π¨ CVE-2026-46411
FlashMQ is a MQTT broker/server, designed for multi-CPU environments. Prior to version 1.26.2, authorized clients have the ability to exceed the permitted over-commit of their write buffer and triggering an internal safe-guard exception. This exception was in a path that was not catchable, and therefore causes a server abort. This issue has been patched in version 1.26.2.
π@cveNotify
FlashMQ is a MQTT broker/server, designed for multi-CPU environments. Prior to version 1.26.2, authorized clients have the ability to exceed the permitted over-commit of their write buffer and triggering an internal safe-guard exception. This exception was in a path that was not catchable, and therefore causes a server abort. This issue has been patched in version 1.26.2.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix uncatchable exception (buffer full) in sending PUBACKs Β· halfgaar/FlashMQ@29e08f7
The following error was seen aborting a running server:
"Trying to exceed circular buffer beyond its 2 GB limit"
This could happen when a client publishes (many) QoS packets tha...
"Trying to exceed circular buffer beyond its 2 GB limit"
This could happen when a client publishes (many) QoS packets tha...
π¨ CVE-2026-46432
LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving large language models. In versions 0.12.3 and prior, LMDeploy is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution through hardcoded "trust_remote_code=True" in multiple HuggingFace model-loading call sites. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.
π@cveNotify
LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving large language models. In versions 0.12.3 and prior, LMDeploy is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution through hardcoded "trust_remote_code=True" in multiple HuggingFace model-loading call sites. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Arbitrary code execution via hardcoded trust_remote_code=True in lmdeploy model initialization
## Summary
lmdeploy hardcodes `trust_remote_code=True` in multiple HuggingFace model-loading call sites.
The affected code paths are in:
```text
lmdeploy/archs.py
lmdeploy/utils.py
````...
lmdeploy hardcodes `trust_remote_code=True` in multiple HuggingFace model-loading call sites.
The affected code paths are in:
```text
lmdeploy/archs.py
lmdeploy/utils.py
````...
π¨ CVE-2026-46491
SimpleSAMLphp-casserver is a CAS 1.0 and 2.0 compliant CAS server in the form of a SimpleSAMLphp module. Prior to version 7.0.3, simplesamlphp-module-casserver builds file paths for the file-based CAS ticket store by directly concatenating the configured ticket directory with an attacker-controlled ticket identifier. Public CAS validation/proxy endpoints pass attacker-controlled ticket / pgt query parameters into this store. In deployments using FileSystemTicketStore, a remote attacker can use path traversal sequences such as ../target.serialized to make the CAS server read and unserialize files outside the ticket directory. In the CAS 1.0 validation flow, the same attacker-selected path is also passed to deleteTicket() immediately after getTicket() returns, which can delete the target file when it is readable by the PHP process, deletable under the PHP process filesystem permissions, and unserializes to a value compatible with the ?array return type. This issue has been patched in version 7.0.3.
π@cveNotify
SimpleSAMLphp-casserver is a CAS 1.0 and 2.0 compliant CAS server in the form of a SimpleSAMLphp module. Prior to version 7.0.3, simplesamlphp-module-casserver builds file paths for the file-based CAS ticket store by directly concatenating the configured ticket directory with an attacker-controlled ticket identifier. Public CAS validation/proxy endpoints pass attacker-controlled ticket / pgt query parameters into this store. In deployments using FileSystemTicketStore, a remote attacker can use path traversal sequences such as ../target.serialized to make the CAS server read and unserialize files outside the ticket directory. In the CAS 1.0 validation flow, the same attacker-selected path is also passed to deleteTicket() immediately after getTicket() returns, which can delete the target file when it is readable by the PHP process, deletable under the PHP process filesystem permissions, and unserializes to a value compatible with the ?array return type. This issue has been patched in version 7.0.3.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Merge commit from fork Β· simplesamlphp/simplesamlphp-module-casserver@b84f3e4
* Validate format of the ticket-parameter
* Canonicalize ticket file path and prevent breaking out of ticket directory
* Use a hash instead of the ticketId as a filename
* Harden against unseria...
* Canonicalize ticket file path and prevent breaking out of ticket directory
* Use a hash instead of the ticketId as a filename
* Harden against unseria...
π¨ CVE-2026-46517
LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving large language models. In versions 0.12.3 and prior, hardcoded "trust_remote_code=True" enables HF supply-chain RCE without user opt-in. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.
