🚨 CVE-2025-15544
A cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada device adoption process. During adoption, authentication credentials associated
with site management are transmitted using a weak hashing algorithm that does
not provide sufficient protection.
An attacker who
successfully intercepts adoption-related authentication traffic may be able to
recover valid credentials and gain unauthorized access to managed devices or
controller-managed environments.
🎖@cveNotify
A cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada device adoption process. During adoption, authentication credentials associated
with site management are transmitted using a weak hashing algorithm that does
not provide sufficient protection.
An attacker who
successfully intercepts adoption-related authentication traffic may be able to
recover valid credentials and gain unauthorized access to managed devices or
controller-managed environments.
🎖@cveNotify
Omadanetworks
Download Center | TP-Link
TP Link - Download Center
🚨 CVE-2025-15627
A cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada adoption protocol.
The protocol relies on hard-coded cryptographic keys to establish trust and
protect authentication exchanges between controllers and managed devices during
device adoption.
An attacker may
be able to impersonate trusted controllers or managed devices and gain access
to sensitive adoption-related communications.
🎖@cveNotify
A cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada adoption protocol.
The protocol relies on hard-coded cryptographic keys to establish trust and
protect authentication exchanges between controllers and managed devices during
device adoption.
An attacker may
be able to impersonate trusted controllers or managed devices and gain access
to sensitive adoption-related communications.
🎖@cveNotify
Omadanetworks
Download Center | TP-Link
TP Link - Download Center
🚨 CVE-2025-15628
Affected
Omada devices rely on embedded certificates that are shared across deployments
to establish trust between controllers and managed devices.
An attacker
who obtains the embedded certificates may be able to impersonate trusted
controllers or devices and intercept affected communications.
🎖@cveNotify
Affected
Omada devices rely on embedded certificates that are shared across deployments
to establish trust between controllers and managed devices.
An attacker
who obtains the embedded certificates may be able to impersonate trusted
controllers or devices and intercept affected communications.
🎖@cveNotify
Omadanetworks
Download Center | TP-Link
TP Link - Download Center
🚨 CVE-2025-15629
A cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada adoption protocol where session encryption keys
used to protect communications between controllers and managed devices may be
predictable due to insufficient entropy in session key generation.
An attacker
who successfully intercepts adoption-related communications may be able to recover
session encryption keys and decrypt affected communications.
🎖@cveNotify
A cryptographic
weakness exists in the Omada adoption protocol where session encryption keys
used to protect communications between controllers and managed devices may be
predictable due to insufficient entropy in session key generation.
An attacker
who successfully intercepts adoption-related communications may be able to recover
session encryption keys and decrypt affected communications.
🎖@cveNotify
Omadanetworks
Download Center | TP-Link
TP Link - Download Center
🚨 CVE-2025-15630
A race
condition exists in the cloud-based Omada device adoption process when an
attacker may be able to interact with the adoption workflow before a legitimate
device completes registration, resulting in provisioning information being
delivered to an attacker.
Successful
exploitation may allow disclosure of provisioning information intended for a
legitimate device.
🎖@cveNotify
A race
condition exists in the cloud-based Omada device adoption process when an
attacker may be able to interact with the adoption workflow before a legitimate
device completes registration, resulting in provisioning information being
delivered to an attacker.
Successful
exploitation may allow disclosure of provisioning information intended for a
legitimate device.
🎖@cveNotify
Omadanetworks
Download Center | TP-Link
TP Link - Download Center
🚨 CVE-2025-15631
A
cryptographic weakness exists in affected Omada devices where site credentials
are protected using a legacy hashing algorithm that does not provide sufficient
protection.
An attacker
who obtains access to stored credential data may be able to recover valid credentials
to gain unauthorized access to affected devices or management environments.
🎖@cveNotify
A
cryptographic weakness exists in affected Omada devices where site credentials
are protected using a legacy hashing algorithm that does not provide sufficient
protection.
An attacker
who obtains access to stored credential data may be able to recover valid credentials
to gain unauthorized access to affected devices or management environments.
🎖@cveNotify
Omadanetworks
Download Center | TP-Link
TP Link - Download Center
🚨 CVE-2026-10849
The hawkBit device management client in subsys/mgmt/hawkbit accumulates the body of an HTTP response from the update server into a heap buffer in response_json_cb() (subsys/mgmt/hawkbit/hawkbit.c). The buffer is sized to hold the received body bytes but reserves no space for a terminating NUL. When the full response has arrived, the code writes response_data[downloaded_size] = '\0' — and whenever the accumulated body length equals the allocation, that terminator lands one byte past the end of the heap object (a heap-based out-of-bounds write, CWE-122 / CWE-787).
