🚨 CVE-2026-16940
The Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 1.5.1 does not validate a user-supplied file path before deletion, allowing unauthenticated users to delete arbitrary files on the server (such as wp-config.php), which can lead to a full site takeover.
🎖@cveNotify
The Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 1.5.1 does not validate a user-supplied file path before deletion, allowing unauthenticated users to delete arbitrary files on the server (such as wp-config.php), which can lead to a full site takeover.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
Custom Fields for WooCommerce < 1.5.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Deletion via Path Traversal
See details on Custom Fields for WooCommerce < 1.5.1 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Deletion via Path Traversal CVE 2026-16940. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-16981
The DHL Shipping Germany for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 4.0.1 does not perform any authorization check (no capability, nonce, login, or ownership check) on one of its shipping-label download endpoints, so an unauthenticated attacker can enumerate sequential ids and download every stored shipping label, each containing the customer's full name, complete postal address, and order reference.
🎖@cveNotify
The DHL Shipping Germany for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 4.0.1 does not perform any authorization check (no capability, nonce, login, or ownership check) on one of its shipping-label download endpoints, so an unauthenticated attacker can enumerate sequential ids and download every stored shipping label, each containing the customer's full name, complete postal address, and order reference.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
DHL for WooCommerce < 4.0.1 - Unauthenticated Shipping Label Download via IDOR
See details on DHL for WooCommerce < 4.0.1 - Unauthenticated Shipping Label Download via IDOR CVE 2026-16981. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-66276
An authenticated attacker can craft a disposition frame with large or illegal ranges causing excessive CPU usage due to naive range handling, leading to denial of service.
This issue affects Apache Qpid Proton-J: through 0.34.1.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.35.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
An authenticated attacker can craft a disposition frame with large or illegal ranges causing excessive CPU usage due to naive range handling, leading to denial of service.
This issue affects Apache Qpid Proton-J: through 0.34.1.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.35.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-67553
An authenticated attacker could exceed the session flow control incoming window potentially leading to denial of service.
This issue affects Apache Qpid Proton-Dotnet: through 1.0.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.1.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
An authenticated attacker could exceed the session flow control incoming window potentially leading to denial of service.
This issue affects Apache Qpid Proton-Dotnet: through 1.0.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.1.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-67591
An authenticated attacker could exceed the session flow control incoming window potentially leading to denial of service.
This issue affects Apache Qpid ProtonJ2: through 1.1.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.2.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
An authenticated attacker could exceed the session flow control incoming window potentially leading to denial of service.
This issue affects Apache Qpid ProtonJ2: through 1.1.0.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 1.2.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-68075
An authenticated attacker could exceed the session flow control incoming window potentially leading to denial of service.
This issue affects Apache Qpid Broker-J: through 10.0.1.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.1.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
An authenticated attacker could exceed the session flow control incoming window potentially leading to denial of service.
This issue affects Apache Qpid Broker-J: through 10.0.1.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.1.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-68077
An authenticated attacker can craft a disposition frame with large or illegal ranges causing excessive CPU usage due to naive range handling, leading to denial of service.
This issue affects Apache Qpid Broker-J: through 10.0.1.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.1.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
An authenticated attacker can craft a disposition frame with large or illegal ranges causing excessive CPU usage due to naive range handling, leading to denial of service.
This issue affects Apache Qpid Broker-J: through 10.0.1.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 10.1.0, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-50749
Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer.
This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1.
Any authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing authorization check on the reject operation.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper Authorization vulnerability in Apache Answer.
This issue affects Apache Answer: through 2.0.1.
Any authenticated user can reject arbitrary pending edit-revisions without review permission due to a missing authorization check on the reject operation.
Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.0.2, which fixes the issue.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-70429
Jenkins 2.575 and earlier, LTS 2.568.1 and earlier handles case-insensitivity in user names and group names inconsistently, allowing attackers able to create new users or groups with names that case-insensitively match other characters to impersonate other users or be granted their permissions in some circumstances.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins 2.575 and earlier, LTS 2.568.1 and earlier handles case-insensitivity in user names and group names inconsistently, allowing attackers able to create new users or groups with names that case-insensitively match other characters to impersonate other users or be granted their permissions in some circumstances.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-08-05
Jenkins – an open source automation server which enables developers around the world to reliably build, test, and deploy their software
🚨 CVE-2026-70430
Jenkins 2.575 and earlier, LTS 2.568.1 and earlier does not restrict the types of objects that can be instantiated as part of the project naming strategy configuration, allowing attackers with Overall/Manage permission to instantiate arbitrary types related to configuration, including those intended for configuration only by administrators.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins 2.575 and earlier, LTS 2.568.1 and earlier does not restrict the types of objects that can be instantiated as part of the project naming strategy configuration, allowing attackers with Overall/Manage permission to instantiate arbitrary types related to configuration, including those intended for configuration only by administrators.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-08-05
Jenkins – an open source automation server which enables developers around the world to reliably build, test, and deploy their software
🚨 CVE-2026-70433
Missing permission checks in Jenkins HCL AppScan Plugin 1.8.3 and earlier allow attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins.
🎖@cveNotify
Missing permission checks in Jenkins HCL AppScan Plugin 1.8.3 and earlier allow attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-08-05
Jenkins – an open source automation server which enables developers around the world to reliably build, test, and deploy their software
🚨 CVE-2026-70434
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins SCM-Manager Plugin 1.11.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
🎖@cveNotify
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins SCM-Manager Plugin 1.11.1 and earlier allows attackers to connect to an attacker-specified URL using attacker-specified credentials IDs obtained through another method, capturing credentials stored in Jenkins.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-08-05
Jenkins – an open source automation server which enables developers around the world to reliably build, test, and deploy their software
🚨 CVE-2026-70436
Jenkins External Workspace Manager Plugin 1.4.1 and earlier does not perform a permission check (1.4.0 and earlier) or performs an improper permission check (1.4.1) when providing access to externally-managed workspaces through the workspace browser, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to read files in workspaces they are not authorized to access.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins External Workspace Manager Plugin 1.4.1 and earlier does not perform a permission check (1.4.0 and earlier) or performs an improper permission check (1.4.1) when providing access to externally-managed workspaces through the workspace browser, allowing attackers with Overall/Read permission to read files in workspaces they are not authorized to access.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-08-05
Jenkins – an open source automation server which enables developers around the world to reliably build, test, and deploy their software
🚨 CVE-2026-70437
Jenkins Webhook Secret Credentials Provider Plugin 16.v0cfa_f0215cf5 and earlier does not use a constant-time comparison function when checking whether the provided and expected webhook bearer token are equal, potentially allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook bearer token.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins Webhook Secret Credentials Provider Plugin 16.v0cfa_f0215cf5 and earlier does not use a constant-time comparison function when checking whether the provided and expected webhook bearer token are equal, potentially allowing attackers to use statistical methods to obtain a valid webhook bearer token.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-08-05
Jenkins – an open source automation server which enables developers around the world to reliably build, test, and deploy their software
🚨 CVE-2026-70438
A missing permission check in Jenkins Parameterized Remote Trigger Plugin 3.2.2 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins.
🎖@cveNotify
A missing permission check in Jenkins Parameterized Remote Trigger Plugin 3.2.2 and earlier allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-08-05
Jenkins – an open source automation server which enables developers around the world to reliably build, test, and deploy their software
🚨 CVE-2026-70445
Missing permission checks in Jenkins Sauce OnDemand Plugin 2.2.0 and earlier allow attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins.
🎖@cveNotify
Missing permission checks in Jenkins Sauce OnDemand Plugin 2.2.0 and earlier allow attackers with Overall/Read permission to enumerate credentials IDs of credentials stored in Jenkins.
🎖@cveNotify
Jenkins Security Advisory 2026-08-05
Jenkins – an open source automation server which enables developers around the world to reliably build, test, and deploy their software
🚨 CVE-2026-18953
Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory in the get_resource tool in Amazon awslabs.aws-transform-mcp-server 0.1.0 through 0.1.4 might allow a context-dependent actor to write arbitrary files outside the intended working directory via the savePath parameter.
