π¨ CVE-2025-1395
Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in Codriapp Innovation and Software Technologies Inc. HeyGarson allows Fuzzing for application mapping.
This issue affects HeyGarson: through 30012026.
NOTE: The vendor was contacted and it was learned that the product is not supported.
π@cveNotify
Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in Codriapp Innovation and Software Technologies Inc. HeyGarson allows Fuzzing for application mapping.
This issue affects HeyGarson: through 30012026.
NOTE: The vendor was contacted and it was learned that the product is not supported.
π@cveNotify
siberguvenlik.gov.tr
T.C. Siber GΓΌvenlik BaΕkanlΔ±ΔΔ±
TΓΌrkiye Cumhuriyeti CumhurbaΕkanlΔ±ΔΔ± Siber GΓΌvenlik BaΕkanlΔ±ΔΔ± resmi web sitesi.
π¨ CVE-2026-47991
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by an Improper Redirect (Open Redirect) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could construct a malicious URL that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a malicious link. Scope is changed.
π@cveNotify
Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by an Improper Redirect (Open Redirect) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could construct a malicious URL that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a malicious link. Scope is changed.
π@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security updates available for Adobe Experience Manager | APSB26-24
π¨ CVE-2026-48000
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Improper Redirect (Open Redirect) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could construct a malicious URL that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a malicious link. Scope is changed.
π@cveNotify
Adobe Commerce is affected by an Improper Redirect (Open Redirect) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could construct a malicious URL that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a malicious link. Scope is changed.
π@cveNotify
Adobe
Adobe Security Bulletin
Security Updates Available for Adobe Commerce | APSB26-73
π¨ CVE-2025-15674
The Passster WordPress plugin before 4.3.7 does not restrict low-privilege users holding the edit_posts capability from reading globally password-protected content through the WordPress core REST API when global protection is enabled, allowing any Contributor or higher to read the content of protected pages and posts without knowing the password.
π@cveNotify
The Passster WordPress plugin before 4.3.7 does not restrict low-privilege users holding the edit_posts capability from reading globally password-protected content through the WordPress core REST API when global protection is enabled, allowing any Contributor or higher to read the content of protected pages and posts without knowing the password.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
Content Protector (Passster) < 4.3.7 - Contributor+ Protected Content Disclosure via Core REST API
See details on Content Protector (Passster) < 4.3.7 - Contributor+ Protected Content Disclosure via Core REST API CVE 2025-15674. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-13342
The Security Optimizer WordPress plugin from 1.5.8 to 1.6.4 does not correctly validate requests to its optional IP-based login restriction feature, allowing the restriction to be bypassed so that unauthenticated requests from non-allowlisted IP addresses can reach and use the login form, defeating the access control the administrator configured.
π@cveNotify
The Security Optimizer WordPress plugin from 1.5.8 to 1.6.4 does not correctly validate requests to its optional IP-based login restriction feature, allowing the restriction to be bypassed so that unauthenticated requests from non-allowlisted IP addresses can reach and use the login form, defeating the access control the administrator configured.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
Security Optimizer β The All-In-One Protection Plugin < 1.6.5 - Login Access IP Allowlist Bypass via post_password
See details on Security Optimizer β The All-In-One Protection Plugin < 1.6.5 - Login Access IP Allowlist Bypass via post_password CVE 2026-13342. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-15149
The WP Hotel Booking WordPress plugin before 2.3.3 does not ensure that room quantities and the resulting order total are non-negative when placing a booking, and relies on client-controlled cart data, allowing unauthenticated users to create confirmed reservations for free or at an arbitrarily reduced price.
π@cveNotify
The WP Hotel Booking WordPress plugin before 2.3.3 does not ensure that room quantities and the resulting order total are non-negative when placing a booking, and relies on client-controlled cart data, allowing unauthenticated users to create confirmed reservations for free or at an arbitrarily reduced price.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
WP Hotel Booking < 2.3.3 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via Price Manipulation
See details on WP Hotel Booking < 2.3.3 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via Price Manipulation CVE 2026-15149. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-15208
The RegistrationMagic WordPress plugin before 6.0.9.5 does not compare the verified PayPal capture's amount, currency, payee, or prior use against the registration it is finalising: its server-side check only confirms the capture status is COMPLETED. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore finalise an expensive paid registration with any genuinely-completed low-value capture, and replay a single capture across unlimited registrations because captures are not de-duplicated.
π@cveNotify
The RegistrationMagic WordPress plugin before 6.0.9.5 does not compare the verified PayPal capture's amount, currency, payee, or prior use against the registration it is finalising: its server-side check only confirms the capture status is COMPLETED. An unauthenticated attacker can therefore finalise an expensive paid registration with any genuinely-completed low-value capture, and replay a single capture across unlimited registrations because captures are not de-duplicated.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
RegistrationMagic < 6.0.9.5 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via Amount-Blind PayPal Verification
See details on RegistrationMagic < 6.0.9.5 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via Amount-Blind PayPal Verification CVE 2026-15208. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-15256
The Ninja Forms WordPress plugin before 3.14.10 does not prevent user-supplied query-string input, used to pre-populate a form field's default value, from being processed as a shortcode, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes registered on the site when a form so configured is embedded on a public page.
