🚨 CVE-2026-10823
The YMC Filter WordPress plugin before 3.11.3 does not properly authorize access to one of its REST API endpoints and does not validate a user-supplied query parameter, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the titles and content of private, draft, and other non-public posts.
🎖@cveNotify
The YMC Filter WordPress plugin before 3.11.3 does not properly authorize access to one of its REST API endpoints and does not validate a user-supplied query parameter, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve the titles and content of private, draft, and other non-public posts.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
YMC Smart Filter < 3.11.3 - Unauthenticated Private/Draft Post Disclosure
See details on YMC Smart Filter < 3.11.3 - Unauthenticated Private/Draft Post Disclosure CVE 2026-10823. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-10835
The SALESmanago & Leadoo WordPress plugin before 3.11.3 does not properly sanitise and escape a parameter passed to one of its AJAX actions before using it in a SQL statement, and fails to enforce authorisation on that action, allowing authenticated users with minimal permissions, such as subscribers, to perform SQL injection attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
The SALESmanago & Leadoo WordPress plugin before 3.11.3 does not properly sanitise and escape a parameter passed to one of its AJAX actions before using it in a SQL statement, and fails to enforce authorisation on that action, allowing authenticated users with minimal permissions, such as subscribers, to perform SQL injection attacks.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
SALESmanago & Leadoo < 3.11.3 - Subscriber+ SQL Injection
See details on SALESmanago & Leadoo < 3.11.3 - Subscriber+ SQL Injection CVE 2026-10835. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-8380
The Frontend File Manager Plugin WordPress plugin through 23.6 does not properly verify ownership of every targeted post before permanent deletion, allowing authenticated users with author-level access and above to permanently delete arbitrary posts and pages. When the Frontend File Manager Plugin WordPress plugin through 23.6's "Allow guest uploads" setting is enabled by an administrator, the same deletion primitive becomes reachable by unauthenticated users.
🎖@cveNotify
The Frontend File Manager Plugin WordPress plugin through 23.6 does not properly verify ownership of every targeted post before permanent deletion, allowing authenticated users with author-level access and above to permanently delete arbitrary posts and pages. When the Frontend File Manager Plugin WordPress plugin through 23.6's "Allow guest uploads" setting is enabled by an administrator, the same deletion primitive becomes reachable by unauthenticated users.
🎖@cveNotify
WPScan
Frontend File Manager Plugin <= 23.6 - Author+ Arbitrary Post Deletion
See details on Frontend File Manager Plugin <= 23.6 - Author+ Arbitrary Post Deletion CVE 2026-8380. View the latest Plugin Vulnerabilities on WPScan.
🚨 CVE-2026-49486
The Apache Airflow FTP provider's `FTPSHook.get_conn()` created an `ftplib.FTP_TLS` connection but never called `prot_p()`, so although the control channel was TLS-protected the data channel was transmitted in cleartext. Any deployment using `FTPSHook` or `FTPSFileTransmitOperator` to move files over FTPS exposed file contents and credentials-in-transit to a network attacker able to observe the data connection. Upgrade apache-airflow-providers-ftp to `3.15.1` or later, which issues `PROT P` to encrypt the data channel.
🎖@cveNotify
The Apache Airflow FTP provider's `FTPSHook.get_conn()` created an `ftplib.FTP_TLS` connection but never called `prot_p()`, so although the control channel was TLS-protected the data channel was transmitted in cleartext. Any deployment using `FTPSHook` or `FTPSFileTransmitOperator` to move files over FTPS exposed file contents and credentials-in-transit to a network attacker able to observe the data connection. Upgrade apache-airflow-providers-ftp to `3.15.1` or later, which issues `PROT P` to encrypt the data channel.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
Call prot_p() in FTPSHook so the FTPS data channel is protected by shubhamraj-git · Pull Request #67946 · apache/airflow
Some FTPS servers are configured to require a protected data channel and reject any data transfer that is not preceded by "PROT P". Against such a server, the current FTPSHook / F...
🚨 CVE-2026-57872
An unauthenticated
directory traversal vulnerability exists in get_fcont.cgi in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient validation of user-supplied file path input before the requested
file is accessed by the CGI component. A remote attacker may exploit this
vulnerability by sending a crafted request to read arbitrary files accessible
to the affected process, resulting in information disclosure.
