🚨 CVE-2026-10547
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 does not properly validate ownership in the deprecated POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices endpoint, allowing an authenticated user to inject arbitrary graph data into a shared cache for any flow. This may result in cross-user cache pollution, unauthorized workflow execution, or denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 does not properly validate ownership in the deprecated POST /api/v1/build/{flow_id}/vertices endpoint, allowing an authenticated user to inject arbitrary graph data into a shared cache for any flow. This may result in cross-user cache pollution, unauthorized workflow execution, or denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in custom component validation and trusted code enforcement
Langflow OSS supports custom Python components and validation of component code for component development workflows. Weaknesses in custom component execution paths, validation endpoints, and trusted template enforcement could allow authenticated users to…
🚨 CVE-2026-17624
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of module imports.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of module imports.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component…
Langflow OSS supports Agentic Assistant generated components and user-supplied custom Python components for workflow development. Weaknesses in code security scanning, runtime validation, custom component execution paths, and trusted code enforcement could…
🚨 CVE-2026-17632
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of Python code during AST-based security scanning.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of Python code during AST-based security scanning.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component…
Langflow OSS supports Agentic Assistant generated components and user-supplied custom Python components for workflow development. Weaknesses in code security scanning, runtime validation, custom component execution paths, and trusted code enforcement could…
🚨 CVE-2026-17633
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to code injection.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to code injection.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component…
Langflow OSS supports Agentic Assistant generated components and user-supplied custom Python components for workflow development. Weaknesses in code security scanning, runtime validation, custom component execution paths, and trusted code enforcement could…
🚨 CVE-2026-18485
There is a local privilege escalation vulnerability recently discovered in the NI-PAL kernel driver. This may allow a local, authenticated user to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects NI-PAL 26.3.1 and prior versions running on Microsoft Windows.
🎖@cveNotify
There is a local privilege escalation vulnerability recently discovered in the NI-PAL kernel driver. This may allow a local, authenticated user to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects NI-PAL 26.3.1 and prior versions running on Microsoft Windows.
🎖@cveNotify
Ni
Local Privilege Escalation in NI-PAL
There is a local privilege escalation vulnerability recently discovered in the NI-PAL kernel driver. This may allow a local, authenticated user to escalate privileges and execute arbitrary code. This vulnerability affects NI-PAL 26.3.1 and prior versions…
🚨 CVE-2026-48168
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. In versions prior to 4.6.40, the bundled Claude GitHub Actions workflow is vulnerable to command injection because it embeds an attacker-controlled pull request branch name into a Bash run: block without quoting or validation. Additionally, the workflow allows any @claude comment to trigger the job regardless of whether the commenter is a trusted collaborator. An outside contributor can open a pull request from a fork whose branch name contains shell metacharacters and comment @claude, causing Bash to execute arbitrary shell code in the GitHub Actions runner. Because these commands run in a job holding a GitHub App token with write permissions, OIDC access, and gh/git access, the injection can be chained through $GITHUB_PATH to compromise later privileged steps, enabling repository writes, pull request and issue manipulation, or OIDC-token abuse. This issue has been fixed in version 4.6.40.
🎖@cveNotify
PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. In versions prior to 4.6.40, the bundled Claude GitHub Actions workflow is vulnerable to command injection because it embeds an attacker-controlled pull request branch name into a Bash run: block without quoting or validation. Additionally, the workflow allows any @claude comment to trigger the job regardless of whether the commenter is a trusted collaborator. An outside contributor can open a pull request from a fork whose branch name contains shell metacharacters and comment @claude, causing Bash to execute arbitrary shell code in the GitHub Actions runner. Because these commands run in a job holding a GitHub App token with write permissions, OIDC access, and gh/git access, the injection can be chained through $GITHUB_PATH to compromise later privileged steps, enabling repository writes, pull request and issue manipulation, or OIDC-token abuse. This issue has been fixed in version 4.6.40.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
refactor: harden input validation and access controls · MervinPraison/PraisonAI@179cab0
Batch security hardening across agents, wrapper, and platform:
sandbox AST checks, SSRF URL validation, MCP path containment,
fail-closed call-server auth, write_file workspace bounds, platform
IDO...
sandbox AST checks, SSRF URL validation, MCP path containment,
fail-closed call-server auth, write_file workspace bounds, platform
IDO...
