π¨ CVE-2026-67329
@better-auth/stripe versions >= 1.4.11 and < 1.6.21, and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 and < 1.7.0-beta.10, contain an authorization bypass in organization subscription actions. The middleware validates the organization ID taken from the request query string against the authorizeReference callback, but the handler reads the organization ID only from the request body and falls back to the caller's active organization from their session. When these differ, an authenticated member of multiple organizations can perform subscription actions (cancel, change plan, restore, billing portal access) against an organization they belong to but should not manage, and can access another organization's billing details including payment methods, invoices, and subscription state.
π@cveNotify
@better-auth/stripe versions >= 1.4.11 and < 1.6.21, and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 and < 1.7.0-beta.10, contain an authorization bypass in organization subscription actions. The middleware validates the organization ID taken from the request query string against the authorizeReference callback, but the handler reads the organization ID only from the request body and falls back to the caller's active organization from their session. When these differ, an authenticated member of multiple organizations can perform subscription actions (cancel, change plan, restore, billing portal access) against an organization they belong to but should not manage, and can access another organization's billing details including payment methods, invoices, and subscription state.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
@better-auth/stripe: cross-organization billing tampering in organization subscription actions
### Am I affected?
You are affected if all of these are true:
- You use `@better-auth/stripe` from version 1.4.11 up to a patched version below. This covers the stable line through 1.6.20 and eve...
You are affected if all of these are true:
- You use `@better-auth/stripe` from version 1.4.11 up to a patched version below. This covers the stable line through 1.6.20 and eve...
π¨ CVE-2026-67330
@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 through <= 1.7.0-beta.9 contain an authorization bypass. SCIM token issuance did not reject provider IDs already used by existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social account providers, and the same logical provider ID was used for both SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. An authenticated user could mint a SCIM token whose provider ID collided with an existing provider namespace, causing SCIM user routes to resolve account rows the token never provisioned. This allowed listing, reading, updating (including rewriting global profile/email fields without uniqueness checks), and deleting global user accounts and sessions, resulting in account takeover and unauthorized deprovisioning. Fixed in 1.6.22 and 1.7.0-beta.10 (1.7.0-rc.0).
π@cveNotify
@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 through <= 1.7.0-beta.9 contain an authorization bypass. SCIM token issuance did not reject provider IDs already used by existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social account providers, and the same logical provider ID was used for both SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. An authenticated user could mint a SCIM token whose provider ID collided with an existing provider namespace, causing SCIM user routes to resolve account rows the token never provisioned. This allowed listing, reading, updating (including rewriting global profile/email fields without uniqueness checks), and deleting global user accounts and sessions, resulting in account takeover and unauthorized deprovisioning. Fixed in 1.6.22 and 1.7.0-beta.10 (1.7.0-rc.0).
π@cveNotify
GitHub
@better-auth/scim: account takeover and stale access via SCIM provider-id collision
### Am I affected?
You are affected if your application registers the `@better-auth/scim` plugin and lets authenticated users generate SCIM tokens. The default `canGenerateToken` policy was affe...
You are affected if your application registers the `@better-auth/scim` plugin and lets authenticated users generate SCIM tokens. The default `canGenerateToken` policy was affe...
π¨ CVE-2026-67331
better-auth SCIM versions from 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 fail to bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator by default, allowing authenticated users to manage other users' providers. Attackers can regenerate SCIM bearer tokens, invalidate legitimate tokens, and authenticate to SCIM API routes with the attacker-controlled token.
π@cveNotify
better-auth SCIM versions from 1.5.0 before 1.7.0-beta.4 fail to bind non-organization SCIM providers to their creator by default, allowing authenticated users to manage other users' providers. Attackers can regenerate SCIM bearer tokens, invalidate legitimate tokens, and authenticate to SCIM API routes with the attacker-controlled token.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
@better-auth/scim: on single tenant use cases authenticated user can regenerate SCIM provider token
### Am I affected?
You are affected if all of these hold:
- You install and register the `@better-auth/scim` plugin (`plugins: [scim()]`).