🎖@cveNotify
An unauthenticated
directory traversal vulnerability exists in get_fcont.cgi in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient validation of user-supplied file path input before the requested
file is accessed by the CGI component. A remote attacker may exploit this
vulnerability by sending a crafted request to read arbitrary files accessible
to the affected process, resulting in information disclosure.
🎖@cveNotify
GeoVision
Cyber Security - GeoVision
- GeoVision specializes in advanced video surveillance solutions, offering state-of-the-art IP cameras, cloud-based surveillance platforms, and tailored surveillance software designed for business buildings, factories, and retail environments. Enhance public…
🚨 CVE-2026-57873
An unauthenticated
NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in IEEE8021x_upload.cgi in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
improper validation of multipart upload headers when processing
certificate-related upload fields. A remote attacker may exploit this
vulnerability by sending a malformed multipart request, causing the affected
CGI process to crash and resulting in a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
An unauthenticated
NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in IEEE8021x_upload.cgi in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
improper validation of multipart upload headers when processing
certificate-related upload fields. A remote attacker may exploit this
vulnerability by sending a malformed multipart request, causing the affected
CGI process to crash and resulting in a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
GeoVision
Cyber Security - GeoVision
- GeoVision specializes in advanced video surveillance solutions, offering state-of-the-art IP cameras, cloud-based surveillance platforms, and tailored surveillance software designed for business buildings, factories, and retail environments. Enhance public…
🚨 CVE-2026-57874
An unauthenticated
buffer overflow vulnerability exists in IEEE8021x_upload.cgi in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient bounds checking when parsing filename values in multipart upload
data. A remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted
upload request with overly long input, causing memory corruption and resulting
in a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
An unauthenticated
buffer overflow vulnerability exists in IEEE8021x_upload.cgi in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient bounds checking when parsing filename values in multipart upload
data. A remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted
upload request with overly long input, causing memory corruption and resulting
in a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
GeoVision
Cyber Security - GeoVision
- GeoVision specializes in advanced video surveillance solutions, offering state-of-the-art IP cameras, cloud-based surveillance platforms, and tailored surveillance software designed for business buildings, factories, and retail environments. Enhance public…
🚨 CVE-2026-57875
An unauthenticated
NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the HTTP request parsing logic
of multiple CGI components in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and
earlier. The vulnerability is caused by improper validation of required HTTP
request metadata before it is used by the affected components. A remote attacker
may exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted HTTP request,
causing the affected process to crash and resulting in a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
An unauthenticated
NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the HTTP request parsing logic
of multiple CGI components in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and
earlier. The vulnerability is caused by improper validation of required HTTP
request metadata before it is used by the affected components. A remote attacker
may exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted HTTP request,
causing the affected process to crash and resulting in a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
GeoVision
Cyber Security - GeoVision
- GeoVision specializes in advanced video surveillance solutions, offering state-of-the-art IP cameras, cloud-based surveillance platforms, and tailored surveillance software designed for business buildings, factories, and retail environments. Enhance public…
🚨 CVE-2026-57876
An unauthenticated
out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in onvif.cgi in GeoVision GV-LPC2011
and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient
bounds checking when processing HTTP request body data. A remote attacker may
exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request with excessive input,
causing memory corruption and resulting in a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
An unauthenticated
out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in onvif.cgi in GeoVision GV-LPC2011
and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient
bounds checking when processing HTTP request body data. A remote attacker may
exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted request with excessive input,
causing memory corruption and resulting in a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
GeoVision
Cyber Security - GeoVision
- GeoVision specializes in advanced video surveillance solutions, offering state-of-the-art IP cameras, cloud-based surveillance platforms, and tailored surveillance software designed for business buildings, factories, and retail environments. Enhance public…
🚨 CVE-2026-57877
An unauthenticated
format string vulnerability exists in vlsvr in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and
GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by improper handling
of externally controlled input during log message formatting in the login
processing path. A remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending
crafted login data, potentially causing information disclosure, memory
corruption, or a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
An unauthenticated
format string vulnerability exists in vlsvr in GeoVision GV-LPC2011 and
GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by improper handling
of externally controlled input during log message formatting in the login
processing path. A remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending
crafted login data, potentially causing information disclosure, memory
corruption, or a denial of service.