To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.1.5 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory in the get_resource tool in Amazon awslabs.aws-transform-mcp-server 0.1.0 through 0.1.4 might allow a context-dependent actor to write arbitrary files outside the intended working directory via the savePath parameter.
To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 0.1.5 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-18958
A vulnerability was detected in imranrisal-dev Student-Management-System 18ea7904c339e0c7b0234724a79c939ce6191def/a8d43a29aaf267e7ca97171d6dbb44057bcd7f8c. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file loginCheckTest.php of the component Login. The manipulation of the argument username/password results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability was detected in imranrisal-dev Student-Management-System 18ea7904c339e0c7b0234724a79c939ce6191def/a8d43a29aaf267e7ca97171d6dbb44057bcd7f8c. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file loginCheckTest.php of the component Login. The manipulation of the argument username/password results in sql injection. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Student-Management-System存在SQL注入 · Issue #1 · winterbergnurullah551-sketch/sql-cves
仓库:https://github.com/imranrisal-dev/Student-Management-System 发现 严重程度:高 影响组件: loginCheckTest.php 登录查询直接拼接用户名和密码,可未认证绕过学生/员工登录 严重程度:危急 影响类型:SQL 注入、认证绕过、学生/员工账户接管、敏感数据泄露 影响范围:未认证远程攻击者 证据: _extracted...
🚨 CVE-2026-55524
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. In versions prior to 1.6.58, the web_crawl tool performs its SSRF check only on the initially supplied URL, allowing the protection to be bypassed so the tool connects to attacker-chosen internal destinations. The check resolves the hostname once with socket.gethostbyname and rejects private/loopback/link-local results, but then passes the URL to a fetcher using httpx.Client(follow_redirects=True) (or urllib.request.urlopen when httpx is absent, which also follows redirects) that re-resolves the hostname at connect time with no further validation. This validate-here/fetch-there gap is exploitable through both HTTP redirects and DNS rebinding. If an attacker can influence URLs passed to web_crawl(), directly or through an agent/tool workflow, they can cause the PraisonAI host to fetch loopback, private-network, or cloud metadata endpoints reachable from that host, with the response body returned in the web_crawl() result. This issue has been fixed in version 1.6.58.
🎖@cveNotify
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. In versions prior to 1.6.58, the web_crawl tool performs its SSRF check only on the initially supplied URL, allowing the protection to be bypassed so the tool connects to attacker-chosen internal destinations. The check resolves the hostname once with socket.gethostbyname and rejects private/loopback/link-local results, but then passes the URL to a fetcher using httpx.Client(follow_redirects=True) (or urllib.request.urlopen when httpx is absent, which also follows redirects) that re-resolves the hostname at connect time with no further validation. This validate-here/fetch-there gap is exploitable through both HTTP redirects and DNS rebinding. If an attacker can influence URLs passed to web_crawl(), directly or through an agent/tool workflow, they can cause the PraisonAI host to fetch loopback, private-network, or cloud metadata endpoints reachable from that host, with the response body returned in the web_crawl() result. This issue has been fixed in version 1.6.58.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
SSRF in web_crawl tool via redirect-following and DNS rebinding (validate-then-fetch gap)
The web_crawl tool performs its SSRF check only on the initial URL: it resolves the hostname once
with socket.gethostbyname and rejects private/loopback/link-local results. It then passes the UR...
with socket.gethostbyname and rejects private/loopback/link-local results. It then passes the UR...
🚨 CVE-2026-68746
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') vulnerability in livebook-dev livebook allows an unauthenticated network client to obtain full access to a Livebook server that enforces identity through Livebook Teams.