π@cveNotify
LMDeploy is a toolkit for compressing, deploying, and serving large language models. In versions 0.12.3 and prior, hardcoded "trust_remote_code=True" enables HF supply-chain RCE without user opt-in. At time of publication, there are no publicly available patches.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Hardcoded trust_remote_code=True is an implicit unsafe remote-code load path with no user opt-out (CWE-1188 default-insecure)
> ## π Reframing (2026-05-02): implicit unsafe remote-code path, not "supply-chain"
>
> The accurate description of this vulnerability is:
> **"`get_model_arch` and relat...
>
> The accurate description of this vulnerability is:
> **"`get_model_arch` and relat...
π¨ CVE-2026-46518
OpenEMR is a free and open source electronic health records and medical practice management application. Prior to version 8.0.0.1, a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the prescription CSS/HTML multi-print feature allows a patient portal user to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a clinician's browser session. Patient demographic fields (name, address) are rendered without output encoding in multiprintcss_header(), and portal patients can write attacker-controlled HTML directly into patient_data by calling the PUT api/patient/:num endpoint, which bypasses the intended audit review workflow. Because the XSS fires in the clinician's authenticated session on the main OpenEMR interface, the attacker can access CSRF tokens, session data, and perform actions as the clinician β crossing the patient-to-clinician trust boundary. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.0.1.
π@cveNotify
OpenEMR is a free and open source electronic health records and medical practice management application. Prior to version 8.0.0.1, a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the prescription CSS/HTML multi-print feature allows a patient portal user to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a clinician's browser session. Patient demographic fields (name, address) are rendered without output encoding in multiprintcss_header(), and portal patients can write attacker-controlled HTML directly into patient_data by calling the PUT api/patient/:num endpoint, which bypasses the intended audit review workflow. Because the XSS fires in the clinician's authenticated session on the main OpenEMR interface, the attacker can access CSRF tokens, session data, and perform actions as the clinician β crossing the patient-to-clinician trust boundary. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.0.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
vuln06: Stored XSS in prescription CSS/HTML print view via patient demographics
### Summary
A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the prescription CSS/HTML multi-print feature allows a patient portal user to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a clinician's browser...
A stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the prescription CSS/HTML multi-print feature allows a patient portal user to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a clinician's browser...
π¨ CVE-2026-46540
Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.4.0, when LightBlockchain::rebranch() adopts a fork chain whose tip is a macro block (checkpoint or election), it only updates self.head but fails to update self.macro_head, self.election_head, self.current_validators, or store the election header in the chain_store. This is in direct contrast with the full Blockchain::rebranch() at blockchain/src/blockchain/push.rs:504-518, which correctly updates all macro/election state when the new head is a macro block. After a rebranch to a macro block, the stale macro_head causes subsequent macro blocks pushed via push() to be verified against the wrong predecessor via verify_macro_successor(&this.macro_head). If the rebranch target was an election block, the stale current_validators causes every subsequent block to fail verify_validators(), completely stalling the light client's chain progression. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0.
π@cveNotify
Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.4.0, when LightBlockchain::rebranch() adopts a fork chain whose tip is a macro block (checkpoint or election), it only updates self.head but fails to update self.macro_head, self.election_head, self.current_validators, or store the election header in the chain_store. This is in direct contrast with the full Blockchain::rebranch() at blockchain/src/blockchain/push.rs:504-518, which correctly updates all macro/election state when the new head is a macro block. After a rebranch to a macro block, the stale macro_head causes subsequent macro blocks pushed via push() to be verified against the wrong predecessor via verify_macro_successor(&this.macro_head). If the rebranch target was an election block, the stale current_validators causes every subsequent block to fail verify_validators(), completely stalling the light client's chain progression. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fixes rebranch logic in light blockchain by jsdanielh Β· Pull Request #3706 Β· nimiq/core-rs-albatross
Fix rebranch logic in the light blockchain to handle edge cases correctly.
Pull request checklist
All tests pass. The project builds and runs.
I have resolved any merge conflicts.
I have resolv...
Pull request checklist
All tests pass. The project builds and runs.
I have resolved any merge conflicts.
I have resolv...