π@cveNotify
The Ninja Forms WordPress plugin before 3.14.10 does not prevent user-supplied query-string input, used to pre-populate a form field's default value, from being processed as a shortcode, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes registered on the site when a form so configured is embedded on a public page.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
Ninja Forms < 3.14.10 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via Query-String Populated Field Default
See details on Ninja Forms < 3.14.10 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Shortcode Execution via Query-String Populated Field Default CVE 2026-15256. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-16067
The Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce (Pro) WordPress plugin before 5.0.3 does not validate the ticket price on the server during its native (non-WooCommerce) checkout, trusting the per-ticket price supplied by the client instead of re-deriving the event's configured price. This allows unauthenticated users to book paid event tickets for free, obtaining completed bookings and valid tickets at no cost.
π@cveNotify
The Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce (Pro) WordPress plugin before 5.0.3 does not validate the ticket price on the server during its native (non-WooCommerce) checkout, trusting the per-ticket price supplied by the client instead of re-deriving the event's configured price. This allows unauthenticated users to book paid event tickets for free, obtaining completed bookings and valid tickets at no cost.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce (Pro) < 5.0.3 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via Client-Controlled Ticket Price
See details on Event Booking Manager for WooCommerce (Pro) < 5.0.3 - Unauthenticated Payment Bypass via Client-Controlled Ticket Price CVE 2026-16067. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-16619
The miniOrange 2FA WordPress plugin before 6.2.8 does not correctly limit the number of second-factor verification attempts, tracking them against a client-supplied identifier that is reissued on every login, allowing an attacker who already knows a user's password to guess the one-time code without limit and take over the account.
π@cveNotify
The miniOrange 2FA WordPress plugin before 6.2.8 does not correctly limit the number of second-factor verification attempts, tracking them against a client-supplied identifier that is reissued on every login, allowing an attacker who already knows a user's password to guess the one-time code without limit and take over the account.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
miniOrange 2FA < 6.2.8 - 2FA Bypass via Unlimited Second-Factor Attempts
See details on miniOrange 2FA < 6.2.8 - 2FA Bypass via Unlimited Second-Factor Attempts CVE 2026-16619. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-16620
The WPC Name Your Price for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.2.5 does not enforce its server-side price allowlist for products configured in "Select" price mode, allowing an unauthenticated visitor to add such a product to the cart at an arbitrary value below the merchant-defined allowed prices and commit a real order at that price (revenue loss / underpriced orders). This is a distinct, unfixed vector from CVE-2025-12115, whose 2.2.0 fix only addressed applying a custom price to products where Name Your Price is disabled and left the Select-mode allowlist unenforced through 2.2.4.
π@cveNotify
The WPC Name Your Price for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.2.5 does not enforce its server-side price allowlist for products configured in "Select" price mode, allowing an unauthenticated visitor to add such a product to the cart at an arbitrary value below the merchant-defined allowed prices and commit a real order at that price (revenue loss / underpriced orders). This is a distinct, unfixed vector from CVE-2025-12115, whose 2.2.0 fix only addressed applying a custom price to products where Name Your Price is disabled and left the Select-mode allowlist unenforced through 2.2.4.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
WPC Name Your Price for WooCommerce < 2.2.5 - Unauthenticated Price Manipulation via Select Mode
See details on WPC Name Your Price for WooCommerce < 2.2.5 - Unauthenticated Price Manipulation via Select Mode CVE 2026-16620. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-19064
A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Online Examination & Learning Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /view.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in authorization bypass. The attack can be launched remotely.
π@cveNotify
A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Online Examination & Learning Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /view.php. The manipulation of the argument ID results in authorization bypass. The attack can be launched remotely.
π@cveNotify
Vulnerability Database
CVE-2026-19064 in Online Examination & Learning Management System
A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Online Examination & Learning Management System 1.0. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2026-19064.
π¨ CVE-2026-19169
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Contextual Tasks in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to perform privilege escalation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in Contextual Tasks in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to perform privilege escalation via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Chrome Releases
Stable Channel Update for Desktop
The Stable channel has been updated to 151.0.7922.108/.109 for Windows and Mac and 151.0.7922.108 for Linux, which will roll out over the c...
π¨ CVE-2026-19170
Use after free in WebGL in Google Chrome on Android prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
π@cveNotify
Use after free in WebGL in Google Chrome on Android prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
π@cveNotify
Chrome Releases
Stable Channel Update for Desktop
The Stable channel has been updated to 151.0.7922.108/.109 for Windows and Mac and 151.0.7922.108 for Linux, which will roll out over the c...
π¨ CVE-2026-19171
Use after free in Media in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Use after free in Media in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Chrome Releases
Stable Channel Update for Desktop
The Stable channel has been updated to 151.0.7922.108/.109 for Windows and Mac and 151.0.7922.108 for Linux, which will roll out over the c...
