๐จ CVE-2026-14939
The Visualizer WordPress plugin before 4.0.6 does not restrict a user-supplied URL to safe address ranges before fetching it server-side, allowing users with Contributor-level access and above to perform Server-Side Request Forgery against link-local instance-metadata endpoints. As the fetched response is returned in the reply, the attack is non-blind, enabling retrieval of cloud instance metadata (including IAM credentials) on cloud-hosted sites.
๐@cveNotify
The Visualizer WordPress plugin before 4.0.6 does not restrict a user-supplied URL to safe address ranges before fetching it server-side, allowing users with Contributor-level access and above to perform Server-Side Request Forgery against link-local instance-metadata endpoints. As the fetched response is returned in the reply, the attack is non-blind, enabling retrieval of cloud instance metadata (including IAM credentials) on cloud-hosted sites.
๐@cveNotify
WPScan
Visualizer: Tables and Charts Manager < 4.0.6 - Contributor+ Server-Side Request Forgery via JSON Import
See details on Visualizer: Tables and Charts Manager < 4.0.6 - Contributor+ Server-Side Request Forgery via JSON Import CVE 2026-14939. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
๐จ CVE-2026-15233
The Nested Pages WordPress plugin before 3.2.15 does not properly escape post titles before outputting them into HTML attributes on an administrative listing screen, allowing users with the Editor role (or Contributor/Author when the Nested Pages WordPress plugin before 3.2.15 is enabled for the post type) to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the session of any higher-privileged user who views that screen.
๐@cveNotify
The Nested Pages WordPress plugin before 3.2.15 does not properly escape post titles before outputting them into HTML attributes on an administrative listing screen, allowing users with the Editor role (or Contributor/Author when the Nested Pages WordPress plugin before 3.2.15 is enabled for the post type) to inject arbitrary JavaScript that executes in the session of any higher-privileged user who views that screen.
๐@cveNotify
WPScan
Nested Pages < 3.2.15 - Editor+ Stored XSS via Post Title
See details on Nested Pages < 3.2.15 - Editor+ Stored XSS via Post Title CVE 2026-15233. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
๐จ CVE-2026-15958
The Easy Integration for Dropbox WordPress plugin before 2.2.0 does not perform authorization checks on several of its file-management AJAX actions that it also registers for unauthenticated users, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to list, download and upload arbitrary files across the connected Dropbox account and to read the connected account and administrator email addresses.
๐@cveNotify
The Easy Integration for Dropbox WordPress plugin before 2.2.0 does not perform authorization checks on several of its file-management AJAX actions that it also registers for unauthenticated users, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to list, download and upload arbitrary files across the connected Dropbox account and to read the connected account and administrator email addresses.
๐@cveNotify
WPScan
Easy Dropbox Integration < 2.2.0 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Connected Dropbox File Access and Upload via nopriv AJAX
See details on Easy Dropbox Integration < 2.2.0 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary Connected Dropbox File Access and Upload via nopriv AJAX CVE 2026-15958. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
๐จ CVE-2026-16035
The miniOrange 2FA WordPress plugin before 6.2.7 does not restrict who can trigger its second-factor configuration OTP send, nor bind the OTP recipient to the enrolling user's own address, allowing a low-privileged user to send one-time-passcode emails to arbitrary recipients and to exhaust the site's metered OTP allowance, preventing legitimate users from receiving their second-factor codes.
๐@cveNotify
The miniOrange 2FA WordPress plugin before 6.2.7 does not restrict who can trigger its second-factor configuration OTP send, nor bind the OTP recipient to the enrolling user's own address, allowing a low-privileged user to send one-time-passcode emails to arbitrary recipients and to exhaust the site's metered OTP allowance, preventing legitimate users from receiving their second-factor codes.
๐@cveNotify
WPScan
miniOrange 2FA < 6.2.7 - Subscriber+ Arbitrary-Recipient OTP Send
See details on miniOrange 2FA < 6.2.7 - Subscriber+ Arbitrary-Recipient OTP Send CVE 2026-16035. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
๐จ CVE-2026-16056
The Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 30.0.7 does not perform any capability or nonce check in one of its handlers, allowing any authenticated user down to Subscriber to read the site's entire stored OpenAI prompt history.
๐@cveNotify
The Contest Gallery WordPress plugin before 30.0.7 does not perform any capability or nonce check in one of its handlers, allowing any authenticated user down to Subscriber to read the site's entire stored OpenAI prompt history.