π¨ CVE-2026-46541
Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.4.0, iIn handle_dht_get(), the DhtResults accumulator is only initialized when the first DHT record passes verification. If the first record fails (from a malicious DHT node), DhtResults is never created, and all subsequent valid records are discarded with "DHT inconsistent state" errors. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0.
π@cveNotify
Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.4.0, iIn handle_dht_get(), the DhtResults accumulator is only initialized when the first DHT record passes verification. If the first record fails (from a malicious DHT node), DhtResults is never created, and all subsequent valid records are discarded with "DHT inconsistent state" errors. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix for DHT query poisoning by jsdanielh Β· Pull Request #3707 Β· nimiq/core-rs-albatross
Harden DHT query handling against poisoning attempts.
Pull request checklist
All tests pass. The project builds and runs.
I have resolved any merge conflicts.
I have resolved all clippy and rus...
Pull request checklist
All tests pass. The project builds and runs.
I have resolved any merge conflicts.
I have resolved all clippy and rus...
π¨ CVE-2026-46542
Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.4.0, a denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the Ed25519 multisig delinearization code path. Ed25519PublicKey::delinearize() in keys/src/multisig/mod.rs called .unwrap() on curve point decompression, which panics when a public key is constructed from 32 bytes that do not represent a valid point on the Ed25519 curve. Ed25519PublicKey construction only validates byte length, not curve membership, so invalid keys can reach the delinearization path and crash the hosting process. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0.
π@cveNotify
Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.4.0, a denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the Ed25519 multisig delinearization code path. Ed25519PublicKey::delinearize() in keys/src/multisig/mod.rs called .unwrap() on curve point decompression, which panics when a public key is constructed from 32 bytes that do not represent a valid point on the Ed25519 curve. Ed25519PublicKey construction only validates byte length, not curve membership, so invalid keys can reach the delinearization path and crash the hosting process. This issue has been patched in version 1.4.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Multisig: return errors instead of panicking on invalid curve points when delinearizing by jsdanielh Β· Pull Request #3713 Β· nimiq/coreβ¦
What's in this pull request?
Ed25519PublicKey::delinearize() called .unwrap() on curve point decompression, which panics when given 32-byte public keys that aren't valid Ed25519 poi...
Ed25519PublicKey::delinearize() called .unwrap() on curve point decompression, which panics when given 32-byte public keys that aren't valid Ed25519 poi...
π¨ CVE-2026-46543
Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.5.0, a remote peer can crash any full node by sending a RequestBatchSet message containing the genesis block's hash. The handler calls get_epoch_chunks which iterates backwards through macro blocks using Policy::macro_block_before. When it reaches the genesis block number, macro_block_before panics with "No macro blocks before genesis block". This issue has been patched in version 1.5.0.
π@cveNotify
Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.5.0, a remote peer can crash any full node by sending a RequestBatchSet message containing the genesis block's hash. The handler calls get_epoch_chunks which iterates backwards through macro blocks using Policy::macro_block_before. When it reaches the genesis block number, macro_block_before panics with "No macro blocks before genesis block". This issue has been patched in version 1.5.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix panic in genesis BatchSet request by jsdanielh Β· Pull Request #3745 Β· nimiq/core-rs-albatross
Fixes a panic in RequestBatchSet when requesting the Genesis batch set
π¨ CVE-2026-46545
Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.5.0, a remote, unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability in MerkleRadixTrie::put_chunk allows any state-sync peer to crash any node performing state synchronization (freshly joining nodes and recovering nodes). This issue has been patched in version 1.5.0.
π@cveNotify
Nimiq is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.5.0, a remote, unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability in MerkleRadixTrie::put_chunk allows any state-sync peer to crash any node performing state synchronization (freshly joining nodes and recovering nodes). This issue has been patched in version 1.5.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Trie: reject ROOT-keyed items in `put_chunk` by jsdanielh Β· Pull Request #3762 Β· nimiq/core-rs-albatross
What's in this pull request?
MerkleRadixTrie::put_chunk processes TrieChunk data from state-sync peers. It validates sorting, key range, and the Merkle proof but does not reject items whose...
MerkleRadixTrie::put_chunk processes TrieChunk data from state-sync peers. It validates sorting, key range, and the Merkle proof but does not reject items whose...
π¨ CVE-2026-47838
SubjectDnX509PrincipalExtractor does not correctly handle certain malformed X.509 certificate CN values, which can lead to reading the wrong value for the username. In a carefully crafted certificate, this can lead to an attacker impersonating another user.
