🚨 CVE-2026-65900
DOMPurify versions >=3.0.0 and before 3.4.8, when configured with SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES together with a DOM output mode (RETURN_DOM, RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT, or IN_PLACE), fail to strip template expressions (e.g. ${evil}, {{evil}}, <%evil%>) inside <template> element content. The final normalization/scrub pass (_scrubTemplateExpressions) uses a NodeIterator and node.normalize() that do not descend into template.content, so expressions that only form after adjacent text nodes merge survive sanitization. This bypasses SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES and can allow a downstream template engine to evaluate attacker-supplied expressions. The string output path is not affected.
🎖@cveNotify
DOMPurify versions >=3.0.0 and before 3.4.8, when configured with SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES together with a DOM output mode (RETURN_DOM, RETURN_DOM_FRAGMENT, or IN_PLACE), fail to strip template expressions (e.g. ${evil}, {{evil}}, <%evil%>) inside <template> element content. The final normalization/scrub pass (_scrubTemplateExpressions) uses a NodeIterator and node.normalize() that do not descend into template.content, so expressions that only form after adjacent text nodes merge survive sanitization. This bypasses SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES and can allow a downstream template engine to evaluate attacker-supplied expressions. The string output path is not affected.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES bypass - template expressions survive sanitization inside <template> content when using DOM output modes
## Summary
When DOMPurify is configured with both `SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true` and `RETURN_DOM: true` (or `IN_PLACE: true`), an attacker can inject template expressions, such as `${evil}`, `{{evil...
When DOMPurify is configured with both `SAFE_FOR_TEMPLATES: true` and `RETURN_DOM: true` (or `IN_PLACE: true`), an attacker can inject template expressions, such as `${evil}`, `{{evil...
🚨 CVE-2026-65901
DOMPurify through 3.4.6 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in IN_PLACE mode that trusts attacker-controlled nodeName on live non-form nodes. Attackers can supply hostile live DOM objects with real script children whose observable nodeName is clobbered to appear as allowed elements, causing scripts to execute when the sanitized tree is inserted into a live document.
🎖@cveNotify
DOMPurify through 3.4.6 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability in IN_PLACE mode that trusts attacker-controlled nodeName on live non-form nodes. Attackers can supply hostile live DOM objects with real script children whose observable nodeName is clobbered to appear as allowed elements, causing scripts to execute when the sanitized tree is inserted into a live document.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
`IN_PLACE` mode trusts attacker-controlled `nodeName` on live non-form nodes, allowing script retention and XSS via attacker-supplied…
## Summary
When `DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true })` is called on an attacker-supplied live DOM node, `DOMPurify` still trusts `currentNode.nodeName` for non-`form` nodes in the main `...
When `DOMPurify.sanitize(root, { IN_PLACE: true })` is called on an attacker-supplied live DOM node, `DOMPurify` still trusts `currentNode.nodeName` for non-`form` nodes in the main `...
🚨 CVE-2026-65902
DOMPurify before 3.4.7 (affected versions <= 3.4.5) passes direct references to the module-level DEFAULT_ALLOWED_TAGS and DEFAULT_ALLOWED_ATTR sets to the uponSanitizeElement and uponSanitizeAttribute hooks via data.allowedTags / data.allowedAttributes when sanitize is called without an explicit cfg.ALLOWED_TAGS / cfg.ALLOWED_ATTR array. A hook that mutates these fields permanently widens the default allow-lists for the lifetime of the DOMPurify instance, so all subsequent default-config sanitize calls inherit the widened defaults and attacker payloads using the poisoned tag/attribute name survive sanitization. removeAllHooks(), clearConfig(), and passing a fresh cfg do not recover the state; only constructing a new DOMPurify instance does.