🚨 CVE-2026-70612
Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. Prior to 39.8.8, 40.9.0, 41.2.1, and 42.0.0-beta.3, requests to open external protocol URLs from web content did not take iframe sandbox restrictions into account, so a sandboxed iframe could cause an OS-registered external application to be launched. The frame sandbox state was also not made available to the app permission handlers, affecting apps that render untrusted content in sandboxed iframes and grant the openExternal permission by default when no setPermissionRequestHandler is installed. This issue is fixed in 39.8.8, 40.9.0, 41.2.1, and 42.0.0-beta.3.
🎖@cveNotify
Electron is a framework for writing cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. Prior to 39.8.8, 40.9.0, 41.2.1, and 42.0.0-beta.3, requests to open external protocol URLs from web content did not take iframe sandbox restrictions into account, so a sandboxed iframe could cause an OS-registered external application to be launched. The frame sandbox state was also not made available to the app permission handlers, affecting apps that render untrusted content in sandboxed iframes and grant the openExternal permission by default when no setPermissionRequestHandler is installed. This issue is fixed in 39.8.8, 40.9.0, 41.2.1, and 42.0.0-beta.3.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: respect iframe sandbox flags for external protocol navigation (#… · electron/electron@08b9d0a
…50964)
Co-authored-by: trop[bot] <37223003+trop[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sam Attard <sattard@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: trop[bot] <37223003+trop[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Sam Attard <sattard@anthropic.com>
🚨 CVE-2026-7658
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 does not properly validate the username field, allowing attackers to inject path traversal sequences and bypass containment checks. This enables multiple severe impacts, including arbitrary directory deletion, cross-tenant data destruction, and JWT signing key deletion leading to session invalidation.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 does not properly validate the username field, allowing attackers to inject path traversal sequences and bypass containment checks. This enables multiple severe impacts, including arbitrary directory deletion, cross-tenant data destruction, and JWT signing key deletion leading to session invalidation.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in custom component validation and trusted code enforcement
Langflow OSS supports custom Python components and validation of component code for component development workflows. Weaknesses in custom component execution paths, validation endpoints, and trusted template enforcement could allow authenticated users to…
🚨 CVE-2026-7869
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 is vulnerable to Path Traversal in the Knowledge Bases API (`POST /api/v1/knowledge_bases`). This occurs because user-supplied knowledge base names are used directly to create file paths without proper sanitization or containment checks. An authenticated attacker can exploit this flaw to create directories and write files anywhere on the server's filesystem.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 is vulnerable to Path Traversal in the Knowledge Bases API (`POST /api/v1/knowledge_bases`). This occurs because user-supplied knowledge base names are used directly to create file paths without proper sanitization or containment checks. An authenticated attacker can exploit this flaw to create directories and write files anywhere on the server's filesystem.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in custom component validation and trusted code enforcement
Langflow OSS supports custom Python components and validation of component code for component development workflows. Weaknesses in custom component execution paths, validation endpoints, and trusted template enforcement could allow authenticated users to…
🚨 CVE-2026-8182
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 installations allow anyone on the internet to execute arbitrary code on the server without any credentials via 2 HTTP requests.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 installations allow anyone on the internet to execute arbitrary code on the server without any credentials via 2 HTTP requests.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component…
Langflow OSS supports Agentic Assistant generated components and user-supplied custom Python components for workflow development. Weaknesses in code security scanning, runtime validation, custom component execution paths, and trusted code enforcement could…
🚨 CVE-2026-8183
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot " sequences ( /.. /) to v i ew arbitrary files on the system.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote attacker to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request containing "dot dot " sequences ( /.. /) to v i ew arbitrary files on the system.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in custom component validation and trusted code enforcement
Langflow OSS supports custom Python components and validation of component code for component development workflows. Weaknesses in custom component execution paths, validation endpoints, and trusted template enforcement could allow authenticated users to…
🚨 CVE-2026-8470
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 use Python's non-cryptographic random module for generating Fernet encryption keys from user secrets under 32 characters. The deterministic Mersenne Twister PRNG produces identical keys for identical seeds, allowing attackers to reproduce encryption keys and decrypt stored API keys and authentication tokens.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, 1.0.0 through 1.10.3, and 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 use Python's non-cryptographic random module for generating Fernet encryption keys from user secrets under 32 characters. The deterministic Mersenne Twister PRNG produces identical keys for identical seeds, allowing attackers to reproduce encryption keys and decrypt stored API keys and authentication tokens.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow is affected by weaknesses in secret handling and sensitive configuration access
