🚨 CVE-2026-51025
Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in fuint Member Marketing System <=v1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the ClientMessageController.java file

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-51031
FlareSolverr before version 3.4.7 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /v1 API endpoint. This allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-51385
An issue in safishamsi Open-Source GRAPHIFY v.0.3.2 through v0.4.29 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the validate_url, safe_fetch, _build_opener, _fetch_html and _download_binary functions.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-52656
An issue in SJCAM AllWinner Tech products SJ4000-Air V1.4C and before and Whitelabel based v.1.4C and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted FEX file

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-55544
NextCRM is open-source customer relationship management (CRM) software. In version 0.12.1, the MCP campaign tools expose campaign read and write operations over the network using user-generated Bearer API tokens (`nxtc__...`). The application has an authorization model that restricts normal users to campaigns they created, but multiple MCP campaign handlers ignore the authenticated user ID and query or mutate campaigns only by object ID. As a result, a low-privileged authenticated user with a valid MCP API token can enumerate all campaigns, read campaign details, update or delete campaigns owned by other users, modify campaign templates and steps, and potentially trigger or pause campaign delivery. Version 0.12.2 fixes the issue.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-55550
NextCRM is open-source customer relationship management (CRM) software. The CRM product catalog is an organization-wide business object. Normal application server actions restrict product creation, update, and deletion to `manager` and `admin` roles. However, in version 0.12.1, the MCP product tools expose the same write operations through `/api/mcp/mcp` using user-generated Bearer tokens and do not enforce role checks. Any authenticated low-privileged user who can generate an MCP API token can create, modify, archive, or soft-delete products in the shared CRM product catalog. Version 0.12.3 contains a fix.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-57494
AgenticMail gives AI agents real email addresses and phone numbers. In @agenticmail/api prior to version 0.9.64, a low-privileged authenticated AgenticMail agent can enumerate another agent's pending/claimed tasks by supplying the target agent name to `GET /api/agenticmail/tasks/pending?assignee=<name>`. The returned task objects include the task IDs and payloads. The same task IDs can then be used with the capability-style task mutation endpoints (`/tasks/:id/claim`, `/tasks/:id/result`, `/tasks/:id/complete`, `/tasks/:id/fail`) to claim, complete, or fail tasks assigned to a different agent. Because ordinary authenticated agents can discover agent names through `GET /api/agenticmail/accounts/directory`, the task ID effectively stops being a secret capability. This turns the intended capability model into a cross-agent authorization bypass. Version 0.9.64 contains a fix.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-57495
AgenticMail gives AI agents real email addresses and phone numbers. In @agenticmail/claudecode prior to version 0.2.39, @agenticmail/codex prior to version 0.1.33, @agenticmail/core prior to version 0.9.43, and @agenticmail/openclaw prior to version 0.5.71, two inbound-mail handlers act on a privileged effect without verifying that the sender is the operator, while a sibling handler in the same repo does. The higher-impact one: any external email routed to the bridge inbox causes the dispatcher to resume the operator's Claude Code session with `permissionMode: 'bypassPermissions'`, embedding the attacker-controlled `from`/`subject`/`preview` verbatim into the prompt the resumed agent reads — an indirect prompt injection into a fully-privileged agent (Bash/Write/Edit/WebFetch + the agenticmail MCP toolbelt) running as the operator's OAuth identity. The sibling operator-query email-reply hook gates the same untrusted-From provenance with `isOperatorReplySender(replyFrom, config.operatorEmail)` (fail-closed); the bridge-wake path — a strictly higher-privilege effect — has no equivalent. @agenticmail/claudecode 0.2.39, @agenticmail/codex 0.1.33, @agenticmail/core 0.9.43, and @agenticmail/openclaw 0.5.71 contain a fix.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-57852
Grav CMS scheduler-webhook plugin contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trigger configured scheduled jobs by exploiting a short-circuit logic flaw in the webhook token validation. Attackers can send a single unauthenticated POST request to the scheduler webhook endpoint to execute all configured scheduled jobs or target a specific job, causing unintended execution of operator-defined commands under the web server process user.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-64624
FreeRDP before 3.28.0 treats lines beginning with forward slash in RDP files as raw command-line options, exposing the entire CLI parser surface to untrusted files. Attackers can craft malicious RDP files with /rdp2tcp, /cert:ignore, or /drive options to execute arbitrary commands, bypass certificate validation, or expose local filesystems without user interaction.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-64625