🎖@cveNotify
DOMPurify before 3.4.7 (affected versions <= 3.4.5) passes direct references to the module-level DEFAULT_ALLOWED_TAGS and DEFAULT_ALLOWED_ATTR sets to the uponSanitizeElement and uponSanitizeAttribute hooks via data.allowedTags / data.allowedAttributes when sanitize is called without an explicit cfg.ALLOWED_TAGS / cfg.ALLOWED_ATTR array. A hook that mutates these fields permanently widens the default allow-lists for the lifetime of the DOMPurify instance, so all subsequent default-config sanitize calls inherit the widened defaults and attacker payloads using the poisoned tag/attribute name survive sanitization. removeAllHooks(), clearConfig(), and passing a fresh cfg do not recover the state; only constructing a new DOMPurify instance does.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: added more checks for clobbering when IN_PLACE is used (#1391) · cure53/DOMPurify@7996f1d
tests: expanded test suite with more cases
🚨 CVE-2026-65903
DOMPurify before 3.4.0 contains a logic error in the ADD_TAGS function where short-circuit evaluation allows forbidden tags to bypass FORBID_TAGS restrictions. Attackers can craft input containing tags listed in FORBID_TAGS that are also added via ADD_TAGS function, causing them to be retained in sanitized output.
🎖@cveNotify
DOMPurify before 3.4.0 contains a logic error in the ADD_TAGS function where short-circuit evaluation allows forbidden tags to bypass FORBID_TAGS restrictions. Attackers can craft input containing tags listed in FORBID_TAGS that are also added via ADD_TAGS function, causing them to be retained in sanitized output.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
ADD_TAGS function form bypasses FORBID_TAGS due to short-circuit evaluation
## Summary
In `src/purify.ts:1117-1123`, `ADD_TAGS` as a function (via `EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck`) bypasses `FORBID_TAGS` due to short-circuit evaluation.
The condition:
```
!(tagCheck...
In `src/purify.ts:1117-1123`, `ADD_TAGS` as a function (via `EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck`) bypasses `FORBID_TAGS` due to short-circuit evaluation.
The condition:
```
!(tagCheck...
🚨 CVE-2026-65904
DOMPurify through 3.3.3 fails to sanitize DOM elements passed via IN_PLACE mode when the element originates from a different window/realm (e.g., an iframe's contentDocument). A cross-realm instanceof check in the private _isNode() function returns false for foreign-realm nodes, causing DOMPurify to stringify the element (yielding '[object HTMLDivElement]'), silently reset IN_PLACE to false, and return the unsanitized element unchanged with any XSS payloads intact.
🎖@cveNotify
DOMPurify through 3.3.3 fails to sanitize DOM elements passed via IN_PLACE mode when the element originates from a different window/realm (e.g., an iframe's contentDocument). A cross-realm instanceof check in the private _isNode() function returns false for foreign-realm nodes, causing DOMPurify to stringify the element (yielding '[object HTMLDivElement]'), silently reset IN_PLACE to false, and return the unsanitized element unchanged with any XSS payloads intact.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
DOMPurify IN_PLACE mode fails to sanitize cross-window DOM elements, allowing XSS bypass
### Edit: Cure53 ###
**Thanks for the report. We published for transparency and discussion, but we do not see it as actionable within DOMPurify’s threat model, so no fix is planned at this point...
**Thanks for the report. We published for transparency and discussion, but we do not see it as actionable within DOMPurify’s threat model, so no fix is planned at this point...
🚨 CVE-2026-65911
In DOMPurify through 3.3.3, function predicates supplied via ADD_ATTR or ADD_TAGS to DOMPurify.sanitize() persist in internal state (EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING) across subsequent sanitize() calls on the same instance. If a later call on the same instance provides ADD_ATTR or ADD_TAGS as an array rather than a function, the previously set function handler is neither cleared nor overwritten, so it continues to approve attacker-controlled attributes or tags. This can allow dangerous event-handler attributes or forbidden tags (bypassing FORBID_TAGS) to survive sanitization, resulting in cross-site scripting. The vendor (Cure53) considers this an edge case outside DOMPurify's threat model; the referenced advisory lists 3.4.0 as the patched version.