๐@cveNotify
WPScan
Contest Gallery < 30.0.7 - Subscriber+ OpenAI Prompt History Disclosure via post_cg_get_openai_prompts
See details on Contest Gallery < 30.0.7 - Subscriber+ OpenAI Prompt History Disclosure via post_cg_get_openai_prompts CVE 2026-16056. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
๐จ CVE-2026-16618
The Improve SEO WordPress plugin through 2.0.11 does not properly validate uploaded files, checking only the file content type while writing the file with the attacker-supplied extension into a publicly accessible directory, allowing unauthenticated users to upload executable PHP files and achieve remote code execution.
๐@cveNotify
The Improve SEO WordPress plugin through 2.0.11 does not properly validate uploaded files, checking only the file content type while writing the file with the attacker-supplied extension into a publicly accessible directory, allowing unauthenticated users to upload executable PHP files and achieve remote code execution.
๐@cveNotify
WPScan
ImproveSEO <= 2.0.11 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload Leading to Remote Code Execution
See details on ImproveSEO <= 2.0.11 - Unauthenticated Arbitrary File Upload Leading to Remote Code Execution CVE 2026-16618. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
๐จ CVE-2026-16623
The Create Block WordPress plugin before 2.10.0 does not correctly escape user-supplied text before writing it into a generated PHP pattern file, allowing a multisite subsite administrator (who holds the capability gating this action but is denied the capability that normally gates PHP file editing) to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code on the server.
๐@cveNotify
The Create Block WordPress plugin before 2.10.0 does not correctly escape user-supplied text before writing it into a generated PHP pattern file, allowing a multisite subsite administrator (who holds the capability gating this action but is denied the capability that normally gates PHP file editing) to inject and execute arbitrary PHP code on the server.
๐@cveNotify
WPScan
Create Block Theme < 2.10.0 - Admin+ PHP Code Injection via Pattern Save (Multisite)
See details on Create Block Theme < 2.10.0 - Admin+ PHP Code Injection via Pattern Save (Multisite) CVE 2026-16623. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
๐จ CVE-2026-18809
Information disclosure in Firefox for Android and Firefox Focus for Android. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 153.0.3.
๐@cveNotify
Information disclosure in Firefox for Android and Firefox Focus for Android. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 153.0.3.
๐@cveNotify
bugzilla.mozilla.org
Access Denied
You are not authorized to access bug 2055683. To see this bug, you must
first log in to an account with the appropriate permissions.
first log in to an account with the appropriate permissions.
๐จ CVE-2026-70369
Koha's reports/acquisitions_stats.pl builds its per-cell statistics query in sub calculate by interpolating the user-controlled Filter request parameters directly into WHERE fragments covering aqbasket.closedate, aqorders.datereceived, aqbooksellers.name, items.homebranch, items.ccode, biblioitems.itemtype, aqbudgets.budget_code, aqorders.sort1, and aqorders.sort2. The statement is prepared and executed with no bound parameters. An authenticated staff user holding the reports module permission can inject arbitrary SQL and read any table reachable by the Koha database user, including borrowers (password hashes, two-factor secrets, personal data), borrower_password_recovery, api_keys, and sessions.
๐@cveNotify
Koha's reports/acquisitions_stats.pl builds its per-cell statistics query in sub calculate by interpolating the user-controlled Filter request parameters directly into WHERE fragments covering aqbasket.closedate, aqorders.datereceived, aqbooksellers.name, items.homebranch, items.ccode, biblioitems.itemtype, aqbudgets.budget_code, aqorders.sort1, and aqorders.sort2. The statement is prepared and executed with no bound parameters. An authenticated staff user holding the reports module permission can inject arbitrary SQL and read any table reachable by the Koha database user, including borrowers (password hashes, two-factor secrets, personal data), borrower_password_recovery, api_keys, and sessions.
๐@cveNotify
bugs.koha-community.org
42360 โ [CVE-2026-70369] SQL Injection in reports/acquisitions_stats.pl via Filter parameter
major, P1 - high, assigned to dcook, RESOLVED, in Reports, Koha
, in version(s) 26.11.00,26.05.01,25.11.06,25.05.12,24.11.17
, in version(s) 26.11.00,26.05.01,25.11.06,25.05.12,24.11.17
๐จ CVE-2026-70370
Koha's reports/catalogue_stats.pl builds dynamic SQL in sub calculate by interpolating the user-controlled Line and Column request parameters directly into identifier positions of the query (SELECT DISTINCTROW, GROUP BY, ORDER BY) with no whitelist validation. When Line contains itemcallnumber and the cotedigits parameter is truthy, cotedigits is additionally concatenated raw as the numeric argument of a LEFT() call. An authenticated staff user holding the reports module permission can inject arbitrary SQL and read any table reachable by the Koha database user, including borrowers (password hashes, two-factor secrets, personal data), api_keys, and sessions.