🎖@cveNotify
GeoVision
Cyber Security - GeoVision
- GeoVision specializes in advanced video surveillance solutions, offering state-of-the-art IP cameras, cloud-based surveillance platforms, and tailored surveillance software designed for business buildings, factories, and retail environments. Enhance public…
🚨 CVE-2026-57878
An unauthenticated
stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in thttpd in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient bounds checking when processing web request parameters in a
specific request path. A remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by
sending a crafted HTTP request with overly long input, resulting in memory
corruption, denial of service, or potentially arbitrary code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
An unauthenticated
stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in thttpd in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient bounds checking when processing web request parameters in a
specific request path. A remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by
sending a crafted HTTP request with overly long input, resulting in memory
corruption, denial of service, or potentially arbitrary code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
GeoVision
Cyber Security - GeoVision
- GeoVision specializes in advanced video surveillance solutions, offering state-of-the-art IP cameras, cloud-based surveillance platforms, and tailored surveillance software designed for business buildings, factories, and retail environments. Enhance public…
🚨 CVE-2026-57879
An unauthenticated
stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A
remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP
request, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially
arbitrary code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
An unauthenticated
stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient bounds checking when processing RTSP custom authentication data. A
remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP
request, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially
arbitrary code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
GeoVision
Cyber Security - GeoVision
- GeoVision specializes in advanced video surveillance solutions, offering state-of-the-art IP cameras, cloud-based surveillance platforms, and tailored surveillance software designed for business buildings, factories, and retail environments. Enhance public…
🚨 CVE-2026-57880
An unauthenticated
stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient bounds checking when parsing RTSP Digest authentication fields. A
remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP
request containing overly long authentication data, resulting in memory
corruption, denial of service, or potentially arbitrary code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
An unauthenticated
stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ssvr in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient bounds checking when parsing RTSP Digest authentication fields. A
remote attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted RTSP
request containing overly long authentication data, resulting in memory
corruption, denial of service, or potentially arbitrary code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
GeoVision
Cyber Security - GeoVision
- GeoVision specializes in advanced video surveillance solutions, offering state-of-the-art IP cameras, cloud-based surveillance platforms, and tailored surveillance software designed for business buildings, factories, and retail environments. Enhance public…
🚨 CVE-2026-57881
An unauthenticated
stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in vlsvr in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient length validation when processing remote login data. A remote
attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted login data with
overly long input, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially
arbitrary code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
An unauthenticated
stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in vlsvr in GeoVision
GV-LPC2011 and GV-LPC2211 V1.12 and earlier. The vulnerability is caused by
insufficient length validation when processing remote login data. A remote
attacker may exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted login data with
overly long input, resulting in memory corruption, denial of service, or potentially
arbitrary code execution.
🎖@cveNotify
GeoVision
Cyber Security - GeoVision
- GeoVision specializes in advanced video surveillance solutions, offering state-of-the-art IP cameras, cloud-based surveillance platforms, and tailored surveillance software designed for business buildings, factories, and retail environments. Enhance public…
🚨 CVE-2026-11702
Bytes::Random::Secure::Tiny versions through 1.011 for Perl share internal state across forked processes.
When an object is initialised before forking, then the internal state for the PRNG is shared across processes and identical random streams will be produced.
Secrets generated in multiprocess applications are predictable across processes.
🎖@cveNotify
Bytes::Random::Secure::Tiny versions through 1.011 for Perl share internal state across forked processes.
When an object is initialised before forking, then the internal state for the PRNG is shared across processes and identical random streams will be produced.
Secrets generated in multiprocess applications are predictable across processes.
🎖@cveNotify
GitHub
The internal PRNG state is not updated on forking · Issue #6 · daoswald/Bytes-Random-Secure-Tiny
The internal PRNG state is shared when creating an object before forking. The result is that different processes will emit the same random streams. Depending on the application, this could allow at...