Langflow includes features for secret protection, environment access, and runtime configuration of workflow components. Weaknesses in cryptographic key handling, exposure of process environment values, and insufficient restriction of sensitive runtime configuration…
🚨 CVE-2026-8478
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code on the system, due to the improper control of user input code.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow a remote attacker to inject arbitrary code on the system, due to the improper control of user input code.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component…
Langflow OSS supports Agentic Assistant generated components and user-supplied custom Python components for workflow development. Weaknesses in code security scanning, runtime validation, custom component execution paths, and trusted code enforcement could…
🚨 CVE-2026-9130
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the MemoryComponent that allows authenticated users to access chat history of other users via session_id collision. The MemoryComponent.retrieve_messages and store_message methods filter on session_id without validating flow_id or user_id ownership, enabling cross-user information disclosure through multiple authenticated API endpoints including /api/v1/run/*, /api/v1/responses, and /api/v2/workflow/*. This vulnerability only affects multi-user deployments with LANGFLOW_AUTO_LOGIN=False.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the MemoryComponent that allows authenticated users to access chat history of other users via session_id collision. The MemoryComponent.retrieve_messages and store_message methods filter on session_id without validating flow_id or user_id ownership, enabling cross-user information disclosure through multiple authenticated API endpoints including /api/v1/run/*, /api/v1/responses, and /api/v2/workflow/*. This vulnerability only affects multi-user deployments with LANGFLOW_AUTO_LOGIN=False.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in custom component validation and trusted code enforcement
Langflow OSS supports custom Python components and validation of component code for component development workflows. Weaknesses in custom component execution paths, validation endpoints, and trusted template enforcement could allow authenticated users to…
🚨 CVE-2026-9196
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute unintended code during Agentic Assistant validation due to improper handling of LLM‑generated components. The application executes model‑generated Python code in the backend during validation prior to user approval, which may allow an attacker to trigger side effects such as outbound network access, file system interaction, or data exfiltration with the privileges of the Langflow backend process.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute unintended code during Agentic Assistant validation due to improper handling of LLM‑generated components. The application executes model‑generated Python code in the backend during validation prior to user approval, which may allow an attacker to trigger side effects such as outbound network access, file system interaction, or data exfiltration with the privileges of the Langflow backend process.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component…
Langflow OSS supports Agentic Assistant generated components and user-supplied custom Python components for workflow development. Weaknesses in code security scanning, runtime validation, custom component execution paths, and trusted code enforcement could…
🚨 CVE-2026-9201
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA‑256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a cryptographic weakness in the custom component validation mechanism. When the optional hardening mode that restricts execution to trusted component templates is enabled, the application validates component code using a truncated SHA‑256 hash. Because the hash comparison relies on only a portion of the digest, an attacker can craft malicious component code that collides with a trusted template hash and bypasses validation. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to introduce and execute unauthorized Python code within the Langflow process, defeating the intended security control and potentially leading to full compromise of the affected instance.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow OSS is affected by arbitrary code execution in component generation, validation, and custom component…
Langflow OSS supports Agentic Assistant generated components and user-supplied custom Python components for workflow development. Weaknesses in code security scanning, runtime validation, custom component execution paths, and trusted code enforcement could…
🚨 CVE-2026-9205
IBM Langflow OSS contains a weak cryptographic key derivation vulnerability in the ensure_fernet_key() function.
🎖@cveNotify
IBM Langflow OSS contains a weak cryptographic key derivation vulnerability in the ensure_fernet_key() function.
🎖@cveNotify
Ibm
Security Bulletin: Langflow is affected by weaknesses in secret handling and sensitive configuration access
Langflow includes features for secret protection, environment access, and runtime configuration of workflow components. Weaknesses in cryptographic key handling, exposure of process environment values, and insufficient restriction of sensitive runtime configuration…
🚨 CVE-2026-54340
h2o is an HTTP server with support for HTTP/1.x, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. Prior to commit 9265bdd, there is an HTTP/2 state amplification issue that combines HPACK decompression amplification with Slowloris-style stream stalling. Amplified decoded header state can be retained by stalled HTTP/2 streams, and depending on the configuration, additional limits are needed to bound decoded header state and prevent attack. This issue has been fixed by commit 9265bdd.
