๐จ CVE-2026-67303
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains a reachable assertion (WINPR_ASSERT(OutputBufferLength == BytesReturned)) in serial_process_irp_device_control() in channels/serial/client/serial_main.c. When serial device redirection is enabled and a server-controlled IRP_MJ_DEVICE_CONTROL request specifies an unsupported IOCTL with a non-zero OutputBufferLength, CommDeviceIoControl() can fail with BytesReturned = 0, causing the mismatch to trigger the assertion and abort the client process (denial of service).
๐@cveNotify
FreeRDP before 3.29.0 contains a reachable assertion (WINPR_ASSERT(OutputBufferLength == BytesReturned)) in serial_process_irp_device_control() in channels/serial/client/serial_main.c. When serial device redirection is enabled and a server-controlled IRP_MJ_DEVICE_CONTROL request specifies an unsupported IOCTL with a non-zero OutputBufferLength, CommDeviceIoControl() can fail with BytesReturned = 0, causing the mismatch to trigger the assertion and abort the client process (denial of service).
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Merge pull request #13018 from akallabeth/win-clip-check ยท FreeRDP/FreeRDP@1cc783d
[client,windows] add server response size check
๐จ CVE-2026-67308
Wazuh workflows before 44bf114 contain a shell injection vulnerability in GitHub Actions that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by submitting pull requests with crafted VERSION.json files. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters into environment variables that are directly interpolated into run steps, enabling command execution and exfiltration of secrets including GITHUB_TOKEN and AWS credentials on self-hosted runners.
๐@cveNotify
Wazuh workflows before 44bf114 contain a shell injection vulnerability in GitHub Actions that allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands by submitting pull requests with crafted VERSION.json files. Attackers can inject shell metacharacters into environment variables that are directly interpolated into run steps, enabling command execution and exfiltration of secrets including GITHUB_TOKEN and AWS credentials on self-hosted runners.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub Actions Shell Injection via Fork Pull Request
Severity: Critical
CVSS Score: 10.0
CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE: CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command)
Status: Exploitable...
CVSS Score: 10.0
CVSS Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CWE: CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command)
Status: Exploitable...
๐จ CVE-2026-67313
axios versions 0.28.0 and later contain uncontrolled recursion in formDataToJSON when processing FormData field names with deeply nested bracket segments. Attackers can supply FormData with field names containing thousands of nested brackets to exhaust the JavaScript call stack and trigger RangeError, causing request failure or process termination in applications that do not handle the exception.
๐@cveNotify
axios versions 0.28.0 and later contain uncontrolled recursion in formDataToJSON when processing FormData field names with deeply nested bracket segments. Attackers can supply FormData with field names containing thousands of nested brackets to exhaust the JavaScript call stack and trigger RangeError, causing request failure or process termination in applications that do not handle the exception.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Excessive recursion in formDataToJSON can cause denial of service
## Summary
Axios versions `0.28.0` and later contain uncontrolled recursion in `formDataToJSON`, the helper behind the public `axios.formToJSON()` / named `formToJSON` API and the default request ...
Axios versions `0.28.0` and later contain uncontrolled recursion in `formDataToJSON`, the helper behind the public `axios.formToJSON()` / named `formToJSON` API and the default request ...
๐จ CVE-2026-67318
axios versions >=1.13.0 (Node.js HTTP adapter) fail to enforce the configured maxBodyLength limit on streamed request bodies when requests are sent with httpVersion: 2. Because Node's HTTP/2 request API does not honor the maxBodyLength option and axios's byte-counting stream wrapper is gated on maxRedirects === 0, an attacker who controls a stream passed to axios can cause the application to transmit outbound data exceeding the configured finite maxBodyLength. Impact is limited to resource consumption and policy bypass (excess egress, upstream quota consumption, limited availability); it does not enable code execution, credential disclosure, or request-destination control. Calls using the default maxBodyLength: -1 and browser adapters are not affected.
๐@cveNotify
axios versions >=1.13.0 (Node.js HTTP adapter) fail to enforce the configured maxBodyLength limit on streamed request bodies when requests are sent with httpVersion: 2. Because Node's HTTP/2 request API does not honor the maxBodyLength option and axios's byte-counting stream wrapper is gated on maxRedirects === 0, an attacker who controls a stream passed to axios can cause the application to transmit outbound data exceeding the configured finite maxBodyLength. Impact is limited to resource consumption and policy bypass (excess egress, upstream quota consumption, limited availability); it does not enable code execution, credential disclosure, or request-destination control. Calls using the default maxBodyLength: -1 and browser adapters are not affected.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
HTTP/2 streamed uploads bypass `maxBodyLength`
## Summary
Axios versions with Node.js HTTP/2 support allow streamed request bodies to bypass `maxBodyLength` enforcement when requests are sent with `httpVersion: 2`.