- You create SCIM providers without an `organizatio...
You are affected if all of these hold:
- You install and register the `@better-auth/scim` plugin (`plugins: [scim()]`).
- You create SCIM providers without an `organizatio...
π¨ CVE-2026-67332
@better-auth/oauth-provider before 1.7.0-beta.4 fails to bind access-token audience to the authorization grant, allowing clients to request tokens for unrelated resources. Attackers can complete an OAuth flow and obtain access tokens whose audience targets resource servers the authorization never covered, bypassing intended authorization boundaries.
π@cveNotify
@better-auth/oauth-provider before 1.7.0-beta.4 fails to bind access-token audience to the authorization grant, allowing clients to request tokens for unrelated resources. Attackers can complete an OAuth flow and obtain access tokens whose audience targets resource servers the authorization never covered, bypassing intended authorization boundaries.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
@better-auth/oauth-provider: access-token audience (resource) not bound to the authorization grant (RFC 8707)
### Am I affected?
You are affected if all of the following hold:
- You depend on `@better-auth/oauth-provider` on any stable `1.6.x` release (the stable line is not patched) or on a pre-rele...
You are affected if all of the following hold:
- You depend on `@better-auth/oauth-provider` on any stable `1.6.x` release (the stable line is not patched) or on a pre-rele...
π¨ CVE-2026-67333
better-auth before 1.6.13 (and pre-release builds 1.7.0-beta.0 through 1.7.0-beta.3) fail to validate the scheme of redirect_uris registered via the deprecated oidc-provider plugin and the mcp plugin (which wraps the same provider). An attacker can register an OAuth client with a javascript: redirect_uri, which the authorization server later returns unchanged in the consent response. If the deployment's consent page navigates the browser to the returned redirectURI (e.g. assigning it to window.location.href), the attacker's JavaScript executes in the authorization-server origin, exposing the victim's session and enabling account takeover.
π@cveNotify
better-auth before 1.6.13 (and pre-release builds 1.7.0-beta.0 through 1.7.0-beta.3) fail to validate the scheme of redirect_uris registered via the deprecated oidc-provider plugin and the mcp plugin (which wraps the same provider). An attacker can register an OAuth client with a javascript: redirect_uri, which the authorization server later returns unchanged in the consent response. If the deployment's consent page navigates the browser to the returned redirectURI (e.g. assigning it to window.location.href), the attacker's JavaScript executes in the authorization-server origin, exposing the victim's session and enabling account takeover.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
oidc-provider(deperecated): stored XSS in the auth-server origin via a javascript: redirect_uri in
### Am I affected?
Check each condition. You are affected when all of the first three hold.
- You enable the `oidc-provider` plugin or the `mcp` plugin from `better-auth/plugins`. The `mcp` p...
Check each condition. You are affected when all of the first three hold.
- You enable the `oidc-provider` plugin or the `mcp` plugin from `better-auth/plugins`. The `mcp` p...
π¨ CVE-2026-67334
better-auth versions before 1.6.11 fail to delete cached sessions when removing users via admin, anonymous, or SCIM endpoints when secondaryStorage is configured and storeSessionInDatabase is false. Attackers can reuse deleted user session tokens to maintain authentication for up to seven days after account deletion.
π@cveNotify
better-auth versions before 1.6.11 fail to delete cached sessions when removing users via admin, anonymous, or SCIM endpoints when secondaryStorage is configured and storeSessionInDatabase is false. Attackers can reuse deleted user session tokens to maintain authentication for up to seven days after account deletion.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
@better-auth/scim: stale sessions persist after user deletion across admin, anonymous, and SCIM flows
### Am I affected?
You are affected if all of the following are true:
- You configure `secondaryStorage` on `betterAuth(...)` (Redis, KV, or any external session cache).
- `session.storeSess...
You are affected if all of the following are true:
- You configure `secondaryStorage` on `betterAuth(...)` (Redis, KV, or any external session cache).