๐@cveNotify
Koha's reports/catalogue_stats.pl builds dynamic SQL in sub calculate by interpolating the user-controlled Line and Column request parameters directly into identifier positions of the query (SELECT DISTINCTROW, GROUP BY, ORDER BY) with no whitelist validation. When Line contains itemcallnumber and the cotedigits parameter is truthy, cotedigits is additionally concatenated raw as the numeric argument of a LEFT() call. An authenticated staff user holding the reports module permission can inject arbitrary SQL and read any table reachable by the Koha database user, including borrowers (password hashes, two-factor secrets, personal data), api_keys, and sessions.
๐@cveNotify
bugs.koha-community.org
42363 โ [CVE-2026-70370] SQL Injection in reports/catalogue_stats.pl via the Line request parameter
major, P5 - low, assigned to dcook, RESOLVED, in Reports, Koha
, in version(s) 26.11.00,26.05.01,25.11.06,25.05.12,24.11.17
, in version(s) 26.11.00,26.05.01,25.11.06,25.05.12,24.11.17
๐จ CVE-2026-70371
Koha's reports/issues_avg_stats.pl builds dynamic SQL in sub calculate by concatenating several user-controlled request parameters directly into the query string. The Line and Column parameters are not validated against any whitelist and land verbatim in identifier positions (SELECT DISTINCTROW, GROUP BY, ORDER BY), and each Filter slot is concatenated raw into single-quoted LIKE, BETWEEN, and comparison fragments with no bound parameters. An authenticated staff user holding the reports module permission can inject arbitrary SQL and read any table reachable by the Koha database user, including borrowers (password hashes, two-factor secrets, personal data), api_keys, and sessions.
๐@cveNotify
Koha's reports/issues_avg_stats.pl builds dynamic SQL in sub calculate by concatenating several user-controlled request parameters directly into the query string. The Line and Column parameters are not validated against any whitelist and land verbatim in identifier positions (SELECT DISTINCTROW, GROUP BY, ORDER BY), and each Filter slot is concatenated raw into single-quoted LIKE, BETWEEN, and comparison fragments with no bound parameters. An authenticated staff user holding the reports module permission can inject arbitrary SQL and read any table reachable by the Koha database user, including borrowers (password hashes, two-factor secrets, personal data), api_keys, and sessions.
๐@cveNotify
bugs.koha-community.org
42368 โ [CVE-2026-70371] SQL Injection in reports/issues_avg_stats.pl via the Filter request parameter (unvalidated string contextโฆ
major, P5 - low, assigned to dcook, RESOLVED, in Reports, Koha
, in version(s) 26.11.00,26.05.01,25.11.06,25.05.12,24.11.17
, in version(s) 26.11.00,26.05.01,25.11.06,25.05.12,24.11.17
๐จ CVE-2026-70372
Koha's reports/bor_issues_top.pl builds dynamic SQL in sub calculate by concatenating several user-controlled request parameters directly into the query string. The Criteria parameter is only normalized by a table-name prefix and is never whitelisted, landing verbatim in identifier positions (SELECT DISTINCTROW, GROUP BY, ORDER BY); Filter values are concatenated raw into single-quoted LIKE, BETWEEN, and comparison fragments, and the Limit parameter is appended raw to a LIMIT clause. An authenticated staff user holding the reports module permission can inject arbitrary SQL and read any table reachable by the Koha database user, including borrowers (password hashes, two-factor secrets, personal data), api_keys, and sessions.
๐@cveNotify
Koha's reports/bor_issues_top.pl builds dynamic SQL in sub calculate by concatenating several user-controlled request parameters directly into the query string. The Criteria parameter is only normalized by a table-name prefix and is never whitelisted, landing verbatim in identifier positions (SELECT DISTINCTROW, GROUP BY, ORDER BY); Filter values are concatenated raw into single-quoted LIKE, BETWEEN, and comparison fragments, and the Limit parameter is appended raw to a LIMIT clause. An authenticated staff user holding the reports module permission can inject arbitrary SQL and read any table reachable by the Koha database user, including borrowers (password hashes, two-factor secrets, personal data), api_keys, and sessions.
