🚨 CVE-2026-8309
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Armiya Information Technologies Ltd. Co. Access Control System (GKS) allows Reflected XSS.
This issue affects Access Control System (GKS): before Version 2.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Armiya Information Technologies Ltd. Co. Access Control System (GKS) allows Reflected XSS.
This issue affects Access Control System (GKS): before Version 2.
🎖@cveNotify
siberguvenlik.gov.tr
T.C. Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı resmi web sitesi.
🚨 CVE-2026-8377
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Armiya Information Technologies Ltd. Co. Access Control System (GKS) allows Collect Data from Common Resource Locations.
This issue affects Access Control System (GKS): before Version 2.
🎖@cveNotify
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Armiya Information Technologies Ltd. Co. Access Control System (GKS) allows Collect Data from Common Resource Locations.
This issue affects Access Control System (GKS): before Version 2.
🎖@cveNotify
siberguvenlik.gov.tr
T.C. Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı resmi web sitesi.
🚨 CVE-2026-13199
EEPROM firmware on Raspberry Pi 5 and Compute Module 5 devices produced non-random KASLR and RNG seed values. This resulted in consistent kernel addresses across boots and devices, potentially making it easier to exploit other vulnerabilities. Additionally, the low-quality RNG seed may affect the quality of random numbers or delay booting while sufficient entropy is accumulated from other sources.
🎖@cveNotify
EEPROM firmware on Raspberry Pi 5 and Compute Module 5 devices produced non-random KASLR and RNG seed values. This resulted in consistent kernel addresses across boots and devices, potentially making it easier to exploit other vulnerabilities. Additionally, the low-quality RNG seed may affect the quality of random numbers or delay booting while sufficient entropy is accumulated from other sources.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
pieeprom-2026-05-26: 2712: Make Pi 5 use the correct entropy source for kaslr-seed and rng-seed (latest) by timg236 · Pull Request…
Make Pi 5 use the correct entropy source
The kernel looks to Device Tree for the rng-seed and kaslr-seed values as sources of entropy. On Pi 5 the bootsys code enables the HWRNG, but for historical...
The kernel looks to Device Tree for the rng-seed and kaslr-seed values as sources of entropy. On Pi 5 the bootsys code enables the HWRNG, but for historical...
🚨 CVE-2026-58384
A flaw was found in GIMP's PSD parser. An integer overflow in read_RLE_channel() can cause an undersized heap allocation for the RLE row-length table, after which subsequent per-row writes corrupt heap memory. This could lead to memory corruption, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in GIMP's PSD parser. An integer overflow in read_RLE_channel() can cause an undersized heap allocation for the RLE row-length table, after which subsequent per-row writes corrupt heap memory. This could lead to memory corruption, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-11610
A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server
(389-ds-base). After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF > 0),
an authenticated attacker can send a specially crafted oversized LDAP UNBIND packet
that is copied into a 512-byte heap receive buffer without a bounds check in
sasl_io_recv() in sasl_io.c. This allows up to approximately 2 megabytes of
attacker-controlled data to overflow the buffer, causing a denial of service (server
crash). In FreeIPA and Red Hat Identity Management deployments, any domain user with
a valid Kerberos ticket, any enrolled host, or any service account can trigger this
vulnerability over the network after authenticating via GSSAPI.
The vulnerable code path has existed since approximately 2013 (389-ds-base 1.3.2) and
was not addressed by the CVE-2025-14905 fix, which patched a separate heap overflow
in schema.c only.
🎖@cveNotify
A heap buffer overflow flaw was found in the SASL I/O layer of 389 Directory Server
(389-ds-base). After a successful SASL bind with integrity protection (SSF > 0),
an authenticated attacker can send a specially crafted oversized LDAP UNBIND packet
that is copied into a 512-byte heap receive buffer without a bounds check in
sasl_io_recv() in sasl_io.c. This allows up to approximately 2 megabytes of
attacker-controlled data to overflow the buffer, causing a denial of service (server
crash). In FreeIPA and Red Hat Identity Management deployments, any domain user with
a valid Kerberos ticket, any enrolled host, or any service account can trigger this
vulnerability over the network after authenticating via GSSAPI.