- `session.storeSess...
π¨ CVE-2026-67335
better-auth versions before 1.6.2 fail to validate the OAuth state parameter against the stored nonce when using cookie-backed state storage without PKCE. Attackers can forge the state parameter and supply an attacker-controlled authorization code to create authenticated sessions bound to the attacker's external identity or persistently link attacker accounts to victim profiles.
π@cveNotify
better-auth versions before 1.6.2 fail to validate the OAuth state parameter against the stored nonce when using cookie-backed state storage without PKCE. Attackers can forge the state parameter and supply an attacker-controlled authorization code to create authenticated sessions bound to the attacker's external identity or persistently link attacker accounts to victim profiles.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
OAuth callback accepts mismatched `state` when cookie-backed state storage is used without PKCE
### Am I affected?
You are affected if all of the following are true:
- Your application uses `better-auth` at a version below `1.6.2` (or `@better-auth/sso` paired with such a version).
- `bett...
You are affected if all of the following are true:
- Your application uses `better-auth` at a version below `1.6.2` (or `@better-auth/sso` paired with such a version).
- `bett...
π¨ CVE-2026-67336
better-auth versions before 1.6.11 contain insecure cryptographic defaults in the oidcProvider and mcp plugins that advertise the none algorithm and accept plain PKCE by default. Attackers can exploit algorithm negotiation to accept unsigned tokens or intercept authorization codes when PKCE plain is used instead of the required S256 method.
π@cveNotify
better-auth versions before 1.6.11 contain insecure cryptographic defaults in the oidcProvider and mcp plugins that advertise the none algorithm and accept plain PKCE by default. Attackers can exploit algorithm negotiation to accept unsigned tokens or intercept authorization codes when PKCE plain is used instead of the required S256 method.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Insecure cryptographic defaults in oidcProvider: alg=none advertised and plain PKCE accepted by default
### Am I affected?
You are affected if all of the following are true:
- You use `better-auth` at a version below the patched release.
- You enable `oidcProvider()` from `better-auth/plugins/oidc...
You are affected if all of the following are true:
- You use `better-auth` at a version below the patched release.
- You enable `oidcProvider()` from `better-auth/plugins/oidc...
π¨ CVE-2026-67337
better-auth versions before 1.4.9 contain a two-factor authentication bypass vulnerability when session.cookieCache is enabled. Attackers with valid primary credentials can access authenticated routes without completing second-factor verification by exploiting premature session caching.
π@cveNotify
better-auth versions before 1.4.9 contain a two-factor authentication bypass vulnerability when session.cookieCache is enabled. Attackers with valid primary credentials can access authenticated routes without completing second-factor verification by exploiting premature session caching.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Two-Factor Authentication Bypass via Premature Session Caching (session.cookieCache)
### Summary
Under certain configurations, sessions may be considered valid before two-factor authentication (2FA) is fully completed. This can allow access to authenticated routes without verify...
Under certain configurations, sessions may be considered valid before two-factor authentication (2FA) is fully completed. This can allow access to authenticated routes without verify...
π¨ CVE-2026-67338
JupyterLab before 4.5.9 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Extension Manager that fails to validate URI protocols in package metadata URLs. Attackers can publish malicious PyPI packages with javascript: URLs in project metadata that execute arbitrary JavaScript in the JupyterLab origin when users click the extension name.
π@cveNotify
JupyterLab before 4.5.9 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Extension Manager that fails to validate URI protocols in package metadata URLs. Attackers can publish malicious PyPI packages with javascript: URLs in project metadata that execute arbitrary JavaScript in the JupyterLab origin when users click the extension name.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix XSS in extension manager's `homepage_url` (#19003) Β· jupyterlab/jupyterlab@4e61e07
<!--
Thanks for contributing to JupyterLab!
Please fill out the following items to submit a pull request.
See the contributing guidelines for more information:
https://github.com/jupyterlab/...
Thanks for contributing to JupyterLab!
Please fill out the following items to submit a pull request.