🎖@cveNotify
In DOMPurify through 3.3.3, function predicates supplied via ADD_ATTR or ADD_TAGS to DOMPurify.sanitize() persist in internal state (EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING) across subsequent sanitize() calls on the same instance. If a later call on the same instance provides ADD_ATTR or ADD_TAGS as an array rather than a function, the previously set function handler is neither cleared nor overwritten, so it continues to approve attacker-controlled attributes or tags. This can allow dangerous event-handler attributes or forbidden tags (bypassing FORBID_TAGS) to survive sanitization, resulting in cross-site scripting. The vendor (Cure53) considers this an edge case outside DOMPurify's threat model; the referenced advisory lists 3.4.0 as the patched version.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
XSS via ADD_ATTR/ADD_TAGS Function Predicate State Leakage Across sanitize() Calls
### Edit: Cure53 ###
**Thanks for the report. We published for transparency and discussion, but we do not see it as actionable within DOMPurify’s threat model, so no fix is planned at this point...
**Thanks for the report. We published for transparency and discussion, but we do not see it as actionable within DOMPurify’s threat model, so no fix is planned at this point...
🚨 CVE-2026-65912
DOMPurify before 3.3.2 contains a URI validation bypass vulnerability when ADD_ATTR is provided as a predicate function via EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.attributeCheck. Attackers can supply a predicate that accepts specific attribute and tag combinations to bypass URI-safe validation, allowing unsafe protocols like javascript: to survive sanitization and execute as DOM-based XSS when the link is activated.
🎖@cveNotify
DOMPurify before 3.3.2 contains a URI validation bypass vulnerability when ADD_ATTR is provided as a predicate function via EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.attributeCheck. Attackers can supply a predicate that accepts specific attribute and tag combinations to bypass URI-safe validation, allowing unsafe protocols like javascript: to survive sanitization and execute as DOM-based XSS when the link is activated.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
DOMPurify ADD_ATTR predicate skips URI validation
## Summary
DOMPurify allows `ADD_ATTR` to be provided as a predicate function via `EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.attributeCheck`. When the predicate returns `true`, `_isValidAttribute` short-circuits the...
DOMPurify allows `ADD_ATTR` to be provided as a predicate function via `EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.attributeCheck`. When the predicate returns `true`, `_isValidAttribute` short-circuits the...
🚨 CVE-2026-65913
DOMPurify before 3.3.2 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability in USE_PROFILES mode that allows attackers to bypass attribute filtering by polluting Array.prototype properties. Attackers can set Array.prototype properties like onclick to true, causing DOMPurify to accept event handlers as allowlisted attributes and resulting in DOM-based XSS when sanitized markup is rendered.
🎖@cveNotify
DOMPurify before 3.3.2 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability in USE_PROFILES mode that allows attackers to bypass attribute filtering by polluting Array.prototype properties. Attackers can set Array.prototype properties like onclick to true, causing DOMPurify to accept event handlers as allowlisted attributes and resulting in DOM-based XSS when sanitized markup is rendered.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
DOMPurify USE_PROFILES prototype pollution allows event handlers
## Summary
When `USE_PROFILES` is enabled, DOMPurify rebuilds `ALLOWED_ATTR` as a plain array before populating it with the requested allowlists. Because the sanitizer still looks up attributes vi...
When `USE_PROFILES` is enabled, DOMPurify rebuilds `ALLOWED_ATTR` as a plain array before populating it with the requested allowlists. Because the sanitizer still looks up attributes vi...
🚨 CVE-2026-63732
9router 0.4.59 (fixed in 0.4.60) contains a chain of vulnerabilities: a hardcoded default password (123456) that authenticates any fresh installation, a bypass of the LOCAL_ONLY network gate via a spoofed Host header, and unvalidated arguments passed to child_process.spawn() when registering MCP plugins. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can log in with the default credential, spoof the Host header to reach local-only routes, and register a malicious MCP plugin (e.g. node -e <payload>) to achieve arbitrary code execution on the host operating system when the plugin's SSE endpoint is triggered.
