π¨ CVE-2026-40989
Under infinite recursion in the routing layer, request-handling can cause OOM error.
Affected Spring Products and Versions:
Spring Cloud Function 3.2.x: versions prior to 3.2.16
Spring Cloud Function 4.1.x: versions prior to 4.1.10
Spring Cloud Function 4.2.x: versions prior to 4.2.6
Spring Cloud Function 4.3.x: versions prior to 4.3.3
Spring Cloud Function 5.0.x: versions prior to 5.0.2
Older, unsupported versions are also affected.
π@cveNotify
Under infinite recursion in the routing layer, request-handling can cause OOM error.
Affected Spring Products and Versions:
Spring Cloud Function 3.2.x: versions prior to 3.2.16
Spring Cloud Function 4.1.x: versions prior to 4.1.10
Spring Cloud Function 4.2.x: versions prior to 4.2.6
Spring Cloud Function 4.3.x: versions prior to 4.3.3
Spring Cloud Function 5.0.x: versions prior to 5.0.2
Older, unsupported versions are also affected.
π@cveNotify
Self Routing guard bypassed via function composition
Level up your Java code and explore what Spring can do for you.
π¨ CVE-2026-40990
OOM error is possible while attempting to add infinite amount of functions to Function Registry.
Affected Spring Products and Versions:
Spring Cloud Function 3.2.x: versions prior to 3.2.16
Spring Cloud Function 4.1.x: versions prior to 4.1.10
Spring Cloud Function 4.2.x: versions prior to 4.2.6
Spring Cloud Function 4.3.x: versions prior to 4.3.3
Spring Cloud Function 5.0.x: versions prior to 5.0.2
Older, unsupported versions are also affected.
π@cveNotify
OOM error is possible while attempting to add infinite amount of functions to Function Registry.
Affected Spring Products and Versions:
Spring Cloud Function 3.2.x: versions prior to 3.2.16
Spring Cloud Function 4.1.x: versions prior to 4.1.10
Spring Cloud Function 4.2.x: versions prior to 4.2.6
Spring Cloud Function 4.3.x: versions prior to 4.3.3
Spring Cloud Function 5.0.x: versions prior to 5.0.2
Older, unsupported versions are also affected.
π@cveNotify
Unbounded cache for function definitions
Level up your Java code and explore what Spring can do for you.
π¨ CVE-2026-41013
Input validation bypass in SMB volume mount handling in CloudFoundry Foundation diego-release allows low-privileged CF space developer to inject arbitrary kernel CIFS mount options via bypassing the mount-option allowlist, enabling privilege escalation and security control bypass on multi-tenant Diego cells.
Affected versions:
smb-volume-release: All versions prior to v3.60.0
CF Deployment: All versions prior to v56.0.0
π@cveNotify
Input validation bypass in SMB volume mount handling in CloudFoundry Foundation diego-release allows low-privileged CF space developer to inject arbitrary kernel CIFS mount options via bypassing the mount-option allowlist, enabling privilege escalation and security control bypass on multi-tenant Diego cells.
Affected versions:
smb-volume-release: All versions prior to v3.60.0
CF Deployment: All versions prior to v56.0.0
π@cveNotify
Cloud Foundry
CVE-2026-41013 - Tenant-controlled comma smuggles arbitrary CIFS mount options | Cloud Foundry
Severity HIGH CVSS 3.1 Score: 8.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N) Vendor CloudFoundry Foundation Versions Affected *Severity is HIGH unless otherwise noted. smb-volume-release β All versions prior to v3.60.0 CF Deployment β All versions prior to v56.0.0β¦
π¨ CVE-2026-43623
microtar through 0.1.0 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the raw_to_header() function in src/microtar.c that allows attackers to corrupt adjacent stack memory by supplying a crafted TAR archive with non-null-terminated name or linkname fields. The function uses strcpy() to copy 100-byte ustar format fields that lack null terminators, causing writes of up to 355 bytes into a 100-byte destination buffer when mtar_open(), mtar_find(), or mtar_read_header() process attacker-supplied TAR archives.