Affected versions:
Spring Security 5.7.0 through 5.7.24; 5.8.0 through 5.8.26; 6.3.0 through 6.3.17; 6.4.0 through 6.4.17; 6.5.0 through 6.5.10.
π@cveNotify
SubjectDnX509PrincipalExtractor does not correctly handle certain malformed X.509 certificate CN values, which can lead to reading the wrong value for the username. In a carefully crafted certificate, this can lead to an attacker impersonating another user.
Affected versions:
Spring Security 5.7.0 through 5.7.24; 5.8.0 through 5.8.26; 6.3.0 through 6.3.17; 6.4.0 through 6.4.17; 6.5.0 through 6.5.10.
π@cveNotify
Unauthorized User Impersonation when Using X.509 Client Certificates
Level up your Java code and explore what Spring can do for you.
π¨ CVE-2026-53673
BuddyPress 14.4.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the messages REST API that allows authenticated attackers to access arbitrary private message threads by supplying a user_id parameter in the request. Attackers can pass another user's identifier to the get_item_permissions_check method, which validates the supplied user_id instead of the logged-in user and is reused by the update and delete handlers, to read, reply to, or delete any user's private messages.
π@cveNotify
BuddyPress 14.4.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the messages REST API that allows authenticated attackers to access arbitrary private message threads by supplying a user_id parameter in the request. Attackers can pass another user's identifier to the get_item_permissions_check method, which validates the supplied user_id instead of the logged-in user and is reused by the update and delete handlers, to read, reply to, or delete any user's private messages.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-53674
BuddyPress 14.4.0 contains a regular expression injection vulnerability in the activity mention resolver that, when username compatibility mode is enabled, allows attackers to manipulate a REGEXP database clause by crafting mention names containing regex metacharacters. Attackers can submit @mentions whose metacharacters pass through esc_sql unescaped and are inserted into an unprepared REGEXP query against the users table, enabling boolean-based inference of usernames and denial of service through catastrophic backtracking.
π@cveNotify
BuddyPress 14.4.0 contains a regular expression injection vulnerability in the activity mention resolver that, when username compatibility mode is enabled, allows attackers to manipulate a REGEXP database clause by crafting mention names containing regex metacharacters. Attackers can submit @mentions whose metacharacters pass through esc_sql unescaped and are inserted into an unprepared REGEXP query against the users table, enabling boolean-based inference of usernames and denial of service through catastrophic backtracking.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-53675
BuddyPress 14.4.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the friends REST API that allows any authenticated attacker to enumerate another user's complete friend list. Attackers can query the friends endpoint with an arbitrary user_id because the get_items_permissions_check method only verifies that the requester is logged in and never checks ownership of the requested list, resulting in disclosure of users' private social connections.
π@cveNotify
BuddyPress 14.4.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability in the friends REST API that allows any authenticated attacker to enumerate another user's complete friend list. Attackers can query the friends endpoint with an arbitrary user_id because the get_items_permissions_check method only verifies that the requester is logged in and never checks ownership of the requested list, resulting in disclosure of users' private social connections.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-44634
SimpleBLE is a cross-platform library and bindings for Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). Prior to version 0.14.0, there are multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities in SimpleBLE. There is a stack overflow vulnerability in the dongl backendβs Protocol::simpleble_write function (local, caller-controlled input). A stack overflow vulnerability when processing manufacturer-specific data in BLE advertisements (remote, no pairing or connection required). Lastly, a stack overflow vulnerability when processing service data in BLE advertisements (remote, no pairing or connection required). This issue has been patched in version 0.14.0.
π@cveNotify
SimpleBLE is a cross-platform library and bindings for Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE). Prior to version 0.14.0, there are multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities in SimpleBLE. There is a stack overflow vulnerability in the dongl backendβs Protocol::simpleble_write function (local, caller-controlled input). A stack overflow vulnerability when processing manufacturer-specific data in BLE advertisements (remote, no pairing or connection required). Lastly, a stack overflow vulnerability when processing service data in BLE advertisements (remote, no pairing or connection required). This issue has been patched in version 0.14.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Addressed a few vulnerability reports. (#466) Β· simpleble/simpleble@1501d59
SimpleBLE - the all-in-one Bluetooth library for MacOS, iOS, Windows, Linux and Android. - Addressed a few vulnerability reports. (#466) Β· simpleble/simpleble@1501d59
π¨ CVE-2026-46546
Frappe Learning Management System (LMS) is a learning system that helps users structure their content. Prior to version 2.53.0, an authenticated user could supply specially crafted content in certain user-editable fields that, when surfaced in page metadata, caused visitors' browsers to navigate to an attacker-chosen URL. This issue has been patched in version 2.53.0.