The vulnerable code path has existed since approximately 2013 (389-ds-base 1.3.2) and
was not addressed by the CVE-2025-14905 fix, which patched a separate heap overflow
in schema.c only.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-14474
A flaw was found in SSSD's LDAP sudo provider. When the ldap_sudo_search_base option is not explicitly configured, SSSD searches the entire LDAP directory tree for sudoRole objects. An authenticated attacker with write access to any subtree can inject a sudoRole object granting root-level sudo privileges on all SSSD-enrolled hosts.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in SSSD's LDAP sudo provider. When the ldap_sudo_search_base option is not explicitly configured, SSSD searches the entire LDAP directory tree for sudoRole objects. An authenticated attacker with write access to any subtree can inject a sudoRole object granting root-level sudo privileges on all SSSD-enrolled hosts.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-14476
A path traversal flaw was found in SSSD's AD GPO provider. The ad_gpo_extract_smb_components() function does not sanitize .. sequences in the gPCFileSysPath LDAP attribute, allowing an attacker with AD GPO management access to write files outside the GPO cache directory as root. On default RHEL configurations with SELinux enforcing, this can be used to inject Kerberos configuration leading to authentication bypass.
🎖@cveNotify
A path traversal flaw was found in SSSD's AD GPO provider. The ad_gpo_extract_smb_components() function does not sanitize .. sequences in the gPCFileSysPath LDAP attribute, allowing an attacker with AD GPO management access to write files outside the GPO cache directory as root. On default RHEL configurations with SELinux enforcing, this can be used to inject Kerberos configuration leading to authentication bypass.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-14867
Credentials of built-in users are insecurely stored in the User directory of PcVue projects, all versions prior to 17.0.0. A local attacker could retrieve users’ credentials.
Active Directory accounts are not affected by this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
Credentials of built-in users are insecurely stored in the User directory of PcVue projects, all versions prior to 17.0.0. A local attacker could retrieve users’ credentials.
Active Directory accounts are not affected by this vulnerability.
🎖@cveNotify
PcVue
Security Bulletins | PcVue
Stay informed with the latest PcVue security bulletins. Review updates, patches, and advisories to keep your system protected and up to date.
🚨 CVE-2026-14868
The encryption algorithm used to protect the configuration of user accounts, stored in the built-in user directory of PcVue projects, all versions prior to 17.0.0, is not strong enough for the level of protection required. A local attacker could alter the existing configuration and ultimately gain privileged access to the PcVue application.
🎖@cveNotify
The encryption algorithm used to protect the configuration of user accounts, stored in the built-in user directory of PcVue projects, all versions prior to 17.0.0, is not strong enough for the level of protection required. A local attacker could alter the existing configuration and ultimately gain privileged access to the PcVue application.
🎖@cveNotify
PcVue
Security Bulletins | PcVue
Stay informed with the latest PcVue security bulletins. Review updates, patches, and advisories to keep your system protected and up to date.
🚨 CVE-2026-48828
The Bulk Variables API in Apache Airflow called the redactor without passing the variable's key, so the key-based `should_hide_value_for_key` check (which triggers on secret-suffixed key names like `*_password` / `*_token` / `*_secret`) could not fire for JSON-decodable variable values. An authenticated UI/API user with bulk Variable read permission could retrieve plaintext values from JSON variables whose key would otherwise trigger redaction. Affects deployments that store sensitive values in JSON-typed Airflow Variables under secret-suffixed key names. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow` 3.3.0 or later (the fix landed on `main` after 3.2.2; no 3.2.x backport).
🎖@cveNotify
The Bulk Variables API in Apache Airflow called the redactor without passing the variable's key, so the key-based `should_hide_value_for_key` check (which triggers on secret-suffixed key names like `*_password` / `*_token` / `*_secret`) could not fire for JSON-decodable variable values. An authenticated UI/API user with bulk Variable read permission could retrieve plaintext values from JSON variables whose key would otherwise trigger redaction. Affects deployments that store sensitive values in JSON-typed Airflow Variables under secret-suffixed key names. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow` 3.3.0 or later (the fix landed on `main` after 3.2.2; no 3.2.x backport).