π@cveNotify
microtar through 0.1.0 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the raw_to_header() function in src/microtar.c that allows attackers to corrupt adjacent stack memory by supplying a crafted TAR archive with non-null-terminated name or linkname fields. The function uses strcpy() to copy 100-byte ustar format fields that lack null terminators, causing writes of up to 355 bytes into a 100-byte destination buffer when mtar_open(), mtar_find(), or mtar_read_header() process attacker-supplied TAR archives.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Stack buffer overflow in raw_to_header() via strcpy on non-NUL-terminated name/linkname fields Β· Issue #28 Β· rxi/microtar
Summary raw_to_header() in microtar.c uses strcpy() to copy the name and linkname fields from the raw tar header into mtar_header_t. In the POSIX tar format, these are fixed-size 100-byte fields th...
π¨ CVE-2026-43624
F5-TTS through version 1.1.20 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the finetune Gradio handlers that allows unauthenticated attackers to write arbitrary files by passing unsanitized user-supplied project names directly to os.path.join() without validating the resulting path stays within the intended base directory. Attackers can supply absolute path arguments such as /tmp/EVIL to override the base directory entirely and create arbitrary directories with attacker-controlled JSON content at any filesystem path writable by the server process.
π@cveNotify
F5-TTS through version 1.1.20 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the finetune Gradio handlers that allows unauthenticated attackers to write arbitrary files by passing unsanitized user-supplied project names directly to os.path.join() without validating the resulting path stays within the intended base directory. Attackers can supply absolute path arguments such as /tmp/EVIL to override the base directory entirely and create arbitrary directories with attacker-controlled JSON content at any filesystem path writable by the server process.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Merge pull request #1294 from AAtomical/fix/path-traversal-finetune-g⦠· SWivid/F5-TTS@2f53ded
β¦radio
fix: path traversal in finetune Gradio handlers
fix: path traversal in finetune Gradio handlers
π¨ CVE-2026-43625
CodexBar prior to 0.32.0 contains a session cookie leakage vulnerability that allows network attackers to intercept imported browser session cookies by exploiting improper redirect handling for Amp and Ollama provider sessions. Attackers can position themselves on the network path to receive cleartext HTTP requests carrying imported session cookies when a provider-controlled redirect target issues a redirect to a cleartext HTTP endpoint within the same provider domain.
π@cveNotify
CodexBar prior to 0.32.0 contains a session cookie leakage vulnerability that allows network attackers to intercept imported browser session cookies by exploiting improper redirect handling for Amp and Ollama provider sessions. Attackers can position themselves on the network path to receive cleartext HTTP requests carrying imported session cookies when a provider-controlled redirect target issues a redirect to a cleartext HTTP endpoint within the same provider domain.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: require HTTPS for provider redirect cookies Β· steipete/CodexBar@cdd7e34
Require HTTPS before manually reattaching imported browser cookies on Amp and Ollama redirects.
Local proof:
- swift test --filter 'AmpUsageFetcherTests|OllamaUsageFetcherTests'
- ...
Local proof:
- swift test --filter 'AmpUsageFetcherTests|OllamaUsageFetcherTests'
- ...
π¨ CVE-2026-43958
A flaw was found in rrdcached, a component of rrdtool. A local attacker with access to a rrdcached socket can exploit a stack-based buffer overflow by sending an oversized CREATE request. This vulnerability can lead to a denial of service by crashing the daemon or potentially allow for arbitrary code execution, impacting the integrity and confidentiality of data.