🎖@cveNotify
9router 0.4.59 (fixed in 0.4.60) contains a chain of vulnerabilities: a hardcoded default password (123456) that authenticates any fresh installation, a bypass of the LOCAL_ONLY network gate via a spoofed Host header, and unvalidated arguments passed to child_process.spawn() when registering MCP plugins. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can log in with the default credential, spoof the Host header to reach local-only routes, and register a malicious MCP plugin (e.g. node -e <payload>) to achieve arbitrary code execution on the host operating system when the plugin's SSE endpoint is triggered.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Authenticated Remote Code Execution via Host Header Bypass and Unvalidated MCP Plugin Arguments
## Summary
9router v0.4.59 contains a chain of vulnerabilities that allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution on the host operating system. The chain combines...
9router v0.4.59 contains a chain of vulnerabilities that allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution on the host operating system. The chain combines...
🚨 CVE-2026-24727
An unrestricted upload of file with dangerous type vulnerability in the e-paper draft upload function of SUNNET Corporate Training Management System through v10.3 allows remote authenticated users with administrator privileges to execute arbitrary commands by uploading a crafted ZIP archive containing a server-executable file.
🎖@cveNotify
An unrestricted upload of file with dangerous type vulnerability in the e-paper draft upload function of SUNNET Corporate Training Management System through v10.3 allows remote authenticated users with administrator privileges to execute arbitrary commands by uploading a crafted ZIP archive containing a server-executable file.
🎖@cveNotify
zuso.ai
ZUSO Generation 如梭世代
為台灣本土專業之資訊安全服務業者,服務團隊具備超過 10 年以上駭客攻擊手法及豐富威脅分析經歷,專為企業組織提供客製化資安服務解決方案。
🚨 CVE-2026-66006
lakeFS through 1.83.0, fixed in commit 71a45ee, contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the /setup_comm_prefs endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to overwrite operator metadata including email, name, and company after setup completion. Attackers can POST to this endpoint to modify security update preferences, disable security communications, and trigger falsified telemetry events using the legitimate installation ID.
🎖@cveNotify
lakeFS through 1.83.0, fixed in commit 71a45ee, contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the /setup_comm_prefs endpoint that allows unauthenticated attackers to overwrite operator metadata including email, name, and company after setup completion. Attackers can POST to this endpoint to modify security update preferences, disable security communications, and trigger falsified telemetry events using the legitimate installation ID.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Reject unauthenticated overwrites of setup comm prefs (#10499) · treeverse/lakeFS@71a45ee
* Reject unauthenticated overwrites of setup comm prefs
POST /setup_comm_prefs is auth-exempt and, unlike /setup_lakefs, did no
setup-state check. Once an installation was initialized, an unauthen...
POST /setup_comm_prefs is auth-exempt and, unlike /setup_lakefs, did no
setup-state check. Once an installation was initialized, an unauthen...
🚨 CVE-2026-65707
Likeshop through 3.0.5 contains an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability that allows admin-level users to extract arbitrary database contents by submitting unsanitized POST parameters to the adjustAccount endpoint. The adjustAccount method in UserLogic.php concatenates the money, integral, growth, and earnings parameters directly into Db::raw() SQL fragments without type casting, numeric validation, or parameter binding, enabling boolean-based binary-search extraction of credentials, PII, and session tokens via distinct success and failure response messages.
🎖@cveNotify
Likeshop through 3.0.5 contains an authenticated SQL injection vulnerability that allows admin-level users to extract arbitrary database contents by submitting unsanitized POST parameters to the adjustAccount endpoint. The adjustAccount method in UserLogic.php concatenates the money, integral, growth, and earnings parameters directly into Db::raw() SQL fragments without type casting, numeric validation, or parameter binding, enabling boolean-based binary-search extraction of credentials, PII, and session tokens via distinct success and failure response messages.