🚨 CVE-2026-13325
A flaw was found in KubeVirt's migration proxy. When spec.configuration.migrations.disableTLS is set to true on the KubeVirt custom resource, the target virt-handler binds a plain TCP listener on all interfaces (0.0.0.0/::) on a random port with no authentication, peer allow-list, or handshake token. This listener proxies directly into the target virt-launcher's virtqemud control socket. An attacker with a running pod on the cluster network can connect to this listener and issue unfiltered libvirt RPC commands against another tenant's virtual machine, including reading VM memory and configuration, modifying VM state via QMP, or destroying the VM. The bind address is unconditionally 0.0.0.0 — configuring a dedicated migration network via migrations.network only changes the advertised migration IP, not the listener bind address, so the port remains reachable on the pod network even when a dedicated migration network is configured. The API documentation describes disableTLS as removing "the additional layer of live migration encryption" without disclosing that it also removes all mutual authentication.
🎖@cveNotify
A flaw was found in KubeVirt's migration proxy. When spec.configuration.migrations.disableTLS is set to true on the KubeVirt custom resource, the target virt-handler binds a plain TCP listener on all interfaces (0.0.0.0/::) on a random port with no authentication, peer allow-list, or handshake token. This listener proxies directly into the target virt-launcher's virtqemud control socket. An attacker with a running pod on the cluster network can connect to this listener and issue unfiltered libvirt RPC commands against another tenant's virtual machine, including reading VM memory and configuration, modifying VM state via QMP, or destroying the VM. The bind address is unconditionally 0.0.0.0 — configuring a dedicated migration network via migrations.network only changes the advertised migration IP, not the listener bind address, so the port remains reachable on the pod network even when a dedicated migration network is configured. The API documentation describes disableTLS as removing "the additional layer of live migration encryption" without disclosing that it also removes all mutual authentication.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-57473
A vulnerability exists in the netclient and factory services of Reolink Home Hub (versions prior to v3.3.0.456_26031911) due to the possibility of brute-force cracking the credentials. This issue could allow attackers on the same local network to intercept traffic between the Hub and associated cameras and compromise the credentials of connected cameras.
🎖@cveNotify
A vulnerability exists in the netclient and factory services of Reolink Home Hub (versions prior to v3.3.0.456_26031911) due to the possibility of brute-force cracking the credentials. This issue could allow attackers on the same local network to intercept traffic between the Hub and associated cameras and compromise the credentials of connected cameras.
🎖@cveNotify
🚨 CVE-2026-57912
Johnson & Johnson Campus Recruiting before 2025-10-31 allows viewing of data provided by recruited students, and notes entered about students by interviewers.
🎖@cveNotify
Johnson & Johnson Campus Recruiting before 2025-10-31 allows viewing of data provided by recruited students, and notes entered about students by interviewers.
🎖@cveNotify
Eaton-Works
Exploiting vulnerabilities in Johnson & Johnson web apps
Campus Recruiting vulnerability exposed student information, and Audit Tracking Management System vulnerability exposed confidential internal audit data.
🚨 CVE-2026-57913
Johnson & Johnson Audit Tracking Management System (ATMS) before 2026-04-21 allows viewing of meeting minutes and transcripts.
🎖@cveNotify
Johnson & Johnson Audit Tracking Management System (ATMS) before 2026-04-21 allows viewing of meeting minutes and transcripts.
🎖@cveNotify
Eaton-Works
Exploiting vulnerabilities in Johnson & Johnson web apps
Campus Recruiting vulnerability exposed student information, and Audit Tracking Management System vulnerability exposed confidential internal audit data.
🚨 CVE-2026-13426
The Mattermost Go module github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/public versions < v0.1.22 fail to validate path parameters when constructing API route paths which allows an attacker to redirect API calls to unintended endpoints via crafted IDs containing path traversal components. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2025-00532
🎖@cveNotify
The Mattermost Go module github.com/mattermost/mattermost/server/public versions < v0.1.22 fail to validate path parameters when constructing API route paths which allows an attacker to redirect API calls to unintended endpoints via crafted IDs containing path traversal components. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2025-00532
🎖@cveNotify
Mattermost.com
Security Updates
Find information about Mattermost security updates, sign up for our Security Bulletin, read our Responsible Disclosure Policy, and more.
🚨 CVE-2026-53914
In JetBrains Kotlin before 2.4.20 code execution was possible via unsafe deserialization in the build cache metadata
🎖@cveNotify
In JetBrains Kotlin before 2.4.20 code execution was possible via unsafe deserialization in the build cache metadata
🎖@cveNotify
JetBrains
Fixed security issues
This page contains information about resolved security issues, including description, severity, assigned CVEs, and the product versions in which they were resolved.