The body length and fragmentation are taken directly from the parsed HTTP response (rsp->body_frag_start / rsp->body_frag_len) and are fully controlled by the remote hawkBit server, which chooses its own response length. The precise trigger depends on how the buffer grows, and both forms are remotely reachable. Since v4.0.0 the reallocation is sized to exactly downloaded_size + body_len, so any response body larger than the 1100-byte initial buffer makes the out-of-bounds write deterministic; such response sizes are normal for hawkBit deployment metadata. Before v4.0.0 the buffer grew by doubling and the growth check ((downloaded_size + body_len) > response_buffer_size) is false at equality, so a response body whose length is exactly the current allocation — 1100 bytes with the default initial buffer — skips the reallocation entirely and writes the terminator at response_data[1100] of an 1100-byte object. The HTTP length-mismatch check does not catch this, because the declared and received lengths genuinely agree. Either form is reachable by a malicious, compromised, or man-in-the-middle update server (TLS is optional and, when enabled, does not protect against a hostile server), with no authentication of response content and no client-side length cap protecting the write.
The out-of-bounds write is a fixed single NUL byte immediately following the allocation, corrupting adjacent allocator metadata or the next allocation. The practical impact is heap corruption leading to denial of service (fault on a subsequent allocation or free), with the bounded, allocator-dependent possibility of further corruption. The fix sizes the buffer to the body length plus one and copies with memcpy, ensuring the terminator always lands within the allocation.
🎖@cveNotify
The hawkBit device management client in subsys/mgmt/hawkbit accumulates the body of an HTTP response from the update server into a heap buffer in response_json_cb() (subsys/mgmt/hawkbit/hawkbit.c). The buffer is sized to hold the received body bytes but reserves no space for a terminating NUL. When the full response has arrived, the code writes response_data[downloaded_size] = '\0' — and whenever the accumulated body length equals the allocation, that terminator lands one byte past the end of the heap object (a heap-based out-of-bounds write, CWE-122 / CWE-787).
The body length and fragmentation are taken directly from the parsed HTTP response (rsp->body_frag_start / rsp->body_frag_len) and are fully controlled by the remote hawkBit server, which chooses its own response length. The precise trigger depends on how the buffer grows, and both forms are remotely reachable. Since v4.0.0 the reallocation is sized to exactly downloaded_size + body_len, so any response body larger than the 1100-byte initial buffer makes the out-of-bounds write deterministic; such response sizes are normal for hawkBit deployment metadata. Before v4.0.0 the buffer grew by doubling and the growth check ((downloaded_size + body_len) > response_buffer_size) is false at equality, so a response body whose length is exactly the current allocation — 1100 bytes with the default initial buffer — skips the reallocation entirely and writes the terminator at response_data[1100] of an 1100-byte object. The HTTP length-mismatch check does not catch this, because the declared and received lengths genuinely agree. Either form is reachable by a malicious, compromised, or man-in-the-middle update server (TLS is optional and, when enabled, does not protect against a hostile server), with no authentication of response content and no client-side length cap protecting the write.
The out-of-bounds write is a fixed single NUL byte immediately following the allocation, corrupting adjacent allocator metadata or the next allocation. The practical impact is heap corruption leading to denial of service (fault on a subsequent allocation or free), with the bounded, allocator-dependent possibility of further corruption. The fix sizes the buffer to the body length plus one and copies with memcpy, ensuring the terminator always lands within the allocation.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
mgmt: hawkbit: fix of by one error · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr@59d7ab5
Make sure that the the added `/0`
char has enough space at the end.
Signed-off-by: Fin Maaß <f.maass@vogl-electronic.com>
char has enough space at the end.
Signed-off-by: Fin Maaß <f.maass@vogl-electronic.com>
🚨 CVE-2026-65802
External control of file name or path in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
External control of file name or path in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-65804
Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66310
External control of file name or path in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.
🎖@cveNotify
External control of file name or path in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66311
Missing authorization in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally.
🎖@cveNotify
Missing authorization in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66312
Buffer over-read in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Buffer over-read in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66313
Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally.
🎖@cveNotify
Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering locally.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66314
Time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Time-of-check time-of-use (toctou) race condition in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66315
Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66316
Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66317
Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66318
Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66321
Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66322
Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Origin validation error in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66325
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
🎖@cveNotify
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
🎖@cveNotify