🎖@cveNotify
Gist
CVE-2026-65707: Authenticated SQL Injection via Db::raw() in likeshop adjustAccount
CVE-2026-65707: Authenticated SQL Injection via Db::raw() in likeshop adjustAccount - CVE-2026-65707.md
🚨 CVE-2026-66033
libssh2 through 1.11.1, fixed in commit a2ed82d, contains a pre-authentication integer underflow vulnerability in the ssh2_cipher_crypt() function in src/openssl.c that allows a malicious SSH server to crash any connecting client by negotiating AES-GCM ciphers during handshake. Attackers can exploit the underflow in the expression computing blocksize minus aadlen minus authentication tag length to trigger an out-of-bounds read and a memcpy call with a near-SIZE_MAX length argument, causing immediate process crash before any authentication occurs.
🎖@cveNotify
libssh2 through 1.11.1, fixed in commit a2ed82d, contains a pre-authentication integer underflow vulnerability in the ssh2_cipher_crypt() function in src/openssl.c that allows a malicious SSH server to crash any connecting client by negotiating AES-GCM ciphers during handshake. Attackers can exploit the underflow in the expression computing blocksize minus aadlen minus authentication tag length to trigger an out-of-bounds read and a memcpy call with a near-SIZE_MAX length argument, causing immediate process crash before any authentication occurs.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
openssl: fix potential OOB read/write with AES-GCM in `ssh2_cipher_cr… · libssh2/libssh2@a2ed82d
…ypt()`
By applying two bounds checks to non-debug builds.
Reported-by: Vladimir Eli Tokarev
Fixes GHSA-c4f7-cvfc-33j7
Follow-up to 3c953c05d67eb1ebcfd3316f279f12c4b1d600b4 #797
Closes #2401
By applying two bounds checks to non-debug builds.
Reported-by: Vladimir Eli Tokarev
Fixes GHSA-c4f7-cvfc-33j7
Follow-up to 3c953c05d67eb1ebcfd3316f279f12c4b1d600b4 #797
Closes #2401
🚨 CVE-2026-66034
libssh2 through 1.11.1, fixed in commit a13bb6c, contains a missing bounds check vulnerability that allows a malicious SSH server to trigger an arbitrary-length heap out-of-bounds read and a free of an uninitialized pointer via the publickey subsystem. In libssh2_publickey_list_fetch(), the version 1 response parser reads a server-controlled comment_len value and advances the parse pointer without verifying sufficient bytes remain in the buffer, causing the out-of-bounds read to leak heap pointers from adjacent allocations defeating ASLR, followed by heap allocator state corruption when the error cleanup path frees an uninitialized pointer from a non-zeroed realloc() region.
🎖@cveNotify
libssh2 through 1.11.1, fixed in commit a13bb6c, contains a missing bounds check vulnerability that allows a malicious SSH server to trigger an arbitrary-length heap out-of-bounds read and a free of an uninitialized pointer via the publickey subsystem. In libssh2_publickey_list_fetch(), the version 1 response parser reads a server-controlled comment_len value and advances the parse pointer without verifying sufficient bytes remain in the buffer, causing the out-of-bounds read to leak heap pointers from adjacent allocations defeating ASLR, followed by heap allocator state corruption when the error cleanup path frees an uninitialized pointer from a non-zeroed realloc() region.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
publickey: fix potential OOB read in `libssh2_publickey_list_fetch()` · libssh2/libssh2@a13bb6c
Reported-by: Vladimir Eli Tokarev
Fixes GHSA-w6g9-cpfp-22gc
Closes #2202
Fixes GHSA-w6g9-cpfp-22gc
Closes #2202
🚨 CVE-2026-66035
libssh2 through 1.11.1, fixed in commit 42e33d8, contains a pre-authentication heap buffer overflow vulnerability that allows a malicious SSH server to corrupt heap metadata in any connecting client by sending a packet with a packet_length smaller than the cipher's block size during Encrypt-then-MAC cipher negotiation. In the fullpacket() function in src/transport.c, the ETM path allocates a buffer of packet_length bytes but copies blocksize minus one bytes via memcpy, causing an overflow that on 32-bit glibc writes attacker-controlled bytes into an adjacent chunk's SIZE field, enabling tcache bin confusion, overlapping live objects, and function pointer overwrite during the session handshake before authentication.
