🚨 CVE-2026-15149
The WP Hotel Booking WordPress plugin before 2.3.3 does not ensure that room quantities and the resulting order total are non-negative when placing a booking, and relies on client-controlled cart data, allowing unauthenticated users to create confirmed reservations for free or at an arbitrarily reduced price.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-15208
The RegistrationMagic WordPress plugin before 6.0.9.5 does not compare the verified PayPal capture's amount, currency, payee, or prior use against the registration it is finalising: its server-side check only confirms the capture status is COMPLETED. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore finalise an expensive paid registration with any genuinely-completed low-value capture, and replay a single capture across unlimited registrations because captures are not de-duplicated.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-15256
The Ninja Forms WordPress plugin before 3.14.10 does not prevent user-supplied query-string input, used to pre-populate a form field's default value, from being processed as a shortcode, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes registered on the site when a form so configured is embedded on a public page.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-16067
The Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce (Pro) WordPress plugin before 5.0.3 does not validate the ticket price on the server during its native (non-WooCommerce) checkout, trusting the per-ticket price supplied by the client instead of re-deriving the event's configured price. This allows unauthenticated users to book paid event tickets for free, obtaining completed bookings and valid tickets at no cost.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-16619
The miniOrange 2FA WordPress plugin before 6.2.8 does not correctly limit the number of second-factor verification attempts, tracking them against a client-supplied identifier that is reissued on every login, allowing an attacker who already knows a user's password to guess the one-time code without limit and take over the account.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-16620
The WPC Name Your Price for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.2.5 does not enforce its server-side price allowlist for products configured in "Select" price mode, allowing an unauthenticated visitor to add such a product to the cart at an arbitrary value below the merchant-defined allowed prices and commit a real order at that price (revenue loss / underpriced orders). This is a distinct, unfixed vector from CVE-2025-12115, whose 2.2.0 fix only addressed applying a custom price to products where Name Your Price is disabled and left the Select-mode allowlist unenforced through 2.2.4.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-19064
A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Online Examination & Learning Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /view.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in authorization bypass. The attack can be launched remotely.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-19169
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Contextual Tasks in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to perform privilege escalation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-19170
Use after free in WebGL in Google Chrome on Android prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-19171
Use after free in Media in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-19172
Use after free in Views in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-19173
Out of bounds write in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-19174
Integer overflow in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-19176
Use after free in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-19177
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-48076
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. The new-client booking flow in versions 1.0.1 and prior consists of three calls: `bootstrap-challenge` (returns a 16-bit PoW challenge with `difficulty=4` leading hex zeroes), `bootstrap-verify` (validates the PoW and issues a Bearer booking access token), and `create-new-client` (consumes the token and creates the tunnel and first appointment). The token correctly binds to `tenantId`, `tunnelId`, `clientPublicKey`, and `emailHash`, but never to `channelId`. The `bootstrap-challenge` request schema does not even accept a `channelId`, and the issued token's payload contains no channel information. Independently, the service function `createNewClientWithAppointment` checks only `channel.archived = false`. The `channel.isPublic` check that protects `addAppointmentToTunnel` is missing in the new-client path. The combination means: an attacker completes the bootstrap flow normally (16-bit PoW, completes in well under one second on commodity hardware, no rate limiting beyond the throttle store), receives a valid booking access token, and then submits the `create-new-client` payload with `channelId` pointing to a private (`isPublic = false`) channel. The booking lands as `CONFIRMED` if the target channel has `requiresConfirmation = false` (the default), otherwise as `NEW`. The patient-facing UI does not list private channels in its picker (`/api/public/channels` correctly filters `isPublic = true`), so the channel ID must be obtained out of band. The companion finding V-10 (schedule endpoint discloses private channels) provides exactly that: a single unauthenticated GET reveals every private channel ID for any tenant. V-10 plus V-11 together make private channels fully reachable to anonymous attackers. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-48081
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, a TENANT_ADMIN can store `javascript:` URLs in the tenant `links` configuration (`website`, `imprint`, `privacyStatement`). These values are returned to the patient-facing landing page via `/api/public`, hydrated into the SvelteKit Button component, and rendered as `<a href="javascript:...">` elements without URL-scheme filtering. A patient who clicks any such link executes the attacker's JavaScript inside the patient browser origin, where patient form data is read before client-side encryption is applied. This breaks the project's central trust claim that the server is an untrusted relay and that administrators cannot read patient data. Patient-side encryption happens after form input, so JavaScript executing in the patient origin can read or alter the plaintext before encryption is performed. Version 1.0.2 fixes the issue.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-48086
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.0.2, a TENANT_ADMIN promotes themselves to platform-wide GLOBAL_ADMIN through a single PUT request. The role-update handler accepts the `GLOBAL_ADMIN` enum value from any tenant admin updating their own tenant's staff. No policy check enforces that "only an existing GLOBAL_ADMIN may grant GLOBAL_ADMIN", so the schema validation IS the authorization decision. After re-login, the JWT contains the new role and the formerly-tenant-scoped admin reaches every other tenant on the platform. On the hosted OpenReception service this is a scope-changed escalation: a single customer-side tenant administrator gains full platform-wide administrative control over all other tenants' configuration, users, staff records, operational metadata, and tenant lifecycle. Plaintext appointment contents remain subject to the E2E model unless chained with the staff-crypto poisoning issue (V-4) or with staff-passkey hijacking (V-1). On a single-tenant self-hosted deployment it is still a privilege escalation because TENANT_ADMIN should not be able to create new tenants, modify global configuration, or manage other administrators. The same handler also accepts updates targeted at any colleague within the tenant. A tenant admin can promote a separate collaborator account instead of themselves, leaving their own audit trail clean while the platform-wide breach happens through a separate identity. Version 1.0.2 fixes the issue.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-54717
Silverstripe CMS is an open source content management system. Prior to 6.2.1, page breadcrumbs in the CMS are vulnerable to cross-site scripting when viewed using the page list view, because page titles are rendered into the breadcrumb trail without being escaped. This issue is fixed in 6.2.1.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-64653
GitHub CLI (gh) is GitHub’s official command line tool. Prior to 2.97.0, some HTTP request URLs interpolate variable path components without percent encoding, allowing URL path metacharacters in attacker-controlled repository or resource values to make gh address a different API endpoint or resource than the user intended. This issue is fixed in version 2.97.0.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-67689
SQL Injection vulnerability in FineAdmin V1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the `field` and `order` parameters in paginated list endpoints

🎖@cveNotify