🚨 CVE-2026-16221
Impact: fast-uri versions from 2.3.1 through 4.1.0 (including the 3.x line up to 3.1.3 and the 2.x line up to 2.4.2) do not treat a literal backslash character (U+005C) as an authority delimiter. Node's native WHATWG URL parser, used by fetch, undici, and Node's http and https clients, normalizes the backslash to a forward slash for special schemes such as http, https, ws, wss, ftp, and file. As a result, the two parsers extract different hosts from the same input string. Applications that use fast-uri to enforce host-based policy such as allowlists, denylists, loopback or SSRF filtering, redirect validation, or outbound proxy routing before passing the same URL into Node's URL or fetch consumers can be steered to an unintended destination, including cloud metadata endpoints, loopback, or internal hosts.
Patches: upgrade to fast-uri 4.1.1, 3.1.4, or 2.4.3.
Workarounds: none.
🎖@cveNotify
Impact: fast-uri versions from 2.3.1 through 4.1.0 (including the 3.x line up to 3.1.3 and the 2.x line up to 2.4.2) do not treat a literal backslash character (U+005C) as an authority delimiter. Node's native WHATWG URL parser, used by fetch, undici, and Node's http and https clients, normalizes the backslash to a forward slash for special schemes such as http, https, ws, wss, ftp, and file. As a result, the two parsers extract different hosts from the same input string. Applications that use fast-uri to enforce host-based policy such as allowlists, denylists, loopback or SSRF filtering, redirect validation, or outbound proxy routing before passing the same URL into Node's URL or fetch consumers can be steered to an unintended destination, including cloud metadata endpoints, loopback, or internal hosts.
Patches: upgrade to fast-uri 4.1.1, 3.1.4, or 2.4.3.
Workarounds: none.
🎖@cveNotify
OpenJS Foundation CVE Numbering Authority
Security Advisories
The OpenJS Foundation’s CVE Numbering Authority (CNA)
🚨 CVE-2026-63840
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v5.3.0 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 86ac011ae234c03fb872f4945913391ea1d8862e)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v5.3.0 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 86ac011ae234c03fb872f4945913391ea1d8862e)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63841
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v5.0.1 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 742a98e2e81702df8fe1b1eccee5223220a03dc2)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v5.0.1 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 742a98e2e81702df8fe1b1eccee5223220a03dc2)
🎖@cveNotify
👍1
🚨 CVE-2026-63843
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v4.0.5 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit f05d0a4f21fc720116d6e238f23308b199891058)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v4.0.5 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit f05d0a4f21fc720116d6e238f23308b199891058)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63844
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v4.0.3 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 2f6afc97d259d530f4f86c7743efbc573a8da927)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v4.0.3 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 2f6afc97d259d530f4f86c7743efbc573a8da927)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63845
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v4.0 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 8d0cac9478a3f046279c657d6a2545de49ae675a)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v4.0 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 8d0cac9478a3f046279c657d6a2545de49ae675a)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63846
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v3.0 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 4d7d774f100efb5089c86a1fb8c5bf47c63fc9ef)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v3.0 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 4d7d774f100efb5089c86a1fb8c5bf47c63fc9ef)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63847
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v2.5 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 3216a7f4e2642bda5fd14f57586e835ae9202587)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v2.5 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 3216a7f4e2642bda5fd14f57586e835ae9202587)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63848
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v2.0 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 96179da0c6b059eb31706a0abe8dd6381c533143)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v2.0 ring
JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS
submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 96179da0c6b059eb31706a0abe8dd6381c533143)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63849
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v5.0.1 enc ring
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit e16be95a2c3ee712b142cb27d2dca0b461181359)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v5.0.1 enc ring
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit e16be95a2c3ee712b142cb27d2dca0b461181359)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63850
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v5.0.0 enc ring
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 49b1fbbb5a071197ee71e2d70959b1cb29bdc317)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v5.0.0 enc ring
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 49b1fbbb5a071197ee71e2d70959b1cb29bdc317)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63851
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v4.0.5 enc ring
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 084d94ac93707bdda07efb5cee786f632de4219b)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v4.0.5 enc ring
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 084d94ac93707bdda07efb5cee786f632de4219b)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63852
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v4.0.3 enc ring
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit ff1a5a125c5a70c328806b9bc01d7d942cf3f9aa)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v4.0.3 enc ring
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit ff1a5a125c5a70c328806b9bc01d7d942cf3f9aa)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63853
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v4.0 enc ring
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit fd852c048b46f9825e904a4f3f4538fe9d8827d9)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v4.0 enc ring
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit fd852c048b46f9825e904a4f3f4538fe9d8827d9)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63854
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v3.0 enc/dec rings
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 663bed3c7b8b9a7624b0d95d300ddae034ad0614)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v3.0 enc/dec rings
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit 663bed3c7b8b9a7624b0d95d300ddae034ad0614)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63855
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v2.5 enc/dec rings
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit efc9dd5590894109bce9a0bfe1fa5592dd6b20b1)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v2.5 enc/dec rings
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit efc9dd5590894109bce9a0bfe1fa5592dd6b20b1)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63856
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v2.0 enc/dec rings
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit e2b5499fca55f1a32960a311bbb62e35891eaf73)
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu/vcn: set no_user_fence for VCN v2.0 enc/dec rings
VCN encoder and decoder rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes,
reject CS submissions with user fences.