See the contributing guidelines for more information:
https://github.com/jupyterlab/...
π¨ CVE-2026-67339
guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.14.2 fail to properly isolate Proxy-Authorization headers from origin servers in cURL handlers. Attackers can capture proxy credentials through origin server access logs when requests are redirected, bypassed, or sent through SOCKS proxies that Guzzle misclassifies as direct connections.
π@cveNotify
guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.14.2 fail to properly isolate Proxy-Authorization headers from origin servers in cURL handlers. Attackers can capture proxy credentials through origin server access logs when requests are redirected, bypassed, or sent through SOCKS proxies that Guzzle misclassifies as direct connections.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Proxy-Authorization headers can be sent to origin servers in guzzlehttp/guzzle
### Impact
In affected versions, the built-in cURL handlers (`CurlHandler` and `CurlMultiHandler`) put every first-class request header in cURL's origin header list (`CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER`). T...
In affected versions, the built-in cURL handlers (`CurlHandler` and `CurlMultiHandler`) put every first-class request header in cURL's origin header list (`CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER`). T...
π¨ CVE-2026-67340
ArcadeDB before 26.7.2 (arcadedb-engine) allows trigger scripts to look up host classes in java.lang.* (via Java.type) because ScriptTriggerExecutor adds java.lang.* to the allowed packages. An authenticated user with UPDATE_SCHEMA permission can create a JavaScript trigger that invokes java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec() (or ProcessBuilder), achieving OS command execution when the trigger fires.
π@cveNotify
ArcadeDB before 26.7.2 (arcadedb-engine) allows trigger scripts to look up host classes in java.lang.* (via Java.type) because ScriptTriggerExecutor adds java.lang.* to the allowed packages. An authenticated user with UPDATE_SCHEMA permission can create a JavaScript trigger that invokes java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec() (or ProcessBuilder), achieving OS command execution when the trigger fires.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Trigger scripts run with java.lang.* allowed, enabling OS command execution (RCE)
ScriptTriggerExecutor sets allowedPackages to java.lang.*, java.util.*, java.time.*, java.math.* (ScriptTriggerExecutor.java:56); trigger creation is gated only at UPDATE_SCHEMA (LocalSchema.create...
π¨ CVE-2026-67341
ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.2 fail to enforce scripting authorization checks on the SQL DEFINE FUNCTION statement with LANGUAGE js. Attackers with database access can execute arbitrary JavaScript code by submitting DEFINE FUNCTION statements, bypassing security controls intended to restrict scripting to administrators.
π@cveNotify
ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.2 fail to enforce scripting authorization checks on the SQL DEFINE FUNCTION statement with LANGUAGE js. Attackers with database access can execute arbitrary JavaScript code by submitting DEFINE FUNCTION statements, bypassing security controls intended to restrict scripting to administrators.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Scripting authorization gate (GHSA-48qw) bypassed via SQL DEFINE FUNCTION ... LANGUAGE js
The GHSA-48qw hardening added a checkPermissionsOnDatabase(UPDATE_SECURITY) gate on the polyglot engine (PolyglotQueryEngine.java:112-114,126,176,199), but only there. The SQL route to JavaScript n...
π¨ CVE-2026-67342
ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.2 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in HTTP handlers for time series, batch, Prometheus, and Grafana endpoints that fail to validate database access permissions. Attackers can access and modify databases they are not authorized to use by directly calling affected endpoints with arbitrary database parameters.
π@cveNotify
ArcadeDB versions before 26.7.2 contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in HTTP handlers for time series, batch, Prometheus, and Grafana endpoints that fail to validate database access permissions. Attackers can access and modify databases they are not authorized to use by directly calling affected endpoints with arbitrary database parameters.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Cross-database IDOR: /ts/*, /batch/*, Prometheus and Grafana handlers bypass authorization
About 14 HTTP handlers resolve the {database} path param and call getDatabase(...) WITHOUT user.canAccessToDatabase(...) and without setting the engine principal, because they extend AbstractServer...