π¨ CVE-2026-19172
Use after free in Views in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
π@cveNotify
Use after free in Views in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)
π@cveNotify
Chrome Releases
Stable Channel Update for Desktop
The Stable channel has been updated to 151.0.7922.108/.109 for Windows and Mac and 151.0.7922.108 for Linux, which will roll out over the c...
π¨ CVE-2026-19173
Out of bounds write in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Out of bounds write in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Chrome Releases
Stable Channel Update for Desktop
The Stable channel has been updated to 151.0.7922.108/.109 for Windows and Mac and 151.0.7922.108 for Linux, which will roll out over the c...
π¨ CVE-2026-19174
Integer overflow in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Integer overflow in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Chrome Releases
Stable Channel Update for Desktop
The Stable channel has been updated to 151.0.7922.108/.109 for Windows and Mac and 151.0.7922.108 for Linux, which will roll out over the c...
π¨ CVE-2026-19176
Use after free in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Use after free in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Chrome Releases
Stable Channel Update for Desktop
The Stable channel has been updated to 151.0.7922.108/.109 for Windows and Mac and 151.0.7922.108 for Linux, which will roll out over the c...
π¨ CVE-2026-19177
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Insufficient validation of untrusted input in UI in Google Chrome prior to 151.0.7922.109 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)
π@cveNotify
Chrome Releases
Stable Channel Update for Desktop
The Stable channel has been updated to 151.0.7922.108/.109 for Windows and Mac and 151.0.7922.108 for Linux, which will roll out over the c...
π¨ CVE-2026-48076
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. The new-client booking flow in versions 1.0.1 and prior consists of three calls: `bootstrap-challenge` (returns a 16-bit PoW challenge with `difficulty=4` leading hex zeroes), `bootstrap-verify` (validates the PoW and issues a Bearer booking access token), and `create-new-client` (consumes the token and creates the tunnel and first appointment). The token correctly binds to `tenantId`, `tunnelId`, `clientPublicKey`, and `emailHash`, but never to `channelId`. The `bootstrap-challenge` request schema does not even accept a `channelId`, and the issued token's payload contains no channel information. Independently, the service function `createNewClientWithAppointment` checks only `channel.archived = false`. The `channel.isPublic` check that protects `addAppointmentToTunnel` is missing in the new-client path. The combination means: an attacker completes the bootstrap flow normally (16-bit PoW, completes in well under one second on commodity hardware, no rate limiting beyond the throttle store), receives a valid booking access token, and then submits the `create-new-client` payload with `channelId` pointing to a private (`isPublic = false`) channel. The booking lands as `CONFIRMED` if the target channel has `requiresConfirmation = false` (the default), otherwise as `NEW`. The patient-facing UI does not list private channels in its picker (`/api/public/channels` correctly filters `isPublic = true`), so the channel ID must be obtained out of band. The companion finding V-10 (schedule endpoint discloses private channels) provides exactly that: a single unauthenticated GET reveals every private channel ID for any tenant. V-10 plus V-11 together make private channels fully reachable to anonymous attackers. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available.
π@cveNotify
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. The new-client booking flow in versions 1.0.1 and prior consists of three calls: `bootstrap-challenge` (returns a 16-bit PoW challenge with `difficulty=4` leading hex zeroes), `bootstrap-verify` (validates the PoW and issues a Bearer booking access token), and `create-new-client` (consumes the token and creates the tunnel and first appointment). The token correctly binds to `tenantId`, `tunnelId`, `clientPublicKey`, and `emailHash`, but never to `channelId`. The `bootstrap-challenge` request schema does not even accept a `channelId`, and the issued token's payload contains no channel information. Independently, the service function `createNewClientWithAppointment` checks only `channel.archived = false`. The `channel.isPublic` check that protects `addAppointmentToTunnel` is missing in the new-client path. The combination means: an attacker completes the bootstrap flow normally (16-bit PoW, completes in well under one second on commodity hardware, no rate limiting beyond the throttle store), receives a valid booking access token, and then submits the `create-new-client` payload with `channelId` pointing to a private (`isPublic = false`) channel. The booking lands as `CONFIRMED` if the target channel has `requiresConfirmation = false` (the default), otherwise as `NEW`. The patient-facing UI does not list private channels in its picker (`/api/public/channels` correctly filters `isPublic = true`), so the channel ID must be obtained out of band. The companion finding V-10 (schedule endpoint discloses private channels) provides exactly that: a single unauthenticated GET reveals every private channel ID for any tenant. V-10 plus V-11 together make private channels fully reachable to anonymous attackers. As of time of publication, no known patched versions are available.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
bootstrap booking flow allows unauthenticated booking on isPublic=false channels
---
## Description
The new-client booking flow consists of three calls: `bootstrap-challenge` (returns a 16-bit PoW challenge with `difficulty=4` leading hex zeroes), `bootstrap-verify` (vali...
## Description
The new-client booking flow consists of three calls: `bootstrap-challenge` (returns a 16-bit PoW challenge with `difficulty=4` leading hex zeroes), `bootstrap-verify` (vali...