🎖@cveNotify
libssh2 through 1.11.1, fixed in commit 42e33d8, contains a pre-authentication heap buffer overflow vulnerability that allows a malicious SSH server to corrupt heap metadata in any connecting client by sending a packet with a packet_length smaller than the cipher's block size during Encrypt-then-MAC cipher negotiation. In the fullpacket() function in src/transport.c, the ETM path allocates a buffer of packet_length bytes but copies blocksize minus one bytes via memcpy, causing an overflow that on 32-bit glibc writes attacker-controlled bytes into an adjacent chunk's SIZE field, enabling tcache bin confusion, overlapping live objects, and function pointer overwrite during the session handshake before authentication.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
transport: fix potential heap overflow on ETM decrypt · libssh2/libssh2@42e33d8
Reported-by: Vladimir Eli Tokarev
Fixes GHSA-6c79-444r-wx26
Closes #2198
Fixes GHSA-6c79-444r-wx26
Closes #2198
🚨 CVE-2026-66011
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-27 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the magick command-line interface when invalid options are provided. Attackers can trigger memory exhaustion by repeatedly supplying malformed command-line arguments to consume system resources.
🎖@cveNotify
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-27 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the magick command-line interface when invalid options are provided. Attackers can trigger memory exhaustion by repeatedly supplying malformed command-line arguments to consume system resources.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Memory Leak when providing invalid options to the cli
A memory leak is possible when invalid options are passed to the cli (`magick`)
🚨 CVE-2026-66012
SiYuan before v3.7.2 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the POST /mcp kernel endpoint, which is gated only by a general auth check (model.CheckAuth) with no admin-role or read-only enforcement. This exposes 31 MCP tools, including a file tool with list/read/write/delete/rename/copy actions across the entire workspace. When the Publish server is enabled in anonymous mode (Conf.Publish.Enable=true and Conf.Publish.Auth.Enable=false), the Publish reverse proxy attaches an anonymous RoleReader JWT to proxied requests, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to reach /mcp. The attacker can read conf/conf.json to extract accessAuthCode, api.token, and cookieKey in plaintext, write arbitrary files in the workspace, and plant a plugin into data/plugins/ that executes with nodeIntegration:true and no contextIsolation on the next desktop launch, leading to administrator takeover.
🎖@cveNotify
SiYuan before v3.7.2 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the POST /mcp kernel endpoint, which is gated only by a general auth check (model.CheckAuth) with no admin-role or read-only enforcement. This exposes 31 MCP tools, including a file tool with list/read/write/delete/rename/copy actions across the entire workspace. When the Publish server is enabled in anonymous mode (Conf.Publish.Enable=true and Conf.Publish.Auth.Enable=false), the Publish reverse proxy attaches an anonymous RoleReader JWT to proxied requests, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to reach /mcp. The attacker can read conf/conf.json to extract accessAuthCode, api.token, and cookieKey in plaintext, write arbitrary files in the workspace, and plant a plugin into data/plugins/ that executes with nodeIntegration:true and no contextIsolation on the next desktop launch, leading to administrator takeover.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
:memo: Update README · siyuan-note/siyuan@c72ca4c
Signed-off-by: Daniel <845765@qq.com>
🚨 CVE-2026-63720
datamodel-code-generator prior to version 0.70.0 contains a code injection vulnerability that allows attackers who control input schemas to achieve remote code execution by supplying a malicious customBasePath value containing embedded newlines and a dot-free Python expression. The crafted value is emitted verbatim into a generated 'from ... import ...' statement without identifier validation, causing arbitrary Python code to execute when the generated module is imported.