AVideo before 29.0 contains an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-45578 where execAsync() re-wraps escaped commands in double-quoted sh -c, allowing command substitution via $() and backticks. Attackers can inject arbitrary OS commands through the Live plugin on_publish.php endpoint despite escapeshellarg() protection.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-64626
AVideo versions from commit 0dbadbca through latest master contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the encoder download-by-URL flow due to an unpinned retry fallback that bypasses DNS pinning validation. An authenticated attacker can supply a downloadURL that redirects to an internal address, causing the unpinned retry to follow the redirect and reach internal targets for blind SSRF attacks.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2025-15115
Petlibro Smart Pet Feeder Platform versions up to 1.7.31 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to access any user account by exploiting OAuth token validation flaws in the social login system. Attackers can send requests to /member/auth/thirdLogin with arbitrary Google IDs and phoneBrand parameters to obtain full session tokens and account access without proper OAuth verification.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2025-3646
Petlibro Smart Pet Feeder Platform versions up to 1.7.31 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows unauthorized users to add users as shared owners to any device by exploiting missing permission checks. Attackers can send requests to the device share API to gain unauthorized access to devices and view owner information without proper authorization validation.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2025-3652
Petlibro Smart Pet Feeder Platform versions up to 1.7.31 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows unauthorized access to private audio recordings by exploiting sequential audio IDs and insecure assignment endpoints. Attackers can send requests to /device/deviceAudio/use with arbitrary audio IDs to assign recordings to any device, then retrieve audio URLs to access other users' private recordings.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2025-3653
Petlibro Smart Pet Feeder Platform versions up to 1.7.31 contains an improper access control vulnerability that allows unauthorized device manipulation by accepting arbitrary serial numbers without ownership verification. Attackers can control any device by sending serial numbers to device control APIs to change feeding schedules, trigger manual feeds, access camera feeds, and modify device settings without authorization checks.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2025-3654
Petlibro Smart Pet Feeder Platform versions up to 1.7.31 contains an information disclosure vulnerability that allows unauthorized access to device hardware information by exploiting insecure API endpoints. Attackers can retrieve device serial numbers and MAC addresses through /device/devicePetRelation/getBoundDevices using pet IDs, enabling full device control without proper authorization checks.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2025-3660
Petlibro Smart Pet Feeder Platform versions up to 1.7.31 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated users to access other users' pet data by exploiting missing ownership verification. Attackers can send requests to /member/pet/detailV2 with arbitrary pet IDs to retrieve sensitive information including pet details, member IDs, and avatar URLs without proper authorization checks.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-46579
A flaw was found in the OpenShift Router. When a Route has `insecureEdgeTerminationPolicy` set to Allow, the HTTP frontend does not remove `X-SSL-Client-*` headers from incoming requests. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to send plain HTTP requests with crafted `X-SSL-Client-*` headers. As a result, backends relying on these headers for mutual TLS (Transport Layer Security) authentication can be bypassed, enabling the attacker to impersonate client certificate identities.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-1784
The Route OpenShift resource allows to define routes to make pods reachable at a subdomain through HAProxy. It was found that the checks performed on the spec.path YAML stanza in a Route document was insufficient and could allow a controlled injection of the HAProxy configuration.

🎖@cveNotify

🚨 CVE-2026-14439
A path traversal vulnerability exists in the Git Service component shared by Altium Enterprise Server and Altium 365. The service accepts a sequence of post-clone file-manipulation operations that use user-supplied paths without validation, allowing an authenticated user with basic git access to move arbitrary files outside the intended repository area.




This file-move primitive can be used to place attacker-controlled script content into directories where it is later executed by the service, resulting in remote code execution under the Git Service account. On multi-tenant Altium 365 deployments, this could have allowed access to data belonging to other tenants on the same infrastructure node.
Altium Enterprise Server is fixed in 8.1.1; the issue has been remediated in Altium 365 (commercial and government cloud) at the service level.

🎖@cveNotify