π@cveNotify
A flaw was found in rrdcached, a component of rrdtool. A local attacker with access to a rrdcached socket can exploit a stack-based buffer overflow by sending an oversized CREATE request. This vulnerability can lead to a denial of service by crashing the daemon or potentially allow for arbitrary code execution, impacting the integrity and confidentiality of data.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-45275
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. Prior to version 2.7.2, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Approval app that allows a user without sharing permissions to force the system to share a file with approvers. This results in an authorization bypass and privilege escalation, allowing unauthorized distribution of restricted files. This issue has been patched in version 2.7.2.
π@cveNotify
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. Prior to version 2.7.2, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Approval app that allows a user without sharing permissions to force the system to share a file with approvers. This results in an authorization bypass and privilege escalation, allowing unauthorized distribution of restricted files. This issue has been patched in version 2.7.2.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Improve testing by lukasdotcom Β· Pull Request #392 Β· nextcloud/approval
β
Approve/disapprove files in the sidebar. Contribute to nextcloud/approval development by creating an account on GitHub.
π¨ CVE-2026-45277
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. Prior to version 2.7.2, authenticated users can check if arbitrary files are associated with specific approval workflows where they can request approval. This issue has been patched in version 2.7.2.
π@cveNotify
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. Prior to version 2.7.2, authenticated users can check if arbitrary files are associated with specific approval workflows where they can request approval. This issue has been patched in version 2.7.2.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Check access permission when requesting rules related with a file by julien-nc Β· Pull Request #356 Β· nextcloud/approval
Better permission check.
π¨ CVE-2026-45281
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. In Nextcloud Server from versions 32.0.0 to before 32.0.9, and 33.0.0 to before 33.0.3, with the knowledge of other usersβ principal URL an attacker could possibly send a request to gain full access to their calendar. Therefore, the attacker must be an authenticated user. This is because of improper authorization controls in the backend of the calendar. If the attacker had access to the calendar, they would be able to view and modify it. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 33.0.3 or 32.0.9. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Enterprise Server is upgraded to 33.0.3, 32.0.9, 31.0.14.5, 30.0.17.9, 29.0.16.16, 28.0.14.17, 27.1.11.26, 26.0.13.26, 25.0.13.29, 24.0.12.34, 23.0.12.35, 22.2.10.39, or 21.0.9.23
π@cveNotify
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. In Nextcloud Server from versions 32.0.0 to before 32.0.9, and 33.0.0 to before 33.0.3, with the knowledge of other usersβ principal URL an attacker could possibly send a request to gain full access to their calendar. Therefore, the attacker must be an authenticated user. This is because of improper authorization controls in the backend of the calendar. If the attacker had access to the calendar, they would be able to view and modify it. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 33.0.3 or 32.0.9. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Enterprise Server is upgraded to 33.0.3, 32.0.9, 31.0.14.5, 30.0.17.9, 29.0.16.16, 28.0.14.17, 27.1.11.26, 26.0.13.26, 25.0.13.29, 24.0.12.34, 23.0.12.35, 22.2.10.39, or 21.0.9.23
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Cross-Account Calendar Takeover via Unauthorized Group-Member-Set Update
### Impact
With the knowledge of other usersβ principal URL an attacker could possibly send a request to gain full access to their calendar. Therefore, the attacker must be an authenticated user...
With the knowledge of other usersβ principal URL an attacker could possibly send a request to gain full access to their calendar. Therefore, the attacker must be an authenticated user...