🎖@cveNotify
datamodel-code-generator prior to version 0.70.0 contains a code injection vulnerability that allows attackers who control input schemas to achieve remote code execution by supplying a malicious customBasePath value containing embedded newlines and a dot-free Python expression. The crafted value is emitted verbatim into a generated 'from ... import ...' statement without identifier validation, causing arbitrary Python code to execute when the generated module is imported.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator: Generate Pydantic v2 models, dataclasses, TypedDict, and msgspec.Struct from OpenAPI…
Generate Pydantic v2 models, dataclasses, TypedDict, and msgspec.Struct from OpenAPI, JSON Schema, GraphQL, Avro, Protobuf, and raw JSON/YAML/CSV. - koxudaxi/datamodel-code-generator
🚨 CVE-2026-66412
Leantime 3.6.2 and prior contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated users to read milestone data from projects they are not assigned to by supplying arbitrary integer milestone IDs to the tickets.getMilestone JSON-RPC endpoint. Attackers can enumerate integer milestone IDs through the JSON-RPC API to access project planning information, milestone titles, descriptions, and timelines across all projects on the instance regardless of project membership.
🎖@cveNotify
Leantime 3.6.2 and prior contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated users to read milestone data from projects they are not assigned to by supplying arbitrary integer milestone IDs to the tickets.getMilestone JSON-RPC endpoint. Attackers can enumerate integer milestone IDs through the JSON-RPC API to access project planning information, milestone titles, descriptions, and timelines across all projects on the instance regardless of project membership.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: add project ownership check to getMilestone() to prevent IDOR · Leantime/leantime@68898ee
The getMilestone() method had #[RequiresPermission] without projectIdParam
and lacked a body-level project ownership check. Any authenticated user
could read milestones from projects they don&#...
and lacked a body-level project ownership check. Any authenticated user
could read milestones from projects they don&#...
🚨 CVE-2026-40000
The Activity zte.com.cn.filer/zte.com.cn.filer.FilePreViewActivity within ZTE File Manager is designed to preview compressed files. Third-party applications can launch this Activity and supply arbitrary file paths (e.g., content://zte.com.cn.filer.fileprovider/root_path), enabling file access with the privilege level of ZTE File Manager. This allows unrooted devices to read files under certain system directories such as /data/data and /data/local/tmp. If access restrictions do not block untrusted applications, additional directories may also be accessible.
🎖@cveNotify
The Activity zte.com.cn.filer/zte.com.cn.filer.FilePreViewActivity within ZTE File Manager is designed to preview compressed files. Third-party applications can launch this Activity and supply arbitrary file paths (e.g., content://zte.com.cn.filer.fileprovider/root_path), enabling file access with the privilege level of ZTE File Manager. This allows unrooted devices to read files under certain system directories such as /data/data and /data/local/tmp. If access restrictions do not block untrusted applications, additional directories may also be accessible.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-66050
NitroShare Desktop through 0.3.4 contains a path traversal vulnerability in its LAN file transfer server that allows unauthenticated attackers on the same network to write arbitrary files by sending a crafted filename containing directory traversal sequences in the JSON item header name field. Attackers can exploit the lack of path validation to write files outside the transfer root directory to arbitrary locations the current user has write access, including the Windows Startup folder, enabling persistent code execution on the next user login.
🎖@cveNotify
NitroShare Desktop through 0.3.4 contains a path traversal vulnerability in its LAN file transfer server that allows unauthenticated attackers on the same network to write arbitrary files by sending a crafted filename containing directory traversal sequences in the JSON item header name field. Attackers can exploit the lack of path validation to write files outside the transfer root directory to arbitrary locations the current user has write access, including the Windows Startup folder, enabling persistent code execution on the next user login.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
GitHub - cduram/NotCVE-2026-0009
Contribute to cduram/NotCVE-2026-0009 development by creating an account on GitHub.