π@cveNotify
Frappe Learning Management System (LMS) is a learning system that helps users structure their content. Prior to version 2.53.0, an authenticated user could supply specially crafted content in certain user-editable fields that, when surfaced in page metadata, caused visitors' browsers to navigate to an attacker-chosen URL. This issue has been patched in version 2.53.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Stored XSS via HTML injection in user-controlled metadata
An authenticated user could store crafted (including HTML-entity-encoded) content in fields like the profile Bio; _lms.py decoded it via BeautifulSoup.get_text() and rendered it unescaped into the ...
π¨ CVE-2026-45160
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.2.7, 5.3.5, 5.4.4, 5.5.4, and 6.0.1, an out-of-bounds read flaw exists in the DHCP server option parser (parse_options() in components/lwip/apps/dhcpserver/dhcpserver.c) shipped with ESP-IDF's lwIP component. The parser walks the BOOTP/DHCP options field without validating that each option's length byte and declared payload length stay within the received packet buffer. A crafted DHCP request can cause the parser to read past the end of the options buffer into adjacent heap memory. The issue affects the DHCP server used by ESP-IDF's SoftAP and any configuration where the device runs as a DHCP server on a local network. This issue has been patched in versions 5.2.8, 5.3.6, 5.4.5, 5.5.5, and 6.0.2.
π@cveNotify
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.2.7, 5.3.5, 5.4.4, 5.5.4, and 6.0.1, an out-of-bounds read flaw exists in the DHCP server option parser (parse_options() in components/lwip/apps/dhcpserver/dhcpserver.c) shipped with ESP-IDF's lwIP component. The parser walks the BOOTP/DHCP options field without validating that each option's length byte and declared payload length stay within the received packet buffer. A crafted DHCP request can cause the parser to read past the end of the options buffer into adjacent heap memory. The issue affects the DHCP server used by ESP-IDF's SoftAP and any configuration where the device runs as a DHCP server on a local network. This issue has been patched in versions 5.2.8, 5.3.6, 5.4.5, 5.5.5, and 6.0.2.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix(lwip): Fix DHCP servver OOB read issue Β· espressif/esp-idf@2bf4dd1
Espressif IoT Development Framework. Official development framework for Espressif SoCs. - fix(lwip): Fix DHCP servver OOB read issue Β· espressif/esp-idf@2bf4dd1
π¨ CVE-2026-45328
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.5.4 and 6.0, the esp_tee component exposes secure-service wrappers in esp_secure_services.c and esp_secure_services_iram.c that bridge calls from the user application (i.e. the REE) to TEE-protected hardware peripherals (AES, SHA, ECC, HMAC, SPI, MMU, WDT) and to the security feature like attestation, OTA updates, secure storage. This issue has been patched in versions 5.5.5 and 6.0.1.
π@cveNotify
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.5.4 and 6.0, the esp_tee component exposes secure-service wrappers in esp_secure_services.c and esp_secure_services_iram.c that bridge calls from the user application (i.e. the REE) to TEE-protected hardware peripherals (AES, SHA, ECC, HMAC, SPI, MMU, WDT) and to the security feature like attestation, OTA updates, secure storage. This issue has been patched in versions 5.5.5 and 6.0.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix(esp_tee): Add missing input validation checks for TEE service calls Β· espressif/esp-idf@145ba4c
- MULTI_HEAP_ASSERT for TEE now aborts on failure, instead of ignoring the condition
- Prevent potential TEE OTA write bounds overflow
- Prevent potential TEE OTA write bounds overflow
π¨ CVE-2026-45329
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.5.4 and 6.0, several ESP-TEE secure-service wrappers in esp_secure_services.c and esp_secure_services_iram.c validated only some of the caller-supplied pointer arguments, leaving input pointer arguments unchecked. Because the underlying TEE-protected hardware peripherals (e.g., ECC, SHA, SPI) run in RISC-V machine mode (M-mode) with full address-space access, a caller could supply pointers into TEE-exclusive memory as inputs, causing the peripheral to read TEE memory and return results derived from it to the REE. Depending on the wrapper, the result contains raw bytes from TEE memory, a computed function of TEE memory recoverable through repeated calls, or a single bit per call that forms an oracle for incremental disclosure of TEE-resident sensitive data. This issue has been patched in versions 5.5.5 and 6.0.1.