This affects applic...
Axios versions with Node.js HTTP/2 support allow streamed request bodies to bypass `maxBodyLength` enforcement when requests are sent with `httpVersion: 2`.
This affects applic...
๐จ CVE-2026-67323
GitPython before 3.1.51 fails to guard against dangerous Git options passed as keyword arguments in Repo.archive() and git.ls_remote(), allowing command injection via options such as --exec/--upload-pack (leading to arbitrary command execution). Additionally, Repo.iter_commits() and Repo.blame() do not check for leading-dash revision arguments, so a revision like --output=<path> can cause Git to open and truncate an arbitrary file. Exploitation requires an application that passes attacker-controlled arguments to these methods.
๐@cveNotify
GitPython before 3.1.51 fails to guard against dangerous Git options passed as keyword arguments in Repo.archive() and git.ls_remote(), allowing command injection via options such as --exec/--upload-pack (leading to arbitrary command execution). Additionally, Repo.iter_commits() and Repo.blame() do not check for leading-dash revision arguments, so a revision like --output=<path> can cause Git to open and truncate an arbitrary file. Exploitation requires an application that passes attacker-controlled arguments to these methods.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
command injection via unguarded Git options in `Repo.archive()`, `git.ls_remote()`, and arbitrary file overwrite via `Repo.iter_commits()`โฆ
## Summary
GitPython already know that --upload-pack / --exec are command-exec vectors, they are denylist in
git/remote.py:535 and check by Git.check_unsafe_options() (git/cmd.py:963), the thin...
GitPython already know that --upload-pack / --exec are command-exec vectors, they are denylist in
git/remote.py:535 and check by Git.check_unsafe_options() (git/cmd.py:963), the thin...
๐จ CVE-2026-67328
@better-auth/sso versions before 1.6.21 contain multiple authentication bypass vulnerabilities in SSO provider handling that allow attackers to sign in as arbitrary users. Attackers can exploit domain verification parsing mismatches, orphaned provider accounts, unbound SAML assertions, or reflected XSS on logout endpoints to gain unauthorized session access and account takeover.
๐@cveNotify
@better-auth/sso versions before 1.6.21 contain multiple authentication bypass vulnerabilities in SSO provider handling that allow attackers to sign in as arbitrary users. Attackers can exploit domain verification parsing mismatches, orphaned provider accounts, unbound SAML assertions, or reflected XSS on logout endpoints to gain unauthorized session access and account takeover.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
@better-auth/sso: account takeover via multiple SSO flaws
## Summary
`@better-auth/sso` has four flaws that each let an attacker sign in as another user. This is account takeover. The flaws share one cause: an SSO sign-in is trusted for an identity it sh...
`@better-auth/sso` has four flaws that each let an attacker sign in as another user. This is account takeover. The flaws share one cause: an SSO sign-in is trusted for an identity it sh...
๐จ CVE-2026-67333
better-auth before 1.6.13 (and pre-release builds 1.7.0-beta.0 through 1.7.0-beta.3) fail to validate the scheme of redirect_uris registered via the deprecated oidc-provider plugin and the mcp plugin (which wraps the same provider). An attacker can register an OAuth client with a javascript: redirect_uri, which the authorization server later returns unchanged in the consent response. If the deployment's consent page navigates the browser to the returned redirectURI (e.g. assigning it to window.location.href), the attacker's JavaScript executes in the authorization-server origin, exposing the victim's session and enabling account takeover.
๐@cveNotify
better-auth before 1.6.13 (and pre-release builds 1.7.0-beta.0 through 1.7.0-beta.3) fail to validate the scheme of redirect_uris registered via the deprecated oidc-provider plugin and the mcp plugin (which wraps the same provider). An attacker can register an OAuth client with a javascript: redirect_uri, which the authorization server later returns unchanged in the consent response. If the deployment's consent page navigates the browser to the returned redirectURI (e.g. assigning it to window.location.href), the attacker's JavaScript executes in the authorization-server origin, exposing the victim's session and enabling account takeover.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
oidc-provider(deperecated): stored XSS in the auth-server origin via a javascript: redirect_uri in
### Am I affected?
Check each condition. You are affected when all of the first three hold.