A Livebook Agent or App Server connected to Livebook Teams caches the identifier of the deployment group it belongs to, and resolves that identifier against a locally cached list of deployment groups on every request in order to decide whether Teams identity enforcement is active. Livebook.Hubs.TeamClient.handle_call/3 in lib/livebook/hubs/team_client.ex does not distinguish a deployment group that could not be resolved from one that was resolved with identity enforcement switched off: the clause matches only the case where a group was found with enforcement enabled, and falls through to a catch-all that reports enforcement as switched off for everything else. The two neighbouring functions that decide user and application access resolve the same identifier and treat the same unresolved result as a denial.
When the identity status is reported as switched off, Livebook.ZTA.LivebookTeams.authenticate/3 in lib/livebook/zta/livebook_teams.ex returns empty identity metadata and allows the request to continue instead of halting it. LivebookWeb.UserPlug.build_current_user/3 merges that empty metadata into a newly built user, whose access type defaults to full access, and LivebookWeb.AuthPlug.authorized?/1 grants access to any user holding full access.
The cached identifier becomes unresolvable when the deployment group it refers to is deleted while the agent is not connected to receive the change, most concretely when a deployment group is deleted during the window in which an agent is disconnected or reconnecting. The client removes the group from its cached list without clearing the identifier that refers to it. Any client able to reach the affected server over the network is then granted the same access as a fully privileged member of the organisation, including the ability to read notebooks and configured secrets, execute code on the server's runtime, and disrupt its operation.
This issue affects livebook: from 0.19.7 before 0.19.9.
🎖@cveNotify
Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open') vulnerability in livebook-dev livebook allows an unauthenticated network client to obtain full access to a Livebook server that enforces identity through Livebook Teams.
A Livebook Agent or App Server connected to Livebook Teams caches the identifier of the deployment group it belongs to, and resolves that identifier against a locally cached list of deployment groups on every request in order to decide whether Teams identity enforcement is active. Livebook.Hubs.TeamClient.handle_call/3 in lib/livebook/hubs/team_client.ex does not distinguish a deployment group that could not be resolved from one that was resolved with identity enforcement switched off: the clause matches only the case where a group was found with enforcement enabled, and falls through to a catch-all that reports enforcement as switched off for everything else. The two neighbouring functions that decide user and application access resolve the same identifier and treat the same unresolved result as a denial.
When the identity status is reported as switched off, Livebook.ZTA.LivebookTeams.authenticate/3 in lib/livebook/zta/livebook_teams.ex returns empty identity metadata and allows the request to continue instead of halting it. LivebookWeb.UserPlug.build_current_user/3 merges that empty metadata into a newly built user, whose access type defaults to full access, and LivebookWeb.AuthPlug.authorized?/1 grants access to any user holding full access.
The cached identifier becomes unresolvable when the deployment group it refers to is deleted while the agent is not connected to receive the change, most concretely when a deployment group is deleted during the window in which an agent is disconnected or reconnecting. The client removes the group from its cached list without clearing the identifier that refers to it. Any client able to reach the affected server over the network is then granted the same access as a fully privileged member of the organisation, including the ability to read notebooks and configured secrets, execute code on the server's runtime, and disrupt its operation.
This issue affects livebook: from 0.19.7 before 0.19.9.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-34966
Gitea prior to 1.27.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to bypass SSRF protections by exploiting HTTP fetch operations in migration and OAuth avatar code paths that use Go's default http.Get without a custom DialContext. Attackers can supply arbitrary URLs through release asset download URLs, pull-request patch URLs, or OAuth avatar endpoints to reach internal services, cloud instance-metadata endpoints, or read local files such as the application configuration containing database credentials and signing secrets, with exfiltrated content persisted as migration release assets for later retrieval.
🎖@cveNotify
Gitea prior to 1.27.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to bypass SSRF protections by exploiting HTTP fetch operations in migration and OAuth avatar code paths that use Go's default http.Get without a custom DialContext. Attackers can supply arbitrary URLs through release asset download URLs, pull-request patch URLs, or OAuth avatar endpoints to reach internal services, cloud instance-metadata endpoints, or read local files such as the application configuration containing database credentials and signing secrets, with exfiltrated content persisted as migration release assets for later retrieval.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - go-gitea/gitea: Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting…
Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD - go-gitea/gitea