π¨ CVE-2026-45282
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. In Nextcloud Server from versions 32.0.0 to before 32.0.9, and 33.0.0 to before 33.0.3, an authenticated attacker can access attachments of link shares when knowing the share token, circumventing password protection or download restrictions. It is applicable to any file that is shared directly, as the attacker only needs to know a documentId they own, apart of the mentioned share token. For shared folders the attacker has to know or guess a documentId of a file that is included inside the folder, making it much harder to exploit. The attacker can only extract an attachments, but not the file shared file or folder itself. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 33.0.3 or 32.0.9. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Enterprise Server is upgraded to 33.0.3, 32.0.9, 31.0.14.5, 30.0.17.9, 29.0.16.16, 28.0.14.17 or 27.1.11.5
π@cveNotify
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. In Nextcloud Server from versions 32.0.0 to before 32.0.9, and 33.0.0 to before 33.0.3, an authenticated attacker can access attachments of link shares when knowing the share token, circumventing password protection or download restrictions. It is applicable to any file that is shared directly, as the attacker only needs to know a documentId they own, apart of the mentioned share token. For shared folders the attacker has to know or guess a documentId of a file that is included inside the folder, making it much harder to exploit. The attacker can only extract an attachments, but not the file shared file or folder itself. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 33.0.3 or 32.0.9. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Enterprise Server is upgraded to 33.0.3, 32.0.9, 31.0.14.5, 30.0.17.9, 29.0.16.16, 28.0.14.17 or 27.1.11.5
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Logged-in user bypasses share password and download restrictions on Text attachments via documentId
### Impact
An authenticated attacker can access attachments of link shares when knowing the share token, circumventing password protection or download restrictions. It is applicable to any file ...
An authenticated attacker can access attachments of link shares when knowing the share token, circumventing password protection or download restrictions. It is applicable to any file ...
π¨ CVE-2026-45283
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. In Nextcloud Server from versions 32.0.0 to before 32.0.2, and 33.0.0 to before 33.0.1, the files_lock app did not properly validate the ownership of files when processing DAV lock and unlock requests. An authenticated user could lock or unlock files belonging to other users by targeting their absolute WebDAV paths. Additionally, lock tokens were disclosed to unauthorized callers in error responses, allowing attackers to remove token-based locks placed by other users' client applications. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 32.0.2 or 33.0.1. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Enterprise Server is upgraded to 31.0.14.4 or 32.0.2 or 33.0.1
π@cveNotify
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. In Nextcloud Server from versions 32.0.0 to before 32.0.2, and 33.0.0 to before 33.0.1, the files_lock app did not properly validate the ownership of files when processing DAV lock and unlock requests. An authenticated user could lock or unlock files belonging to other users by targeting their absolute WebDAV paths. Additionally, lock tokens were disclosed to unauthorized callers in error responses, allowing attackers to remove token-based locks placed by other users' client applications. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Server is upgraded to 32.0.2 or 33.0.1. It is recommended that the Nextcloud Enterprise Server is upgraded to 31.0.14.4 or 32.0.2 or 33.0.1
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix(DAV): Fix getFileFromAbsoluteUri by provokateurin Β· Pull Request #1007 Β· nextcloud/files_lock
Contribute to nextcloud/files_lock development by creating an account on GitHub.
π¨ CVE-2026-12968
The Product Addons and Product Options With Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 1.6.15 does not restrict an unauthenticated file-upload endpoint and accepts SVG files that are stored and served inline, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to upload a malicious SVG whose embedded script executes in the session of any user (such as an administrator) who later opens the file.
π@cveNotify
The Product Addons and Product Options With Custom Fields WordPress plugin before 1.6.15 does not restrict an unauthenticated file-upload endpoint and accepts SVG files that are stored and served inline, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to upload a malicious SVG whose embedded script executes in the session of any user (such as an administrator) who later opens the file.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
Product Addons β WowAddons < 1.6.15 - Unauthenticated Stored XSS via Arbitrary SVG Upload
See details on Product Addons β WowAddons < 1.6.15 - Unauthenticated Stored XSS via Arbitrary SVG Upload CVE 2026-12968. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-12987
The Events Manager WordPress plugin before 7.3.7 does not safely handle booking-registration data on sites using No-User-Account Booking Mode: a booker-supplied registration field is stored as booking meta and later deserialized without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection. The resulting gadget chain reaches a database query that is built without parameterisation, so an unauthenticated attacker can read arbitrary database data (e.g. user password hashes, secret keys) when the booking is later loaded.