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Fix the miss redact in variable Json value by shubhamraj-git · Pull Request #67495 · apache/airflow
When a Variable's key matches the sensitive-key heuristic (e.g. db_password), its value is correctly masked when stored as a plain string but if the value is valid JSON, the redact() call i...
🚨 CVE-2026-48891
A bug in Apache Airflow's `/ui/dependencies` scheduling graph endpoint applied the caller's readable-Dag filter to the top-level serialized Dag key but still emitted referenced Dag IDs through the `dep.source` and `dep.target` fields of trigger / sensor dependency entries. An authenticated UI user with read permission on some Dags could enumerate the identifiers of other Dags they were not authorized to read by inspecting the dependency graph for trigger / sensor references. Affects deployments that rely on per-Dag read scoping to keep Dag identifiers private across teams. This is a residual gap in the fix for CVE-2026-28563, which filtered the top-level Dag key but did not propagate the filter into the trigger / sensor dep-source / dep-target fields. Users who already upgraded for CVE-2026-28563 should additionally upgrade to `apache-airflow` 3.3.0 or later to cover the residual trigger / sensor dependency leak.
🎖@cveNotify
A bug in Apache Airflow's `/ui/dependencies` scheduling graph endpoint applied the caller's readable-Dag filter to the top-level serialized Dag key but still emitted referenced Dag IDs through the `dep.source` and `dep.target` fields of trigger / sensor dependency entries. An authenticated UI user with read permission on some Dags could enumerate the identifiers of other Dags they were not authorized to read by inspecting the dependency graph for trigger / sensor references. Affects deployments that rely on per-Dag read scoping to keep Dag identifiers private across teams. This is a residual gap in the fix for CVE-2026-28563, which filtered the top-level Dag key but did not propagate the filter into the trigger / sensor dep-source / dep-target fields. Users who already upgraded for CVE-2026-28563 should additionally upgrade to `apache-airflow` 3.3.0 or later to cover the residual trigger / sensor dependency leak.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Filter scheduling-dependencies graph edges by readable-DAG access by potiuk · Pull Request #67627 · apache/airflow
The UI scheduling-dependencies graph route (GET /ui/dependencies?dependency_type=scheduling) was filtering only the top-level DAG keys in get_scheduling_dependencies() by the caller's reada...
🚨 CVE-2026-48892
The Config API in Apache Airflow surfaced per-key secrets-backend overrides (environment variables like `AIRFLOW__SECRETS__BACKEND_KWARG__SECRET_ID` and `AIRFLOW__WORKERS__SECRETS_BACKEND_KWARG__SECRET_ID`) as synthetic config options whose option names were not in `sensitive_config_values`, so the masker did not redact them. An authenticated UI/API user with Config read permission could retrieve plaintext secrets-backend credentials (Vault `role_id` / `secret_id`, etc.) from the Config API output. Affects deployments that configure secrets backends via per-key environment overrides. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow` 3.3.0 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
The Config API in Apache Airflow surfaced per-key secrets-backend overrides (environment variables like `AIRFLOW__SECRETS__BACKEND_KWARG__SECRET_ID` and `AIRFLOW__WORKERS__SECRETS_BACKEND_KWARG__SECRET_ID`) as synthetic config options whose option names were not in `sensitive_config_values`, so the masker did not redact them. An authenticated UI/API user with Config read permission could retrieve plaintext secrets-backend credentials (Vault `role_id` / `secret_id`, etc.) from the Config API output. Affects deployments that configure secrets backends via per-key environment overrides. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow` 3.3.0 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Mask per-key secrets-backend-kwarg overrides on the Config API by potiuk · Pull Request #67622 · apache/airflow
Per-key environment-variable overrides like AIRFLOW__SECRETS__BACKEND_KWARG__SECRET_ID and AIRFLOW__WORKERS__SECRETS_BACKEND_KWARG__SECRET_ID are materialised by conf.as_dict as synthetic options u...