- You enable the `oidc-provider` plugin or the `mcp` plugin from `better-auth/plugins`. The `mcp` p...
Check each condition. You are affected when all of the first three hold.
- You enable the `oidc-provider` plugin or the `mcp` plugin from `better-auth/plugins`. The `mcp` p...
๐จ CVE-2026-67338
JupyterLab before 4.5.9 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Extension Manager that fails to validate URI protocols in package metadata URLs. Attackers can publish malicious PyPI packages with javascript: URLs in project metadata that execute arbitrary JavaScript in the JupyterLab origin when users click the extension name.
๐@cveNotify
JupyterLab before 4.5.9 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Extension Manager that fails to validate URI protocols in package metadata URLs. Attackers can publish malicious PyPI packages with javascript: URLs in project metadata that execute arbitrary JavaScript in the JupyterLab origin when users click the extension name.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix XSS in extension manager's `homepage_url` (#19003) ยท jupyterlab/jupyterlab@4e61e07
<!--
Thanks for contributing to JupyterLab!
Please fill out the following items to submit a pull request.
See the contributing guidelines for more information:
https://github.com/jupyterlab/...
Thanks for contributing to JupyterLab!
Please fill out the following items to submit a pull request.
See the contributing guidelines for more information:
https://github.com/jupyterlab/...
๐จ CVE-2026-67343
ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.2 fail to properly redact the cluster token in the GET /api/v1/server endpoint, allowing authenticated users to retrieve the arcadedb.ha.clusterToken value in cleartext. Attackers can use the leaked token with X-ArcadeDB-Cluster-Token and X-ArcadeDB-Forwarded-User headers to impersonate root and execute administrative actions including user creation, database operations, and server shutdown.
๐@cveNotify
ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.2 fail to properly redact the cluster token in the GET /api/v1/server endpoint, allowing authenticated users to retrieve the arcadedb.ha.clusterToken value in cleartext. Attackers can use the leaked token with X-ArcadeDB-Cluster-Token and X-ArcadeDB-Forwarded-User headers to impersonate root and execute administrative actions including user creation, database operations, and server shutdown.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Cluster token disclosed via GET /api/v1/server enables root impersonation
GET /api/v1/server requires only authentication (no root check). exportSettings emits every non-DATABASE GlobalConfiguration key/value and masks only keys whose name contains "password"; ...
๐จ CVE-2026-67355
guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 fail to preserve host-only cookie scope, storing the request host in the Domain field instead of marking cookies as host-only. Attackers controlling child hosts can receive host-only cookies intended only for parent hosts, potentially disclosing session identifiers and authorization tokens when the same cookie jar is reused across trust boundaries.
๐@cveNotify
guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 fail to preserve host-only cookie scope, storing the request host in the Domain field instead of marking cookies as host-only. Attackers controlling child hosts can receive host-only cookies intended only for parent hosts, potentially disclosing session identifiers and authorization tokens when the same cookie jar is reused across trust boundaries.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Host-only cookie scope is not preserved in guzzlehttp/guzzle
### Impact
In affected versions, `CookieJar` does not preserve whether a response cookie was set without a `Domain` attribute or with an empty one. A cookie without `Domain` is host-only and mus...
In affected versions, `CookieJar` does not preserve whether a response cookie was set without a `Domain` attribute or with an empty one. A cookie without `Domain` is host-only and mus...
๐จ CVE-2026-55735
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in ueberauth guardian allows an unauthenticated attacker to revoke a victim's session with a forged token.
Guardian.revoke/3 in lib/guardian.ex decodes the supplied token with peek/1, which performs no signature verification (it only base64-decodes the JWT header and payload). The resulting unverified claims are forwarded directly to the configured token module's revoke callback and the implementation's on_revoke callback, a state-mutating sink. The sibling operations refresh/2 and exchange/4 both call decode_and_verify first, so the signature is checked before anything acts on the claims; revoke/3 is the only state-mutating path that acts on claims without verifying the signature.
An attacker who knows or guesses a victim's identifying claim values (jti, sub) can forge a JWT carrying those claims, sign it with an arbitrary key, and submit it to any endpoint that funnels a caller-supplied token into Guardian.revoke/3 (the standard logout / session-revocation pattern). When the token module mutates state keyed by the claims (whitelist deletion or blacklist insertion, for example a GuardianDb-style store), the victim's legitimate session is evicted. This is an unauthenticated session-revocation denial of service; the attacker never needs the signing secret.