π@cveNotify
The Events Manager WordPress plugin before 7.3.7 does not safely handle booking-registration data on sites using No-User-Account Booking Mode: a booker-supplied registration field is stored as booking meta and later deserialized without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection. The resulting gadget chain reaches a database query that is built without parameterisation, so an unauthenticated attacker can read arbitrary database data (e.g. user password hashes, secret keys) when the booking is later loaded.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
Events Manager < 7.3.7 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via PHP Object Injection in Booking Registration
See details on Events Manager < 7.3.7 - Unauthenticated SQL Injection via PHP Object Injection in Booking Registration CVE 2026-12987. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-14322
The Timetics WordPress plugin before 1.0.57 does not enforce a pending or unpaid status for new bookings created through a payment method other than its recognised gateways, allowing unauthenticated users to create fully-approved bookings for priced appointments without making any payment.
π@cveNotify
The Timetics WordPress plugin before 1.0.57 does not enforce a pending or unpaid status for new bookings created through a payment method other than its recognised gateways, allowing unauthenticated users to create fully-approved bookings for priced appointments without making any payment.
π@cveNotify
WPScan
Timetics < 1.0.57 - Unauthenticated Booking Auto-Approval via Arbitrary payment_method
See details on Timetics < 1.0.57 - Unauthenticated Booking Auto-Approval via Arbitrary payment_method CVE 2026-14322. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
π¨ CVE-2026-3821
Supermicro (SMC) SMASH services contain an Arbitrary code execution issue in X14DBG-DAP and X14DBI.
An authorized attacker can exploit SMASHβs input capability to compromise data integrity or launch a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack against the BMC.
π@cveNotify
Supermicro (SMC) SMASH services contain an Arbitrary code execution issue in X14DBG-DAP and X14DBI.
An authorized attacker can exploit SMASHβs input capability to compromise data integrity or launch a Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack against the BMC.
π@cveNotify
π¨ CVE-2026-45284
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. From version 1.3.6 to before version 8.4.0, an improper check allowed users that where provided by LDAP to still authenticate towards user OIDC after they where deleted. This issue has been patched in version 8.4.0.
π@cveNotify
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. From version 1.3.6 to before version 8.4.0, an improper check allowed users that where provided by LDAP to still authenticate towards user OIDC after they where deleted. This issue has been patched in version 8.4.0.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Wrong condition in the User OIDC app's LdapService allowed deleted LDAP users to authenticate
### Impact
An improper check allowed users that where provided by LDAP to still authenticate towards user OIDC after they where deleted.
### Patches
It is recommended that the user_oidc ap...
An improper check allowed users that where provided by LDAP to still authenticate towards user OIDC after they where deleted.
### Patches
It is recommended that the user_oidc ap...
π¨ CVE-2026-45285
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. From versions 32.0.0 to before 32.0.9, and 33.0.0 to before 33.0.3, when a user shares a folder or file with a Nextcloud Team that includes an external member (a person added via email address who does not have a Nextcloud account), the system automatically creates a public link for that external member. This public link is not displayed in the share section of the folder, so the folder owner has no knowledge of its existence. It is sent via email to the external member. It grants the same permissions (read, write, delete, reshare, download) as the Teamβs access. An attacker who receives or intercepts this link can access, modify, delete, reshare, and download all data in the shared folder without any further authentication. The folder owner cannot see or revoke the link through the normal sharing interface. This issue has been patched in versions 32.0.9 and 33.0.3.
π@cveNotify
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. From versions 32.0.0 to before 32.0.9, and 33.0.0 to before 33.0.3, when a user shares a folder or file with a Nextcloud Team that includes an external member (a person added via email address who does not have a Nextcloud account), the system automatically creates a public link for that external member. This public link is not displayed in the share section of the folder, so the folder owner has no knowledge of its existence. It is sent via email to the external member. It grants the same permissions (read, write, delete, reshare, download) as the Teamβs access. An attacker who receives or intercepts this link can access, modify, delete, reshare, and download all data in the shared folder without any further authentication. The folder owner cannot see or revoke the link through the normal sharing interface. This issue has been patched in versions 32.0.9 and 33.0.3.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: update shares handling by cristianscheid Β· Pull Request #2454 Β· nextcloud/circles
Resolves: #
Summary
Update how shares are handled.