π¨ CVE-2026-67344
ArcadeDB before 26.7.2 fails to enforce the UPDATE_SCHEMA database permission on the ALTER TYPE ... CUSTOM and ALTER TYPE ... BUCKETSELECTIONSTRATEGY SQL operations, which map to setCustomValue and setBucketSelectionStrategy in LocalDocumentType. An authenticated user with only read access (e.g., a read-only API token) can submit these ALTER TYPE statements via the HTTP command endpoint to mutate a type's custom schema metadata and bucket-selection strategy, bypassing the documented updateSchema permission boundary and potentially corrupting schema metadata and record routing.
π@cveNotify
ArcadeDB before 26.7.2 fails to enforce the UPDATE_SCHEMA database permission on the ALTER TYPE ... CUSTOM and ALTER TYPE ... BUCKETSELECTIONSTRATEGY SQL operations, which map to setCustomValue and setBucketSelectionStrategy in LocalDocumentType. An authenticated user with only read access (e.g., a read-only API token) can submit these ALTER TYPE statements via the HTTP command endpoint to mutate a type's custom schema metadata and bucket-selection strategy, bypassing the documented updateSchema permission boundary and potentially corrupting schema metadata and record routing.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Read-only users can mutate type schema via ALTER TYPE CUSTOM and BUCKETSELECTIONSTRATEGY (missing UPDATE_SCHEMA check, siblingβ¦
### Summary
Two type-level schema mutators reachable from SQL, `ALTER TYPE <t> CUSTOM <key> = <value>` and `ALTER TYPE <t> BUCKETSELECTIONSTRATEGY <impl>`, do not e...
Two type-level schema mutators reachable from SQL, `ALTER TYPE <t> CUSTOM <key> = <value>` and `ALTER TYPE <t> BUCKETSELECTIONSTRATEGY <impl>`, do not e...
π¨ CVE-2026-67352
luci-app-https-dns-proxy contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the resolver_url parameter that allows authenticated users to inject active HTML. When an administrator views the HTTPS DNS Proxy status page, the resolver URL is rendered as raw HTML and executes JavaScript in the administrator's browser origin.
π@cveNotify
luci-app-https-dns-proxy contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the resolver_url parameter that allows authenticated users to inject active HTML. When an administrator views the HTTPS DNS Proxy status page, the resolver URL is rendered as raw HTML and executes JavaScript in the administrator's browser origin.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
luci-app-https-dns-proxy: delegated resolver_url stored XSS
## Summary
An authenticated LuCI/rpcd user with only `luci-app-https-dns-proxy` access can store active HTML in a `https-dns-proxy` `resolver_url` value. When an administrator opens the LuCI...
An authenticated LuCI/rpcd user with only `luci-app-https-dns-proxy` access can store active HTML in a `https-dns-proxy` `resolver_url` value. When an administrator opens the LuCI...
π¨ CVE-2026-67353
guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 contain a denial of service vulnerability in the CookieJar that accepts unlimited Set-Cookie header fields with no size restrictions. Attackers can return many large cookies from a malicious server, causing Guzzle to store excessive data in memory and generate oversized Cookie headers that fail in handlers or destination servers.
π@cveNotify
guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 contain a denial of service vulnerability in the CookieJar that accepts unlimited Set-Cookie header fields with no size restrictions. Attackers can return many large cookies from a malicious server, causing Guzzle to store excessive data in memory and generate oversized Cookie headers that fail in handlers or destination servers.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Unbounded response cookies risk denial of service in guzzlehttp/guzzle
### Impact
In affected versions, Guzzle's built-in `CookieJar` accepts any number of `Set-Cookie` header fields from one response, with no limit on the size of each field. When a later reque...
In affected versions, Guzzle's built-in `CookieJar` accepts any number of `Set-Cookie` header fields from one response, with no limit on the size of each field. When a later reque...