🚨 CVE-2026-49296
Before apache-airflow 3.3.0, a user authorized to read one Dag could disclose the source of other Dags co-located in the same source file. `GET /api/v2/dagSources/{dag_id}` — and the equivalent Dag-source view in the UI — returned the entire source file without redacting Dags the caller was not authorized to read, bypassing per-DAG read authorization. Deployments that co-locate multiple Dags in a single file and rely on per-DAG access control to limit source visibility are affected; single-Dag-per-file deployments are not. Upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.0 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
Before apache-airflow 3.3.0, a user authorized to read one Dag could disclose the source of other Dags co-located in the same source file. `GET /api/v2/dagSources/{dag_id}` — and the equivalent Dag-source view in the UI — returned the entire source file without redacting Dags the caller was not authorized to read, bypassing per-DAG read authorization. Deployments that co-locate multiple Dags in a single file and rely on per-DAG access control to limit source visibility are affected; single-Dag-per-file deployments are not. Upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.0 or later.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Apply per-file authorization to dag-source endpoint by potiuk · Pull Request #67662 · apache/airflow
This PR applies per-file authorization to the /api/v2/dagSources/{dag_id} endpoint, matching the pattern already in place for the import-errors endpoint in #65329.
The dag-source endpoint currently...
The dag-source endpoint currently...
🚨 CVE-2026-49487
In Apache Airflow before 3.3.0, the REST API task-instance detail and list
endpoints returned a deferred task's trigger kwargs without masking. When a
deferred operator passed a secret (for example a provider API key) into its
trigger, any authenticated user with DAG-scoped task-instance read access for
that DAG could read that secret in clear text while the task was deferred.
Users should upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.0 or later, which masks sensitive
values in trigger kwargs returned by the API.
🎖@cveNotify
In Apache Airflow before 3.3.0, the REST API task-instance detail and list
endpoints returned a deferred task's trigger kwargs without masking. When a
deferred operator passed a secret (for example a provider API key) into its
trigger, any authenticated user with DAG-scoped task-instance read access for
that DAG could read that secret in clear text while the task was deferred.
Users should upgrade to apache-airflow 3.3.0 or later, which masks sensitive
values in trigger kwargs returned by the API.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Remove trigger kwargs from the REST API response by potiuk · Pull Request #67868 · apache/airflow
Why
TriggerResponse.kwargs returned the decrypted trigger keyword arguments verbatim — and only as a stringified Python dict, not a usable JSON value. Those kwargs can carry credentials a deferred ...
TriggerResponse.kwargs returned the decrypted trigger keyword arguments verbatim — and only as a stringified Python dict, not a usable JSON value. Those kwargs can carry credentials a deferred ...
🚨 CVE-2011-10043
Module::Load versions before 0.22 for Perl allow arbitrary modules outside of @INC to be loaded.
Module names starting with "::" could be passed to the load function to specify arbitrary module paths.
Attackers able to influence module names passed to load could use that bug to execute arbitrary code.
🎖@cveNotify
Module::Load versions before 0.22 for Perl allow arbitrary modules outside of @INC to be loaded.
Module names starting with "::" could be passed to the load function to specify arbitrary module paths.
Attackers able to influence module names passed to load could use that bug to execute arbitrary code.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-11348
Improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Liman MYS allows Fake the Source of Data.
This issue affects Liman MYS: before release.Master.1107.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper verification of cryptographic signature vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Liman MYS allows Fake the Source of Data.
This issue affects Liman MYS: before release.Master.1107.
🎖@cveNotify
siberguvenlik.gov.tr
T.C. Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı resmi web sitesi.
🚨 CVE-2026-13696
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an LDAP query ('LDAP injection') vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Liman MYS allows LDAP Injection.
This issue affects Liman MYS: before release.Master.1107.
🎖@cveNotify
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an LDAP query ('LDAP injection') vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Liman MYS allows LDAP Injection.
This issue affects Liman MYS: before release.Master.1107.
🎖@cveNotify
siberguvenlik.gov.tr
T.C. Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Siber Güvenlik Başkanlığı resmi web sitesi.