This issue affects guardian: from 1.0.0 before 2.4.1.
๐@cveNotify
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in ueberauth guardian allows an unauthenticated attacker to revoke a victim's session with a forged token.
Guardian.revoke/3 in lib/guardian.ex decodes the supplied token with peek/1, which performs no signature verification (it only base64-decodes the JWT header and payload). The resulting unverified claims are forwarded directly to the configured token module's revoke callback and the implementation's on_revoke callback, a state-mutating sink. The sibling operations refresh/2 and exchange/4 both call decode_and_verify first, so the signature is checked before anything acts on the claims; revoke/3 is the only state-mutating path that acts on claims without verifying the signature.
An attacker who knows or guesses a victim's identifying claim values (jti, sub) can forge a JWT carrying those claims, sign it with an arbitrary key, and submit it to any endpoint that funnels a caller-supplied token into Guardian.revoke/3 (the standard logout / session-revocation pattern). When the token module mutates state keyed by the claims (whitelist deletion or blacklist insertion, for example a GuardianDb-style store), the victim's legitimate session is evicted. This is an unauthenticated session-revocation denial of service; the attacker never needs the signing secret.
This issue affects guardian: from 1.0.0 before 2.4.1.
๐@cveNotify
Erlang Ecosystem Foundation CNA
Guardian.revoke/3 acts on unverified token claims, allowing forged-token session revocation
This project handles the CVE Numbering Authority (CNA) for the Erlang Ecosystem Foundation (EEF).
๐จ CVE-2026-18570
A flaw was found in the full-scope-disabled client-policy executor within the keycloak-services component. This component is responsible for enforcing security policies during client registration and configuration in Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue occurs because the executor only validates the fullScopeAllowed field when it is explicitly provided in a request. By omitting this field, a delegated user can bypass the policy, resulting in a client created with full scope access. This allows the client to obtain tokens with unauthorized role mappings.
๐@cveNotify
A flaw was found in the full-scope-disabled client-policy executor within the keycloak-services component. This component is responsible for enforcing security policies during client registration and configuration in Red Hat Build of Keycloak. The issue occurs because the executor only validates the fullScopeAllowed field when it is explicitly provided in a request. By omitting this field, a delegated user can bypass the policy, resulting in a client created with full scope access. This allows the client to obtain tokens with unauthorized role mappings.
๐@cveNotify
๐จ CVE-2026-18571
A flaw was found in the user creation component of Keycloak when Fine-Grained Admin Permissions V2 (FGAP V2) is enabled. This issue allows a sub-administrator with permission to create users to add those users to any group, even groups the sub-administrator is not authorized to manage. This could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information or elevated privileges for the newly created users.
๐@cveNotify
A flaw was found in the user creation component of Keycloak when Fine-Grained Admin Permissions V2 (FGAP V2) is enabled. This issue allows a sub-administrator with permission to create users to add those users to any group, even groups the sub-administrator is not authorized to manage. This could lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information or elevated privileges for the newly created users.
๐@cveNotify
๐จ CVE-2026-12231
The Exclusive Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the โ exad_infobox_imageโ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.9.8 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
๐@cveNotify
The Exclusive Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the โ exad_infobox_imageโ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.9.8 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
๐@cveNotify
๐จ CVE-2026-67357
ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.3 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the MCP get_server_settings tool that leaks the arcadedb.ha.clusterToken in cleartext. Attackers with MCP access can retrieve the cluster token and use it with X-ArcadeDB-Cluster-Token and X-ArcadeDB-Forwarded-User headers to impersonate root and achieve full server compromise.
๐@cveNotify
ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.3 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the MCP get_server_settings tool that leaks the arcadedb.ha.clusterToken in cleartext. Attackers with MCP access can retrieve the cluster token and use it with X-ArcadeDB-Cluster-Token and X-ArcadeDB-Forwarded-User headers to impersonate root and achieve full server compromise.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
MCP get_server_settings leaks HA clusterToken in cleartext enabling root impersonation
## Summary
The MCP `get_server_settings` tool masks only settings whose key contains "password". `arcadedb.ha.clusterToken` (SCOPE.SERVER) is returned in cleartext. That token is the tru...
The MCP `get_server_settings` tool masks only settings whose key contains "password". `arcadedb.ha.clusterToken` (SCOPE.SERVER) is returned in cleartext. That token is the tru...