Checklist
Code is properly formatted
Sign-off message is added to all commits
Tests (unit, integration, api and/or acceptance) are included
Sc...
Summary
Update how shares are handled.
Checklist
Code is properly formatted
Sign-off message is added to all commits
Tests (unit, integration, api and/or acceptance) are included
Sc...
π¨ CVE-2026-45286
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. From versions 5.5.13 to before 5.5.17, and 6.2.0 to before 6.2.3, an authenticated user can enumerate users on the same Nextcloud instance by using the Calendar app's endpoint for suggesting attendees. The sharing restrictions, applied to other endpoints, were not effective here. This issue has been patched in versions 5.5.17 and 6.2.3.
π@cveNotify
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. From versions 5.5.13 to before 5.5.17, and 6.2.0 to before 6.2.3, an authenticated user can enumerate users on the same Nextcloud instance by using the Calendar app's endpoint for suggesting attendees. The sharing restrictions, applied to other endpoints, were not effective here. This issue has been patched in versions 5.5.17 and 6.2.3.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
Attendee invite to a calendar event will autocomplete everyone (data protection issue) Β· Issue #7971 Β· nextcloud/calendar
Steps to reproduce Open an event in the calendar Type any letter in the attendees dropdown menu Autocompletion will show everyone in the nextcloud instance that matches the letter, regardless of an...
π¨ CVE-2026-45302
parse-nested-form-data is a tiny node module for parsing FormData by name into objects and arrays. Prior to version 1.0.1, parseFormData() walks bracket and dot-notation FormData field names into nested objects without filtering reserved property keys. A single FormData field whose name begins with __proto__, or contains .__proto__. mid-path, causes the parser to traverse onto Object.prototype and assign properties there, polluting the prototype chain of every plain object in the running process. This issue has been patched in version 1.0.1.
π@cveNotify
parse-nested-form-data is a tiny node module for parsing FormData by name into objects and arrays. Prior to version 1.0.1, parseFormData() walks bracket and dot-notation FormData field names into nested objects without filtering reserved property keys. A single FormData field whose name begins with __proto__, or contains .__proto__. mid-path, causes the parser to traverse onto Object.prototype and assign properties there, polluting the prototype chain of every plain object in the running process. This issue has been patched in version 1.0.1.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: prevent prototype pollution via __proto__ in FormData field name⦠· milamer/parse-nested-form-data@527ad58
β¦s (#4)
fix: prevent prototype pollution via __proto__ in FormData field names
`parseFormData` walked bracket and dot-notation field names into nested
objects without filtering reserved property ...
fix: prevent prototype pollution via __proto__ in FormData field names
`parseFormData` walked bracket and dot-notation field names into nested
objects without filtering reserved property ...
π¨ CVE-2026-45543
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. From version 4.3.0 to before version 5.2.7, a removed collaborator retains unauthorized read access to uploaded respondent files for the affected form. The scope is limited to uploaded files for forms where that user previously had results access. This issue has been patched in version 5.2.7.
π@cveNotify
Nextcloud is an open source content collaboration platform. From version 4.3.0 to before version 5.2.7, a removed collaborator retains unauthorized read access to uploaded respondent files for the affected form. The scope is limited to uploaded files for forms where that user previously had results access. This issue has been patched in version 5.2.7.
π@cveNotify
GitHub
fix: clean up file shares on collaborator removal by pringelmann Β· Pull Request #3291 Β· nextcloud/forms
Deleting a Forms collaborator share previously left the separate Files share for the uploaded response folder in place, so a removed collaborator kept read access to respondent uploads.