๐@cveNotify
bugs.koha-community.org
42369 โ [CVE-2026-70372] SQL Injection in reports/bor_issues_top.pl via the Filter request parameter (unvalidated string contextโฆ
major, P5 - low, assigned to dcook, RESOLVED, in Reports, Koha
, in version(s) 26.11.00,26.05.01,25.11.06,25.05.12,24.11.17
, in version(s) 26.11.00,26.05.01,25.11.06,25.05.12,24.11.17
๐จ CVE-2026-70373
Koha's reports/issues_stats.pl (the circulation statistics report) builds its calculation query in sub calculate by concatenating several user-controlled request parameters directly into the SQL string. The PeriodTypeSel, PeriodDaySel, and PeriodMonthSel parameters are interpolated raw into single-quoted equality and function-comparison fragments, and the Filter slots plus the Line and Column identifiers are likewise interpolated with no whitelist and no placeholder binding. An authenticated staff user holding the reports module permission can inject arbitrary SQL and read any table reachable by the Koha database user, including borrowers (password hashes, two-factor secrets, personal data), api_keys, and sessions.
๐@cveNotify
Koha's reports/issues_stats.pl (the circulation statistics report) builds its calculation query in sub calculate by concatenating several user-controlled request parameters directly into the SQL string. The PeriodTypeSel, PeriodDaySel, and PeriodMonthSel parameters are interpolated raw into single-quoted equality and function-comparison fragments, and the Filter slots plus the Line and Column identifiers are likewise interpolated with no whitelist and no placeholder binding. An authenticated staff user holding the reports module permission can inject arbitrary SQL and read any table reachable by the Koha database user, including borrowers (password hashes, two-factor secrets, personal data), api_keys, and sessions.
๐@cveNotify
bugs.koha-community.org
42735 โ SQL Injection in reports/issues_stats.pl via PeriodTypeSel / PeriodDaySel / PeriodMonthSel / Filter parameters (unvalidatedโฆ
critical, P1 - high, assigned to jonathan.druart, RESOLVED, in Reports, Koha
, in version(s) 26.11.00,26.05.01,25.11.06,25.05.12,24.11.17
, in version(s) 26.11.00,26.05.01,25.11.06,25.05.12,24.11.17
๐จ CVE-2026-15307
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
GeoDjango spatial lookups optimistically parse the right-hand-side value as a raster by passing it to the `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` constructor. Any value used in a spatial lookup against a `GeometryField` or `RasterField` reaches this constructor, including untrusted input, for example a spatial-field filter submitted through the Django admin changelist query string by a staff user with view permission. A `dict`, or a `str` holding its JSON representation, is opened in write mode regardless of the constructor's `write=False` default, allowing a file with an attacker-chosen name and contents to be written through a file-backed GDAL driver. Any other `str` is treated as a datasource, allowing an outbound network request through a GDAL virtual filesystem handler. Writing a file to a location later imported by the application can result in remote code execution.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Bence Nagy, localhost-detect, and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue.
๐@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
GeoDjango spatial lookups optimistically parse the right-hand-side value as a raster by passing it to the `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` constructor. Any value used in a spatial lookup against a `GeometryField` or `RasterField` reaches this constructor, including untrusted input, for example a spatial-field filter submitted through the Django admin changelist query string by a staff user with view permission. A `dict`, or a `str` holding its JSON representation, is opened in write mode regardless of the constructor's `write=False` default, allowing a file with an attacker-chosen name and contents to be written through a file-backed GDAL driver. Any other `str` is treated as a datasource, allowing an outbound network request through a GDAL virtual filesystem handler. Writing a file to a location later imported by the application can result in remote code execution.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Bence Nagy, localhost-detect, and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue.
๐@cveNotify
Django Project
Archive of security issues | Django documentation
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
๐จ CVE-2026-15314
Tapo P110 v1
smart Wi-Fi Plug contains an improper boundary validation vulnerability in the
handling of authenticated HTTP request bodies due to insufficient input
validation before memory copy operations. This may lead to buffer overflow condition,
causing the web service process to crash.
Successful exploitation
may cause the web service process to stop responding or restart, resulting in a
denial-of-service condition.
๐@cveNotify
Tapo P110 v1
smart Wi-Fi Plug contains an improper boundary validation vulnerability in the
handling of authenticated HTTP request bodies due to insufficient input
validation before memory copy operations. This may lead to buffer overflow condition,
causing the web service process to crash.
Successful exploitation
may cause the web service process to stop responding or restart, resulting in a
denial-of-service condition.
๐@cveNotify
TP-Link
Download for Tapo P110 | TP-Link
TP Link - Download Center Detail
๐จ CVE-2026-15337
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.
๐@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.
