attempt authentication with invalid credentials without triggering the lockout mechanism for users within active stores.
When the account locking mechanism is bypassed due to the inaccessibility of secondary user stores, users in accessible user stores are left vulnerable to brute force attacks. A malicious actor can exploit this by attempting numerous invalid password combinations against a user account without the expected account lockout consequence.
๐@cveNotify
Wso2
Security Advisory WSO2-2024-3352/CVE-2024-6832
Documentation for WSO2 Security and Compliance
๐จ CVE-2026-10849
The hawkBit device management client in subsys/mgmt/hawkbit accumulates the body of an HTTP response from the update server into a heap buffer in response_json_cb() (subsys/mgmt/hawkbit/hawkbit.c). The buffer is sized to hold the received body bytes but reserves no space for a terminating NUL. When the full response has arrived, the code writes response_data[downloaded_size] = '\0' โ and whenever the accumulated body length equals the allocation, that terminator lands one byte past the end of the heap object (a heap-based out-of-bounds write, CWE-122 / CWE-787).
The body length and fragmentation are taken directly from the parsed HTTP response (rsp->body_frag_start / rsp->body_frag_len) and are fully controlled by the remote hawkBit server, which chooses its own response length. The precise trigger depends on how the buffer grows, and both forms are remotely reachable. Since v4.0.0 the reallocation is sized to exactly downloaded_size + body_len, so any response body larger than the 1100-byte initial buffer makes the out-of-bounds write deterministic; such response sizes are normal for hawkBit deployment metadata. Before v4.0.0 the buffer grew by doubling and the growth check ((downloaded_size + body_len) > response_buffer_size) is false at equality, so a response body whose length is exactly the current allocation โ 1100 bytes with the default initial buffer โ skips the reallocation entirely and writes the terminator at response_data[1100] of an 1100-byte object. The HTTP length-mismatch check does not catch this, because the declared and received lengths genuinely agree. Either form is reachable by a malicious, compromised, or man-in-the-middle update server (TLS is optional and, when enabled, does not protect against a hostile server), with no authentication of response content and no client-side length cap protecting the write.
The out-of-bounds write is a fixed single NUL byte immediately following the allocation, corrupting adjacent allocator metadata or the next allocation. The practical impact is heap corruption leading to denial of service (fault on a subsequent allocation or free), with the bounded, allocator-dependent possibility of further corruption. The fix sizes the buffer to the body length plus one and copies with memcpy, ensuring the terminator always lands within the allocation.
๐@cveNotify
The hawkBit device management client in subsys/mgmt/hawkbit accumulates the body of an HTTP response from the update server into a heap buffer in response_json_cb() (subsys/mgmt/hawkbit/hawkbit.c). The buffer is sized to hold the received body bytes but reserves no space for a terminating NUL. When the full response has arrived, the code writes response_data[downloaded_size] = '\0' โ and whenever the accumulated body length equals the allocation, that terminator lands one byte past the end of the heap object (a heap-based out-of-bounds write, CWE-122 / CWE-787).
The body length and fragmentation are taken directly from the parsed HTTP response (rsp->body_frag_start / rsp->body_frag_len) and are fully controlled by the remote hawkBit server, which chooses its own response length. The precise trigger depends on how the buffer grows, and both forms are remotely reachable. Since v4.0.0 the reallocation is sized to exactly downloaded_size + body_len, so any response body larger than the 1100-byte initial buffer makes the out-of-bounds write deterministic; such response sizes are normal for hawkBit deployment metadata. Before v4.0.0 the buffer grew by doubling and the growth check ((downloaded_size + body_len) > response_buffer_size) is false at equality, so a response body whose length is exactly the current allocation โ 1100 bytes with the default initial buffer โ skips the reallocation entirely and writes the terminator at response_data[1100] of an 1100-byte object. The HTTP length-mismatch check does not catch this, because the declared and received lengths genuinely agree. Either form is reachable by a malicious, compromised, or man-in-the-middle update server (TLS is optional and, when enabled, does not protect against a hostile server), with no authentication of response content and no client-side length cap protecting the write.
The out-of-bounds write is a fixed single NUL byte immediately following the allocation, corrupting adjacent allocator metadata or the next allocation. The practical impact is heap corruption leading to denial of service (fault on a subsequent allocation or free), with the bounded, allocator-dependent possibility of further corruption. The fix sizes the buffer to the body length plus one and copies with memcpy, ensuring the terminator always lands within the allocation.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
mgmt: hawkbit: fix of by one error ยท zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr@59d7ab5
Make sure that the the added `/0`
char has enough space at the end.
Signed-off-by: Fin Maaร <f.maass@vogl-electronic.com>
char has enough space at the end.
Signed-off-by: Fin Maaร <f.maass@vogl-electronic.com>
๐จ CVE-2026-62870
Use after free in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
๐@cveNotify
Use after free in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
๐@cveNotify
๐จ CVE-2026-11368
The Bluetooth host ATT layer (subsys/bluetooth/host/att.c) associates each in-flight ATT TX buffer with its owning channel via the static tx_meta_data_storage[] array (data->att_chan = chan). When a buffer's last reference is dropped, its net-buf destroy callback defers the completion handling to the system workqueue (att_tx_destroy -> att_tx_destroy_work_handler -> att_on_sent_cb -> bt_att_sent), where bt_att_sent dereferences the channel and its ATT context (sys_slist_get(&att->reqs)).