(cherry picked from commit e2b5499fca55f1a32960a311bbb62e35891eaf73)
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63857
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: airoha: Do not read uninitialized fragment address in airoha_dev_xmit()
The transmit loop in airoha_dev_xmit() reads fragment address and length
during its final iteration, when the loop index equals
skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags, at which point the fragment data is
uninitialized. While these values are never consumed, the read itself is
unsafe and may trigger a page fault. Fix this by avoiding the fragment
read on the last iteration.
Additionally, move the skb pointer from the first to the last used packet
descriptor, so that airoha_qdma_tx_napi_poll() defers freeing the skb
until the final descriptor is processed.
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: airoha: Do not read uninitialized fragment address in airoha_dev_xmit()
The transmit loop in airoha_dev_xmit() reads fragment address and length
during its final iteration, when the loop index equals
skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags, at which point the fragment data is
uninitialized. While these values are never consumed, the read itself is
unsafe and may trigger a page fault. Fix this by avoiding the fragment
read on the last iteration.
Additionally, move the skb pointer from the first to the last used packet
descriptor, so that airoha_qdma_tx_napi_poll() defers freeing the skb
until the final descriptor is processed.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63858
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: add hook transactions for device deletions
Restore the flag that indicates that the hook is going away, ie.
NFT_HOOK_REMOVE, but add a new transaction object to track deletion
of hooks without altering the basechain/flowtable hook_list during
the preparation phase.
The existing approach that moves the hook from the basechain/flowtable
hook_list to transaction hook_list breaks netlink dump path readers
of this RCU-protected list.
It should be possible use an array for nft_trans_hook to store the
deleted hooks to compact the representation but I am not expecting
many hook object, specially now that wildcard support for devices
is in place.
Note that the nft_trans_chain_hooks() list contains a list of struct
nft_trans_hook objects for DELCHAIN and DELFLOWTABLE commands, while
this list stores struct nft_hook objects for NEWCHAIN and NEWFLOWTABLE.
Note that new commands can be updated to use nft_trans_hook for
consistency.
This patch also adapts the event notification path to deal with the list
of hook transactions.
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
netfilter: nf_tables: add hook transactions for device deletions
Restore the flag that indicates that the hook is going away, ie.
NFT_HOOK_REMOVE, but add a new transaction object to track deletion
of hooks without altering the basechain/flowtable hook_list during
the preparation phase.
The existing approach that moves the hook from the basechain/flowtable
hook_list to transaction hook_list breaks netlink dump path readers
of this RCU-protected list.
It should be possible use an array for nft_trans_hook to store the
deleted hooks to compact the representation but I am not expecting
many hook object, specially now that wildcard support for devices
is in place.
Note that the nft_trans_chain_hooks() list contains a list of struct
nft_trans_hook objects for DELCHAIN and DELFLOWTABLE commands, while
this list stores struct nft_hook objects for NEWCHAIN and NEWFLOWTABLE.
Note that new commands can be updated to use nft_trans_hook for
consistency.
This patch also adapts the event notification path to deal with the list
of hook transactions.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63860
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRING
These attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), but
NLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.
Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmt
specifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.
As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspace
does include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, and
thus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/core: Prefer NLA_NUL_STRING
These attributes are evaluated as c-string (passed to strcmp), but
NLA_STRING doesn't check for the presence of a \0 terminator.
Either this needs to switch to nla_strcmp() and needs to adjust printf fmt
specifier to not use plain %s, or this needs to use NLA_NUL_STRING.
As the code has been this way for long time, it seems to me that userspace
does include the terminating nul, even tough its not enforced so far, and
thus NLA_NUL_STRING use is the simpler solution.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-63863
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/gpusvm: Fix unbalanced unlock in drm_gpusvm_scan_mm()
There is a unbalanced lock/unlock to gpusvm notifier lock:
[ 931.045868] =====================================
[ 931.046509] WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
[ 931.047149] 6.19.0-rc6+xe-**************** #9 Tainted: G U
[ 931.048150] -------------------------------------
[ 931.048790] kworker/u5:0/51 is trying to release lock (&gpusvm->notifier_lock) at:
[ 931.049801] [<ffffffffa090c0d8>] drm_gpusvm_scan_mm+0x188/0x460 [drm_gpusvm_helper]
[ 931.050802] but there are no more locks to release!
[ 931.051463]
The drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock() sits under err_free label and the
first jump to err_free is just before calling the
drm_gpusvm_notifier_lock() causing unbalanced unlock.
🎖@cveNotify
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/gpusvm: Fix unbalanced unlock in drm_gpusvm_scan_mm()
There is a unbalanced lock/unlock to gpusvm notifier lock:
[ 931.045868] =====================================
[ 931.046509] WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
[ 931.047149] 6.19.0-rc6+xe-**************** #9 Tainted: G U
[ 931.048150] -------------------------------------
[ 931.048790] kworker/u5:0/51 is trying to release lock (&gpusvm->notifier_lock) at:
[ 931.049801] [<ffffffffa090c0d8>] drm_gpusvm_scan_mm+0x188/0x460 [drm_gpusvm_helper]
[ 931.050802] but there are no more locks to release!
[ 931.051463]
The drm_gpusvm_notifier_unlock() sits under err_free label and the
first jump to err_free is just before calling the
drm_gpusvm_notifier_lock() causing unbalanced unlock.
🎖@cveNotify