๐@cveNotify
Django Project
Archive of security issues | Django documentation
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
๐จ CVE-2026-15830
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
GeoDjango's `django.contrib.gis.geos.GEOSGeometry` is subject to a potential denial-of-service when parsing deeply nested `GEOMETRYCOLLECTION` objects supplied as well-known text (WKT), well-known binary (WKB), or hex-encoded WKB, which triggers unbounded recursion and a segmentation fault in the underlying GEOS library. Spatial field lookups and the `django.contrib.gis.forms.GeometryField` form field are also affected.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Andrew MacPherson and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue.
๐@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
GeoDjango's `django.contrib.gis.geos.GEOSGeometry` is subject to a potential denial-of-service when parsing deeply nested `GEOMETRYCOLLECTION` objects supplied as well-known text (WKT), well-known binary (WKB), or hex-encoded WKB, which triggers unbounded recursion and a segmentation fault in the underlying GEOS library. Spatial field lookups and the `django.contrib.gis.forms.GeometryField` form field are also affected.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Andrew MacPherson and kimchunbok_ for reporting this issue.
๐@cveNotify
Django Project
Archive of security issues | Django documentation
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
๐จ CVE-2026-15920
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` renders `URLField` values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.
Exploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. `URLField` validation through a `ModelForm` or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist `URLField` data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.
Django would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue.
๐@cveNotify
An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.contrib.admin.utils.display_for_field()` renders `URLField` values as clickable links in the admin without validating the URL. A value stored with an unsafe scheme is displayed as a link on changelist and read-only admin pages, which allows cross-site scripting against staff users who click the link.
Exploitation requires the unsafe value to already be stored in the database. `URLField` validation through a `ModelForm` or the admin rejects unsafe schemes, so this affects applications that persist `URLField` data without running model validation, for example through direct queryset writes, deserialization, or bulk import of untrusted input.
Django would like to thank Egor Saltykov for reporting this issue.
๐@cveNotify
Django Project
Archive of security issues | Django documentation
The web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
๐จ CVE-2026-18785
A vulnerability was determined in o6 open62541 ca356b088ada7dee824d1b4acd07c1ff07ce242b. Impacted is the function UA_Client_getRemoteDataTypes of the file examples/custom_datatype/client_types_custom.c. Executing a manipulation can lead to use after free. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project closed the issue report, stating that this is not the official way to report a security vulnerability.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was determined in o6 open62541 ca356b088ada7dee824d1b4acd07c1ff07ce242b. Impacted is the function UA_Client_getRemoteDataTypes of the file examples/custom_datatype/client_types_custom.c. Executing a manipulation can lead to use after free. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project closed the issue report, stating that this is not the official way to report a security vulnerability.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
open62541 client stack overflow in `UA_Client_getRemoteDataTypes` via unbounded recursive `HasSubtype` traversal ยท Issue #12 ยทโฆ
Summary UA_Client_getRemoteDataTypes() recursively walks the remote DataType -> HasSubtype graph in order to discover unknown custom types. In commit ca356b088ada7dee824d1b4acd07c1ff07ce242b, th...
๐จ CVE-2026-18787
A vulnerability was identified in GL.iNet AX1800 up to 4.8.3. The affected element is the function remove_rule of the file /usr/share/gl-ngx/oui-rpc.lua of the component RPC Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument args.id leads to command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was identified in GL.iNet AX1800 up to 4.8.3. The affected element is the function remove_rule of the file /usr/share/gl-ngx/oui-rpc.lua of the component RPC Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument args.id leads to command injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
iot/GL-link AX1800.md at main ยท xxianxiayubanmian/iot
Contribute to xxianxiayubanmian/iot development by creating an account on GitHub.
๐จ CVE-2026-56848
A flaw in Node.js HTTP/2 handling allows `nghttp2_session_mem_send()` to be called re-entrantly while `nghttp2_session_mem_recv()` is executing, resulting in a heap-use-after-free.
This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x**, **24.x**, and **22.x**.
๐@cveNotify
A flaw in Node.js HTTP/2 handling allows `nghttp2_session_mem_send()` to be called re-entrantly while `nghttp2_session_mem_recv()` is executing, resulting in a heap-use-after-free.
This vulnerability affects Node.js **26.x**, **24.x**, and **22.x**.
๐@cveNotify
nodejs.org
Node.js โ Wednesday, July 29, 2026 Security Releases
Node.jsยฎ is a free, open-source, cross-platform JavaScript runtime environment that lets developers create servers, web apps, command line tools and scripts.