🎖@cveNotify
h2o is an HTTP server with support for HTTP/1.x, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. Prior to commit 9265bdd, there is an HTTP/2 state amplification issue that combines HPACK decompression amplification with Slowloris-style stream stalling. Amplified decoded header state can be retained by stalled HTTP/2 streams, and depending on the configuration, additional limits are needed to bound decoded header state and prevent attack. This issue has been fixed by commit 9265bdd.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Merge pull request #3597 from h2o/kazuho/hpack-bomb · h2o/h2o@9265bdd
new mitigations for HTTP/2 state amplification
🚨 CVE-2026-16158
Impact: @fastify/reply-from versions from 8.3.1 up to but not including 12.6.4 build the internal URL cache key by concatenating the destination and source path without a delimiter. Different destination and source pairs can therefore produce the same key while resolving to different upstream URLs. When getUpstream selects an upstream from request data, a URL cached for one upstream can be reused for a request intended for another upstream, causing cross-upstream data access and modification. The default configuration is affected. Setting disableCache to true prevents the behavior. Patches: upgrade to @fastify/reply-from 12.6.4. Workarounds: pass disableCache: true when registering the plugin.
🎖@cveNotify
Impact: @fastify/reply-from versions from 8.3.1 up to but not including 12.6.4 build the internal URL cache key by concatenating the destination and source path without a delimiter. Different destination and source pairs can therefore produce the same key while resolving to different upstream URLs. When getUpstream selects an upstream from request data, a URL cached for one upstream can be reused for a request intended for another upstream, causing cross-upstream data access and modification. The default configuration is affected. Setting disableCache to true prevents the behavior. Patches: upgrade to @fastify/reply-from 12.6.4. Workarounds: pass disableCache: true when registering the plugin.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority
Security Advisories
The OpenJS Foundation’s CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
🚨 CVE-2026-16221
Impact: fast-uri versions from 2.3.1 through 4.1.0 (including the 3.x line up to 3.1.3 and the 2.x line up to 2.4.2) do not treat a literal backslash character (U+005C) as an authority delimiter. Node's native WHATWG URL parser, used by fetch, undici, and Node's http and https clients, normalizes the backslash to a forward slash for special schemes such as http, https, ws, wss, ftp, and file. As a result, the two parsers extract different hosts from the same input string. Applications that use fast-uri to enforce host-based policy such as allowlists, denylists, loopback or SSRF filtering, redirect validation, or outbound proxy routing before passing the same URL into Node's URL or fetch consumers can be steered to an unintended destination, including cloud metadata endpoints, loopback, or internal hosts.
Patches: upgrade to fast-uri 4.1.1, 3.1.4, or 2.4.3.
Workarounds: none.
🎖@cveNotify
Impact: fast-uri versions from 2.3.1 through 4.1.0 (including the 3.x line up to 3.1.3 and the 2.x line up to 2.4.2) do not treat a literal backslash character (U+005C) as an authority delimiter. Node's native WHATWG URL parser, used by fetch, undici, and Node's http and https clients, normalizes the backslash to a forward slash for special schemes such as http, https, ws, wss, ftp, and file. As a result, the two parsers extract different hosts from the same input string. Applications that use fast-uri to enforce host-based policy such as allowlists, denylists, loopback or SSRF filtering, redirect validation, or outbound proxy routing before passing the same URL into Node's URL or fetch consumers can be steered to an unintended destination, including cloud metadata endpoints, loopback, or internal hosts.
Patches: upgrade to fast-uri 4.1.1, 3.1.4, or 2.4.3.
Workarounds: none.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority
Security Advisories
The OpenJS Foundation’s CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
🚨 CVE-2026-15788
BuildKit's cache mount source= selector on Windows Container on Windows (WCOW) workers does not detect NTFS directory junctions placed inside the cache root. A build authored by an untrusted user on a WCOW-configured BuildKit daemon can read arbitrary host files reachable to the BuildKit daemon process.
🎖@cveNotify
BuildKit's cache mount source= selector on Windows Container on Windows (WCOW) workers does not detect NTFS directory junctions placed inside the cache root. A build authored by an untrusted user on a WCOW-configured BuildKit daemon can read arbitrary host files reachable to the BuildKit daemon process.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
WCOW cache mount source selector resolves NTFS junctions outside of cache root
### Impact
A build authored by an untrusted user on a WCOW-configured BuildKit daemon can read arbitrary host files reachable to the BuildKit daemon process.
### Patches
Issue is fixed in Bui...
A build authored by an untrusted user on a WCOW-configured BuildKit daemon can read arbitrary host files reachable to the BuildKit daemon process.
### Patches
Issue is fixed in Bui...