π@cveNotify
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.5.4 and 6.0, several ESP-TEE secure-service wrappers in esp_secure_services.c and esp_secure_services_iram.c validated only some of the caller-supplied pointer arguments, leaving input pointer arguments unchecked. Because the underlying TEE-protected hardware peripherals (e.g., ECC, SHA, SPI) run in RISC-V machine mode (M-mode) with full address-space access, a caller could supply pointers into TEE-exclusive memory as inputs, causing the peripheral to read TEE memory and return results derived from it to the REE. Depending on the wrapper, the result contains raw bytes from TEE memory, a computed function of TEE memory recoverable through repeated calls, or a single bit per call that forms an oracle for incremental disclosure of TEE-resident sensitive data. This issue has been patched in versions 5.5.5 and 6.0.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix(esp_tee): Add missing input validation checks for TEE service calls Β· espressif/esp-idf@145ba4c
- MULTI_HEAP_ASSERT for TEE now aborts on failure, instead of ignoring the condition
- Prevent potential TEE OTA write bounds overflow
- Prevent potential TEE OTA write bounds overflow
π¨ CVE-2026-45541
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.2.6, 5.3.5, 5.4.4, 5.5.4, and 6.0, a NULL-pointer dereference exists in the WebSocket subprotocol-negotiation path of the esp_http_server component. While parsing the client-supplied Sec-WebSocket-Protocol request header during the WebSocket handshake, the tokenisation result is dereferenced without a NULL check, so a malformed header value can crash the server before any application-level authentication runs. This issue has been patched in versions 5.2.7, 5.3.6, 5.4.5, 5.5.5, and 6.0.1.
π@cveNotify
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.2.6, 5.3.5, 5.4.4, 5.5.4, and 6.0, a NULL-pointer dereference exists in the WebSocket subprotocol-negotiation path of the esp_http_server component. While parsing the client-supplied Sec-WebSocket-Protocol request header during the WebSocket handshake, the tokenisation result is dereferenced without a NULL check, so a malformed header value can crash the server before any application-level authentication runs. This issue has been patched in versions 5.2.7, 5.3.6, 5.4.5, 5.5.5, and 6.0.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: fixes websocket server possible null dereference Β· espressif/esp-idf@00a2f7f
Espressif IoT Development Framework. Official development framework for Espressif SoCs. - fix: fixes websocket server possible null dereference Β· espressif/esp-idf@00a2f7f
π¨ CVE-2026-45542
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.2.6, 5.3.5, 5.4.4, 5.5.4, and 6.0, a heap buffer overflow exists in the Security Scheme 2 (SRP6a) session-setup path of the protocomm component. The first-phase handler (handle_session_command0() in components/protocomm/src/security/security2.c) trusts the length of a client-supplied protobuf field for the SRP6a username and copies it into a buffer whose size is derived from a narrower destination type. The resulting truncation-versus-copy asymmetry corrupts the heap when an oversized value is supplied. This issue has been patched in versions 5.2.7, 5.3.6, 5.4.5, 5.5.5, and 6.0.1.
π@cveNotify
ESF-IDF is the Espressif Internet of Things (IOT) Development Framework. In versions 5.2.6, 5.3.5, 5.4.4, 5.5.4, and 6.0, a heap buffer overflow exists in the Security Scheme 2 (SRP6a) session-setup path of the protocomm component. The first-phase handler (handle_session_command0() in components/protocomm/src/security/security2.c) trusts the length of a client-supplied protobuf field for the SRP6a username and copies it into a buffer whose size is derived from a narrower destination type. The resulting truncation-versus-copy asymmetry corrupts the heap when an oversized value is supplied. This issue has been patched in versions 5.2.7, 5.3.6, 5.4.5, 5.5.5, and 6.0.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix(protocomm): fixes potential issues that can lead to crash during β¦ Β· espressif/esp-idf@0ea58d7
β¦device provisioning