๐จ CVE-2026-68582
Vikunja versions >= 0.24.0 and <= 2.3.0 contain a broken object level authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in the task-collection endpoint (GET /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/tasks). The endpoint loads the requested project view from the URL path without verifying the caller is authorized for it. For a link-share token holder, the task scope is pinned to the share's own project, but the view is taken from the attacker-controlled path and never re-validated. As a result, a holder of any project share link can read any other tenant's kanban bucket records โ bucket titles and the full created_by user object (username, name, id) โ for every view in the instance. The same missing pre-authorization view load also creates a project/view-ID existence oracle (404 vs. non-404) usable by link shares and ordinary authenticated users. Task contents remain constrained to the share's own project and are not disclosed. Fixed in 2.4.0.
๐@cveNotify
Vikunja versions >= 0.24.0 and <= 2.3.0 contain a broken object level authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in the task-collection endpoint (GET /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/tasks). The endpoint loads the requested project view from the URL path without verifying the caller is authorized for it. For a link-share token holder, the task scope is pinned to the share's own project, but the view is taken from the attacker-controlled path and never re-validated. As a result, a holder of any project share link can read any other tenant's kanban bucket records โ bucket titles and the full created_by user object (username, name, id) โ for every view in the instance. The same missing pre-authorization view load also creates a project/view-ID existence oracle (404 vs. non-404) usable by link shares and ordinary authenticated users. Task contents remain constrained to the share's own project and are not disclosed. Fixed in 2.4.0.
๐@cveNotify
GitHub
Link-share token reads any tenant's kanban buckets and enumerates usernames/IDs instance-wide (BOLA)
## Summary
The task-collection endpoint `GET /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/tasks` loads the requested project view straight from the URL path without verifying the caller is authorized...
The task-collection endpoint `GET /api/v1/projects/{project}/views/{view}/tasks` loads the requested project view straight from the URL path without verifying the caller is authorized...
๐จ CVE-2026-18581
A vulnerability was determined in ggml-org llama.cpp e15efe0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file common/jinja/parser.cpp of the component Jinja Minja Template Parser. Executing a manipulation with the input {{9|9|{ can lead to reachable assertion. The attack requires local access. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
๐@cveNotify
A vulnerability was determined in ggml-org llama.cpp e15efe0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file common/jinja/parser.cpp of the component Jinja Minja Template Parser. Executing a manipulation with the input {{9|9|{ can lead to reachable assertion. The attack requires local access. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
๐@cveNotify
drive.proton.me
Proton Drive
Securely store, share, and access your important files and photos. Anytime, anywhere.
๐จ CVE-2026-20464
In hevc decoder, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11104718; Issue ID: MSV-8297.
๐@cveNotify
In hevc decoder, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS11104718; Issue ID: MSV-8297.
๐@cveNotify
Mediatek
MediaTek | Home Page
MediaTek powers smarter devices with cutting-edge chipsets for smartphones, smart homes, automotive, IoT, and more. Discover innovation that connects.
๐จ CVE-2026-20465
In wlan AP driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: WCNCR00489200; Issue ID: MSV-7834.
๐@cveNotify
In wlan AP driver, there is a possible out of bounds write due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to remote (proximal/adjacent) escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: WCNCR00489200; Issue ID: MSV-7834.
๐@cveNotify
Mediatek
MediaTek | Home Page
MediaTek powers smarter devices with cutting-edge chipsets for smartphones, smart homes, automotive, IoT, and more. Discover innovation that connects.
๐จ CVE-2026-20466
In sec boot, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege, if an attacker has physical access to the device, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: AUTO00845351 (Note: For MT2737) / ALPS11072643 (Note: For MT6880, MT6890, MT6990); Issue ID: MSV-6929.
๐@cveNotify
In sec boot, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege, if an attacker has physical access to the device, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: AUTO00845351 (Note: For MT2737) / ALPS11072643 (Note: For MT6880, MT6890, MT6990); Issue ID: MSV-6929.
๐@cveNotify
Mediatek
MediaTek | Home Page
MediaTek powers smarter devices with cutting-edge chipsets for smartphones, smart homes, automotive, IoT, and more. Discover innovation that connects.
๐จ CVE-2026-20467
In apusys, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: AUTO00837766; Issue ID: MSV-6767.
๐@cveNotify
In apusys, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: AUTO00837766; Issue ID: MSV-6767.
๐@cveNotify
Mediatek
MediaTek | Home Page
MediaTek powers smarter devices with cutting-edge chipsets for smartphones, smart homes, automotive, IoT, and more. Discover innovation that connects.