When a peer disconnects while an ATT PDU (a server notification/indication or any response) is still in flight in the controller TX path, L2CAP tears the channel down in l2cap_chan_del(): it runs the disconnected callback and then the released callback (bt_att_released), which frees the channel slab slot. Because the in-flight buffer is held by the connection TX path rather than the channel's own queue, its deferred destroy work can run after the channel has been freed. The att_on_sent_cb guard intended to drop the stale callback itself dereferences meta->att_chan, which is now a dangling pointer into a freed (and possibly reused) slab slot.
A remote peer with an ATT connection can drive this by disconnecting during routine ATT traffic; no pairing or user interaction is required to reach the ATT bearer. The result is a use-after-free read/write of freed channel memory, reliably crashing the Bluetooth host (denial of service) and, because the channel slab slot may be reused, potentially corrupting live memory.
The fix makes bt_att_released() NULL the att_chan field of every tx_meta_data_storage[] entry still referencing the channel before freeing it, so the deferred guard observes a NULL pointer and drops the callback. Teardown and the destroy work both run on the cooperative system workqueue, so the array update is serialized and needs no lock.
๐@cveNotify
The Bluetooth host ATT layer (subsys/bluetooth/host/att.c) associates each in-flight ATT TX buffer with its owning channel via the static tx_meta_data_storage[] array (data->att_chan = chan). When a buffer's last reference is dropped, its net-buf destroy callback defers the completion handling to the system workqueue (att_tx_destroy -> att_tx_destroy_work_handler -> att_on_sent_cb -> bt_att_sent), where bt_att_sent dereferences the channel and its ATT context (sys_slist_get(&att->reqs)).
When a peer disconnects while an ATT PDU (a server notification/indication or any response) is still in flight in the controller TX path, L2CAP tears the channel down in l2cap_chan_del(): it runs the disconnected callback and then the released callback (bt_att_released), which frees the channel slab slot. Because the in-flight buffer is held by the connection TX path rather than the channel's own queue, its deferred destroy work can run after the channel has been freed. The att_on_sent_cb guard intended to drop the stale callback itself dereferences meta->att_chan, which is now a dangling pointer into a freed (and possibly reused) slab slot.
A remote peer with an ATT connection can drive this by disconnecting during routine ATT traffic; no pairing or user interaction is required to reach the ATT bearer. The result is a use-after-free read/write of freed channel memory, reliably crashing the Bluetooth host (denial of service) and, because the channel slab slot may be reused, potentially corrupting live memory.
The fix makes bt_att_released() NULL the att_chan field of every tx_meta_data_storage[] entry still referencing the channel before freeing it, so the deferred guard observes a NULL pointer and drops the callback. Teardown and the destroy work both run on the cooperative system workqueue, so the array update is serialized and needs no lock.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Bluetooth: Host: Fix use-after-free in bt_att_sent on disconnect ยท zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr@dfdea9b
When the peer disconnects mid-transfer, the bt_att and bt_att_chan are
freed (att_chan_detach()/att_reset(), then bt_att_released()) while a
deferred unenhanced-ATT "sent" callbac...
freed (att_chan_detach()/att_reset(), then bt_att_released()) while a
deferred unenhanced-ATT "sent" callbac...
๐จ CVE-2024-10302
The user self-signup flow in multiple WSO2 products fails to adequately validate user-supplied input. This weakness allows arbitrary unvalidated data to be included within user claims, which are then used by downstream processes.
Allowing unvalidated input into user claims can lead to various security risks. Malicious or malformed data injected during signup could be processed by other parts of the application, potentially enabling attacks such as content manipulation, redirection, user interface inconsistencies, unauthorized actions, and data exposure. The actual impact depends on how the compromised data is consumed and the privileges associated with the affected users.
๐@cveNotify
The user self-signup flow in multiple WSO2 products fails to adequately validate user-supplied input. This weakness allows arbitrary unvalidated data to be included within user claims, which are then used by downstream processes.
Allowing unvalidated input into user claims can lead to various security risks. Malicious or malformed data injected during signup could be processed by other parts of the application, potentially enabling attacks such as content manipulation, redirection, user interface inconsistencies, unauthorized actions, and data exposure. The actual impact depends on how the compromised data is consumed and the privileges associated with the affected users.
๐@cveNotify
Wso2
Security Advisory WSO2-2024-3740/CVE-2024-10302
Documentation for WSO2 Security and Compliance
๐จ CVE-2026-19354
A vulnerability was found in lock-upme OPMS up to 831440f37a92c1568f2e071d5233bc873a9d8b09. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file controllers/messages/message.go of the component IN Clause Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ids results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was found in lock-upme OPMS up to 831440f37a92c1568f2e071d5233bc873a9d8b09. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file controllers/messages/message.go of the component IN Clause Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ids results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
๐@cveNotify
Vulnerability Database
CVE-2026-19354 in OPMS
A vulnerability was found in lock-upme OPMS up to 831440f37a92c1568f2e071d5233bc873a9d8b09. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-19354.