🚨 CVE-2026-10659
The Dhara flash translation layer disk driver (drivers/disk/ftl_dhara.c) implemented the dhara_nand_ callbacks so that, on a flash error, the error code was written unconditionally through the caller-supplied dhara_error_t err pointer (e.g. *err = DHARA_E_ECC in dhara_nand_read, and similar in dhara_nand_erase/prog/copy). The upstream Dhara library calls these callbacks with err == NULL along its journal-resume binary search: find_last_checkblock() invokes find_checkblock(j, mid, &found, NULL), which forwards the NULL pointer into dhara_nand_read(). This path runs during disk_ftl_access_init() -> dhara_map_resume() whenever the FTL disk is mounted/initialised. If a flash read error (uncorrectable ECC, bad block, controller error) occurs on one of the probed checkpoint pages, the driver dereferences and writes to NULL, faulting the kernel (denial of service). The trigger is conditioned on the NAND medium content/health, which can be influenced by media wear, induced faults, or a corrupted/crafted on-flash image. The fix routes all error assignments through the library's NULL-safe dhara_set_error() helper. Affects Zephyr v4.4.0, where the driver was introduced.
🎖@cveNotify
The Dhara flash translation layer disk driver (drivers/disk/ftl_dhara.c) implemented the dhara_nand_ callbacks so that, on a flash error, the error code was written unconditionally through the caller-supplied dhara_error_t err pointer (e.g. *err = DHARA_E_ECC in dhara_nand_read, and similar in dhara_nand_erase/prog/copy). The upstream Dhara library calls these callbacks with err == NULL along its journal-resume binary search: find_last_checkblock() invokes find_checkblock(j, mid, &found, NULL), which forwards the NULL pointer into dhara_nand_read(). This path runs during disk_ftl_access_init() -> dhara_map_resume() whenever the FTL disk is mounted/initialised. If a flash read error (uncorrectable ECC, bad block, controller error) occurs on one of the probed checkpoint pages, the driver dereferences and writes to NULL, faulting the kernel (denial of service). The trigger is conditioned on the NAND medium content/health, which can be influenced by media wear, induced faults, or a corrupted/crafted on-flash image. The fix routes all error assignments through the library's NULL-safe dhara_set_error() helper. Affects Zephyr v4.4.0, where the driver was introduced.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
drivers: disk: ftl: fix null pointer dereference · zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr@a8371b0
find_last_checkblock() passes a NULL error pointer to
find_checkblock(), which is forwarded to dhara_nand_read().
If a read error occurs, dhara_nand_read() attempts to write
to the NULL pointer, ca...
find_checkblock(), which is forwarded to dhara_nand_read().
If a read error occurs, dhara_nand_read() attempts to write
to the NULL pointer, ca...
🚨 CVE-2026-53481
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access to the system. This is a critical severity vulnerability as it allows an attacker to take complete control of system; so Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity.
🎖@cveNotify
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to unauthorized access to the system. This is a critical severity vulnerability as it allows an attacker to take complete control of system; so Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-44938
A vulnerability has been identified in Fleet's agent-side deployer, which did not filter security-sensitive keys from namespaceLabels in fleet.yaml (or BundleDeployment.spec.options.namespaceLabels) when applying them to the target namespace.
An attacker with git push access to a
Fleet-monitored repository could overwrite Pod Security Standards (PSS)
enforcement labels on a target namespace. This allows the attacker to
weaken admission controls and deploy workloads that PSS policies would
otherwise block.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability has been identified in Fleet's agent-side deployer, which did not filter security-sensitive keys from namespaceLabels in fleet.yaml (or BundleDeployment.spec.options.namespaceLabels) when applying them to the target namespace.
An attacker with git push access to a
Fleet-monitored repository could overwrite Pod Security Standards (PSS)
enforcement labels on a target namespace. This allows the attacker to
weaken admission controls and deploy workloads that PSS policies would
otherwise block.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-53479
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command Injection') vulnerability. A remote high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to protection mechanism bypass. This is a Critical vulnerability as it allows an attacker to invoke arbitrary command execution with root privileges; so Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity.
🎖@cveNotify
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2026 release version 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70 contain an improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ('OS command Injection') vulnerability. A remote high privileged attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to protection mechanism bypass. This is a Critical vulnerability as it allows an attacker to invoke arbitrary command execution with root privileges; so Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity.
🎖@cveNotify