π¨ CVE-2026-67354
guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in RedirectMiddleware. When the optional allow_redirects.referer setting is enabled, the middleware copies the URI fragment (the portion after '#') from the referring request into the generated Referer header when following a same-scheme redirect (e.g., HTTPS to HTTPS). An attacker who controls the redirect destination can read this fragment from the incoming Referer header, potentially disclosing one-time login secrets, access tokens, state values, or other sensitive client data to a server never meant to receive it. The referer setting is disabled by default. Fixed in 7.15.1, which strips the fragment before generating the Referer value.
π@cveNotify
guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in RedirectMiddleware. When the optional allow_redirects.referer setting is enabled, the middleware copies the URI fragment (the portion after '#') from the referring request into the generated Referer header when following a same-scheme redirect (e.g., HTTPS to HTTPS). An attacker who controls the redirect destination can read this fragment from the incoming Referer header, potentially disclosing one-time login secrets, access tokens, state values, or other sensitive client data to a server never meant to receive it. The referer setting is disabled by default. Fixed in 7.15.1, which strips the fragment before generating the Referer value.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
URI fragments disclosed in redirect Referer headers in guzzlehttp/guzzle
### Impact
When the optional `referer` redirect setting is enabled, affected versions of `RedirectMiddleware` can copy the fragment from the referring request URI into a generated `Referer` head...
When the optional `referer` redirect setting is enabled, affected versions of `RedirectMiddleware` can copy the fragment from the referring request URI into a generated `Referer` head...
π¨ CVE-2026-67355
guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 fail to preserve host-only cookie scope, storing the request host in the Domain field instead of marking cookies as host-only. Attackers controlling child hosts can receive host-only cookies intended only for parent hosts, potentially disclosing session identifiers and authorization tokens when the same cookie jar is reused across trust boundaries.
π@cveNotify
guzzlehttp/guzzle versions before 7.15.1 fail to preserve host-only cookie scope, storing the request host in the Domain field instead of marking cookies as host-only. Attackers controlling child hosts can receive host-only cookies intended only for parent hosts, potentially disclosing session identifiers and authorization tokens when the same cookie jar is reused across trust boundaries.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Host-only cookie scope is not preserved in guzzlehttp/guzzle
### Impact
In affected versions, `CookieJar` does not preserve whether a response cookie was set without a `Domain` attribute or with an empty one. A cookie without `Domain` is host-only and mus...
In affected versions, `CookieJar` does not preserve whether a response cookie was set without a `Domain` attribute or with an empty one. A cookie without `Domain` is host-only and mus...
π¨ CVE-2026-15105
A flaw has been found in davenardella snap7 up to 1.4.3. This affects the function TS7Worker::PerformFunctionRead of the file src/core/s7_server.cpp of the component ReadVar Request Handler. This manipulation causes out-of-bounds write. The attack requires access to the local network. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
π@cveNotify
A flaw has been found in davenardella snap7 up to 1.4.3. This affects the function TS7Worker::PerformFunctionRead of the file src/core/s7_server.cpp of the component ReadVar Request Handler. This manipulation causes out-of-bounds write. The attack requires access to the local network. The exploit has been published and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - davenardella/snap7: Snap7 Official repository
Snap7 Official repository. Contribute to davenardella/snap7 development by creating an account on GitHub.
π¨ CVE-2024-21536
Versions of the package http-proxy-middleware before 2.0.7, from 3.0.0 and before 3.0.3 are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due to an UnhandledPromiseRejection error thrown by micromatch. An attacker could kill the Node.js process and crash the server by making requests to certain paths.
π@cveNotify
Versions of the package http-proxy-middleware before 2.0.7, from 3.0.0 and before 3.0.3 are vulnerable to Denial of Service (DoS) due to an UnhandledPromiseRejection error thrown by micromatch. An attacker could kill the Node.js process and crash the server by making requests to certain paths.
π@cveNotify
Gist
`http-proxy-middleware` Denial-of-Service exploit for certain paths
`http-proxy-middleware` Denial-of-Service exploit for certain paths - gist:28be67266d82a53708ed59ce5dc3c94a