๐จ CVE-2026-19355
A vulnerability was determined in MingSoft MCMS up to 3.0.6. This affects the function ModelDataImpl.queryDiyFormData of the file /mdiy/form/data/list.do of the component ms-mdiy. Executing a manipulation of the argument formFields can lead to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was determined in MingSoft MCMS up to 3.0.6. This affects the function ModelDataImpl.queryDiyFormData of the file /mdiy/form/data/list.do of the component ms-mdiy. Executing a manipulation of the argument formFields can lead to sql injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
๐@cveNotify
Vulnerability Database
CVE-2026-19355 in MCMS
A vulnerability was determined in MingSoft MCMS up to 3.0.6. This vulnerability appears as CVE-2026-19355.
๐จ CVE-2026-19356
A vulnerability was identified in MingSoft MCMS up to 3.0.6. This impacts an unknown function of the file /mdiy/form/data/list of the component ms-mdiy. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was identified in MingSoft MCMS up to 3.0.6. This impacts an unknown function of the file /mdiy/form/data/list of the component ms-mdiy. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
๐@cveNotify
Vulnerability Database
CVE-2026-19356 in MCMS
A vulnerability was identified in MingSoft MCMS up to 3.0.6. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2026-19356.
๐1
๐จ CVE-2026-1609
A flaw was found in Keycloak. When the JSON Web Token (JWT) authorization grant preview feature is enabled and a user account is disabled, Keycloak fails to validate the userโs disabled status during JWT authorization grant processing. A remote attacker with low privileges can exploit this improper access control vulnerability by presenting a valid assertion token from an external identity provider to obtain a JWT for a disabled user. This allows unauthorized access to sensitive resources.
๐@cveNotify
A flaw was found in Keycloak. When the JSON Web Token (JWT) authorization grant preview feature is enabled and a user account is disabled, Keycloak fails to validate the userโs disabled status during JWT authorization grant processing. A remote attacker with low privileges can exploit this improper access control vulnerability by presenting a valid assertion token from an external identity provider to obtain a JWT for a disabled user. This allows unauthorized access to sensitive resources.
๐@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-1609 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
๐จ CVE-2026-15945
A flaw was found in the group search functionality of the Keycloak server's administrative API. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP) v2 is enabled, a delegated administrator can bypass access restrictions to view parent groups they are not authorized to see. By searching for a child group they have permission to view, the system incorrectly returns the full details of the parent group in the response, leading to the disclosure of sensitive group attributes and configuration.
๐@cveNotify
A flaw was found in the group search functionality of the Keycloak server's administrative API. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAP) v2 is enabled, a delegated administrator can bypass access restrictions to view parent groups they are not authorized to see. By searching for a child group they have permission to view, the system incorrectly returns the full details of the parent group in the response, leading to the disclosure of sensitive group attributes and configuration.
๐@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-15945 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
๐จ CVE-2026-15943
A flaw was found in the Keycloak keycloak-services component, which handles the management of identity providers. The issue occurs when a delegated administrator updates an OIDC identity provider using a masked client secret sentinel value. Due to improper validation, Keycloak reuses the existing real secret even if security-sensitive fields like the token URL have been changed, allowing an attacker to redirect and capture the secret.
๐@cveNotify
A flaw was found in the Keycloak keycloak-services component, which handles the management of identity providers. The issue occurs when a delegated administrator updates an OIDC identity provider using a masked client secret sentinel value. Due to improper validation, Keycloak reuses the existing real secret even if security-sensitive fields like the token URL have been changed, allowing an attacker to redirect and capture the secret.
๐@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-15943 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
๐จ CVE-2026-16072
A flaw was found in the organization management component of Keycloak. A delegated administrator with permission to manage organizations can create an invitation for a non-existent email address and then retrieve the secret registration link directly through the application programming interface. By using this link, the administrator can create new user accounts and add them to the organization without having the required user management permissions or access to the invited email account. This allows an administrator to bypass security boundaries and add unauthorized members to an organization.
๐@cveNotify
A flaw was found in the organization management component of Keycloak. A delegated administrator with permission to manage organizations can create an invitation for a non-existent email address and then retrieve the secret registration link directly through the application programming interface. By using this link, the administrator can create new user accounts and add them to the organization without having the required user management permissions or access to the invited email account. This allows an administrator to bypass security boundaries and add unauthorized members to an organization.
๐@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-16072 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App
๐จ CVE-2026-16089
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue occurs because OAuth 2.0 authorization codes are not properly bound to the client that originally requested them. An attacker who can intercept an authorization code can modify it to be redeemed by their own client, potentially allowing them to obtain access tokens for a victim's identity.
๐@cveNotify
A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue occurs because OAuth 2.0 authorization codes are not properly bound to the client that originally requested them. An attacker who can intercept an authorization code can modify it to be redeemed by their own client, potentially allowing them to obtain access tokens for a victim's identity.
๐@cveNotify
Redhat
CVE-2026-16089 - Red Hat Customer Portal
CVE Details App